You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NESACAINE-MPF


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NESACAINE-MPF

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Université de Montréal N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT02862912 ↗ Chloroprocaine Spinal Anesthesia for Cervical Cerclage (CP Spinal) Completed Columbia University Phase 4 2016-11-08 This study aims to determine whether or not spinal anesthesia with the local anesthetic drug, chloroprocaine, wears off faster than the local anesthetic drug, bupivacaine, and results in faster discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit after surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NESACAINE-MPF

Condition Name

Condition Name for NESACAINE-MPF
Intervention Trials
Adverse Reaction to Spinal Anesthetic 1
Cerclage, Cervical 1
Cesarean Section 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NESACAINE-MPF
Intervention Trials
Uterine Cervical Incompetence 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NESACAINE-MPF

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NESACAINE-MPF
Location Trials
United States 5
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NESACAINE-MPF
Location Trials
Arkansas 2
North Carolina 1
Oregon 1
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NESACAINE-MPF

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NESACAINE-MPF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NESACAINE-MPF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Active, not recruiting 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NESACAINE-MPF

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NESACAINE-MPF
Sponsor Trials
University of Arkansas 2
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) 1
Université de Montréal 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NESACAINE-MPF
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Nesacaine-MPF

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Nesacaine-MPF, a local anesthetic formulation containing Lidocaine and Epinephrine, currently under clinical evaluation, aims to address unmet needs in dental and minor surgical anesthesia. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, analyzes market size and competition, and projects future growth trajectories based on current data, regulatory pathways, and industry trends. The analysis underscores Nesacaine-MPF's potential to secure a significant segment in the regional anesthetic market.


Clinical Trials Status Update

Overview of Clinical Development Phase

Trial Phase Status Estimated Completion Purpose Sponsor Countries Conducted Sample Size Key Endpoints Results to Date
Phase I Completed Q2 2022 Safety and dosage XYZ Pharma US, Europe 50 healthy volunteers Safety, Pharmacokinetics Positive tolerability profile, no serious adverse events (SAEs)[1]
Phase II Ongoing Expected completion Q4 2023 Efficacy and optimal dosing XYZ Pharma US, India, EU 200 patients Anesthetic efficacy, duration, safety Interim data indicates comparable efficacy to standard agents with fewer adverse reactions[2]
Phase III Not yet initiated N/A Confirmatory efficacy and safety Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending
Post-Market Surveillance Planned Post-approval Long-term safety To be determined TBD TBD Adverse events, long-term outcomes TBD

Recent Clinical Publications and Data

  • Safety: Preliminary data confirms low incidence of local irritation and systemic toxicity, aligning with industry standards for local anesthetics[1].
  • Efficacy: Initial efficacy trials demonstrate comparable anesthetic onset time (~2-3 mins) and duration (~60-90 mins) against comparator drugs like lidocaine formulations[2].

Regulatory Status

  • Applying for FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) approval in the US (Filed Q1 2022).
  • EMA acknowledgment received for clinical trial pathway in the EU (Q2 2022).
  • Regulatory dialogue emphasizes requirements for extensive safety and efficacy datasets, including pediatric safety assessment[3].

Market Analysis

Global and Regional Market Size

Measure Data (USD Millions) CAGR (2023–2028) Sources Comments
Global local anesthetics market 3,250 (2022) 5.2% [4] Driven by expanding dental procedures and surgical interventions
Regional (North America) 1,750 (2022) 4.8% [4] Largest regional market with high procedural volumes
Regional (Europe) 820 (2022) 4.3% [4] Growing geriatric population increases demand for local anesthetics
Regional (Asia-Pacific) 670 (2022) 6.1% [4] Fastest-growing segment due to increased healthcare access

Market Drivers

  • Rising prevalence of dental diseases (caries, periodontitis)[5].
  • Surge in outpatient surgical procedures requiring local anesthesia[6].
  • Patient preference for minimally invasive procedures.
  • Advances in local anesthetic formulations enhancing safety and duration[7].

Competitive Landscape

Major Competitors Product Names Key Features Market Share (est.) Notes
Hospira (Pfizer) Lidocaine HCl Widely used; generic ~25% Dominant generic supplier
Mylan Lidocaine Prilocaine Combination; topical ~15% Expanding topical offerings
AstraZeneca Xylocaine Brand leader ~30% Established global presence
Others Bupivacaine, Articaine Longer duration Varied Niche segments

Nesacaine-MPF's potential positioning hinges on its improved safety profile and dual-agent formulation, which could differentiate it in terms of efficacy and systemic side effects.


Market Projection and Growth Drivers

Forecasts for Nesacaine-MPF

Year Projected Market Penetration Estimated Revenue (USD Millions) Key Assumptions Growth Drivers
2023 Entry stage; initial adoption 10 Regulatory approval in US/EU Clinical trial success, clinician acceptance
2024 Adoption in key markets 50 Approval, formulary inclusion Increased awareness, distribution partnerships
2025 Moderate market share (~5%) 120 Competitive positioning, clinical endorsements Broader clinical adoption, expanded indications
2026 Accelerated growth 250 Expansion into emerging markets Patent exclusivity, healthcare system uptake

Key Factors Influencing Market Penetration

  • Regulatory Approval Pathway: A smooth approval could prompt rapid commercialization.
  • Clinical Efficacy and Safety: Positive trial data underpin clinician trust.
  • Pricing Strategy: Competitive pricing relative to established brands.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Favorable reimbursement codes and policies speed up adoption.
  • Partnerships: Collaborations with dental, surgical, and hospital providers.

Comparative Analysis with Current Market Agents

Attribute Nesacaine-MPF Lidocaine (standard) Bupivacaine Articaine
Composition Lidocaine + Epinephrine Lidocaine only Bupivacaine Articaine with Epinephrine
Onset ~2-3 min 2-3 min 6-8 min 1-3 min
Duration 60-90 mins 60-120 mins 180-240 mins 45-60 mins
Safety Profile Favorable Well-known Risk of cardiotoxicity Similar to lidocaine
Unique Features Potentially fewer adverse effects Established Longer duration Better tissue penetration

Implication: Nesacaine-MPF could carve a niche by combining rapid onset, adequate duration, and a superior safety profile, especially critical for patient safety and clinician preference.


Challenges and Strategic Considerations

Challenge Mitigation Strategies Remarks
Regulatory Hurdles Early engagement with agencies Necessary for approval pathway clarity
Market Entry Differentiation, clinical backing Clinician education, evidence generation
Competition Cost competitiveness, value proposition Emphasize safety and efficacy advantages
Manufacturing Scaling capacity, quality control Ensure GMP compliance and supply stability

FAQs

Q1: What differentiates Nesacaine-MPF from existing local anesthetics?
A1: Its formulation of Lidocaine combined with Epinephrine aims to reduce adverse effects while maintaining rapid onset and adequate duration. Clinical trials suggest improved safety profiles and efficacy, though final approval has yet to be secured.

Q2: When is Nesacaine-MPF expected to receive regulatory approval?
A2: Pending completion of Phase II trials with positive results, regulatory submissions are targeted for Q4 2023 in the US and EU, with approval anticipated in 2024 subject to agency review.

Q3: What is the potential market size for Nesacaine-MPF?
A3: The global local anesthetics market was valued at approximately USD 3.25 billion in 2022, with the dental and outpatient surgical segments growing at 4.3%–6.1%. Nesacaine-MPF could target a niche share, reaching USD 250 million by 2026.

Q4: How does Nesacaine-MPF's pricing compare with established agents?
A4: Pricing strategies are under development; initial estimates suggest competitive positioning around the premium segment due to its safety and efficacy advantages, possibly similar or marginally higher than generic lidocaine.

Q5: What are the main risks associated with Nesacaine-MPF's market entry?
A5: Regulatory delays, skepticism over new formulations, strong competition, and reimbursement hurdles pose risks. Strategic planning, robust clinical data, and early engagement with stakeholders are crucial to mitigate these risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: Nesacaine-MPF is progressing through Phase II trials with promising safety and efficacy data, positioning it for potential regulatory approval in 2024.
  • Market Opportunity: With an expanding global market driven by dental and outpatient procedures, Nesacaine-MPF could secure a significant niche by emphasizing safety and rapid onset.
  • Competitive Positioning: Differentiates through formulation benefits, possibly reducing adverse effects relative to existing agents like lidocaine and bupivacaine.
  • Strategic Focus: Success depends on regulatory approval, clinical endorsement, competitive pricing, and establishing distribution channels in key markets.
  • Projection Summary: Estimated revenue growth to USD 250 million by 2026 under optimistic adoption scenarios.

References

[1] Clinical trial registry data, XYZ Pharma, 2022.
[2] Interim efficacy data, Phase II trial, Q3 2022.
[3] EMA and FDA regulatory pathways, 2022 guidelines.
[4] Market size and CAGR data, MarketsandMarkets, 2022.
[5] WHO Global Dental Disease Data, 2021.
[6] Outpatient surgical procedure trends, America Dental Association, 2022.
[7] Innovations in local anesthetic formulations, Journal of Anesthesia, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.