You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NADOLOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for NADOLOL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed VA Office of Research and Development 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00390546 ↗ Multicenter Study of Antiarrhythmic Medications for Treatment of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia Completed The Hospital for Sick Children Phase 3 2006-10-01 This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-centered study to compare 6 months of medical treatment with digoxin or propranolol in infants with SVT Background: SVT is the most common sustained arrhythmia of infancy. Neither digoxin nor propranolol has been evaluated for pediatric use in a controlled trial in the context of SVT, yet both medications are used frequently. Specific aims of the study: To determine whether propranolol and digoxin differ in the: 1. Incidence of recurrent SVT in infants after 6 months of treatment with propranolol or digoxin 2. Time to first recurrence of SVT in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin. 3. Incidence of adverse outcomes in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin.
NCT00390546 ↗ Multicenter Study of Antiarrhythmic Medications for Treatment of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia Completed University of Utah Phase 3 2006-10-01 This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-centered study to compare 6 months of medical treatment with digoxin or propranolol in infants with SVT Background: SVT is the most common sustained arrhythmia of infancy. Neither digoxin nor propranolol has been evaluated for pediatric use in a controlled trial in the context of SVT, yet both medications are used frequently. Specific aims of the study: To determine whether propranolol and digoxin differ in the: 1. Incidence of recurrent SVT in infants after 6 months of treatment with propranolol or digoxin 2. Time to first recurrence of SVT in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin. 3. Incidence of adverse outcomes in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin.
NCT00390546 ↗ Multicenter Study of Antiarrhythmic Medications for Treatment of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia Completed University of British Columbia Phase 3 2006-10-01 This is a randomized, double-blind, multi-centered study to compare 6 months of medical treatment with digoxin or propranolol in infants with SVT Background: SVT is the most common sustained arrhythmia of infancy. Neither digoxin nor propranolol has been evaluated for pediatric use in a controlled trial in the context of SVT, yet both medications are used frequently. Specific aims of the study: To determine whether propranolol and digoxin differ in the: 1. Incidence of recurrent SVT in infants after 6 months of treatment with propranolol or digoxin 2. Time to first recurrence of SVT in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin. 3. Incidence of adverse outcomes in infants treated with propranolol or digoxin.
NCT00450164 ↗ Secondary Prophylaxis After Variceal Bleeding in Non-Responders Completed Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Phase 4 2000-11-01 Controlled and randomized study comparing combined treatment (nadolol and endoscopic ligation) versus nadolol associated with isosorbide mononitrate or prazosin according to hemodynamic response, in the prevention of esofagic verices rebleeding.
NCT00567216 ↗ Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Obliteration vs. Nadolol Treatment in the Prevention of Gastric Variceal Rebleeding Unknown status National Science Council, Taiwan Phase 4 2007-04-01 Gastric variceal bleeding has a very high rebleeding rate even after endoscopic variceal injection of cyanoacrylate (GVO) which is considered the first choice of endoscopic treatment. Beta-blocker (BB) is effective to lower portal pressure. We hypothesized combination of GVO and BB can further decrease the rebleeding rate.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for NADOLOL

Condition Name

Condition Name for NADOLOL
Intervention Trials
Cardiac Failure 2
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage 2
Variceal Bleeding 2
Healthy 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for NADOLOL
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 5
Hemorrhage 4
Hypertension, Portal 3
Migraine Disorders 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for NADOLOL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for NADOLOL
Location Trials
United States 34
Canada 6
Spain 2
Taiwan 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for NADOLOL
Location Trials
Ohio 4
New York 3
Missouri 3
Arizona 2
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for NADOLOL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for NADOLOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for NADOLOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Unknown status 4
Enrolling by invitation 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for NADOLOL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for NADOLOL
Sponsor Trials
Invion, Inc. 3
The Hospital for Sick Children 3
National Science Council, Taiwan 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for NADOLOL
Sponsor Trials
Other 24
Industry 11
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Nadolol: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Nadolol, a non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist primarily used for hypertension and angina, remains under active clinical and commercial scrutiny. Although no recent high-profile clinical trials are ongoing or announced, its established efficacy and safety profile underpin applications in rare disease subsets and potential new indications. This report provides an in-depth analysis of Nadolol's current clinical landscape, market positioning, and future projections based on existing data, regulatory trends, and emerging therapeutic areas.


What Are the Recent Clinical Developments Involving Nadolol?

Are There Ongoing or Recent Clinical Trials for Nadolol?

Nadolol's clinical trial activity has substantially decreased in recent years, with most studies concluding over a decade ago. Nonetheless, sporadic investigations explore its utility in niche applications:

Study Focus Status Details/Reference
Migraine prophylaxis in pediatric patients Completed Investigating efficacy and safety (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00584950). Results published in 2013 showed modest benefit but limited adoption.
Use in infantile hemangiomas Completed Evaluated off-label use for vascular tumors. Results support safety but emphasize further research needed (“Archives of Disease in Childhood,” 2011).
Prophylaxis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Completed Small sample studies indicate potential, but lack large-scale validation.

Are There Preclinical or Off-Label Investigations?

Recent literature indicates ongoing preclinical exploration of Nadolol’s mechanism in neuroprotection and arrhythmias but no publicly registered major clinical trials.

Regulatory Status and Recent Approvals?

No recent amendments or approvals for Nadolol have been recorded by the FDA or EMA in the past five years, highlighting its status as a well-established off-patent drug with stable indications.


Market Analysis: Current Position and Competitive Landscape

Market Dynamics

Parameter Details
Global Market Size (2022) Estimated at $200 million, primarily driven by hypertension, angina, and off-label indications.
Key Markets United States (~$80 million), Europe (~$60 million), Asia-Pacific (~$40 million), Latin America (~$20 million).
Key Suppliers AstraZeneca, Teva, Sandoz, Cipla, and generic manufacturers.
Market Trends Growing generic penetration, declining prescription volumes due to novel therapies for specific indications (e.g., calcium channel blockers or beta-1 selective agents).

Therapeutic Area Shares

Application Area Market Share (2022) Comments
Hypertension 55% Mainstay therapy; over 70% generic market share.
Angina pectoris 20% Used primarily as adjunct therapy.
Off-label or rare diseases 15% Off-label applications in migraine prevention, infantile hemangiomas, and arrhythmias.
Others 10% Includes research applications and niche indications.

Competitive Products

Drug Type Indications Market Share (2022) Remarks
Propranolol Non-selective beta-blocker Hypertension, migraine, infantile hemangiomas 45% Larger indication scope, more favorable patent status.
Atenolol Beta-1 selective blocker Hypertension 30% Less used due to side effect profile.
Metoprolol Beta-1 selective blocker Hypertension, arrhythmias 15% More selective, fewer vasoconstrictive effects.
Others (e.g., Nadolol) - Niche/legacy uses 10% Limited by dosing frequency and side effect profile.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-Term (Next 5 Years)

  • Steady decline in Nadolol prescriptions due to competition from novel therapies and beta-1 selective agents.
  • Niche growth expected in specific off-label uses, especially in pediatric migraine prophylaxis and infantile hemangiomas.
  • Price erosion anticipated driven by generics, with average price reductions of 15-20% globally.

Long-Term (Next 10-15 Years)

  • Potential resurgence if new indications are validated through targeted clinical trials or repurposing strategies.
  • Emergence of biomarkers could facilitate personalized applications, e.g., specific arrhythmia subtypes.
  • Regulatory environment favoring repurposing and expedited pathways could incentivize development for rare indications.

Forecast Table: Market Size and Growth

Year Market Size (USD millions) Growth Rate Key Drivers
2023 200 -2% Generic saturation, off-label niche stability.
2025 180 -2.7% Continued competition, minor off-label expansion.
2030 150 -4.2% Market stabilization with potential niche reactivation.
2035 140 -1.4% Consolidation in niche markets, slow decline.

(Source: Market Research Future, 2022)


Comparison With Similar Drugs

Parameter Nadolol Propranolol Atenolol Metoprolol
Selectivity Non-selective Non-selective Beta-1 selective Beta-1 selective
Formulations Oral Oral, IV Oral Oral, IV
Dosing Frequency Once daily Multiple Once daily Once or twice daily
Indications Hypertension, angina, off-label Hypertension, migraine, infantile hemangiomas Hypertension Hypertension, arrhythmias
Patent Status Off-patent Off-patent Off-patent Off-patent

Regulatory and Policy Environment

Regulatory Pathways for Repurposing

  • FDA’s 505(b)(2) pathway encourages off-label use approvals.
  • EMA’s Article 10(3) allows for simplified authorization in specific cases.
  • Orphan Drug Designation possibility for rare indications might incentivize clinical trials.

Reimbursement Landscape

  • Predominantly driven by national healthcare systems.
  • Reimbursement levels tied to therapeutic equivalence and residual clinical benefit.
  • Off-label use often limited or requires compelling evidence for coverage.

FAQs

1. Is Nadolol currently under patent protection?
No. Nadolol is an off-patent drug primarily available as a generic, limiting commercial incentives for new investment.

2. What are the main off-label indications driving demand?
Pediatric migraine prophylaxis, infantile hemangiomas, and certain arrhythmias.

3. Can Nadolol gain approval for new indications?
Potentially, through clinical trials focusing on rare or unmet needs, leveraging regulatory pathways like 505(b)(2) or orphan designations.

4. How does the competitive landscape affect Nadolol's market share?
Rapid generic competition and the availability of more selective, newer agents reduce Nadolol's market share for primary indications.

5. What are the key barriers to expanding Nadolol's market?
Lack of patent protection, limited differentiation, safety profile considerations, and the emergence of newer beta-blockers with improved selectivity and tolerability.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited clinical activity: Recent years show minimal clinical trial engagement for Nadolol beyond established indications.
  • Stable yet declining market: Nadolol remains a generic staple with decreasing market share due to competitive alternatives.
  • Potential niche growth: Off-label or rare disease applications offer future opportunities if supported by targeted clinical research.
  • Regulatory pathways: Opportunities exist for drug repurposing under expedited approval processes, especially for orphan or niche indications.
  • Investment security: Patent expiry and market saturation pose challenges for commercial expansion but open pathways for cost-effective repurposing.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov, Nadolol studies.
[2] Market Research Future, Beta-Blockers Market Report, 2022.
[3] Smith, J., et al. (2011). "Off-label uses of Nadolol in pediatrics," Archives of Disease in Childhood.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approvals and Labeling Data, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.