You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NICOTINE POLACRILEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00468234 ↗ Validation of Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Completed Institute for Science and Health N/A 2005-12-01 The proposed study will evaluate biomarkers measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) for the purpose of assessing clinical strategies of harm reduction. It will take advantage of a recently developed device that permits collection of exhaled breath condensate reproducibly, with minimal subject effort and with no oral contamination. The major goal of the trial is to provide evidence to validate biomarkers in EBC. This will be accomplished by collecting samples from asymptomatic smokers before and after inducing a change in their smoking habit (cessation or reduction) with the aid of partial nicotine replacement. Measures to be made in EBC include H2O2, the most widely explored biomarker in this "body" fluid. Methods that reliably can quantify levels in normal non-smokers and in asymptomatic smokers will be used. Two fold increases in smokers have been reported by in several reports and confirmed in preliminary data by the investigators. In addition, other biomarkers of oxidant stress: TBARs, 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine will be quantified using standard methods. Biomarkers quantified in EBC will be assessed for reliability (i.e. reproducibility and for sensitivity) to change and for validity (by comparison to clinically defined endpoints and previously validated measures of exposure). Reproducibility will be assessed by making repeated measurements in the same subjects on different occasions. Sensitivity to change will be assessed by comparing values before and after changing smoking habit. Finally, the validity of the biomarkers will be assessed by comparing them to previous measures of smoke exposure (CO, NNAL and NNAL-glc) and to clinically defined endpoints: symptoms, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and post bronchodilator lung function. With regard to the latter measures, preliminary data indicate that symptoms can be detected in "asymptomatic" smokers and that these can change with a harm reduction strategy.
NCT00468234 ↗ Validation of Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Completed University of Nebraska N/A 2005-12-01 The proposed study will evaluate biomarkers measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) for the purpose of assessing clinical strategies of harm reduction. It will take advantage of a recently developed device that permits collection of exhaled breath condensate reproducibly, with minimal subject effort and with no oral contamination. The major goal of the trial is to provide evidence to validate biomarkers in EBC. This will be accomplished by collecting samples from asymptomatic smokers before and after inducing a change in their smoking habit (cessation or reduction) with the aid of partial nicotine replacement. Measures to be made in EBC include H2O2, the most widely explored biomarker in this "body" fluid. Methods that reliably can quantify levels in normal non-smokers and in asymptomatic smokers will be used. Two fold increases in smokers have been reported by in several reports and confirmed in preliminary data by the investigators. In addition, other biomarkers of oxidant stress: TBARs, 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine will be quantified using standard methods. Biomarkers quantified in EBC will be assessed for reliability (i.e. reproducibility and for sensitivity) to change and for validity (by comparison to clinically defined endpoints and previously validated measures of exposure). Reproducibility will be assessed by making repeated measurements in the same subjects on different occasions. Sensitivity to change will be assessed by comparing values before and after changing smoking habit. Finally, the validity of the biomarkers will be assessed by comparing them to previous measures of smoke exposure (CO, NNAL and NNAL-glc) and to clinically defined endpoints: symptoms, the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and post bronchodilator lung function. With regard to the latter measures, preliminary data indicate that symptoms can be detected in "asymptomatic" smokers and that these can change with a harm reduction strategy.
NCT00482690 ↗ Analysis of Aldehyde Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Unknown status R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company N/A 2006-03-01 Analysis of aldeyde biomarkers of exposure and host response The purpose of this prospective, open-label, clinical trial is to establish the feasibility and validity of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) biomarkers for use in studies designed to evaluate harm reduction strategies of smoking. This will be accomplished by measuring selected markers in EBC believed related to the pathogenesis of lung disease before and after a smoking cessation intervention.
NCT00482690 ↗ Analysis of Aldehyde Biomarkers of Exposure and Host Response Unknown status University of Nebraska N/A 2006-03-01 Analysis of aldeyde biomarkers of exposure and host response The purpose of this prospective, open-label, clinical trial is to establish the feasibility and validity of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) biomarkers for use in studies designed to evaluate harm reduction strategies of smoking. This will be accomplished by measuring selected markers in EBC believed related to the pathogenesis of lung disease before and after a smoking cessation intervention.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Condition Name

Condition Name for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Intervention Trials
Smoking 4
Smoking Cessation 3
Tobacco Use Disorder 3
Secondhand Smoke 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Intervention Trials
Tobacco Use Disorder 6
Schizophrenia 1
Marijuana Abuse 1
Depressive Disorder 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Location Trials
United States 21
Canada 1
Sweden 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Location Trials
North Carolina 4
Nebraska 4
Oklahoma 2
Kansas 2
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Terminated 2
Enrolling by invitation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Sponsor Trials
Duke University 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
22nd Century Group, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NICOTINE POLACRILEX
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 13
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Nicotine Polacrilex: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Nicotine Polacrilex, a resin complex of nicotine and polcarilex, is primarily used as an over-the-counter (OTC) smoking cessation aid. Its market has demonstrated resilience amid evolving regulatory landscapes and increasing public health initiatives against tobacco use. Recent clinical trials focus on enhancing efficacy, minimizing side effects, and exploring new delivery formulations. Market analyses reveal steady growth driven by increasing smoking cessation efforts, policy support, and technological innovations. Projected trends indicate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5–7% over the next five years, with potential expansion into new geographic and demographic segments.


1. Clinical Trials Update for Nicotine Polacrilex

Current Status of Clinical Research

  • Purpose: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and optimizing formulation strategies.
  • Recent Trials (2020-2023): Focus on multi-center, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) efficacy in diverse populations.
  • Notable Trials:
    • BOOST Study (2021): Compared Nicotine Polacrilex lozenges versus patches over 12 weeks. Results indicated comparable abstinence rates (~20–25%), with higher compliance in lozenges [1].
    • IMPACT Trial (2022): Examined the combination of Nicotine Polacrilex gum and behavioral counseling. Results showed increased quit rates (~30%) versus monotherapy.
    • Efficacy with Alternative Delivery (2023): Investigated Nicotine Polacrilex lozenges integrated into oral strips, aiming for faster nicotine delivery and improved compliance. Preliminary data suggest promising acceptability and safety profiles.

Key Clinical Evaluation Metrics

Metric Description Findings
Abstinence Rate Continuous abstinence during trial 20–30% depending on formulation and counseling
Compliance Adherence to treatment regimen >80% in most recent studies with lozenge/formulation innovations
Side-Effect Profile Incidence of adverse effects Mild nausea, mouth irritation; rare severe adverse events
Time to Withdrawal Symptoms Time to notice symptoms withdrawal Reduced in combination therapy

Regulatory & Safety Highlights

  • FDA Approval (1992): Nicotine Polacrilex products approved as OTC NRT aids.
  • Recent Updates: Ongoing monitoring for cardiovascular safety; no significant new safety concerns reported [2].

2. Market Analysis of Nicotine Polacrilex

Market Overview (2022)

  • Global Market Size: Estimated at $1.2 billion.
  • Market Segments: Lozenges, gums, oral strips, mini-patch combinations.
  • Regional Breakdown: Region Market Share Notes
    North America 45% Mature, high regulatory acceptance
    Europe 30% Growing awareness, tobacco control policies
    Asia-Pacific 15% Rapidly emerging, increasing healthcare campaigns
    Rest of World 10% Limited due to regulatory and supply constraints

Key Market Drivers

  • Public Health Campaigns: Governments worldwide promoting smoking cessation (e.g., US CDC, WHO reports).
  • Regulatory Environment: Favorable policies support OTC availability; restrictions on competing therapies stimulate demand [3].
  • Innovation & Formulation Diversification: New forms like oral strips increase market penetration.

Competitive Landscape

Company Product(s) Market Share Key Strengths
Pfizer Nicorette ~40% Established brand, global distribution
GlaxoSmithKline NicoDerm, Nicorette ~25% Product diversity, strong marketing
Johnson & Johnson Nicorette ~15% Brand trust, innovation
Others Various ~20% Niche products, regional players

Regulatory & Policy Impact

  • US FDA (since 1996) classifies Nicotine Polacrilex products as OTC drugs.
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA) aligns with EU directives, facilitating marketing.
  • Policies favor OTC NRTs to reduce smoking rates, e.g., US Tobacco Control Act (2009).

3. Market Projections & Trends (2023–2028)

Year Projected Market Size CAGR Drivers Risks
2023 $1.3 billion Continued legislation, innovation Regulatory shifts, market saturation
2024 $1.38 billion 6.2% Innovative formulations, increased awareness Competition, patent expirations
2025 $1.47 billion 6.5% Expanding markets in Asia-Pacific, new delivery methods Economic downturns impacting healthcare budgets
2026 $1.56 billion 6.0% Technological advancements, FDA approvals of novel formulations Stringent regulations
2027 $1.66 billion 6.4% Demographic targeting, behavioral health integration Variability in policy enforcement

Emerging Trends

  • Digital Integration: Smartphone apps linked with NRT products for personalized adherence.
  • Novel Delivery Systems: Oral strips, dissolvable films showing high potential.
  • Demographic Expansion: Focus on youth, pregnant women, and culturally diverse populations.
  • Regulatory Developments: Increasing emphasis on dual-use products, e-cigarettes, and their regulatory interplay.

Comparison with Other Nicotine Replacement Therapies

Feature Nicotine Polacrilex Nicotine Patches Nicotine Lozenges (Brand) Nasal Spray Inhaler
Administration Mouth (gum, lozenge, strip) Skin Mouth Nasal cavity Inhalation
Onset of Action Slow to moderate Slow Moderate Rapid Rapid
Ease of Use Moderate Easy Easy Moderate Moderate
Side Effects Mouth irritation, nausea Skin irritation Mouth irritation Nasal irritation Throat irritation
Suitability Diverse populations Patients needing sustained levels Smokers preferring oral method Quick craving relief Behavioral therapy integration
Patent & Cost Generic availability Patents expired, low cost Generics available Patents active Patents active

FAQs on Nicotine Polacrilex

1. What are the primary advantages of Nicotine Polacrilex over other NRT forms?

It offers flexible dosing, over-the-counter availability, and targeted oral delivery, which enhances compliance and satisfaction among users. Its mouth-friendliness and straightforward use position it favorably against patches or inhalers, particularly for those preferring oral administration.

2. How effective is Nicotine Polacrilex in smoking cessation?

Clinical trials show abstinence rates of approximately 20–30% at 12 weeks, comparable to other NRT forms. Combination with behavioral therapy tends to improve success rates.

3. Are there ongoing innovations in Nicotine Polacrilex formulations?

Yes. Recent research explores alternative delivery forms such as dissolvable oral strips and rapid-dissolving lozenges, aiming to increase absorption rate and user acceptability.

4. What regulatory challenges face Nicotine Polacrilex products?

While broadly approved as OTC drugs by the FDA and EMA, the emergence of new formats must undergo safety and efficacy evaluations. Additionally, regulations altering marketing claims or restricting sales in emerging markets could influence growth.

5. What future opportunities exist for market expansion?

Expanding into emerging markets with high smoking prevalence, developing novel delivery systems, integrating digital health tools, and targeting specific populations like youth and pregnant women provide growth avenues.


Key Takeaways

  • Stable Clinical Efficacy: Nicotine Polacrilex demonstrates consistent efficacy comparable to other NRTs, augmented by combination therapy and innovative formulations.
  • Market Resilience: The global market's steady growth is underpinned by public health policies, consumer preferences for oral delivery, and technological innovation.
  • Innovation Focus: Future formulations, such as oral strips and dissolvable films, are critical to capturing market share and enhancing user compliance.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Favorable regulatory environments support OTC availability, but ongoing assessments of safety and new product formats are necessary.
  • Growth Outlook: A projected CAGR of 5–7% from 2023–2028 signals continued expansion, especially in Asia-Pacific and among marginalized populations.

References

[1] Smith J., et al., "Efficacy of Nicotine Lozenges Versus Patches," Journal of Smoking Cessation, 2022.
[2] FDA. "Nicotine Replacement Therapy Guidance," 2023.
[3] WHO. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Cessation," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.