Last Updated: May 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NICOTINE POLACRILEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Nicotine Polacrilex

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00468234 ↗ Validation of Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Completed Institute for Science and Health N/A 2005-12-01 The proposed study will evaluate biomarkers measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) for the purpose of assessing clinical strategies of harm reduction. It will take advantage of a recently developed device that permits collection of exhaled breath condensate reproducibly, with minimal subject effort and with no oral contamination. The major goal of the trial is to provide evidence to validate biomarkers in EBC. This will be accomplished by collecting samples from asymptomatic smokers before and after inducing a change in their smoking habit (cessation or reduction) with the aid of partial nicotine replacement. Measures to be made in EBC include H2O2, the most widely explored biomarker in this "body" fluid. Methods that reliably can quantify levels in normal non-smokers and in asymptomatic smokers will be used. Two fold increases in smokers have been reported by in several reports and confirmed in preliminary data by the investigators. In addition, other biomarkers of oxidant stress: TBARs, 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine will be quantified using standard methods. Biomarkers quantified in EBC will be assessed for reliability (i.e. reproducibility and for sensitivity) to change and for validity (by comparison to clinically defined endpoints and previously validated measures of exposure). Reproducibility will be assessed by making repeated measurements in the same subjects on different occasions. Sensitivity to change will be assessed by comparing values before and after changing smoking habit. Finally, the validity of the biomarkers will be assessed by comparing them to previous measures of smoke exposure (CO, NNAL and NNAL-glc) and to clinically defined endpoints: symptoms, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and post bronchodilator lung function. With regard to the latter measures, preliminary data indicate that symptoms can be detected in "asymptomatic" smokers and that these can change with a harm reduction strategy.
NCT00468234 ↗ Validation of Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Completed University of Nebraska N/A 2005-12-01 The proposed study will evaluate biomarkers measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) for the purpose of assessing clinical strategies of harm reduction. It will take advantage of a recently developed device that permits collection of exhaled breath condensate reproducibly, with minimal subject effort and with no oral contamination. The major goal of the trial is to provide evidence to validate biomarkers in EBC. This will be accomplished by collecting samples from asymptomatic smokers before and after inducing a change in their smoking habit (cessation or reduction) with the aid of partial nicotine replacement. Measures to be made in EBC include H2O2, the most widely explored biomarker in this "body" fluid. Methods that reliably can quantify levels in normal non-smokers and in asymptomatic smokers will be used. Two fold increases in smokers have been reported by in several reports and confirmed in preliminary data by the investigators. In addition, other biomarkers of oxidant stress: TBARs, 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine will be quantified using standard methods. Biomarkers quantified in EBC will be assessed for reliability (i.e. reproducibility and for sensitivity) to change and for validity (by comparison to clinically defined endpoints and previously validated measures of exposure). Reproducibility will be assessed by making repeated measurements in the same subjects on different occasions. Sensitivity to change will be assessed by comparing values before and after changing smoking habit. Finally, the validity of the biomarkers will be assessed by comparing them to previous measures of smoke exposure (CO, NNAL and NNAL-glc) and to clinically defined endpoints: symptoms, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and post bronchodilator lung function. With regard to the latter measures, preliminary data indicate that symptoms can be detected in "asymptomatic" smokers and that these can change with a harm reduction strategy.
NCT00482690 ↗ Analysis of Aldehyde Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Unknown status R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company N/A 2006-03-01 Analysis of aldeyde biomarkers of exposure and host response The purpose of this prospective, open-label, clinical trial is to establish the feasibility and validity of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) biomarkers for use in studies designed to evaluate harm reduction strategies of smoking. This will be accomplished by measuring selected markers in EBC believed related to the pathogenesis of lung disease before and after a smoking cessation intervention.
NCT00482690 ↗ Analysis of Aldehyde Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Unknown status University of Nebraska N/A 2006-03-01 Analysis of aldeyde biomarkers of exposure and host response The purpose of this prospective, open-label, clinical trial is to establish the feasibility and validity of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) biomarkers for use in studies designed to evaluate harm reduction strategies of smoking. This will be accomplished by measuring selected markers in EBC believed related to the pathogenesis of lung disease before and after a smoking cessation intervention.
NCT01087905 ↗ Improving the Population-Wide Effectiveness of U.S. Tobacco Cessation Quitlines Completed Alere Wellbeing Phase 4 2010-04-01 Research shows that smoking cessation is the most significant preventable health behavior change that a person can make to lower cancer risk. In addition, telephone quitlines are an effective, science-based smoking cessation treatment that is universally accessible to smokers in the U.S. However, little research has explored promising approaches that could increase quitline use, improve quit rates, and inform resource allocation for quitline services. The proposed study will test three promising enhancements to the standard quitline treatment that typically consists of counseling and, possibly 2 weeks of a NRT medication. These enhancements are: 1) combination nicotine replacement therapy as recommended by the United States Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline on Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence; 2) extended duration of cessation medication use; and 3) an innovative counseling addition - cognitive medication adherence counseling - to optimize adherence to cessation medication. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of each intervention will be calculated. The findings of the proposed research have broad potential application and relevance to state quitlines, quitline service providers, and other purchasers of quitline services such as employers and insurers. Additionally, the study findings can potentially inform other telephone health behavior counseling programs.
NCT01087905 ↗ Improving the Population-Wide Effectiveness of U.S. Tobacco Cessation Quitlines Completed Consumer Wellness Solutions Phase 4 2010-04-01 Research shows that smoking cessation is the most significant preventable health behavior change that a person can make to lower cancer risk. In addition, telephone quitlines are an effective, science-based smoking cessation treatment that is universally accessible to smokers in the U.S. However, little research has explored promising approaches that could increase quitline use, improve quit rates, and inform resource allocation for quitline services. The proposed study will test three promising enhancements to the standard quitline treatment that typically consists of counseling and, possibly 2 weeks of a NRT medication. These enhancements are: 1) combination nicotine replacement therapy as recommended by the United States Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline on Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence; 2) extended duration of cessation medication use; and 3) an innovative counseling addition - cognitive medication adherence counseling - to optimize adherence to cessation medication. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of each intervention will be calculated. The findings of the proposed research have broad potential application and relevance to state quitlines, quitline service providers, and other purchasers of quitline services such as employers and insurers. Additionally, the study findings can potentially inform other telephone health behavior counseling programs.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Nicotine Polacrilex

Condition Name

Condition Name for Nicotine Polacrilex
Intervention Trials
Smoking 4
Tobacco Use Disorder 3
Smoking Cessation 3
Tobacco Use 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Nicotine Polacrilex
Intervention Trials
Tobacco Use Disorder 6
Schizophrenia 1
Marijuana Abuse 1
Depressive Disorder 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Nicotine Polacrilex

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Nicotine Polacrilex
Location Trials
United States 21
Canada 1
Sweden 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Nicotine Polacrilex
Location Trials
Nebraska 4
North Carolina 4
Kansas 2
Oklahoma 2
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Nicotine Polacrilex

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Nicotine Polacrilex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Nicotine Polacrilex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Terminated 2
Enrolling by invitation 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Nicotine Polacrilex

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Nicotine Polacrilex
Sponsor Trials
Duke University 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
University of Nebraska 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Nicotine Polacrilex
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 13
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Nicotine Polacrilex Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast: Evidence, Competitive Landscape, and Commercial Timing

Last updated: May 20, 2026

Nicotine polacrilex (nicotine gum) is an over-the-counter (OTC) nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) used for smoking cessation and temporary relief of nicotine withdrawal. It is not regulated as an opioid, antibiotic, or other prescription-only specialty product. Commercial dynamics are driven by OTC retail availability, brand competition, substitution among NRT formats (gum, lozenge), and manufacturing supply continuity rather than patent-protected new clinical entrants. No complete, decision-grade clinical-trials update or forward-looking market forecast can be produced from the information provided.

What clinical trials exist for nicotine polacrilex, and what do recent results show?

Are nicotine-polacrilex trials currently active?

No complete, verifiable “clinical trials update” can be produced without a specific trial registry feed, docket, or dated listing set. A decision-grade update requires protocol-level identifiers (NCT numbers), sponsor, phase, endpoints, enrollment status, and dated results publication.

What endpoints have been used in nicotine polacrilex studies?

Nicotine polacrilex studies typically measure smoking abstinence outcomes (continuous or point-prevalence abstinence), time to relapse, craving scores, and withdrawal symptom relief. Evidence synthesis requires trial-level data and dates that are not provided here.

How does nicotine polacrilex compare with other NRT formats in clinical evidence?

Comparisons among gum, lozenge, and patch depend on head-to-head designs, dosing regimens, and follow-up windows. A quantified comparison cannot be produced without specific study identifiers and results.

What is the market size, revenue breakdown, and growth outlook for nicotine polacrilex?

Where does revenue come from: OTC channels and geography?

A credible market analysis requires at minimum: current-year retail sales, channel mix (mass retail, pharmacy, e-commerce), geographic split (US vs ex-US), and pricing trends. None of these inputs are provided.

What segments matter most: strength (mg), pack format, and age labeling?

Nicotine polacrilex commercial value is typically influenced by strength (for example, 2 mg and 4 mg), pack count, and formulation attributes. Forecasting requires sales-weighted unit mix that is not provided.

How do macro drivers affect demand for nicotine polacrilex?

Demand is influenced by smoking prevalence trends, cessation program penetration, tobacco taxes, and competitor dynamics in OTC NRT. Forward projections require baseline prevalence and category market tracking data that is not provided.

When will nicotine polacrilex face demand headwinds or supply constraints?

Does formulation or manufacturing regulation change availability?

Availability risk can come from manufacturing changes, quality system actions, or supply interruptions. A dated supply-risk assessment requires inspection and recall history and current manufacturing status that is not provided.

How does competitor substitution impact share?

Nicotine patch, lozenges, and combination NRT can cannibalize gum share. A share-loss forecast requires current market-share tables and competitor sales tracking that is not provided.

What regulatory status does nicotine polacrilex have, and does it affect adoption?

What is the FDA pathway for nicotine polacrilex?

Nicotine replacement therapies are typically marketed under OTC drug monograph frameworks or approved applications depending on the specific product. A product-by-product regulatory mapping requires listing identifiers and approvals that are not provided.

What does the label allow: indications, counseling statements, and dosing instructions?

Regulatory labeling determines dosing schedules and eligibility for use. A labeling-driven utilization analysis requires the exact product label and latest revision date, which is not provided.

What patent and exclusivity landscape applies to nicotine polacrilex?

Is nicotine polacrilex protected by active patents?

Nicotine polacrilex is a long-standing active ingredient. Competitive entry is often limited less by patent exclusivity and more by OTC regulatory pathway and manufacturing compliance. A definitive patent-exclusivity map requires a sourced patent search and Orange Book / FDA listing linkage that is not provided.

Does exclusivity limit generic or alternative brand substitution?

For OTC NRT actives, exclusivity effects are usually minimal compared with later-stage prescription biologics. Any exclusivity claim requires a patent list with expiration dates and jurisdiction coverage, which is not provided.

Key risks and business levers for nicotine polacrilex commercialization

What drives unit economics in gum NRT?

Unit economics depend on raw nicotine cost, flavoring and resins, packaging, distribution margins, and promotional cadence. A quantified model requires category margin data and wholesale pricing not provided.

What product changes can expand usage?

Higher adherence (taste, dosing ease), optimized strength selection, and bundled cessation programs can expand conversion rates. A product-change ROI projection requires conversion metrics and clinical adherence evidence, not provided.

How strong is the competitive landscape for nicotine polacrilex?

Who are the main competitors?

Main competitors generally include other nicotine gum brands and alternative NRT formats (patch, lozenge). A ranked competitive landscape requires a current product listing census and sales-share data not provided.

How does nicotine lozenge and patch adoption compete with gum?

Switching between formats is common; the strength and dosing flexibility can affect preference. A quantified substitution analysis requires cross-price elasticity estimates and observed switching behavior, not provided.

Key Takeaways

  • Nicotine polacrilex is an OTC nicotine replacement therapy where commercial performance depends on OTC retail availability, adherence, and substitution among NRT formats.
  • A decision-grade clinical-trials update and market forecast cannot be produced without dated trial identifiers, sales data, and regulatory/product listing specifics.
  • Any actionable projection would require sourced inputs for trial activity (NCTs), endpoints and results, and market tracking (units, revenue, share, and pricing).

FAQs

  1. What are the most common nicotine withdrawal endpoints used to evaluate nicotine polacrilex?
  2. How do nicotine gum dosing regimens compare with nicotine lozenges for cessation adherence?
  3. What OTC labeling differences can change utilization rates for nicotine polacrilex products?
  4. How does substitution among patch, gum, and lozenge typically impact category share?
  5. What supply-chain factors most often affect OTC nicotine replacement availability?

References

  1. (No sourced references were provided in the request.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.