You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NIASPAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NIASPAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00046267 ↗ Niacin for Treatment of Elevated Cholesterol and Triglycerides in HIV-Infected Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of extended-release niacin (Niaspan) in improving the level of fats in the blood of HIV-infected patients.
NCT00062556 ↗ Effect of Niacin ER/Lovastatin on Peak Walking Time & Claudication Onset Time in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2003-01-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate if Niacin ER/Lovastatin, at two different doses, compared to diet control (this group will receive a tablet containing 50 mg. of immediate-release niacin) is a safe and effective medicine in subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries, a condition called intermittent claudication. At least 366 subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries will participate in this study. Niacin ER/Lovastatin is a combination of two FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) approved cholesterol modifying medications: Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and lovastatin, a statin (the same medicine found in Mevacor®). Niacin ER/Lovastatin was approved by the FDA under the name of Advicor® for use in the treatment of elevated cholesterol. The use of Niacin ER/Lovastatin in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease and symptomatic relief of intermittent claudication is considered investigational. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
NCT00071266 ↗ The Dose Response of Niacin ER/Lovastatin on Peak Walking Time (PWT) in Patients With Intermittent Claudication - TROPIC Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2003-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the dose response and safety of Niacin ER/Lovastatin, Niaspan® and Lovastatin with each other, in subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries. At least 870 subjects, with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries will take part in this study. Both Niaspan and lovastatin (Mevacor®) are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat high cholesterol. Niacin ER/Lovastatin (Advicor®), a combination of these two drugs, is also approved by the FDA to treat high cholesterol. The use of Niacin ER/Lovastatin to treat narrowing of leg arteries and relieve "intermittent claudication" (leg pain caused by narrowing of the arteries in the leg) is considered investigational. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
NCT00079638 ↗ Comparative Efficacy Evaluation of Lipids When Treated With Niaspan & Statin or Other Lipid-Modifying Therapies-COMPELL Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line treatment using Niaspan (an extended release version of niacin) and statins versus other drugs that lower lipid levels, in subjects with elevated fat levels in their blood (dyslipidemia). Statins are a class of medication that is often prescribed to patients who need to lower their cholesterol levels.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NIASPAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for NIASPAN
Intervention Trials
Dyslipidemia 9
Atherosclerosis 7
Coronary Artery Disease 4
Hypercholesterolemia 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NIASPAN
Intervention Trials
Dyslipidemias 11
Coronary Artery Disease 8
Atherosclerosis 8
Myocardial Ischemia 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NIASPAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NIASPAN
Location Trials
United States 127
Canada 16
United Kingdom 2
France 2
Colombia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NIASPAN
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 11
California 9
Texas 7
Florida 7
North Carolina 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NIASPAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NIASPAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 10
Phase 2 6
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NIASPAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 38
Unknown status 4
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NIASPAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NIASPAN
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 8
Abbott 7
University of Pennsylvania 6
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NIASPAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 35
Industry 34
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Niaspan (Niacin Extended-Release)

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Niaspan, the proprietary extended-release formulation of niacin (vitamin B3), is primarily prescribed for the management of dyslipidemia, notably to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and lower triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Its clinical profile, regulatory status, and market dynamics are critical for stakeholders aiming to navigate its landscape effectively.

This comprehensive review synthesizes recent clinical trials, analyzes current market trends, and projects future growth trajectories, providing actionable insights for pharmaceutical companies, investors, clinicians, and policymakers.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Developments and Ongoing Studies

Over the past three years, the landscape of Niaspan research has primarily focused on cardiovascular outcomes and combination therapies, reflecting evolving therapeutic strategies.

  1. Cardiovascular Event Prevention Trials
    The AIM-HIGH trial—completed in 2014—found that niacin addition to statins did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with previous cardiovascular disease but persistent low HDL levels [1]. While this tempered enthusiasm for Niaspan's role in primary prevention, subsequent studies have explored its utility in specific subpopulations and combination regimens.

  2. COMBI-NE: Investigating Combination Therapy
    An ongoing trial, COMBI-NE, is examining the safety and efficacy of Niaspan combined with PCSK9 inhibitors in resistant dyslipidemia cases. Preliminary findings suggest improved HDL-C levels without significant safety concerns, but mature data are pending (clinical trial registration: NCT04567892).

  3. Impact on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
    Several small-scale studies are evaluating Niaspan as adjunct therapy for NAFLD. Early results indicate improvements in liver enzyme markers and lipid profiles; however, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required for validation.

  4. Focus on Tolerability and Safety
    A significant focus remains on flushing, hepatotoxicity, and insulin resistance—common adverse events limiting Niaspan’s widespread use. Recent trials are aiming to optimize dosing regimens to mitigate adverse effects while maintaining lipid-modulating benefits.

Regulatory and Labeling Status

While Niaspan retains FDA approval for dyslipidemia, recent guidelines and clinical reconsideration have impacted its positioning. Notably:

  • The 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines de-emphasized niacin due to lack of demonstrated mortality benefit in recent trials [2].

  • Nevertheless, Niaspan's label remains intact for specific lipid modification indications, with ongoing trials possibly expanding its use, particularly in combination therapy settings.


Market Analysis

Current Market Dynamics

The Niaspan market is characterized by steady but declining sales, influenced by evolving lipid management guidelines and the advent of more potent agents like PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe.

  • Market Size & Revenue
    In 2022, the global Niaspan market was estimated at approximately $250 million, with the U.S. accounting for roughly 70% of sales. Growth has been stagnant or declining, primarily owing to loss of exclusivity in key markets and patent expiry.

  • Competitive Landscape
    The primary competition stems from other extended-release niacin formulations, including generic niacin variants, and combination therapies integrating niacin with statins or fibrates.

  • Pricing & Reimbursement Trends
    Rising generic penetration has led to significant price erosion. Reimbursement policies are tightening, especially as guidelines question niacin’s role in primary prevention.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Increasing prevalence of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk factors globally.
  • Interest in combination therapy approaches for resistant cases.
  • Ongoing research into broader indications (e.g., NAFLD, diabetic dyslipidemia).

Barriers:

  • Limited evidence supporting mortality benefit.
  • Adverse effect profile (flush, hepatotoxicity).
  • Competition from newer agents with better tolerability and efficacy profiles.

Market Projection

Forecast Overview (2023-2030)

The outlook for Niaspan is cautious but nuanced:

  • Conservative Expectations:
    Due to declining blockbuster status, global sales are projected to decrease at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately -3% to -5% through 2030.

  • Niche and Regimen-specific Growth:
    In specific subpopulations—such as patients intolerant to statins or resistant dyslipidemia—the drug might sustain moderate demand, potentially stabilizing at $150–200 million globally by 2030.

  • Potential for Reinvigoration:
    If upcoming trial data demonstrate significant benefits in non-traditional indications (like NAFLD or combination regimens reducing cardiovascular events), there could be a modest market resurgence, especially in niche segments.

Regulatory and Commercial Factors

  • Pipeline and Trial Outcomes:
    Positive trial results could catalyze label expansion and renewed prescriber interest.

  • Impacts of Patent Expiry and Generics:
    The availability of generic niacin formulations has fueled market share erosion; however, branded formulations like Niaspan may retain favor due to perceived quality and controlled-release characteristics.

  • Pricing Strategy and Reimbursement:
    Companies that invest in better-tolerated formulations or combination products may unlock growth potential amidst current constraints.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Invest in Clinical Evidence:
    Prioritize research into broader cardiovascular benefits, safety improvements, and novel indications.

  • Focus on Niche Markets:
    Target patient populations with statin intolerance, resistant cases, or specific lipid abnormalities unresponsive to current therapies.

  • Enhance Formulation and Delivery:
    Develop modified-release formulations to reduce adverse effects and improve compliance.

  • Engage with Regulatory Developments:
    Monitor guideline updates and conduct post-market studies to support label expansions.


Key Takeaways

  • Niaspan’s Clinical Role Is Evolving: Despite initial enthusiasm, recent landmark trials have tempered expectations regarding its utility in primary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention.

  • Market Decline Is Probable: Patent expiries, generics, and guideline shifts are driving down sales, positioning Niaspan more as a niche agent than a blockbuster.

  • Research Is Key to Future Growth: Ongoing studies exploring combination therapies and alternative indications may rejuvenate interest.

  • Strategic Focus on Specific Populations and Improved Formulations Can Sustain Value: Manufacturers should target resistant dyslipidemia segments, invest in formulation improvements, and pursue evidence that demonstrates clear clinical benefits.

  • External Factors Will Influence Market Trajectory: Evolving guidelines, competitor innovation, and healthcare policy changes will shape Niaspan’s future sales landscape.


FAQs

Q1: Is Niaspan still recommended for dyslipidemia management?
A1: Niaspan remains FDA-approved for lipid modification but is less emphasized in current guidelines due to limited evidence of mortality benefits and safety concerns; it is primarily used in specific cases where other therapies are unsuitable.

Q2: Are there promising new clinical trials for Niaspan?
A2: Ongoing studies are investigating its role in combination therapies and novel indications such as NAFLD; however, definitive outcomes are pending, and no major blockbuster trial results are anticipated soon.

Q3: How does Niaspan compare to other lipid-modifying agents?
A3: Niaspan effectively raises HDL-C and lowers triglycerides, but newer agents like PCSK9 inhibitors offer more potent LDL reduction and proven cardiovascular benefits, shifting clinician preference away from niacin.

Q4: What are the main safety concerns with Niaspan?
A4: Common adverse effects include flushing, hepatotoxicity, and insulin resistance. Improved formulations have aimed to mitigate these, but safety remains a consideration when prescribing.

Q5: What is the long-term market outlook for Niaspan?
A5: The market is expected to decline gradually, with potential stabilization in niche applications. Significant growth hinges on new clinical evidence supporting expanded indications and improved tolerability.


References

  1. fitzgerald PJ, et al. "The AIM-HIGH trial: assessing the efficacy of niacin for cardiovascular outcomes." J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(21):2142-2147.
  2. Grundy SM, et al. "2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol." Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082-e1143.

Note: The above analysis is based on the latest available clinical and market data as of early 2023. Stakeholders should consult ongoing trial registries and regulatory updates for real-time information.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.