You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NEURONTIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NEURONTIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001482 ↗ New Drugs in the Treatment of Mood Disorders Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 2 1995-05-01 This clinical study compares the effectiveness of two anticonvulsants Lamotrigine (Lamictal) Monotherapy and Gabapentin (Neurontin) in patients with treatment resistant affective disorders. We initially have found that the response rate to lamotrigine (51%) exceeded that of gabapentin (28%) or placebo (21%). In this study the placebo phase has been dropped so that we examine possible clinical and biological factors predictors of response. The drugs will be given in a randomized order for six weeks each and you will not know when you are on a given one. There will be a 2-4 week "washout" period between treatments. If you respond well to one of these treatments, a longer open continuation period will be offered at the end of this study. This would involve one or both drugs in combination. A variety of rating scales and brain imaging procedures will also be offered before and during each drug evaluation. Both lamotrigine and gabapentin are generally well tolerated. A serious potentially life threatening rash occurs in about 1/500 patients treated with lamotrigine, however. Common side effects are rash, dizziness, unsteadiness, double vision, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, sedation, and headache. These side effects are usually mild, and resolve with continued time on the drug or a decrease in dosage.
NCT00011297 ↗ Comparing Gabapentin and Lorazepam for Treating Alcohol Withdrawal Completed National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) Phase 2 1969-12-31 This study will evaluate a safe and useful medication for outpatient detoxification that is as effective as benzodiazepines in the short-term, and more effective in the protracted withdrawal period. Gabapentin (Neurontin) will be compared to a standard benzodiazepine, lorazepam (Ativan), for its effectiveness in treating alcohol withdrawal.
NCT00108550 ↗ Chronic Low Back Pain Research Project Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs Phase 2 2004-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin is efficacious as an analgesic for chronic low back pain.
NCT00108550 ↗ Chronic Low Back Pain Research Project Completed VA Office of Research and Development Phase 2 2004-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin is efficacious as an analgesic for chronic low back pain.
NCT00112138 ↗ Gabapentin for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Menopausal Women Completed North Toronto Primary Care Research Network Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of gabapentin compared to placebo in the treatment of hot flashes in postmenopausal women using a phase III randomized controlled trial.
NCT00137735 ↗ Gabapentin for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Completed Pfizer Phase 3 2003-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin is safe and effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NEURONTIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for NEURONTIN
Intervention Trials
Pain 17
Healthy 13
Pain, Postoperative 9
Postoperative Pain 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NEURONTIN
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 25
Head and Neck Neoplasms 6
Disease 5
Alcoholism 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NEURONTIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NEURONTIN
Location Trials
United States 90
Canada 11
Egypt 3
Thailand 2
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NEURONTIN
Location Trials
California 13
New York 10
North Carolina 7
Minnesota 6
North Dakota 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NEURONTIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NEURONTIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 44
Phase 3 11
Phase 2/Phase 3 6
[disabled in preview] 31
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NEURONTIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 75
Terminated 16
Unknown status 12
[disabled in preview] 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NEURONTIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NEURONTIN
Sponsor Trials
Actavis Inc. 6
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
University of California, Davis 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NEURONTIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 124
Industry 24
NIH 19
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Neurontin (Gabapentin): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Neurontin (gabapentin), developed by Pfizer and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993, is a widely used anticonvulsant medication. Originally approved for epilepsy, gabapentin’s off-label uses—including neuropathic pain and mood disorders—have expanded its market scope. This comprehensive analysis explores the latest clinical trial developments, current market trends, and future projections for Neurontin, considering regulatory, therapeutic, and competitive factors.


Clinical Trials Landscape: Recent Developments and Emerging Evidence

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Despite its age as an established treatment, research into gabapentin continues, particularly concerning its off-label indications and safety profile. As of late 2022, several clinical trials investigating gabapentin's efficacy and safety are active:

  • Neuropathic Pain in Diabetic Patients: Multiple Phase IV studies are assessing optimal dosing regimens, long-term safety, and addiction potential. A notable trial (NCT04525742) initiated in 2021 focuses on chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathy, aiming to refine therapeutic protocols.
  • Geriatric Anxiety Disorders: A randomized controlled trial (NCT03988768) explored gabapentin's efficacy for anxiety in elderly populations, reporting promising reductions in symptom severity with manageable side effects.
  • COVID-19 Neurological Sequelae: Emerging research investigates gabapentin's potential in managing post-viral neurological symptoms, including neuropathy and cognitive deficits related to long COVID.

Key Findings & Limitations

While these trials yield promising data, limitations persist:

  • Variable Efficacy: Variability in patient response, especially for off-label indications, underscores the need for further large-scale, placebo-controlled trials.
  • Safety Concerns: Reports of off-label overuse, dependency, and side effects such as dizziness and somnolence reflect ongoing safety debates.
  • Regulatory Stance: Regulatory agencies remain cautious, emphasizing that existing evidence predominantly supports epilepsy and certain neuropathic pain indications.

Future Directions in Clinical Research

Upcoming studies are likely to focus on:

  • Mechanisms of Action: Clarifying gabapentin’s precise mechanism in neuropathic versus psychiatric conditions.
  • Combination Therapies: Evaluating synergistic effects with other medications for refractory pain or mood disorders.
  • Pharmacogenomics: Investigating genetic predictors of response and adverse effects to personalize therapy.

Market Analysis: Current State and Drivers

Market Size and Growth Dynamics

The global gabapentin market was valued at approximately USD 2.4 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 3.2 billion by 2028, expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.2% ([1]). The primary drivers include:

  • Established Efficacy: Neurotherapeutic success in epilepsy and diabetic neuropathy sustains demand.
  • Off-label Utilization: Physician prescribing for conditions such as phantom limb pain and anxiety fosters additional sales.
  • Generic Availability: Patent expirations (e.g., Pfizer’s patent for Neurontin expired in 2004 in the U.S.) have led to widespread generic proliferation, lowering treatment costs and expanding access.

Competitive Landscape

While Neurontin remains a prominent brand, the market is increasingly saturated with generics and alternative therapies:

  • Generic Gabapentin: Dominates due to cost advantages, reducing Neurontin’s market share.
  • Newer Agents: Medications like pregabalin (Lyrica) and gabapentin enacarbil target similar patient populations, often with purported superior pharmacokinetic profiles.
  • Regulatory & Legal Challenges: Pfizer faced significant legal liabilities over off-label marketing practices, impacting market perception and branding.

Pricing & Reimbursement Outlook

Reimbursement policies favor generic gabapentin, with insurers often favoring lower-cost options. Despite this, branded Neurontin retains niche markets, especially where clinicians prefer the marketed formulation due to perceived reliability.


Market Projections and Strategic Insights

Forecasting for 2023-2030

Considering current trends, the Neurontin market is predisposed to decline in branded sales as generics dominate, but certain segments may sustain or grow:

  • Niche and Refractory Indications: Patients with treatment-resistant neuropathy or specific psychiatric conditions may continue to receive branded Neurontin, especially in regions with limited generic penetration.
  • Emerging Indications: Pending positive clinical trial outcomes could open new markets, particularly in managing neurological sequelae of COVID-19 or certain mood disorders.
  • Regulatory Resilience: With ongoing safety investigations, regulatory bodies may tighten prescribing guidelines, affecting market volume.

Opportunities & Challenges

  • Opportunities:

    • Developing fixed-dose combination therapies for neuropathic pain.
    • Investing in pharmacogenomic research to personalize therapy.
    • Expanding into emerging markets with low generic penetration.
  • Challenges:

    • Competitive pressure from newer agents with improved side-effect profiles.
    • Legal and reputational issues stemming from past off-label marketing controversies.
    • Public perception and regulatory scrutiny around off-label use and dependency concerns.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical companies involved in gabapentin, whether as originators or generic suppliers, must strategically navigate a landscape characterized by clinical investigational needs, regulatory vigilance, and shifting market preferences. Investment in clinical trial innovation and evidence-based positioning will determine long-term viability and profitability.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline remains active: Ongoing trials are refining gabapentin’s efficacy and safety for diverse indications, with potential regulatory approvals for new uses.
  • Market saturation with generics: Patent expiration led to widespread generics, constraining branded Neurontin’s market share but leaving certain niche segments active.
  • Emerging therapeutic roles: Research into post-COVID neurological syndromes could carve new niches, provided clinical outcomes are favorable.
  • Regulatory and safety challenges: Ongoing safety assessments and past legal issues continue to influence prescribing practices.
  • Future growth hinges on innovation: Personalized medicine approaches and novel combination therapies represent opportunities amid competition.

FAQs

1. What are the primary approved indications for Neurontin today?

Neurontin is primarily approved for epilepsy and postherpetic neuralgia. Off-label uses include neuropathic pain, migraine prevention, and certain psychiatric conditions.

2. How does the patent status of Neurontin affect its market?

Pfizer’s patent for Neurontin expired in 2004 in the U.S., leading to the proliferation of generics, significantly reducing its market share and profitability for the branded product.

3. Are there new clinical trials that could expand Neurontin’s approved indications?

Yes, early-phase trials exploring gabapentin's efficacy for long COVID neurological symptoms, anxiety, and other neuropsychiatric conditions could lead to expanded indications if positive outcomes are confirmed.

4. What are the main safety concerns associated with gabapentin?

Concerns include dizziness, somnolence, potential dependency, and misuse, especially when used off-label. Regulatory agencies continue to monitor post-market safety data.

5. How is the market for gabapentin evolving with competition from newer drugs?

While generic gabapentin dominates due to low cost, newer options like pregabalin are gaining popularity for their pharmacokinetic advantages, influencing prescribing patterns and market dynamics.


References

  1. Market Watch. "Global Gabapentin Market Size & Trends." 2022.
  2. FDA. Neurontin (Gabapentin) Prescribing Information. 1993.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Recent trials involving gabapentin and its off-label applications.
  4. IQVIA Data. "Pharmaceutical Market Insights 2021."
  5. Legal Case Studies. Pfizer’s legal liabilities and marketing controversies.

This analysis provides a strategic overview of Neurontin’s clinical and market landscape, enabling informed decision-making for pharma executives, investors, and healthcare providers.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.