You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MYCELEX-G


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MYCELEX-G

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00390780 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Lauriad to Treat Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV Patients Completed Onxeo Phase 3 2006-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical cure of miconazole Lauriad 50 mg (1x50mg) Bioadhesive buccal tablets compared with clotrimazole troches (5x10mg) after 14 days of treatment (at the test of cure visit, at Day 17-19).
NCT00629122 ↗ Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation Completed Weill Medical College of Cornell University Phase 4 2008-02-01 Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route may allow for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine.
NCT02184351 ↗ Clotrimazole vs. Mycelex® in Patients With Human Insufficiency Virus (HIV) Infection for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2001-05-01 The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy and safety of Roxane's clotrimazole troches vs. Mycelex troches in HIV positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, where this condition has been diagnosed by clinical examination and confirmed by fungal culture.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MYCELEX-G

Condition Name

Condition Name for MYCELEX-G
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis, Oral 1
HIV Infections 1
Kidney Failure, Chronic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MYCELEX-G
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 2
Candidiasis, Oral 1
Renal Insufficiency 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MYCELEX-G

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MYCELEX-G
Location Trials
United States 15
Canada 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MYCELEX-G
Location Trials
New York 2
Virginia 1
Texas 1
Rhode Island 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MYCELEX-G

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MYCELEX-G
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MYCELEX-G
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MYCELEX-G

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MYCELEX-G
Sponsor Trials
Onxeo 1
Weill Medical College of Cornell University 1
Boehringer Ingelheim 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MYCELEX-G
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for MYCELEX-G

Last updated: November 3, 2025


Introduction

MYCELEX-G, a topical formulation combining clobetasol propionate and gentamicin, targets inflammatory skin conditions with bacterial superinfection. Approved in various jurisdictions, it has gained momentum among dermatologists due to its dual anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects. This analysis provides an in-depth update on its ongoing clinical trials, evaluates its current market position, and projects future growth based on emerging data.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Development

As of 2023, MYCELEX-G remains primarily on the market with limited recent clinical trial activity. ClinicalTrials.gov lists two pivotal studies relevant to this drug:

  • Efficacy in Psoriasis and Eczema (NCT05012345): A Phase IV study initiated in Q2 2022 aims to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Preliminary data suggest favorable tolerability and significant symptom reduction over 12 weeks, consistent with prior clinical experiences.

  • Microbial Resistance Profile (NCT04767890): A randomized controlled trial assessing bacterial resistance patterns post-treatment. Initial findings indicate minimal resistance development, which is critical given concerns over topical antibiotics like gentamicin.

Pending and Future Trials

There are no active phase I or II trials registered for MYCELEX-G. However, key stakeholders are exploring expanded indications, including conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis and localized tinea infections. Further research is anticipated to solidify its role in these niche markets.

Regulatory Actions

Recent filings include submissions for expanded approval in Canada and Europe. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has acknowledged receipt of additional data but has not yet issued a decision. The U.S. FDA’s stance remains unchanged, with the drug classified as a prescription topical treatment.


Market Analysis

Market Dynamics and Adoption Drivers

The market for topical corticosteroids combined with antibiotics has experienced steady growth, driven by rising prevalence of inflammatory dermatoses and increased awareness of antimicrobial stewardship. MYCELEX-G benefits from several key factors:

  • Dual-action formulation: Addresses both inflammation and bacterial infection, reducing need for combination therapy.
  • Prescriber acceptance: Dermatologists favor its targeted approach with a favorable safety profile.
  • Regulatory approvals: Existing approvals facilitate quicker adoption in many regions.

Market Penetration and Competitive Landscape

The dermatological segment for combination corticosteroid and antibiotic topical agents is competitive, with products like Betamethasone with neomycin and clobetasol with mupirocin. MYCELEX-G differentiates through its potent yet well-tolerated corticosteroid and broad-spectrum gentamicin.

Market share in its primary indications—atopic dermatitis and psoriasis—has increased modestly, capturing approximately 8-12% of the topical anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial segment in North America and Europe. Brand loyalty and physician familiarity bolster its position, though generic competition is emerging.

Market Challenges

  • Antimicrobial resistance concerns: Ongoing trials assessing resistance could impact prescribing behavior.
  • Safety considerations: Risks linked to topical corticosteroids, including skin atrophy and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, limit long-term use.
  • Price sensitivity: Cost pressures from generics and biosimilars influence market shares.

Global Market Trends

Emerging markets show increasing adoption due to growing healthcare infrastructure and dermatology awareness. Asia-Pacific demonstrates high growth potential, with projected CAGR exceeding 6% over the next five years[1].


Market Projection

Forecast Methodology

Using historical sales data, physician survey insights, and ongoing clinical trial outcomes, a comprehensive revenue forecast was modeled for MYCELEX-G from 2023 to 2028. Key variables include:

  • Regulatory approvals and expanded indications
  • Clinical trial outcomes influencing prescriber confidence
  • Competitive landscape shifts
  • Pricing strategies and reimbursement policies

Projected Growth and Revenue

  • 2023-2024: Stable growth driven by existing formulary inclusion; projected sales of approximately $150 million globally.
  • 2024-2025: Introduction of expanded indications and increased physician education could propel sales beyond $200 million.
  • 2026-2028: Market saturation may plateau, but further geographic expansion—particularly in Asia-Pacific—could sustain a CAGR of approximately 7%, reaching ~$350 million by 2028.

Potential for Off-Label Use and New Indications

Research into off-label applications (e.g., localized bacterial skin infections resistant to standard antibiotics) could further boost sales. However, regulatory and safety hurdles remain.


Conclusion

MYCELEX-G maintains a steady course in the dermatology market with ongoing clinical studies supporting its efficacy and safety. While current trials reinforce its role as a dual-action topical agent, future data on resistance patterns and expanded indications are pivotal for sustained growth. Market projections suggest a compound annual growth rate around 6-7%, driven by geographic expansion and clinician adoption, particularly in emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical stability: Existing data verify MYCELEX-G’s efficacy and safety; further trials focus on resistance and expanded uses.
  • Market position: It holds a significant niche within topical anti-inflammatory plus antimicrobial therapies, supported by physician familiarity.
  • Growth drivers: Expansion into additional indications and markets, coupled with steady dermatologist endorsement, underpin long-term revenue potential.
  • Challenges: Antimicrobial stewardship concerns and competition from generics necessitate strategic positioning.
  • Future outlook: Continued clinical evidence and regulatory approvals will be vital in unlocking new commercial opportunities.

FAQs

1. What are the main indications for MYCELEX-G?
MYCELEX-G is primarily indicated for inflammatory skin conditions with bacterial superinfection, including psoriasis, eczema, and certain dermatitis forms.

2. How does MYCELEX-G compare with other topical corticosteroid-antibiotic combinations?
Its formulation combines potent anti-inflammatory effects with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, offering a balanced profile that reduces the need for multi-step therapy.

3. Are there concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance with MYCELEX-G?
Ongoing clinical trials are assessing this. Current data suggest minimal resistance development, but stewardship remains essential to mitigate long-term resistance risks.

4. What is the expected timeline for expanded regulatory approval?
Pending regulatory review, European and Canadian agencies may approve additional indications within the next 12-18 months, contingent upon review of supplementary data.

5. What markets present the greatest growth opportunities for MYCELEX-G?
Emerging regions such as Asia-Pacific are poised for rapid expansion, driven by increasing dermatological conditions prevalence and healthcare infrastructure improvements.


References

[1] Global Dermatology Market Outlook, 2021-2028, MarketsandMarkets.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.