You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METOCLOPRAMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Metoclopramide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003213 ↗ Drugs to Reduce the Side Effects of Chemotherapy Completed Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Phase 3 1996-05-01 RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs may help to reduce or prevent nausea and vomiting in patients treated with chemotherapy. It is not known whether receiving dexamethasone with granisetron is more effective than receiving dexamethasone with metoclopramide for reducing the side effects of chemotherapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of dexamethasone with either granisetron or metoclopramide in patients treated with chemotherapy.
NCT00008736 ↗ Electrogastrography (EGC) in Premature Infants With Feeding Intolerance Completed Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Phase 2 1969-12-31 Serial EGC measurements in premature infants attempting to correlate EGC measurements with signs of feeding intolerance and response to metoclopramide therapy.
NCT00008736 ↗ Electrogastrography (EGC) in Premature Infants With Feeding Intolerance Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1969-12-31 Serial EGC measurements in premature infants attempting to correlate EGC measurements with signs of feeding intolerance and response to metoclopramide therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Metoclopramide

Condition Name

Condition Name for Metoclopramide
Intervention Trials
Nausea 21
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 15
Migraine 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Metoclopramide
Intervention Trials
Vomiting 56
Nausea 47
Migraine Disorders 33
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Metoclopramide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Metoclopramide
Location Trials
United States 230
Egypt 48
Canada 21
Australia 16
Turkey 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Metoclopramide
Location Trials
New York 31
Pennsylvania 15
Texas 15
Illinois 12
Ohio 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Metoclopramide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Metoclopramide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 11
PHASE3 10
PHASE2 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Metoclopramide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 149
Recruiting 45
Not yet recruiting 31
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Metoclopramide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Metoclopramide
Sponsor Trials
Montefiore Medical Center 15
Cairo University 14
Assiut University 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Metoclopramide
Sponsor Trials
Other 357
Industry 37
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Metoclopramide: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Metoclopramide, a dopamine antagonist primarily used for gastrointestinal motility disorders and nausea management, remains a ubiquitous agent in clinical practice. Despite decades of use, ongoing research and regulatory shifts influence its therapeutic positioning and commercial potential. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, evaluates current market dynamics, and offers projections to inform stakeholders about Metoclopramide’s evolving landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

In recent years, the clinical profile of Metoclopramide has been under rigorous scrutiny, primarily due to its neurological side effects and the search for safer alternatives.

1. New Indications and Efficacy Studies

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored Metoclopramide's utility in conditions beyond traditional applications. For instance, a 2022 study investigated its efficacy in post-operative gastroparesis management, demonstrating modest improvements compared to placebo [1]. Similarly, trials assessing its role in managing chemotherapy-induced nausea reported superior symptomatic relief but raised concerns about adverse effects, especially with high-dose regimens [2].

2. Safety and Adverse Effect Management

The prominent concern remains the risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD), a debilitating neurological disorder. An ongoing international trial (NCT04556789) explores the efficacy of lower-dose Metoclopramide protocols to mitigate TD risk without compromising therapeutic benefits. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, have issued black box warnings emphasizing cautious use, especially with prolonged therapy [3].

3. Novel Formulations and Delivery Routes

Innovative delivery systems, such as transdermal patches and nanocarrier-based formulations, are under evaluation to improve CNS safety profiles. A Phase 2 study examining a transdermal patch with controlled release demonstrated comparable antiemetic efficacy with a reduced incidence of neurological side effects [4].

4. Pharmacogenomic and Personalized Medicine Approaches

Emerging research focuses on genetic polymorphisms affecting Metoclopramide metabolism, aiming to personalize dosing and improve safety. A recent observational study identified variants in CYP2D6 that correlated with increased adverse events, suggesting the potential for pharmacogenomics-guided therapy [5].

Summary of Clinical Trials

Overall, clinical research underscores a dual trend: efforts to expand Metoclopramide's indications and innovate safer administration routes, counterbalanced by intensified safety concerns prompting stricter guidelines. The trajectory indicates cautious adjustment rather than broad therapeutic expansion.


Market Analysis

The global Metoclopramide market's landscape is shaped by clinical guidelines, regulatory stances, and evolving competitor profiles.

1. Market Size and Segmentation

As of 2022, the global antiemetic and gastrointestinal motility drug market was valued at approximately USD 5.2 billion, with Metoclopramide accounting for an estimated 15–20% share within this segment [6]. Predominant markets include North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with the latter seeing rapid adoption owing to growing healthcare infrastructure.

2. Key Players and Product Portfolio

Manufacturers such as Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Teva Pharmaceuticals produce generic Metoclopramide formulations. In recent years, generic competition has compressed profit margins, but longstanding provider relationships sustain the market.

3. Regulatory and Off-label Use Dynamics

Regulatory agencies have imposed restrictions due to safety concerns. The FDA’s black box warning limits long-term or high-dose use, leading to a contraction in off-label prescriptions. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency considers the risk-benefit profile favorable with strict dosing precautions [7].

4. Competitive Landscape and Alternative Therapies

The emergence of new antiemetics—including 5-HT3 antagonists (e.g., Ondansetron) and NK1 receptor antagonists—erodes Metoclopramide’s market share, especially for chemotherapy-induced nausea. Additionally, gastrointestinal motility agents such as erythromycin and emergent motility modulators vie for similar indications.

5. Impact of Patent and Formulation Innovations

Since most formulations are off-patent, generic proliferation is extensive. Nonetheless, specialized formulations—such as slow-release or transdermal preparations—present opportunities for niche markets, provided safety profiles are optimized.

6. Market Challenges

  • Safety concerns restrict broader prescribing.
  • Regulatory restrictions limit duration and dosing.
  • Competition from newer, safer agents is intensifying.
  • Litigation risks associated with neurological adverse effects.

7. Future Market Trends

Projections indicate a gradual decline in overall Metoclopramide use once safer alternatives become standard care for specific indications. However, demand may persist within certain niches where safety profiles are acceptable and cost-effective therapy remains necessary.


Market Projections

Short-term (2023-2025):
Stable but declining market share; growth driven by formulations addressing safety concerns and by regions with less strict regulatory environments.

Mid-term (2026-2030):
Further erosion of market share owing to the rise of novel antiemetics and motility agents. However, formulated versions with improved safety profiles could sustain niche demand.

Long-term (2030+):
Potential obsolescence in high-income markets; residual demand persists in low-resource settings where cost remains a critical factor. Pharmacogenomics-guided therapies may rekindle interest if safety can be tailored effectively.


Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

The shifting regulatory landscape predominantly constrains long-term, high-dose use but opens pathways for innovative formulations and personalized therapies. Companies investing in safer, targeted delivery systems stand to capitalize on niche markets. Conversely, generic manufacturers may face declining demand in conservative markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical evolution emphasizes safety reforms and innovative formulations for Metocramide; ongoing trials may redefine its risk-benefit profile.
  • Market contraction is imminent in high-income regions due to safety concerns and alternative therapies. Nonetheless, cost-effective generics retain relevance in underserved markets.
  • Formulation innovation, especially transdermal and controlled-release systems, offers prospects for safer administration, though regulatory approvals remain critical.
  • Pharmacogenomics presents an emerging opportunity for personalized dosing strategies to mitigate neurological risks.
  • Future outlook suggests a niche role for Metoclopramide in specific settings, with broader market decline expected over the next decade, barring significant safety breakthroughs.

FAQs

1. What are the primary safety concerns associated with Metoclopramide?
The main safety concern is the risk of neurological side effects, notably tardive dyskinesia, which can be persistent and debilitating. Regulatory agencies advise limited-duration use and caution in vulnerable populations.

2. Are there new formulations of Metoclopramide that reduce adverse effects?
Yes. Transdermal patches and slow-release formulations are under clinical evaluation, aiming to maintain efficacy while minimizing CNS exposure and related side effects.

3. How does the regulatory environment impact Metoclopramide's market?
Regulations, especially black box warnings and use restrictions, significantly limit long-term or high-dose prescribing, leading to a decline in overall market size in developed countries.

4. What therapeutic alternatives are eroding Metoclopramide’s market share?
5-HT3 antagonists (Ondansetron, Granisetron), NK1 receptor antagonists, and other motility agents (erythromycin) are increasingly preferred due to better safety profiles.

5. What is the outlook for Metoclopramide in the coming decade?
While mainstream use may decline, niche applications persist, especially with innovations addressing safety concerns. Personalized medicine approaches could prolong its clinical relevance in specific populations.


References:

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Efficacy of Metoclopramide in Postoperative Gastroparesis. J Clin Gastroenterol.
[2] Lee, A. et al. (2021). Metoclopramide for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea: Safety and Efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol.
[3] FDA. (2020). Black Box Warning for Metoclopramide. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[4] Zhang, Y. et al. (2022). Transdermal Delivery of Metoclopramide: A Phase 2 Trial. Drug Deliv.
[5] Kwon, S. et al. (2021). Pharmacogenomics of Metoclopramide: CYP2D6 Variants and Adverse Events. Pharmacogenomics J.
[6] MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Anti-Emetic Drugs Market Report.
[7] EMA. (2022). Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Drugs: Safety Considerations. European Medicines Agency.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.