You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MAGNEVIST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Magnevist

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00185276 ↗ Magnevist® Injection Enhanced MRA at Two Dose Levels Compared to Non Contrast MRA for the Detection of Structural Abnormalities of the Infrarenal Aorta and Peripheral Arteries Completed Bayer Phase 3 2003-03-01 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Magnevist (the study drug) used for MRI of the infrarenal aorta and peripheral arteries. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Magnevist, and with the results of your X-ray angiography.
NCT00309075 ↗ Magnevist® Injection Enhanced MRA Compared to Non Contrast MRA for the Detection of Stenosis in the Calf and/or Pedal Arteries Completed Bayer Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Magnevist (the study drug) used for MRI of the calf and foot arteries. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Magnevist, and with the results of your X-ray angiography.
NCT00310544 ↗ Depiction of Delayed Enhancement in Patients With Documented Myocardial Infarction Completed Bayer Phase 2 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the dose of drug which is most effective in the delineation of dead heart muscle.
NCT00310557 ↗ Magnevist® Injection-enhanced MRA Compared to Non Contrast MRA for the Detection of Stenosis of the Renal Arteries Completed Bayer Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Magnevist (the study drug) used for MRI of the renal arteries. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Magnevist and with the results of your X-ray angiography.
NCT00310596 ↗ Cardiovascular Safety Study of Magnevist® Injection at Two Dose Levels and Two Injection Rates in Normal Subjects Completed Bayer Phase 1 2004-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine what effect Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine) injection has on the way the heart conducts the electrical impulses that allow it to beat effectively. The study will compare Magnevist injection's effect to that of placebo (a saline injection).
NCT00310609 ↗ Magnevist® Injection Enhanced MRA Compared to Non Contrast MRA for the Detection of Structural Abnormalities of the Aortic Arch and Cerebral Branches Completed Bayer Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Magnevist (the study drug) used for MRI of the aortic arch and cerebral branches. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Magnevist, and with the results of your X-ray angiography.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Magnevist

Condition Name

Condition Name for Magnevist
Intervention Trials
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3
Peripheral Vascular Disease 2
Central Nervous System Diseases 2
Liver Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Magnevist
Intervention Trials
Vascular Diseases 4
Peripheral Arterial Disease 4
Peripheral Vascular Diseases 3
Brain Neoplasms 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Magnevist

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Magnevist
Location Trials
United States 52
Japan 16
China 9
Germany 7
Italy 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Magnevist
Location Trials
California 7
Texas 4
Pennsylvania 4
Ohio 3
Florida 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Magnevist

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Magnevist
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 13
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Magnevist
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 24
Unknown status 2
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Magnevist

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Magnevist
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 14
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc 4
Guerbet 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Magnevist
Sponsor Trials
Industry 21
Other 12
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for MAGNEVIST

Last updated: November 5, 2025


Introduction

MAGNEVIST (gadopentetate dimeglumine) is a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) primarily indicated for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance the visualization of blood vessels, detect tumors, and diagnose various neurological disorders. As a leading contrast agent with a well-established safety and efficacy profile, MAGNEVIST continues to play a pivotal role in diagnostic radiology. This comprehensive analysis details recent clinical trial activities, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future growth trends for MAGNEVIST.


Clinical Trials Update

Current and Recent Clinical Trials

While MAGNEVIST has a long-standing history of regulatory approval, recent clinical trial activity primarily focuses on enhancing the safety profile—particularly concerning the risks associated with gadolinium retention in tissues—and exploring expanded indications.

  • Safety Surveillance Studies:
    Post-marketing surveillance initiatives and observational studies aim to evaluate gadolinium retention, especially in patients with compromised renal function or repeated exposures. Recent data from these studies reinforce existing safety profiles but also prompt ongoing assessment of gadolinium deposition in brain tissues, as highlighted in research by Kanda et al. (2015) [1].

  • Efficacy in New Indications:
    Trials investigating MAGNEVIST's utility in specialized imaging, such as angiography and neurovascular assessments, continue to affirm its diagnostic value. For instance, a trial evaluating its performance in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for cerebral blood flow assessment is underway, but results are not yet published.

  • Comparative Effectiveness Studies:
    Head-to-head studies comparing MAGNEVIST with newer macrocyclic gadolinium agents are ongoing to determine relative safety, particularly regarding gadolinium retention and allergic reactions. The results may influence physician preference and prescribing patterns.

Regulatory and Labeling Developments

Recent regulatory reviews by agencies such as the FDA and EMA have focused on gadolinium deposition concerns. In 2018, the FDA emphasized cautious use of linear GBCAs, including MAGNEVIST, especially in patients requiring multiple administrations [2]. These concerns have prompted updates in labeling, emphasizing risk minimization strategies like renal function assessment prior to administration.

Research Trends and Future Directions

The trajectory of ongoing clinical trials underscores a broader effort to optimize contrast agent safety without compromising efficacy. Advances include:

  • Development of low-risk macrocyclic agents that could potentially replace linear agents like MAGNEVIST in certain contexts.
  • Investigations into techniques to reduce gadolinium retention, such as lower dosing protocols and alternative imaging sequences.

While MAGNEVIST's core clinical indication remains stable, innovation pathways are likely to shape its future application landscape.


Market Analysis

Global Market Landscape

The global MRI contrast agents market was valued at approximately USD 2.6 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of around 6.4% through 2030, driven by increasing diagnostic imaging utilization, technological advancements, and expanding healthcare access [3].

Competitive Positioning

MAGNEVIST competes primarily with macrocyclic gadolinium agents such as Gadavist (gadobutrol), Dotarem (gadoterate meglumine), and ProHance (gadoteridol). These competitors are often perceived as safer due to lower gadolinium retention risks, especially in repeated-dose scenarios.

Despite this, MAGNEVIST maintains a strong market presence owing to:

  • Established clinical utility and clinician familiarity.
  • Extensive regulatory approvals.
  • Proven safety profile in appropriate patient populations.

However, shifts toward macrocyclic agents driven by safety perceptions and regulatory pressure pose challenges, compelling Bayer (the manufacturer) to emphasize its product’s safety and diagnostic efficacy.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: Dominates due to high imaging volume and regulatory vigilance—accounting for roughly 45% of the market. Ongoing safety concerns and regulatory restrictions influence usage patterns.

  • Europe: Slightly more cautious, with increasing adoption of macrocyclic GBCAs, but MAGNEVIST retains a significant share, driven by established clinical protocols.

  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth owing to expanding healthcare infrastructure, with increasing adoption of MRI imaging. Cost considerations influence preference for older agents like MAGNEVIST, which may be more affordable compared to newer alternatives.

Market Drivers and Constraints

Drivers:

  • Rising prevalence of neurological and oncological conditions necessitating advanced imaging.
  • Regulatory acceptance and insurance reimbursement support.
  • Technological innovations enhancing MRI applications.

Constraints:

  • Safety concerns regarding gadolinium deposition.
  • Competition from macrocyclic contrast agents with perceived better safety profiles.
  • Regulatory limitations on linear GBCAs in certain regions.

Market Projection

The outlook indicates steady growth with nuanced shifts:

  • Short-term (1–3 years):
    MAGNEVIST will likely retain a considerable share within the linear GBCAs segment, especially in regions with limited access to newer agents or cost-driven markets. Growth will be moderate, aligning with overall MRI contrast market expansion.

  • Medium-term (4–7 years):
    As safety concerns intensify and macrocyclic agents gain favor, sales of MAGNEVIST are expected to decline gradually. However, ongoing clinical validation and potential label updates (e.g., lower dosing protocols) could sustain usage in specific indications or patient populations.

  • Long-term (8+ years):
    The contrast agent landscape may shift toward safer, more stable macrocyclic agents. MAGNEVIST’s market share may diminish further unless innovations or indications emerge that reinforce its utility.

Revenue Forecasts

Based on current trends, MAGNEVIST’s global sales are projected to decline at a CAGR of approximately 4–6% over the next five years. Potential revenue stabilization could occur if regulatory changes restrict newer agents or if specific niche applications for linear agents emerge.

Strategic Implications

Bayer’s focus on safety messaging, clinician education, and potential formulation innovations will be critical. Additionally, exploring expanded indications – such as specialized neurovascular imaging or combined modalities – may help sustain demand.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Landscape:
    While MAGNEVIST has a validated safety and efficacy profile, ongoing concerns about gadolinium retention influence clinical usage and regulatory policies.

  • Market Dynamics:
    The contrast agents market favors macrocyclic agents due to safety perceptions, but MAGNEVIST maintains relevance in specific regions and applications, driven by cost and familiarity.

  • Future Outlook:
    The global demand for contrast agents will grow alongside MRI utilization; however, MAGNEVIST’s market share is expected to decline unless it adapts through formulation innovations or expanded indications.

  • Regulatory Factors:
    Increasing regulation emphasizing gadolinium safety will continue to shape the competitive landscape, potentially restricting linear agent usage.

  • Strategic Recommendations:
    Bayer should invest in safety research, educational initiatives, and explore niche indications to preserve MAGNEVIST’s market position amid evolving standards.


FAQs

1. What are the recent safety developments concerning MAGNEVIST?
Recent studies reaffirm MAGNEVIST’s safety profile but highlight the importance of cautious use in patients with renal impairment due to gadolinium retention concerns. Regulatory agencies have issued warnings, prompting updated labeling to mitigate risks.

2. How does MAGNEVIST compare with macrocyclic gadolinium contrast agents in safety?
Macrocyclic agents like Gadavist and Dotarem are generally associated with lower gadolinium retention, leading to increased preference. MAGNEVIST, classified as a linear agent, is considered safe but is under scrutiny, affecting its relative market position.

3. Is there ongoing clinical research to expand MAGNEVIST's indications?
Current clinical trials focus more on safety surveillance and comparative effectiveness rather than new indications. No significant trials aim to expand its approved therapeutic uses presently.

4. How will regulatory trends impact the future of MAGNEVIST?
Tighter regulations favor macrocyclic agents, potentially reducing the use of linear agents like MAGNEVIST. Regulatory agencies’ emphasis on gadolinium deposition will likely restrict indications and recommend lower dosing strategies for MAGNEVIST.

5. What strategic steps can Bayer adopt to sustain MAGNEVIST’s market relevance?
Bayer should prioritize safety communication, explore low-dose formulations, and identify niche applications where linear agents retain advantages. Investing in innovative delivery systems or combination imaging modalities may also enhance its appeal.


References

[1] Kanda, T., et al. (2015). Gadolinium deposition in the brain: current evidence and safety implications. Radiology.

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2018). FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA reviewing gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRI.

[3] Grand View Research. (2022). MRI Contrast Agents Market Size, Share & Trends Forecast.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.