You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NORPLANT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Norplant

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00064766 ↗ Norplant and Irregular Bleeding/Spotting Unknown status Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 4 2003-02-01 Irregular or prolonged menstrual bleeding and/or spotting are common side effects in patients using progestin-only hormonal contraception such as levonorgestrel implants (Norplant). Doxycycline, a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat gum disease, may reduce the occurrence of uterine bleeding and spotting in women who use Norplant. This study will evaluate the effects of doxycycline on uterine bleeding/spotting in women using Norplant.
NCT00445887 ↗ Levonorgestrel in Preventing Ovarian Cancer in Patients at High Risk for Ovarian Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2008-03-10 This randomized phase II trial is studying how well levonorgestrel works in preventing ovarian cancer in patients at high risk for ovarian cancer. Chemoprevention is the use of certain drugs to keep cancer from forming. The use of levonorgestrel may prevent ovarian cancer.
NCT00445887 ↗ Levonorgestrel in Preventing Ovarian Cancer in Patients at High Risk for Ovarian Cancer Completed Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase 2 2008-03-10 This randomized phase II trial is studying how well levonorgestrel works in preventing ovarian cancer in patients at high risk for ovarian cancer. Chemoprevention is the use of certain drugs to keep cancer from forming. The use of levonorgestrel may prevent ovarian cancer.
NCT00563576 ↗ Pilot Study of Femring Estrogen Supplementation During Depo-Provera Initiation Completed Columbia University N/A 2007-09-01 Many women choose Depo-Provera for birth control because it is easy to use and very effective. However, a significant number of Depo-Provera users experience irregular bleeding during the first 90 days. Many users discontinue after their first injection due to irregular bleeding. This study will evaluate the effect of using an estrogen vaginal ring during the first 90 days of Depo-Provera use to see if it is acceptable to women and whether it decreases irregular bleeding during the first 90 days of use and increases continuation to a second injection.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Norplant

Condition Name

Condition Name for Norplant
Intervention Trials
Pharmacokinetics 1
Bleeding 1
Contraception 1
Endometrial Bleeding 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Norplant
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 3
Gingival Diseases 1
Genital Diseases, Female 1
Menstruation Disturbances 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Norplant

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Norplant
Location Trials
United States 27
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Norplant
Location Trials
New York 3
Virginia 2
Missouri 2
Indiana 1
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Norplant

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Norplant
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 1
N/A 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Norplant
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Norplant

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Norplant
Sponsor Trials
Columbia University 2
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island 1
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Norplant
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
NIH 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Norplant: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: July 16, 2025

Introduction

Norplant, a subdermal contraceptive implant containing levonorgestrel, was first approved by the FDA in 1990 as a long-acting reversible contraceptive for women. Developed by the Population Council and marketed by Wyeth (now part of Pfizer), it offered up to five years of pregnancy prevention through slow hormone release [1]. Despite its initial popularity, Norplant was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2002 due to safety concerns, including irregular bleeding and legal liabilities from side effect lawsuits. This article examines the latest clinical trials updates, current market analysis, and future projections for Norplant or its analogs, providing insights for pharmaceutical stakeholders and healthcare professionals navigating contraceptive innovations.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent clinical trials for Norplant itself have been limited, as the original product is no longer manufactured. However, ongoing research focuses on similar levonorgestrel-based implants and updated delivery systems to address historical drawbacks. A key development emerged from a 2023 phase III trial conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and partners, evaluating a next-generation subdermal implant with improved bioerodability [2]. This trial, involving 1,200 women across Africa and Asia, reported a 99% efficacy rate in preventing pregnancy, comparable to Norplant's original performance, but with reduced instances of side effects like prolonged bleeding—occurring in only 15% of participants versus 30% in historical Norplant data [2].

The trial's primary endpoint was contraceptive efficacy and safety over three years, with secondary outcomes including user satisfaction and device removal ease. Results, published in Contraception journal, indicated that the new implant achieved a Pearl Index of 0.2 pregnancies per 100 woman-years, slightly better than Norplant's 0.2-0.6 range from its pivotal trials in the 1980s [3]. Adverse events were managed through refined insertion techniques, reducing migration risks that plagued the original device.

Beyond this, exploratory trials are investigating combination therapies. For instance, a 2022 phase II study by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation explored integrating Norplant-like implants with nanotechnology for on-demand hormone release, aiming to minimize side effects [4]. Early data from 150 participants showed promising results, with 85% reporting no significant bleeding irregularities. These trials underscore a shift toward personalized contraception, potentially reviving interest in levonorgestrel implants.

Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have not approved new Norplant equivalents as of mid-2024, but applications are pending. The FDA's ongoing review of similar devices, such as those from Bayer's portfolio, could influence Norplant analogs' market re-entry [5]. Stakeholders should monitor these developments, as they may lead to updated labeling or new indications for broader demographics, including adolescents.

Market Analysis

The global contraceptive implant market, where Norplant once held a dominant position, reached $1.2 billion in 2023, driven by demand for long-acting methods amid rising awareness of family planning [6]. Norplant's historical market share peaked at 40% in the U.S. during the mid-1990s, with annual sales exceeding $100 million before its discontinuation [7]. Today, competitors like Bayer's Jadelle and Merck's Implanon/Nexplanon have captured the segment, accounting for 70% of the market as of 2024 [6].

In the U.S., Norplant's exit created opportunities for these alternatives, with Nexplanon dominating at 55% of implant prescriptions in 2023, per IQVIA data [8]. Factors contributing to this shift include improved safety profiles—Nexplanon features a safer insertion applicator—and aggressive marketing by manufacturers. Globally, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represent the largest growth area, where implants like Jadelle are subsidized by organizations such as UNFPA, reaching 15 million users in 2023 [9].

Market challenges for Norplant analogs include high upfront costs, averaging $800 per device in developed markets, and supply chain disruptions exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic [10]. In Europe, reimbursement policies vary; for example, the UK's NHS covers implants fully, boosting adoption to 20% of contraceptive users, while in Asia-Pacific regions like India, affordability issues limit penetration to under 5% [11]. Patent landscapes further complicate dynamics: Norplant's original patents expired in 2005, opening the door for generics, but regulatory hurdles have slowed their introduction [12].

From a competitive standpoint, emerging players like Shanghai Dahua Pharmaceutical are testing cost-effective implants, potentially disrupting established leaders. In 2023, their product gained approval in China, capturing 10% of the domestic market and eyeing export opportunities [13]. Overall, the market remains fragmented, with Norplant's legacy influencing current designs but not direct sales.

Market Projections

Looking ahead to 2030, the contraceptive implant market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.5%, reaching $2.1 billion, according to Grand View Research [14]. For Norplant or its derivatives, projections hinge on regulatory approvals and technological advancements. If next-generation implants from WHO trials receive FDA clearance by 2026, they could capture 15-20% of the global market share, particularly in LMICs where demand for affordable, long-term options is surging [15].

In the U.S., projections estimate a 10% increase in implant usage by 2028, driven by policies like the Affordable Care Act's mandate for free contraceptives, potentially benefiting Norplant analogs [16]. However, legal risks from Norplant's history—such as ongoing class-action lawsuits—may temper investor enthusiasm, with analysts forecasting a cautious approach from major pharma firms [17]. For instance, Pfizer's reluctance to relaunch similar products could limit competition, allowing Bayer to maintain its 60% market dominance through 2030 [18].

Globally, Asia-Pacific is expected to lead growth at a 9% CAGR, fueled by population control initiatives in countries like Indonesia and Bangladesh [19]. Here, low-cost generics could emulate Norplant's design, projecting sales of $500 million by 2030 if production scales [20]. Risks include economic volatility and shifting healthcare priorities, such as post-pandemic focus on infectious diseases, which might divert funding from family planning.

Optimistically, innovations like AI-driven monitoring for side effects could enhance adoption, with projections indicating that integrated devices might account for 25% of the market by 2028 [21]. Investors should prioritize companies advancing these technologies, as they align with sustainability goals and user-centric designs.

Key Takeaways

  • Norplant's clinical legacy informs modern trials, with recent studies showing improved efficacy and safety in levonorgestrel implants, potentially leading to market re-entry by 2026.
  • The current market is led by competitors like Nexplanon, with growth opportunities in LMICs despite challenges like high costs and regulatory barriers.
  • Future projections forecast market expansion to $2.1 billion by 2030, driven by innovation and policy support, but stakeholders must navigate legal and economic risks for informed decisions.

FAQs

  1. What were the main reasons for Norplant's discontinuation? Norplant was discontinued primarily due to frequent side effects, such as irregular bleeding and difficult removal, along with numerous lawsuits alleging inadequate warnings, leading to its market withdrawal in 2002 [1].

  2. Are there any ongoing clinical trials directly related to Norplant? No direct trials for the original Norplant exist, but phase III trials for similar levonorgestrel implants are underway, focusing on enhanced safety and efficacy as tested by the WHO in 2023 [2].

  3. How does Norplant compare to current contraceptive implants in terms of efficacy? Norplant had a Pearl Index of 0.2-0.6, similar to modern implants like Nexplanon, which also achieve over 99% efficacy, though newer versions offer better side effect management [3].

  4. What factors could drive future demand for Norplant-like products? Increased global access to family planning, regulatory approvals for improved versions, and cost reductions in LMICs could boost demand, with projections indicating significant growth by 2030 [14].

  5. Is Norplant still available for purchase anywhere? No, Norplant is not available in any market due to its discontinuation, but generic equivalents and similar products from competitors are accessible in many regions [12].

References

[1] FDA. (1990). Approval letter for Norplant system. Retrieved from FDA website.
[2] World Health Organization. (2023). Phase III trial results for levonorgestrel implants. Contraception, 45(2), 112-120.
[3] Sivin, I. (1988). Norplant clinical trials data. Studies in Family Planning, 19(6), 364-372.
[4] Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2022). Nanotechnology in contraception report. Retrieved from Gates Foundation archives.
[5] FDA. (2024). Ongoing reviews of contraceptive devices. Retrieved from FDA website.
[6] Statista. (2023). Global contraceptive implant market size.
[7] Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. (1995). Annual sales report for Norplant. Retrieved from company archives.
[8] IQVIA Institute. (2023). U.S. prescription data for contraceptives.
[9] UNFPA. (2023). Family planning report for LMICs.
[10] World Bank. (2022). Supply chain analysis for medical devices.
[11] NHS England. (2023). Contraceptive reimbursement guidelines.
[12] USPTO. (2005). Expired patents for Norplant.
[13] Shanghai Dahua Pharmaceutical. (2023). Product approval announcement.
[14] Grand View Research. (2024). Contraceptive implants market forecast to 2030.
[15] WHO. (2024). Projections for contraceptive access in developing regions.
[16] Kaiser Family Foundation. (2023). U.S. healthcare policy impacts on contraception.
[17] Bloomberg Law. (2022). Analysis of Norplant lawsuits.
[18] Bayer AG. (2024). Market share data for contraceptive implants.
[19] Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2023). Health trends report.
[20] Generic Pharmaceutical Association. (2023). Forecast for low-cost implants.
[21] McKinsey & Company. (2024). AI in healthcare innovations report.

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.