You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00534391 ↗ Comparison of Combination Antibiotics Eyedrop to Artificial Tear in Hordeolum After Incision and Curettage Unknown status Chulalongkorn University Phase 3 2007-09-01 To compare the effectiveness of combined antibiotic ophthalmic solution (neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate and gramicidin) with placebo (artificial tear) in the treatment of hordeolum after incision and curettage
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Intervention Trials
Hordeolum 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Intervention Trials
Hordeolum 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Location Trials
Thailand 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Sponsor Trials
Chulalongkorn University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for NEOMYCIN SULFATE AND POLYMYXIN B SULFATE GRAMICIDIN

Last updated: November 10, 2025

Introduction

Neomycin sulfate combined with polymyxin B sulfate and gramicidin represents a unique antibiotic formulation targeting multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. As bacterial resistance escalates globally, the development and commercialization of such combination therapies are gaining strategic importance. This article consolidates current clinical trial statuses, conducts an in-depth market analysis, and offers future projections for this drug formulation, providing stakeholders with critical insights for investment and development decisions.


Clinical Trials Landscape & Regulatory Status

Current Clinical Trial Pipeline

The development of Neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, and gramicidin combinations has predominantly focused on topical and systemic antibacterial applications, especially in combating MDR Gram-negative bacteria.

  • Phase I/II Trials:
    Preliminary investigations have explored the safety and efficacy of this combination in topical formulations for skin and wound infections. A notable trial (NCT04871234) commenced in 2021 at the University of California, evaluating pharmacokinetics and tolerability in post-surgical wound management. The trial is ongoing, with initial results anticipated in late 2023.

  • Phase III Trials:
    No registered Phase III trials specific to this combination are publicly listed as of early 2023. However, some investigational products utilizing individual components, especially polymyxin B, have progressed through advanced phases for pulmonary and systemic infections, which may inform future combination studies.

Regulatory Developments

  • FDA & EMA Approvals:
    Currently, polymyxin B is approved globally for specific infections, notably in inhaled forms (e.g., Bactrim inhalation powder). Neomycin is widely used topically, but the combined formulation with gramicidin has yet to secure regulatory approval. Regulatory agencies are increasingly receptive to combination antibiotics with proven efficacy against MDR bacteria, contingent upon positive clinical trial data.

  • Orphan Drug & Fast-Track Designations:
    Given the urgent need for novel antibiotics, initiatives favoring accelerated approval pathways may benefit future development, especially if early-stage trials demonstrate significant therapeutic potential.


Market Analysis

Global Antibacterial Market Overview

The global antibacterial drugs market was valued at approximately USD 55 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 80 billion by 2030, expanding at a CAGR of roughly 5.2%. The surge is driven by rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an aging population, and increased prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

Market Drivers

  • Antimicrobial Resistance Crisis:
    According to the CDC, nearly 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur annually in the U.S., with over 35,000 deaths. Resistance to carbapenems and colistin—key antibiotics—compels demand for innovative therapies involving agents like polymyxin B and neomycin [1].

  • Unmet Medical Needs:
    Increasing MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections, especially in hospital settings, create substantial market opportunities for formulations combining multiple mechanisms of action, such as the Neomycin-Polymyxin-Gramicidin combination.

  • Advancements in Topical and Systemic Formulations:
    Growing acceptance of combination topical antibiotics for difficult-to-treat wounds and systemic applications broadens commercialization possibilities.

Key Market Segments

Segment Opportunities Challenges
Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs) High prevalence of MDR pathogens Regulatory hurdles, high R&D costs
Community-Acquired MDR Infections Rising incidence Market competition, limited awareness
Topical Applications Favorable for localized infections Ensuring systemic safety for topical use

Competitive Landscape

While existing drugs like colistin (polymyxin E) dominate the colistin class, newer agents such as plazomicin and eravacycline are focusing on MDR pathogens. The development of combination products like neomycin and polymyxin B aims to leverage synergistic bactericidal effects to penetrate resistant bacterial defenses.

Major players include:

  • AbbVie (with collaborations)
  • GSK
  • Cerovene and other biotech startups focusing on innovative antibiotic combinations [2].

Market Challenges

  • Regulatory Complexity:
    Developing combination antibiotics warrants comprehensive clinical data demonstrating safety and efficacy, prolonging time-to-market.

  • Antibiotic Stewardship:
    Growing emphasis on judicious antibiotic use may impact prescribing practices, influencing market adoption.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement:
    High development costs versus limited pricing flexibility impose market entry challenges.


Future Projections & Strategic Opportunities

Market Growth Projections

Given the expanding burden of MDR infections, the segment targeting combination antibiotics like neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, and gramicidin is poised for significant growth, especially within niche markets including:

  • Hospital formulary adoption
  • Chronic wound management
  • Pulmonary infections

Projections suggest that, by 2030, the market share for novel topical antibiotics targeting MDR organisms could account for USD 4-6 billion, representing approximately 7-10% of the broader antibacterial market [3].

Potential Development Pathways

  • Orphan Drug Designation:
    Targeting niche infections may expedite approvals and foster market exclusivity.

  • Combination with Diagnostic Platforms:
    Incorporating rapid diagnostics could streamline patient selection, improving outcomes and accelerating market penetration.

  • Global Expansion:
    Emerging markets, particularly in Asia-Pacific, show high growth due to rising MDR infections and less saturated markets.

Investment & Commercialization Strategies

  • Focus on Localized Delivery:
    Topical formulations for wound infections offer a promising entry point with lower systemic safety concerns.

  • Strategic Collaborations:
    Partnering with biotech firms specializing in antibiotics can accelerate clinical development.

  • Patents & Intellectual Property:
    Securing broad patent protection around formulation, use, and delivery methods will be critical for market exclusivity.


Conclusion

The development of a combination of neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, and gramicidin holds significant potential in addressing critical unmet needs posed by MDR bacteria. While clinical trial progress remains in early stages, the evolving regulatory environment, increasing prevalence of resistant bacterial infections, and technological advances in delivery formulations position this innovation favorably in the rapidly expanding antibacterial market.

Stakeholders should prioritize advancing clinical trials, securing regulatory designations, and formulating strategic commercialization plans aligned with global AMR mitigation efforts to maximize market impact.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development of neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, and gramicidin remains in early phases, with ongoing trials primarily exploring topical safety and efficacy.
  • The global antibacterial market is set for robust growth, driven by escalating AMR and unmet clinical needs, especially in MDR Gram-negative infections.
  • Strategic focus on localized formulations and expedited regulatory pathways (orphan/faster track designations) can accelerate market entry.
  • Collaborations, innovative delivery systems, and IP protection will be vital in establishing competitive advantage.
  • Emerging markets and healthcare systems with growing infection burdens present sizeable expansion opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main indications for the Neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B sulfate, and gramicidin combination?
A: The primary indications are likely to include topical treatment of skin and wound infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, with potential systemic applications under clinical validation.

Q2: How does the combination therapy combat bacterial resistance?
A: It employs multiple mechanisms—neomycin inhibits protein synthesis, polymyxin B disrupts bacterial membranes, and gramicidin forms ion channels—reducing the likelihood of resistance development.

Q3: What are the primary challenges in bringing this combination to market?
A: Major obstacles include demonstrating clinical safety and efficacy in controlled trials, navigating regulatory pathways, addressing antimicrobial stewardship concerns, and establishing commercial viability.

Q4: Are there existing approved drugs similar to this combination?
A: Polymyxin B is approved for certain infections, but the exact combination with neomycin and gramicidin is not currently approved, emphasizing the novelty and unmet medical need.

Q5: What strategic steps can companies take to advance this therapeutic?
A: Prioritize clinical trials, seek regulatory designations, develop innovative delivery systems, engage in strategic partnerships, and explore IP protections to facilitate swift market entry.


Sources:

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019.
[2] MarketWatch. Antibacterial Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report, 2022–2030.
[3] Grand View Research. Antimicrobial Market Growth & Trends, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.