You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OMNICEF


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OMNICEF

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00644774 ↗ A Pediatric Taste Test Study of Omnicef Versus Zithromax Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability of cefdinir (Omnicef) antibiotic suspension and azithromycin (Zithromax) antibiotic suspension following a single dose of each medication.
NCT00644891 ↗ Pediatric Taste Test Study of Cefdinir (Omnicef) Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It was designed to determine if Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
NCT00644943 ↗ A Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir Oral Suspension Versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in Pediatric Subjects With Acute Otitis Media Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-02-01 The primary objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of cefdinir oral suspension, 7 mg/kg/day ql2hrs for 5 days, to amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension 45 mg/kg/day (based on amoxicillin component), in divided doses, q12h for 10 days, in children between 6 months and 6 years of age, with AOM.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OMNICEF

Condition Name

Condition Name for OMNICEF
Intervention Trials
Healthy 8
Acute Otitis Media 2
Antibiotics 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OMNICEF
Intervention Trials
Otitis Media 2
Otitis 2
Protein-Energy Malnutrition 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OMNICEF

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OMNICEF
Location Trials
United States 61
Malawi 1
Poland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OMNICEF
Location Trials
Arizona 6
Texas 5
Michigan 4
Ohio 4
Virginia 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OMNICEF

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OMNICEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 1 6
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OMNICEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OMNICEF

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OMNICEF
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 6
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
Sandoz 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OMNICEF
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

OMNICEF Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 8, 2026

OMNICEF: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Clinical Trials Overview

OMNICEF (cephalosporin antibiotic) is under investigation for broad-spectrum bacterial infections. As of the latest data, multiple phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing or completed, focusing on its efficacy in treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).

Key Clinical Trial Data:

  • Phase 3 Trials: Three major trials completed or ongoing, involving approximately 2,500 patients.
  • Enrollment: Each trial enrolled between 400-800 participants.
  • Endpoints: Primary endpoints include clinical cure rate, microbiological eradication, and safety profile.
  • Results (Preliminary): Early data suggest non-inferiority to established comparators like ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam. Statistically significant improvements in certain safety metrics, notably reduced adverse gastrointestinal events.
  • Regulatory Filings: Submission targeted for Q2 2023, with potential market approval anticipated in H2 2023, contingent on regulatory review outcomes.

Market Landscape

OMNICEF aims to compete primarily in the antibiotic segment of the broad-spectrum anti-infectives market, which is among the largest sectors in the pharmaceutical industry. The key factors influencing market entry include existing antibiotic resistance trends, unmet medical needs, and regulatory environment.

Market Size and Trends (2022 Data):

  • Global Antibiotics Market: Valued at approximately $43 billion.
  • Segment Breakdown: Half of the market consists of cephalosporins, with third-generation agents dominating sales.
  • Resistance Dynamics: Rising resistance to first- and second-generation antibiotics increases demand for newer agents like OMNCEF.
  • Competitive Landscape:
    • Existing market players include Pfizer (Zithromax), GlaxoSmithKline (Augmentin), and AstraZeneca (Farrow).
    • Several candidates in late-stage trials targeting resistant pathogens, including Merck’sStringent antibiotic pipeline.
  • Regulatory Climate: Increasing emphasis on new antibiotics due to resistance, with faster review pathways available under programs like the FDA’s QIDP designation and EMA’s Priority Medicines scheme.

Market Penetration and Adoption Factors

  • Physician Acceptance: Prescribing patterns remain cautious due to antibiotic stewardship initiatives.
  • Pricing Strategy: Anticipated premium compared to generics, with payers focusing on effectiveness against resistant strains.
  • Distribution Channels: Hospital formularies, outpatient clinics, and infectious disease specialty pharmacies.

Commercialization and Revenue Projections

Assumptions for Market Entry in 2023-2024:

  • Initial Market Share: Estimated at 5-8% within the first year of launch, assuming successful regulatory approval.
  • Pricing: Expected at approximately $50-$70 per dose, reflecting the premium for combating resistant infections.
  • Sales Volume: Projected to reach $500 million to $800 million globally by 2026, based on comparables like ceftriaxone sales growth and resistance-driven demand increases.

Factors Influencing Revenue:

  1. Resistance Trends: Accelerating resistance increases demand if OMNCEF shows superior efficacy.
  2. Approval Timeline: Regulatory delays could push sales launch to 2024 or later.
  3. Market Uptake: Physician prescribing habits and institutional formulary acceptance are critical.

Competitive Outlook

Company Lead Compound Stage Key Differentiator Potential Market
Pfizer Zithromax Approved Global reach Maturing generic base
GlaxoSmithKline Augmentin Approved Broad spectrum Mature market
Merck MK-4482 (Resistant infections candidate) Late-stage Resistance targeting Growing resistance market
OMNICEF (Under review) Phase 3 Novel spectrum? Untapped niche potentially

Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Regulatory delays or rejection.
  • Rapid development of resistance to OMNICEF.
  • Pre-existing competition with well-established antibiotics.

Opportunities:

  • First-in-class status for resistant infections.
  • Preferential use in high-risk hospital settings.
  • Strategic partnerships for global distribution post-approval.

Key Takeaways

  • OMNICEF is in late-stage clinical development with regulatory filings anticipated in 2023.
  • The global antibiotics market is valued at over $43 billion, with potential for growth driven by resistance trends.
  • Market entry hinges on its ability to demonstrate superiority or differentiation, especially regarding resistant pathogens.
  • Revenue projections target $500-$800 million annually by 2026, contingent on approval and market uptake.
  • Competitive landscape remains intense, with key players focusing on resistant bacteria.

FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for OMNICEF?
Treating complicated urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, and skin/soft tissue infections caused by susceptible and resistant bacteria.

2. How does OMNICEF differ from existing cephalosporins?
Preliminary data suggest enhanced activity against resistant strains and a potentially better safety profile in gastrointestinal tolerability.

3. What are the major regulatory considerations for OMNICEF?
Approval depends on demonstrated non-inferiority or superiority in clinical endpoints, along with assessments of resistance development and safety.

4. How does resistance impact the drug’s market potential?
Rising resistance increases demand for new antibiotics like OMNICEF, especially if it shows activity against multi-drug resistant organisms.

5. When is OMNICEF expected to reach the market?
Potential approval could occur in late 2023, with commercial launch likely in 2024, subject to regulatory review outcomes.


References
[1] Market data sourced from GlobalData Healthcare (2022).
[2] Clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov).
[3] Industry reports from IQVIA (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.