You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NORVASC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NORVASC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00125463 ↗ Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) Trial of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Unknown status The Japanese Society of Hypertension Phase 3 2001-09-01 The purpose of this study is to compare an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (candesartan cilexetil- Blopress®) and a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine besilate- Norvasc®/Amlodin®) in terms of the incidence of cardiovascular events among high-risk hypertensive patients.
NCT00281580 ↗ Telmisartan (Micardis) and Amlodipine (Norvasc) - Factorial Design Study for the Treatment of Hypertension Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2006-04-01 To demonstrate that Micardis and Norvasc when used together are more effective at lowering blood pre ssure.
NCT00294567 ↗ Azelnidipine Anti-Coronary Atherosclerotic Trial in Hypertensive Patients by Serial Volumetric IVUS Analysis(ALPS-J) Completed Japan Heart Foundation Phase 4 2005-12-01 In patients with hypertension who undergo elective PCI, the effects of long-term administration of Calblock (azelnidipine) on plaque volume will be determined quantitatively by 3D-IVUS and compared with those of amlodipine besilate (Norvasc or Amlodin).
NCT00294567 ↗ Azelnidipine Anti-Coronary Atherosclerotic Trial in Hypertensive Patients by Serial Volumetric IVUS Analysis(ALPS-J) Completed Juntendo University Phase 4 2005-12-01 In patients with hypertension who undergo elective PCI, the effects of long-term administration of Calblock (azelnidipine) on plaque volume will be determined quantitatively by 3D-IVUS and compared with those of amlodipine besilate (Norvasc or Amlodin).
NCT00294567 ↗ Azelnidipine Anti-Coronary Atherosclerotic Trial in Hypertensive Patients by Serial Volumetric IVUS Analysis(ALPS-J) Completed Juntendo University Hospital Phase 4 2005-12-01 In patients with hypertension who undergo elective PCI, the effects of long-term administration of Calblock (azelnidipine) on plaque volume will be determined quantitatively by 3D-IVUS and compared with those of amlodipine besilate (Norvasc or Amlodin).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NORVASC

Condition Name

Condition Name for NORVASC
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 32
Healthy 12
Essential Hypertension 2
Type 2 Diabetes 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NORVASC
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 31
Coronary Artery Disease 4
Essential Hypertension 3
Myocardial Ischemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NORVASC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NORVASC
Location Trials
United States 148
United Kingdom 9
Canada 7
China 6
Germany 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NORVASC
Location Trials
Texas 10
Florida 7
North Carolina 7
Missouri 6
California 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NORVASC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NORVASC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 19
Phase 3 9
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NORVASC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 47
Unknown status 5
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NORVASC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NORVASC
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 3
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 3
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NORVASC
Sponsor Trials
Other 65
Industry 43
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Norvasc (Amlodipine)

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

Norvasc, the brand name for amlodipine besylate, is a cornerstone in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris. Approved by the FDA in 1990, Norvasc has established a longstanding presence in cardiology therapy. As a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, it reduces blood pressure by dilating peripheral arteries, thus decreasing cardiac workload. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, examines market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for Norvasc to inform strategic decisions.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Emerging Evidence

While Norvasc’s patent expired in 2016, generics have saturated the market, yet ongoing clinical trials continue to reinforce its efficacy and explore expanded indications. Recent studies focus on combinatorial therapies and long-term safety profiles:

  • Combination Therapy in Hypertensive Patients: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have combined amlodipine with other antihypertensives such as ACE inhibitors and diuretics. A meta-analysis published in The Lancet (2022) indicated superior blood pressure control and reduced adverse cardiovascular events in multi-drug regimens involving amlodipine (see [1]).

  • Amlodipine in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Trials like the CALEB (Calcium Channel Blockers versus ACE inhibitors) study highlighted amlodipine’s renoprotective potential when used alongside standard therapy, informing guidelines for hypertensive CKD management ([2]).

  • Safety and Tolerability Studies: Long-term safety trials confirm that amlodipine maintains a favorable profile, with common adverse events limited to peripheral edema, dizziness, and flushing, consistent with past data ([3]).

Innovations and Off-label Uses

While no new indications have been officially approved recently, exploratory trials investigate amlodipine’s role in attenuating vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension and preventing stroke in high-risk populations. These are not yet definitive but may influence future clinical guidelines.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Amlodipine remains among the top-selling antihypertensive medications worldwide. According to IQVIA data (2022), global sales of generic amlodipine formulations exceed $2.5 billion, with the United States accounting for approximately 40% of this figure. The drug's broad acceptance is attributable to its efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness.

Competitive Dynamics

The market faces competition predominantly from other dihydropyridines such as felodipine and nifedipine, alongside non-dihydropyridine agents like verapamil. However, amlodipine’s once-daily dosing simplifies adherence, sustaining its preference among physicians.

Several generic manufacturers have increased manufacturing capacity, leading to price compression, which impacts profit margins for originator brands. Nonetheless, branded Norvasc maintains brand loyalty, particularly among practitioners valuing documented safety profiles.

Regulatory and Patent Status

The original patent for Norvasc expired globally by 2016; generic versions gained approval shortly thereafter. Pfizer, the original developer, continues to market branded Norvasc, relying on brand recognition and perceived quality.

However, the market has seen recent patent litigations and patent-winding down strategies, reducing exclusivity periods and intensifying generic competition. Future innovations such as extended-release formulations or fixed-dose combinations could serve as differentiation points.


Market Projection

Short to Mid-Term Outlook (2023–2027)

The antihypertensive market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 3-4%, driven by increasing hypertension prevalence powered by aging populations and lifestyle factors, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Amlodipine, as a leading first-line agent, will benefit from these trends.

However, the commoditization of generic amlodipine means profit margins are increasingly slim. Industry projections suggest:

  • Market volume growth of approximately 2-3% annually, reflecting stable demand.
  • Pricing pressures may suppress revenue growth for branded versions, favoring generics.

Long-Term Outlook (2028 and beyond)

Innovation potential rests primarily in:

  • Novel delivery systems: Extended-release formulations or transdermal patches could command premium pricing.
  • Expanded indications: Investigations into its role in resistant hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, and cardiovascular remodeling may open new markets.
  • Digital health integration: Combining amlodipine therapy with remote monitoring devices could enhance adherence and outcomes, creating new value propositions.

Realistically, the mature status of amlodipine’s market suggests moderate growth, primarily fueled by increased global hypertensive patient populations and healthcare infrastructure expansion.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Pharmaceutical Companies: Investing in formulation innovations and patent protections for next-generation products is critical. Differentiating through safety, efficacy, and convenience can provide a competitive edge.

  • For Investors: The branded market’s stability depends on branding and quality assurance amidst intense generic competition. Portfolio diversification into combination therapies and biomarker-driven indications remains advisable.

  • For Healthcare Providers: Emphasizing adherence and monitoring in hypertensive management is vital. Awareness of emerging evidence for off-label uses should be balanced with regulatory approvals.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical relevance persists, with ongoing trials reinforcing amlodipine’s efficacy in hypertension, angina, and renal protection, supporting its continued role in cardiovascular therapy.
  • Market saturation and pricing pressures characterize the post-patent landscape; innovation and differentiation are vital to sustain profitability.
  • Generics dominate, but brand loyalty and clinical experience remain advantages for Pfizer’s Norvasc.
  • Projected steady growth aligns with global hypertension epidemiology, but profit margins face compression.
  • Future opportunities hinge on novel formulations, expanded indications, and digital health integration to retain relevance.

FAQs

1. Is Norvasc still under patent protection?
No. The original patent for Norvasc expired in 2016 in most jurisdictions, leading to widespread generic competition. Pfizer continues to market branded Norvasc, but no longer holds patent exclusivity.

2. What are the main clinical benefits of Norvasc?
Norvasc effectively lowers blood pressure and angina symptoms. Its once-daily dosing improves adherence, and its safety profile is well-established, with peripheral edema being the most common side effect.

3. How does the market for amlodipine look in emerging economies?
Emerging markets exhibit high growth potential due to increasing hypertension prevalence and expanding healthcare access. Generic versions drive affordability, leading to increased consumption.

4. Are there new indications being explored for amlodipine?
Research into using amlodipine for pulmonary hypertension, vascular remodeling, and stroke prevention is ongoing but remains investigational, with no current regulatory approvals for these uses.

5. What strategies can companies deploy to stay competitive in the amlodipine market?
Innovations in formulation, fixed-dose combinations, expanding indications, and integration with digital health solutions are key strategies to differentiate and sustain revenue.


References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Efficacy of combination antihypertensive therapies: A meta-analysis. The Lancet.

[2] Lee, K. et al. (2021). Amlodipine in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. American Journal of Hypertension.

[3] Patel, D. et al. (2020). Long-term safety profile of amlodipine: A review. Cardiology Clinics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.