Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OMNISCAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OMNISCAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00209391 ↗ A Safety & Efficacy Clinical Study to Evaluate the Narrowing of the Renal Arteries While Using Gadodiamide Completed GE Healthcare Phase 3 2003-09-01 Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is an examination similar to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) which uses a magnetic field and a contrast medium when needed to visualize blood flow in the arterial vessels throughout the body. Gadodiamide, a contrast medium, is already approved and is used to image blood vessels by directly injecting it into the vein, but this procedure has not been formally tested to image the renal artery vessels using MR. The study is designed to determine the presence or absence of a relevant stenosis (ie greater than/equal to 50%) or occlusion in renal arteries. Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography will be used as the standard of truth.
NCT00209443 ↗ A Safety and Efficacy Clinical Study to Evaluate the Narrowing of the Aorto-iliac Arteries While Using Gadodiamide Completed GE Healthcare Phase 3 2004-09-01 Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is an examination similar to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) which uses a magnetic field and a contrast medium when needed to visualize blood flow in the arterial vessels throughout the body. Gadodiamide, a contrast medium, is already approved and is used to image blood vessels by directly injecting it into the vein, but this procedure has not been formally tested to image the aorto-iliac vessels using MR. The study is designed to determine the presence or absence of a relevant stenosis (ie greater than/equal to 50%) or occlusion in aorto-iliac arteries. Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography (IADSA) will be used as the standard of truth.
NCT00323102 ↗ A Study Comparing Two Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Contrast Agents in MRI of the Brain Completed Bracco Diagnostics, Inc Phase 4 2006-05-01 This study aims at a direct comparison between Multihance and a validated comparator like Omniscan in a cross-over individual design in patients with brain tumors to confirm the superior overall diagnostic performance of MuliHance for this indication
NCT00526188 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Primovist in Chinese Patients Completed Bayer Phase 3 2007-08-01 Participants who had been diagnosed or suspected by doctors to have focal liver lesions that need further evaluation in order to make an accurate diagnosis. Participants would need to have an enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan so that doctors could have further information about the number and characteristics of the focal liver lesions. Participants were invited to take part in this clinical study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Primovist, which is a liver-specific MRI contrast medium, on the efficacy of lesion detection and characterization, and tolerability in Chinese patients with known or suspected focal liver lesions. Primovist, the investigational drug in this study, is a liver-specific MRI contrast medium developed by Bayer Schering Pharma AG. Its active substance is Gd-EOB-DTPA. Primovist was first approved in 2004 in Sweden followed by an approval in the European community, in Switzerland and Australia in the same year. Procedures: Before entry into the study and after entry of the study a physical examination was conducted, blood pressure and heart rate were measured, blood and urine samples were taken. Current medications and medical conditions (including suspected pregnancy) and medical and surgical history were elicited by doctors. After entry into the study, participants were scheduled to have an MRI examination, which lasted about 25-35 minutes. During the MRI examination, an initial MRI scan without contrast was acquired which followed by another MRI series after the intravenous administration of Primovist. The following day participants were asked to return to the hospital for a follow-up safety evaluation. Possible Benefit Participants were scheduled to receive an enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scan. Clinical studies indicated that Primovist increased the efficacy of detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by providing better contrast between the focal liver lesions and surrounding normal tissue. Primovist were shown to provide additional information regarding existence, number and characterization (lesion or non-lesion, malignant or benign) of these abnormalities. Based on the experience with patients given Primovist, some adverse reactions were observed. Most of undesirable effects were transient and of mild to moderate intensity. The most commonly noted adverse events (AEs) in subjects receiving Primovist for MRI were nausea and headache with an incidence of 1.1%. Other AEs that occurred in 0.5% of the subject population were feeling hot (0.8%), back pain (0.6%) and dizziness (0.5%). All other AEs occurred in less than 0.5% of the patients, e.g. anxiety; coughing; eye disorder; fever; flatulence; generalized spasm; hypertension; injection site symptoms including edema, inflammation, and reaction; lightheadedness; parosmia; postural hypotension; taste perversion, motoric unrest; acute respiratory distress; fatigue; malaise; vomiting; palpitations, erythema, chest pain and back pain. Coldness, warmth or pain at the injection site, injection site reaction, and injection site accumulation of fluid were rare. In very rare cases strong allergy-like reactions ranging to shock may occur. Post-marketing tachycardia and restlessness have been reported. As in the case of other investigational drugs, there may also be unforeseen side effects. Additional information concerning all Gadolinium- based contrast agents Primovist contains the rare earth metal gadolinium as active ingredient. There have been reports of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) associated with use of some gadolinium-containing contrast agents (especially Omniscan) in patients with severe renal impairment. NSF is a systemic disease characterised by formation of connective tissue in the skin, which becomes thickened and hard, sometimes leading to contractures and joint immobility. The clinical course is usually progressive and currently no treatment is available. To date NSF has only been reported in association with some Gd-containing contrast agents, but the role of these contrast agents in the overall pathogenesis of the disease is still not completely understood. No reports of patients with NSF after administration of Primovist® are known. The risk to trigger NSF in risk patients with severe renal impairment is considered to be low for Primovist® due to the low dose given and the additional excretion via feces. Furthermore the participation of patients with severe renal impairment are excluded from this study. In case the participants were suffering from renal insufficiency, they were told to tell their doctors prior to application of the contrast agent. In case the participants experienced any new alterations of the skin following the administration of the contrast agent, they were told to contact their doctors as soon as possible after they had recognized these symptoms.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OMNISCAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for OMNISCAN
Intervention Trials
Arterial Occlusive Diseases 1
Brain Pathology 1
Chronic Kidney Disease 1
Cognitive Function 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OMNISCAN
Intervention Trials
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 1
Renal Insufficiency 1
Kidney Diseases 1
Arterial Occlusive Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OMNISCAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OMNISCAN
Location Trials
United States 6
China 3
Germany 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OMNISCAN
Location Trials
New Jersey 2
North Carolina 1
Massachusetts 1
Illinois 1
Arizona 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OMNISCAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OMNISCAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OMNISCAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OMNISCAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OMNISCAN
Sponsor Trials
GE Healthcare 3
i3 Statprobe 1
Bayer AG (Sponsor) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OMNISCAN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 25, 2026

Omniscan (gadoversetamide) clinical trials update, market analysis, and market projection through generic entry and biosimilar risk

Omniscan (gadoversetamide) is a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) positioned for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement. Post-marketing development is limited because GBCA product lifecycles typically hinge on regulatory label updates, manufacturing site changes, and incremental formulation or packaging changes rather than new Phase 3 efficacy programs. In the absence of a clearly identified, current global development pipeline that includes ongoing clinical trials with registrable endpoints for Omniscan specifically, the actionable forward view is driven by: (1) remaining exclusivity for branded presentation(s) in key markets, (2) generic/authorized generic availability and procurement pricing pressure, and (3) GBCA safety-driven prescribing and regulatory labeling trends.

Bottom line for investors and BD

  • The near-to-mid-term revenue outlook for Omniscan is typically constrained by generic competitive entry and distributor contracting dynamics rather than patent-protected growth.
  • Market share is likely to migrate toward newer-generation GBCA products where labeling, comparative safety perceptions, and payer formularies favor alternative agents.
  • “Clinical trials update” for Omniscan largely translates into post-market safety surveillance and label management rather than fresh Phase 2/3 readouts.

What clinical trials have been reported for Omniscan (gadoversetamide) in 2022–2026?

Featured snippet answer: No current, clearly attributable Phase 2 or Phase 3 “new efficacy” trials with Omniscan as the investigational product can be stated from verifiable public trial registries in the information provided.

What counts as “clinical trials” for Omniscan in practice

For legacy GBCA brands, registrable activity often appears as:

  • post-authorization safety studies (PASS)
  • pharmacovigilance commitments
  • renal safety monitoring cohorts
  • dosing or administration technique studies
  • bridging studies for manufacturing changes

What to expect in GBCA “trial updates”

When new studies are filed, they usually address:

  • renal impairment populations and mitigation protocols
  • gadolinium retention risk messaging and contrast selection
  • institutional dosing protocols (repeat dosing intervals and dose minimization)

Competitive signal from the class rather than brand

Even when Omniscan-specific trials are limited, the GBCA category has ongoing regulatory scrutiny related to:

  • gadolinium deposition in the brain and other tissues
  • NSF-like renal impairment risk framing
  • cumulative GBCA exposure in pediatrics and chronic MRI patients

Is Omniscan still under clinical development, or is it a post-approval product only?

Featured snippet answer: Omniscan is effectively treated as an established, post-approval product in commercial practice, with development activity focused on label support and manufacturing/administration lifecycle rather than new large clinical programs.

Common sources of “development” activity for established GBCA brands

  • regulatory labeling updates in response to safety communications
  • manufacturing site validations and changes
  • packaging/labeling revisions for distribution
  • local bridging studies in regulated markets with different presentation requirements

Implication for market projection

If no material new Phase 3 clinical evidence is expected, then:

  • growth is primarily volume- and price-driven
  • market outlook is dominated by generic substitution and payer switching

What is the Orange Book status of Omniscan (gadoversetamide) and what patents protect it?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because the Orange Book listing set for Omniscan and its specific labeled presentations cannot be reliably enumerated from the provided information.

Patent estate mechanics that matter for GBCAs

For a GBCA brand, the competitive barrier is usually:

  • formulation/presentation-specific IP (concentration, container, ready-to-use format)
  • manufacturing-process claims
  • method-of-use claims only if they add differentiation beyond labeling
  • lifecycle-management patents that may delay generic entry for specific presentations

How this affects projection

If patents are weak or expired and labeling is shared across competitors, price compression is the dominant driver. If patents still control key presentations, volume loss may be slower and concentrated in specific package sizes or concentrations.


When does Omniscan lose exclusivity in the US and major EU markets?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because specific FDA-listed exclusivity windows, patent expiration dates, and EU regulatory data cannot be enumerated from the provided information.

How exclusivity typically plays out for GBCAs

  • US: branded GBCA exclusivity typically ends with first approval protections or later blocking patents tied to specific presentations
  • EU: data exclusivity and market authorization may differ by member state and by generic adoption via MRP/DCP pathways

Projection impact

Exclusivity end dates set the timing of:

  • authorized generic availability
  • hospital formulary switching cycles
  • tender re-bids for radiology distributors

What generic entry risks exist for Omniscan, and what Paragraph IV challenges apply?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because Paragraph IV challenges and their case numbers cannot be stated from the provided information.

Generic risk in GBCA markets

Generic entry risk usually depends on:

  • whether a generics-only pathway exists for the same labeled concentration and container type
  • whether the branded product uses manufacturing IP that is harder to “design around”
  • whether substitution is permitted without interchange restrictions in local formularies

Projection impact

A typical GBCA pattern:

  • immediate price compression after generic adoption
  • slower market share erosion if hospitals keep established supply contracts
  • deeper discounting after re-tendering

What patent litigation or settlement agreements involve Omniscan (gadoversetamide)?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because Omniscan-specific litigation docket details and settlement terms cannot be identified from the provided information.

Why litigation matters less for mature GBCA brands

Where Omniscan is already widely supplied by brands and generics, litigation may influence:

  • timing of tender wins
  • specific presentation availability
  • carve-outs in supply agreements

Projection impact

Without active litigation driving delays, the default assumption for market forecasts is competitive price pressure.


What formulations and delivery presentations of Omniscan are commercially relevant?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because the specific labeled presentations (concentration, package size, vial type) and their competitive mapping cannot be verified from the provided information.

Form factors that typically affect contracting

GBCA brands differ by:

  • 0.5 M vs other molarities (where applicable by product)
  • prefilled syringe vs vial
  • single-use vs multipack
  • vial sizes that match radiology dose rounding

Projection impact

Presentation-specific competition can lead to:

  • partial substitution where only certain vial sizes are generically available
  • channel-specific pricing differences (hospital supply vs retail)

How does Omniscan compare with alternative gadolinium contrast agents on efficacy and safety positioning?

Featured snippet answer: Omniscan is a linear non-ionic GBCA in the gadoversetamide class; in practice, market positioning vs competitors is dominated by safety labeling narratives and institutional GBCA selection protocols more than by labeled efficacy differences.

Competitive landscape within the GBCA market

Key competitive axes:

  • perceived gadolinium retention risk profile (influenced by regulatory communications)
  • renal impairment screening protocols and dose minimization guidance
  • formulary adoption and vendor contracting

Projection impact

Even if Omniscan retains label parity, selection shifts can favor competitors where:

  • clinical pathways emphasize lower retention narratives
  • payers maintain restrictive substitution policies

What is the current market size for Omniscan and how is the market changing?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because Omniscan-specific sales data, market shares, and recent growth rates cannot be verified from the provided information.

What drives GBCA market growth or decline

  • MRI utilization trends
  • hospital imaging volume and throughput
  • dose practices
  • substitution to competing GBCA brands
  • procurement price changes

Projection structure that typically holds for mature GBCAs

A defensible forecast model for Omniscan normally decomposes revenue into:

  • unit volume (MRI exams using GBCA times GBCA share)
  • average selling price (ASP) net of rebates and tender discounts
  • mix shift (vial sizes and concentration if different from generics)
  • geography-specific formularies and reimbursement

Omniscan revenue forecast: what volumes and ASP assumptions drive 2025–2030 projections?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because quantified assumptions (current unit volumes, ASP trajectory, generic share penetration, geography mix) cannot be stated from the provided information.

Practical projection drivers for mature GBCA brands

  • Generic share penetration schedule by market
  • Hospital tender cadence (often 1 to 3 years)
  • Channel mix shifts toward cost-minimizing suppliers
  • Safety label communications that change prescribing behavior

Which companies market or compete with Omniscan in the US and Europe?

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because competitor mapping requires verified product-level data and cannot be stated from the provided information.

Typical GBCA competitive set structure

  • branded GBCA manufacturer(s)
  • multiple authorized generics and generic GBCA suppliers
  • distribution intermediaries that control tender outcomes

Projection impact

Competitor count and tender consolidation strongly influence ASP erosion rates.


Key regulatory questions for Omniscan: FDA label status, EMA positioning, and renal impairment warnings

Featured snippet answer: Not determinable in this response because current FDA/EMA label excerpts and any recent regulatory communications cannot be verified from the provided information.

What regulators typically scrutinize for linear GBCAs

  • renal impairment screening and contraindication framing
  • guidance on use in pregnancy and pediatric populations
  • risk messaging on repeated exposure
  • compliance with GBCA mitigation protocols

Projection impact

If label restrictions tighten or radiology societies change protocols, prescribing volumes can shift away from specific agents.


Key Takeaways

  • Omniscan is a mature GBCA with commercial dynamics dominated by contracting and competitive substitution rather than new large clinical development.
  • “Clinical trials updates” for Omniscan, when present, usually take the form of post-market safety and operational protocol studies.
  • Market projection hinges on generic/authorized generic availability, tender cycles, and GBCA class-level safety labeling effects, not on fresh Phase 3 efficacy outcomes.
  • Specific US Orange Book status, exclusivity end dates, Paragraph IV litigation, and quantified sales forecasts cannot be enumerated from the provided information.

FAQs

  1. How do hospital GBCA formularies decide between Omniscan and other gadolinium agents?
  2. What renal impairment protocols most affect utilization of linear GBCAs like gadoversetamide?
  3. How quickly does ASP typically drop after generic GBCA tender wins?
  4. Do manufacturing changes for Omniscan trigger new clinical commitments or bridging studies?
  5. What safety communications most influence prescribing behavior for contrast MRI in pediatrics?

References

  1. No sources were provided in the prompt, and no verifiable Omniscan-specific clinical, Orange Book, litigation, or sales datasets were included in the input to cite.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.