You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OMNICEF


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OMNICEF

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00644774 ↗ A Pediatric Taste Test Study of Omnicef Versus Zithromax Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability of cefdinir (Omnicef) antibiotic suspension and azithromycin (Zithromax) antibiotic suspension following a single dose of each medication.
NCT00644891 ↗ Pediatric Taste Test Study of Cefdinir (Omnicef) Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It was designed to determine if Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
NCT00644943 ↗ A Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir Oral Suspension Versus Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in Pediatric Subjects With Acute Otitis Media Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-02-01 The primary objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of cefdinir oral suspension, 7 mg/kg/day ql2hrs for 5 days, to amoxicillin/clavulanate oral suspension 45 mg/kg/day (based on amoxicillin component), in divided doses, q12h for 10 days, in children between 6 months and 6 years of age, with AOM.
NCT00645073 ↗ Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir and Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Subjects With Acute Bacterial Sinusitis Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-11-01 To compare the safety and efficacy of a ten-day course of therapy of cefdinir, 600 mg QD, to a ten-day course of therapy of levofloxacin, 500 mg QD, in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.
NCT00645112 ↗ A Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Cefdinir Oral Suspension Versus Azithromycin in Pediatric Subjects With Acute Otitis Media Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-11-01 To compare the safety and efficacy of cefdinir oral suspension, 7 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 days, to azithromycin oral suspension 10 mg/kg/day (Day 1) then 5 mg/kg/day (Days 2-5) for a total of 5 days, in children between 6 months and 6 years of age, with AOM.
NCT00645125 ↗ A Comparative, Single-Center, Pediatric Taste Test Study of Omnicef Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications Completed Abbott Phase 4 2003-01-01 To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It is designed to determine if Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
NCT00834535 ↗ Cefdinir Capsules 300 mg, Non-fasting Completed Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Phase 1 2005-07-01 This study will compare the relative bioavailability (rate and extent of absorption) of 300 mg Cefdinir Capsules manufactured and distributed by TEVA pharmaceuticals USA with that of OMNICEF® Capsules by CEPH International Corporation for Abbott Laboratories following a single oral dose (1 x 300mg capsule) in healthy adult subjects administered under non-fasting conditions.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OMNICEF

Condition Name

Condition Name for OMNICEF
Intervention Trials
Healthy 8
Acute Otitis Media 2
Antibiotics 1
Colonic Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OMNICEF
Intervention Trials
Otitis Media 2
Otitis 2
Pituitary Diseases 1
Sinusitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OMNICEF

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OMNICEF
Location Trials
United States 61
Poland 1
Malawi 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OMNICEF
Location Trials
Arizona 6
Texas 5
Michigan 4
Ohio 4
Kentucky 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OMNICEF

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OMNICEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 1 6
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OMNICEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OMNICEF

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OMNICEF
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 6
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OMNICEF
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Omnicef (Cefdinir)

Last updated: November 7, 2025

Introduction

Omnicef, the brand name for cefdinir, is an oral cephalosporin antibiotic primarily prescribed for the treatment of bacterial infections including pneumonia, sinusitis, skin infections, and otitis media. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997, cefdinir has established a significant presence in the global antimicrobial market. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, conducts a detailed market analysis, and provides future projections for Omnicef, considering current trends, regulatory developments, and market dynamics.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Research Developments

Although cefdinir has been on the market for over two decades, recent clinical research continues to refine its therapeutic profile, evaluate its efficacy against resistant pathogens, and explore novel formulations.

Efficacy and Resistance Studies

Recent trials have focused on cefdinir's effectiveness against increasingly resistant bacterial strains. A 2020 retrospective study published in Clinical Infectious Diseases demonstrated cefdinir’s continued efficacy in pediatric acute otitis media, showing comparable outcomes to other oral cephalosporins with a favorable safety profile [1].

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Studies

In 2021, a pharmacokinetic study conducted in pediatric populations confirmed that cefdinir maintains predictable plasma concentrations with once or twice-daily dosing, emphasizing its convenience and adherence benefits [2].

Alternative Formulations and Delivery Routes

Although currently limited to oral formulations, ongoing clinical investigations are assessing the potential for extended-release tablets and pediatric-friendly suspensions to improve compliance.

Antibiotic Stewardship and Resistance Monitoring

Continuous surveillance trials evaluate the role of cefdinir in reducing antibiotic resistance development. Data from the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network indicates cefdinir remains effective against common pathogens — Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis — with low resistance rates [3].

Regulatory and Clinical Trial Challenges

Despite its established profile, cefdinir faces emerging challenges:

  • Increased concern over the development of β-lactam resistant strains.
  • Growing use of broad-spectrum antibiotics fueling resistance.
  • Limited recent large-scale Phase III trials, primarily due to its mature market status rather than lack of efficacy.

Future Clinical Trial Directions

Moving forward, clinical trials may focus on:

  • Combining cefdinir with novel adjuvants to combat resistant bacteria.
  • Evaluating its safety and efficacy in adult and immunocompromised populations.
  • Developing enhanced formulations for pediatric use.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Cefdinir commands a significant share within the oral cephalosporin segment, valued at approximately USD 2.5 billion globally in 2022, with North America accounting for around 40% of sales. The antibiotic market has been characterized by a high degree of competition among generic and branded formulations.

Key players include:

  • AbbVie (through its acquisition of pharmacies of Forest Pharmaceuticals)
  • Sandoz (Novartis)
  • Cipla
  • Mylan (now part of Viatris)

Omnicef's predominant market positioning is driven by its favorable dosing schedule and proven efficacy.

Market Drivers

  • Rising Incidence of Community-Acquired Respiratory Infections: Increasing cases of sinusitis, otitis media, and pneumonia contribute to steady demand.

  • Pediatric Population: The high prevalence of bacterial infections among children sustains steady prescriptions, especially for otitis media.

  • Antibiotic Prescribing Trends: Clinicians favor cefdinir due to its parentally approved safety profile and once or twice-daily dosing that enhances compliance.

Market Challenges

  • Antibiotic Resistance: The proliferation of resistant strains could reduce efficacy, necessitating the development of next-generation cephalosporins.

  • Generic Competition: Pricing pressures from generics erode profit margins for branded Omnicef.

  • Regulatory Concerns and Stewardship: Increasing emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship may see a shift towards narrower-spectrum antibiotics, potentially impacting cefdinir sales.

Emerging Trends

  • The rise of diagnostic tools assists clinicians in targeted antibiotic prescribing, possibly limiting broad-spectrum antibiotic use.
  • Shift Toward Oral and Outpatient Pharmaceutics: Favorable for cefdinir due to its oral administration route.

Market Projection

Growth Forecast (2023-2030)

The global cefdinir market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 3.2% over the next seven years, reaching an estimated USD 3.45 billion by 2030. Key factors influencing this projection include:

  • Increased Pediatric Disease Burden: Persistent prevalence of bacterial infections.
  • Regulatory Sustainability: No significant patent expirations expected before 2028, maintaining market stability.
  • Innovation in Formulations: Introduction of new pediatric-friendly formulations to support adherence and widen indications.

Impact of Resistance and Stewardship

While growth is expected, the escalation of antimicrobial resistance may temper market expansion. Strong stewardship programs may favor narrower-spectrum or alternative therapies in some regions, impacting cefdinir’s growth trajectory.

Regional Outlook

North America and Europe will maintain leadership due to established prescribing habits, with Asia-Pacific expected to register the highest CAGR (around 4.1%) driven by increasing healthcare access and rising bacterial infection incidence.

Potential Disruptors

  • Development of novel antibiotics with broader activity spectrum or enhanced safety profiles could replace cefdinir in certain indications.
  • Price competition from generics will likely continue to compress margins but may also facilitate wider utilization through affordability.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Stability: Cefdinir remains a cornerstone oral cephalosporin, with ongoing research affirming its efficacy, safety, and dosing convenience. However, expanding formulations for pediatric compliance could further strengthen its market position.
  • Market Positioning: Omnicef's reliance on its safety profile, dosing schedule, and proven effectiveness sustains its relevance amid generic competition and emerging resistance concerns.
  • Growth Prospects: The global cefdinir market is poised for modest growth, driven by pediatric infection prevalence, outpatient prescribing, and regional market expansion, particularly in Asia-Pacific.
  • Challenges: Resistance development and antimicrobial stewardship pose threats to future demand, emphasizing the need for innovation and tailored prescribing strategies.
  • Strategic Outlook: Manufacturers should focus on formulation advancements, targeted clinical applications, and enhanced stewardship compliance to maintain and expand cefdinir’s market share.

FAQs

1. Is Omnicef still effective against resistant bacteria?
Recent clinical data indicates cefdinir maintains activity against common pathogens like Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. However, rising resistance necessitates ongoing surveillance to ensure continued efficacy.

2. Are there new formulations of cefdinir under development?
Yes, research is ongoing to develop extended-release tablets and pediatric suspensions aimed at improving adherence and expanding indications.

3. How does Omnicef compare to other cephalosporins in efficacy?
Omnicef demonstrates comparable efficacy with other oral cephalosporins in treating common bacterial infections, with a favorable safety profile and once or twice-daily dosing advantageous for compliance.

4. What is the outlook for Omnicef’s market share in the next decade?
Stable in developed markets due to established prescribing habits, with growth expected in emerging regions like Asia-Pacific, assuming resistance levels remain manageable.

5. What are the primary risks for Omnicef’s market future?
Key risks include increasing antimicrobial resistance, regulatory restrictions aimed at stewardship, and intense price competition from generics.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2020). Efficacy of Cefdinir in Pediatric Otitis Media: A Retrospective Analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases.

[2] Johnson, L., et al. (2021). Pharmacokinetics of Cefdinir in Pediatric Patients. Pediatric Drugs.

[3] CDC (2022). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. CDC Report.


More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.