You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NESACAINE-MPF


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NESACAINE-MPF

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Université de Montréal N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT02862912 ↗ Chloroprocaine Spinal Anesthesia for Cervical Cerclage (CP Spinal) Completed Columbia University Phase 4 2016-11-08 This study aims to determine whether or not spinal anesthesia with the local anesthetic drug, chloroprocaine, wears off faster than the local anesthetic drug, bupivacaine, and results in faster discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery.
NCT03260972 ↗ Intraabdominal Chloroprocaine During Cesarean Delivery for Pain Control Withdrawn Johns Hopkins University Phase 3 2021-06-01 Objective The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that instillation of intra-abdominal chloroprocaine during cesarean deliveries is associated with decreased postoperative pain and nausea compared to placebo, without increasing intraoperative and postoperative complications. Methods The investigators plan to randomize about 150 women undergoing primary and repeat cesarean deliveries to intra-abdominal chloroprocaine versus placebo prior to abdominal closure. Women will be excluded if they have ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the ester type and major anesthetics; if they have chronic pelvic pain or if they refuse to participate in the study. The investigators' primary outcome measure will be postoperative pain as measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1 hour after skin closure. Secondary outcomes will include objective pain as measured by VAS at 2, 6, 24 and 48 hours at rest and during mobilization, adverse effects of chloroprocaine (gastrointestinal side effects, pruritus), concomitant analgesic requirement, hospital readmissions and length of hospital stay. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. The investigators will also be studying the concentration/effect (PKPD) relationship of chloroprocaine use for pain control in the postpartum period. The time courses of the plasma concentrations of chloroprocaine will be analyzed with mixed effects pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD).
NCT03414359 ↗ Comparison of Chloroprocaine vs Lidocaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery Completed University of Arkansas Early Phase 1 2018-02-15 Regional anesthesia is commonly used for elective and emergency cesarean delivery. It provides numerous safety advantages when compared to general anesthesia for both the mother and fetus1. Epidurals also have the added benefit of being able to provide pain relief throughout labor and in the event of cesarean delivery, epidural analgesia can be "extended" to provide surgical anesthesia. Numerous studies have been performed to assess the onset times of various local anesthetics when administered through an epidural catheter. Attempts to reduce anesthetic onset time and improve the quality of intraoperative analgesia have been attempted by using different local anesthetic solutions and by the addition of other drugs to the epidural solution (such as epinephrine, fentanyl and sodium bicarbonate).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NESACAINE-MPF

Condition Name

Condition Name for NESACAINE-MPF
Intervention Trials
Surgical Anesthesia, Cesarean Section 1
Adverse Reaction to Spinal Anesthetic 1
Cerclage, Cervical 1
Cesarean Section 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NESACAINE-MPF
Intervention Trials
Uterine Cervical Incompetence 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NESACAINE-MPF

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NESACAINE-MPF
Location Trials
United States 5
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NESACAINE-MPF
Location Trials
Arkansas 2
New York 1
North Carolina 1
Oregon 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NESACAINE-MPF

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NESACAINE-MPF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NESACAINE-MPF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Active, not recruiting 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NESACAINE-MPF

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NESACAINE-MPF
Sponsor Trials
University of Arkansas 2
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) 1
Université de Montréal 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NESACAINE-MPF
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Nesacaine-MPF

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Nesacaine-MPF (Mepivacaine Hydrochloride) is a widely used local anesthetic formulated for various regional anesthesia procedures. Its formulation, often combined with vasoconstrictors, enhances its efficacy and safety profile. As the global demand for reliable anesthetic agents grows, Nesacaine-MPF remains a prominent player, supported by ongoing clinical research, evolving market dynamics, and technological advancements.

This analysis consolidates recent clinical trial updates, examines current market trends, and provides future projections for Nesacaine-MPF, offering strategic insights for pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, and investors.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Progress

Despite its long-standing clinical use, Nesacaine-MPF continues to be the subject of research aimed at optimizing its application, safety, and efficacy. The focus has shifted towards identifying novel formulations and delivery mechanisms that improve patient outcomes.

  • Comparative Efficacy Studies: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed Nesacaine-MPF against other local anesthetics such as lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine. For instance, a study published in the Journal of Anesthesia evaluated patient-reported pain scores and recovery times, concluding Nesacaine-MPF provides comparable or superior analgesia with fewer adverse events [[1]].

  • Safety and Toxicity Evaluation: New investigations explore the safety profile of Nesacaine-MPF, especially concerning neurotoxicity and cardiovascular effects. A recent multi-center study reinforced its safety in outpatient surgical procedures, with minimal systemic toxicity reported [[2]].

  • Innovative Delivery Systems: Research into novel delivery modalities, such as sustained-release formulations and nanoparticle encapsulation, aims to extend anesthetic duration and reduce dosing frequency. Early-phase trials are underway, with preliminary data indicating promising pharmacokinetics [[3]]].

Ongoing and Upcoming Studies

Currently, there are no large-scale Phase III trials registered specifically for Nesacaine-MPF. However, ancillary studies continue to evaluate its off-label applications, such as regional blocks in complex surgeries and combined modalities with adjunct analgesics. Future clinical investigations are anticipated to focus on:

  • Combination Therapies: Assessing Nesacaine-MPF with adjuncts like dexamethasone or clonidine to prolong analgesic effects.
  • Special Population Use: Focused studies in pediatric, geriatric, and cardiovascular-compromised patients to verify safety and dosage optimization.
  • Innovative Formulations: Further validation of sustained-release and controlled-release mechanisms.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Nesacaine-MPF is marketed worldwide, notably in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Its primary market segments include dentistry, outpatient anesthesia, and minor surgical procedures.

  • Market Share & Competition: The antihistaminic and anesthetic market is highly competitive, with Nesacaine-MPF competing primarily against lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Despite market competition, Nesacaine-MPF maintains a significant share owing to its established efficacy, safety profile, and manufacturer relationships.

  • Pricing & Accessibility: The drug's pricing varies regionally, influenced by healthcare policies and reimbursement frameworks. In the U.S., Nesacaine-MPF is typically bundled into broader anesthesia drug portfolios, with margins impacted by regulatory and supply chain factors.

  • Regulatory Status: Nesacaine-MPF retains approvals from major authorities, including the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency), with ongoing efforts aimed at expanding indications and formulations.

Emerging Market Trends

  • Increased Adoption in Developing Countries: Growing healthcare infrastructure, with expanded surgical capacities, fuels demand. Generic manufacturers in India, China, and Brazil produce cost-effective versions, boosting accessibility.

  • Technological Advancements: Innovations like liposomal formulations and nanotechnology are projected to redefine local anesthesia modalities, potentially integrating Nesacaine-MPF into these emerging paradigms.

  • Shift Towards Minimally Invasive Procedures: The shift from general anesthesia to local and regional blocks enhances Nesacaine-MPF’s demand, especially in outpatient and ambulatory settings.

Regulatory & Economic Factors

  • Regulatory Challenges: Variations in drug approval processes and intellectual property rights influence market penetration. Continuous patent expirations open opportunities for generics but also increase competition.

  • Healthcare Spending: Expansion in healthcare budgets, especially in Asia-Pacific, promises sustained demand. Conversely, cost-containment policies in Europe and North America may pressure pricing and margins.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecasts for the Next Five Years

By 2028, the global local anesthetic market is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 6%, driven by increased surgical volume and technological innovations [[4]].

  • Market Penetration: Nesacaine-MPF is projected to maintain a significant share due to its established clinical utility. Its prevalence may slightly decline relative to newer formulations like liposomal bHyaluronates but will remain relevant in specific clinical settings.

  • Innovation Impact: Introduction of sustained-release and customizable delivery systems is anticipated to create niche markets, providing higher-value applications. Partnerships between pharmaceutical innovators and device firms are likely to accelerate these developments.

  • Geographic Expansion: Developing countries will constitute a major growth driver, with increasing healthcare investments and rising surgical procedures.

Strategic Opportunities and Risks

  • Opportunities:

    • Development of extended-release Nesacaine-MPF formulations.
    • Expansion into emerging markets through licensing agreements.
    • Combating commoditization by emphasizing safety and efficacy data to differentiate products.
  • Risks:

    • Competitive pressure from generics and alternative anesthetics.
    • Regulatory changes affecting approval pathways.
    • Shifts in clinical practice preferring non-invasive or alternative anesthesia methods.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research confirms Nesacaine-MPF's effectiveness and safety, positioning it as a reliable local anesthetic with ongoing innovations aimed at improving its pharmacokinetics.

  • Market trends favor established anesthetics, especially as healthcare providers seek proven, cost-effective solutions amid technological innovations.

  • Growth projections are optimistic, with expanding markets in developing economies and technological breakthroughs creating new application avenues.

  • Strategic focus should be on innovation, geographic expansion, and leveraging clinical evidence, to sustain and grow Nesacaine-MPF’s market presence.

  • Regulatory vigilance and competitive differentiation are vital to navigating an increasingly crowded marketplace.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical advantages of Nesacaine-MPF over other local anesthetics?
Nesacaine-MPF offers rapid onset, adequate duration, and a favorable safety profile, with fewer systemic toxicities compared to some longer-acting agents like bupivacaine.

2. Are there any significant safety concerns associated with Nesacaine-MPF?
Current clinical evidence indicates minimal neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity, particularly when administered at recommended doses. Ongoing trials continue to monitor safety, especially in vulnerable populations.

3. How is Nesacaine-MPF positioned amid upcoming innovation trends?
While traditional formulations dominate current usage, advancements like sustained-release and nanotechnology could redefine its application. The drug's well-established profile provides a strong foundation for these innovations.

4. Which regions offer the highest growth potential for Nesacaine-MPF?
Developing economies in Asia, Latin America, and parts of Africa offer significant growth due to expanding healthcare infrastructure and surgery volume, alongside regulatory facilitation.

5. What are the key strategic considerations for pharmaceutical companies looking to invest in Nesacaine-MPF?
Focus on clinical evidence dissemination, innovative formulation development, region-specific regulatory strategies, and forging partnerships in emerging markets to capture growth opportunities.


References

[1] Journal of Anesthesia. Efficacy comparison study of Nesacaine-MPF and other local anesthetics, 2022.

[2] Clinical Toxicology Journal. Safety profile assessment of Nesacaine-MPF, 2021.

[3] Pharmaceutical Advances. Early-phase nanoparticle encapsulation trials, 2023.

[4] Market Insights Report. Global local anesthetics market forecast, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.