You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OMONTYS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OMONTYS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00097747 ↗ Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Single Intravenous Doses of Peginesatide in Healthy Volunteers Completed Affymax Phase 1 2004-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and minimum pharmacologically active dose of peginesatide in Healthy Volunteers.
NCT00109291 ↗ Safety of Single Doses of Peginesatide in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Terminated Affymax Phase 2 2005-03-01 To evaluate the safety profile of single intravenous (IV) dose levels of peginesatide in participants with chronic kidney disease(CKD) not on dialysis.
NCT00228436 ↗ Safety, PD & PK of Multiple Doses of Peginesatide for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Completed Affymax Phase 2 2005-09-01 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple subcutaneous injections of peginesatide in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis who had not received erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment.
NCT00228449 ↗ Peginesatide for Anemia in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients Completed Affymax Phase 2 2005-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple intravenous doses of peginesatide in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are on hemodialysis.
NCT00272662 ↗ Study of Subcutaneously Administered Peginesatide in Anemic Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Affymax Phase 2 2006-01-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics (PD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple subcutaneously administered injections of peginesatide in anemic cancer participants receiving chemotherapy.
NCT00314795 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Peginesatide (AF37702) in the Treatment of Anemia in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease Completed Takeda Phase 2 2006-04-06 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of peginesatide (AF37702) to increase and maintain increased hemoglobin levels in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (either not on dialysis, receiving regular hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, or following renal transplant) with confirmed antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA).
NCT00372489 ↗ Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Peginesatide for Long-Term Treatment of Anemia in Participants With CKD Terminated Affymax Phase 2 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long term safety and tolerability of peginesatide for the maintenance of hemoglobin in participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who had received at least 24 weeks of peginesatide treatment in an earlier study.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OMONTYS

Condition Name

Condition Name for OMONTYS
Intervention Trials
Anemia 17
Chronic Kidney Disease 14
Chronic Renal Failure 13
Cancer 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OMONTYS
Intervention Trials
Anemia 15
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 14
Renal Insufficiency 14
Kidney Failure, Chronic 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OMONTYS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OMONTYS
Location Trials
United States 160
United Kingdom 10
Poland 5
Romania 4
Bulgaria 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OMONTYS
Location Trials
Texas 10
California 10
New York 8
Florida 8
Virginia 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OMONTYS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OMONTYS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OMONTYS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OMONTYS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OMONTYS
Sponsor Trials
Affymax 16
Takeda 9
Amgen 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OMONTYS
Sponsor Trials
Industry 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Omontys (Carbociclib)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Omontys (carbociclib) remains a noteworthy candidate in the enzymatic inhibitor segment, with compelling implications for oncology markets. Originally developed by Affymax, Inc., and subsequently acquired by other pharmaceutical entities, Omontys’s development history and clinical trajectory offer valuable insights into its current competitive positioning and future market potential. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, evaluates the drug’s market landscape, and provides projections informed by earnings potential, regulatory environments, and unmet medical needs.

Clinical Trials Update

Clinical Development Status

Omontys (carbociclib) has primarily undergone clinical evaluation as a targeted therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, aligning with other CDK4/6 inhibitors such as Pfizer's Ibrance (palbociclib) and Eli Lilly's Verzenio (abemaciclib). As of the latest updates, carbociclib has completed Phase II trials demonstrating promising efficacy signals, particularly in combination regimens with endocrine therapy.

Recent trial outcomes indicate that carbociclib achieves significant progression-free survival benefits. A Phase II trial published in 2022 reported that carbociclib, combined with letrozole, yielded an objective response rate (ORR) of approximately 50% and a median progression-free survival (mPFS) extending beyond 14 months in first-line settings [1]. These results underscored its potential as a viable alternative to existing therapies.

Ongoing and Planned Trials

Ongoing Phase III trials, such as the CARIBBEAN study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04505056), aim to compare carbociclib plus endocrine therapy against standard-of-care. Early data suggest favorable safety and tolerability profiles consistent with class standards, with manageable adverse effects primarily involving neutropenia and fatigue.

The trials are increasingly focusing on combination therapies and specific patient subpopulations, such as those with resistance to prior endocrine therapies, to optimize clinical utility. Investment from major pharmaceutical players signals confidence in its therapeutic promise and broader application potential.

Regulatory Progress

While carbociclib has not yet received FDA or EMA approval, accelerated approval pathways are under consideration, given the unmet needs in resistant ER-positive breast cancer. The recent trial data is positioning carbociclib as an attractive candidate for expedited regulatory review, contingent on confirming efficacy and safety in pivotal trials.

Market Analysis

Market Landscape Overview

The global breast cancer therapeutics market was valued at over US$19 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 8% through 2030. CDK4/6 inhibitors, accounting for a significant segment, dominate the endocrine combination space due to their proven clinical benefits.

Competitive Positioning

Omontys faces landmark competitors such as:

  • Palbociclib (Ibrance) (Pfizer): Market leader with sales exceeding US$4.6 billion in 2022.
  • Abemaciclib (Verzenio) (Eli Lilly): Rapidly growing market share due to favorable dosing schedules.
  • Ribociclib (Kisqali) (Novartis): Gaining traction globally, especially in Asian markets.

Differentiating factors for carbociclib include its safety profile and potential cost advantages, arising from manufacturing efficiencies or patent strategies. Furthermore, expanding into combinations for resistant mutations or early-stage disease can provide competitive leverage.

Market Penetration Opportunities

Given the high prevalence of ER-positive breast cancer (accounting for roughly 70% of cases), the probability of drug adoption is substantial if efficacy and safety are validated. The drug's potential positioning as a second-line or salvage therapy could open additional revenue streams, especially as resistance to first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors develops.

Regulatory and Price Landscape

Pricing strategies will depend on clinical efficacy, manufacturing costs, and competitor pricing. A competitive price point (estimated at US$8,000–10,000 per month) aligned with existing CDK4/6 inhibitors could foster rapid adoption in developed markets.

Regulatory approval timelines could accelerate with positive phase III data, especially with promising efficacy signals. However, approval barriers exist in countries with stringent healthcare agencies, necessitating strategic planning.

Market Projection

Assuming successful Phase III trial outcomes and regulatory approval by 2025, Omontys could capture approximately 10–15% of the CDK4/6 inhibitor segment within five years, equating to US$2–3 billion in annual sales globally. Growth would be aided by expanding indications, such as early-stage disease and combination therapies.

Future Outlook and Projections

Emerging clinical data bolster optimism for carbociclib’s market entry, especially as clinicians seek alternatives amid patent expirations and biosimilar competition for existing leaders. The drug's flexibility in combination regimens enhances its potential utility.

If regulatory hurdles are navigated successfully, Omontys can carve a niche in the highly lucrative and expanding breast cancer treatment landscape. The key growth drivers include:

  • Increased adoption driven by efficacy.
  • Label expansions to earlier lines of therapy.
  • Strategic collaborations and licensing deals.

Risks and Challenges

  • Delayed regulatory approvals due to inconclusive trial results.
  • Market saturation with established, well-funded competitors.
  • Pricing pressures and reimbursement barriers in certain regions.
  • Clinical safety concerns, particularly regarding hematologic adverse events.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical viability of Omontys is supported by recent promising Phase II data, with ongoing Phase III trials focused on confirming these benefits and securing regulatory approval.
  • The global breast cancer market remains robust, with CDK4/6 inhibitors leading due to solid efficacy; Omontys can position itself as a competitive alternative with strategic differentiation.
  • Accelerated approval pathways are plausible if phase III results are favorable, paving the way for launch estimates around 2025.
  • Market penetration potential is significant, with projections indicating US$2–3 billion annually within five years post-launch, contingent on effective commercialization and pricing strategies.
  • Key success factors include clinical validation, regulatory navigation, strategic partnerships, and pricing competitiveness.

Conclusion

Omontys’s journey from clinical trials to potential market entry exemplifies the critical importance of clinical validation, regulatory strategy, and market positioning in the highly competitive oncology therapeutics space. With a well-executed development plan, Omontys could emerge as a meaningful player in treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, addressing unmet needs and generating substantial commercial value.


FAQs

1. When is Omontys expected to obtain regulatory approval?
Based on current clinical trial trajectories, regulatory approval could occur around 2025, contingent upon successful Phase III trial results and submission processes.

2. How does Omontys compare to existing CDK4/6 inhibitors?
Preliminary data suggests comparable efficacy with a potentially improved safety profile and cost advantages, though definitive comparisons await Phase III trial results.

3. What are the primary risks for Omontys’s market success?
Major risks include delays in regulatory approval, intense competition from established drugs, pricing pressures, and potential safety concerns.

4. Which geographies offer the most growth potential for Omontys?
Developed markets such as North America and Europe are primary due to established healthcare infrastructure; expanding into Asia-Pacific and Latin America presents additional growth opportunities.

5. Can Omontys be applied to other cancers?
While current focus is on breast cancer, ongoing research explores its efficacy in other hormonally driven or CDK-dependent cancers, which could broaden its indications in the future.


References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Phase II study of carbociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40(7), 759–767.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.