Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MYCELEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MYCELEX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00390780 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Lauriad to Treat Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV Patients Completed Onxeo Phase 3 2006-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical cure of miconazole Lauriad 50 mg (1x50mg) Bioadhesive buccal tablets compared with clotrimazole troches (5x10mg) after 14 days of treatment (at the test of cure visit, at Day 17-19).
NCT00629122 ↗ Pharmacokinetics of Sublingual Versus Oral Tacrolimus in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation Completed Weill Medical College of Cornell University Phase 4 2008-02-01 Tacrolimus (Prograf) belongs to a class of medications known as the calcineurin inhibitors. It is a maintenance drug that is used to prevent rejection in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients. Calcineurin inhibitors display high pharmacokinetic (the body's effects on a drug) variability and necessitate use of blood tests to ensure that adequate drug levels are present to maintain effectiveness and safety. Early after transplant or at times when tacrolimus cannot be taken by mouth, alternative routes of administration are sought. Although an intravenous (through the vein) product is available, it can be toxic to the kidneys and has been associated with allergic reactions. Drug delivery via the oral mucosa is an alternative method of systemic drug administration which offers an alternative when oral administration is impractical (gastrointestinal dysmotility, reduced drug absorption, intestinal failure, difficulty in swallowing, or in those with nausea or vomiting). Administration of tacrolimus by the sublingual route may allow for direct entry into the systemic circulation and bypasses problems associated with drug absorption and breakdown that take place in the small intestine.
NCT02184351 ↗ Clotrimazole vs. Mycelex® in Patients With Human Insufficiency Virus (HIV) Infection for the Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2001-05-01 The objectives of this study are to compare the efficacy and safety of Roxane's clotrimazole troches vs. Mycelex troches in HIV positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, where this condition has been diagnosed by clinical examination and confirmed by fungal culture.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MYCELEX

Condition Name

Condition Name for MYCELEX
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 1
Kidney Failure, Chronic 1
Candidiasis, Oral 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MYCELEX
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 2
HIV Infections 1
Candidiasis, Oral 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MYCELEX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MYCELEX
Location Trials
United States 15
Canada 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MYCELEX
Location Trials
New York 2
Michigan 1
Maryland 1
Illinois 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MYCELEX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MYCELEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MYCELEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MYCELEX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MYCELEX
Sponsor Trials
Onxeo 1
Weill Medical College of Cornell University 1
Boehringer Ingelheim 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MYCELEX
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

MYCELEX Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 11, 2026

MYCELEX (clotrimazole) clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection

MYCELEX is a branded clotrimazole antifungal. In the US, it is marketed primarily as an OTC vaginal antifungal (formulations vary by market, including 3-day and 7-day regimens depending on product line). Because MYCELEX is not a new molecular entity and clotrimazole is long-established, the commercial landscape is driven by formulation-specific share, persistent generic competition, channel mix (OTC vs Rx equivalents), and payer/price pressure rather than pipeline-driven clinical differentiation.

What is MYCELEX and which clinical-development activity exists?

MYCELEX is clotrimazole (Imidazole antifungal). Clinical “update” for MYCELEX is largely historical and labeling-based rather than ongoing Phase 2 or Phase 3 registrational work tied to the brand.

Clinical-development reality (brand-linked)

  • No current registrational Phase 3 or Phase 2 trials are identifiable as brand-specific for “MYCELEX” by the brand name in the public trial landscape.
  • Clinical evidence for clotrimazole is primarily anchored in earlier randomized studies comparing topical/vaginal antifungals for vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), including comparisons within the azole class.

Practical implication for R&D

  • Brand strategy is constrained to formulation lifecycle management (pack size, dosing duration, delivery format) and postmarketing label maintenance rather than a new clinical differentiation path.
  • Competitive differentiation typically comes from product economics and user-facing convenience, not new mechanism or trial outcomes.

Key publicly accessible references for clotrimazole in VVC

  • The FDA drug label for clotrimazole products is the primary authoritative source for dosing regimens, indications, and safety language in the US market. For MYCELEX specifically, dosing regimens reflect the product presentation sold OTC (varies by country and formulation).
  • Drug class guidance and standard-of-care comparisons for VVC rely on prior azole evidence, not new MYCELEX trials.

Sources: FDA product label information is the controlling regulatory reference for dosing and indication framing for US clotrimazole antifungal use. [1]


What does the competitive market look like for clotrimazole/VVC OTC?

The VVC market (OTC and Rx) is crowded with azole antifungals and includes clotrimazole, miconazole, tioconazole, butoconazole, and others depending on geography. The commercial baseline is mature, with generic penetration high and promotional intensity recurring around seasonal and consumer behavior cycles.

How is MYCELEX positioned vs other azoles?

In OTC VVC, brand-level survival usually depends on:

  • Regimen length (short-course dosing tends to perform better with consumers)
  • Pharmacy and mass retail execution
  • Promotion and price consistency
  • Shelf-ready differentiation (pack size, applicator type, and dosing-day convenience)

Clotrimazole is one of the most established OTC azoles, which supports availability and trust, but it also enables rapid generic substitution.

Market structure

  • Segment: OTC vulvovaginal candidiasis treatment (fungal infection of the vagina/vulva)
  • Mechanism: azole antifungal (clotrimazole)
  • Competition: azole class generics and branded competitors depending on territory

Sources: The OTC use pattern and clotrimazole labeling basis are reflected in regulatory references and established class practice. [1]


Where does price and volume pressure come from?

For long-running OTC antifungals:

  • Generics compress price and reduce brand margin.
  • SKU rationalization and pack-size changes shift unit economics.
  • Retailer formulary-like behavior (especially for pharmacy chains) increases bargaining power for private label and lowest-cost generics.

Brand-level outcomes for MYCELEX

  • MYCELEX generally competes as a recognizable branded clotrimazole option where consumer preference, counseling behavior (if pharmacist-involved), and retail channel execution influence repeat purchase.

Sources: FDA labeling governs product use and dosing. Market-level economics follow standard OTC generic competition dynamics for mature molecules. [1]


What does the evidence base imply for product performance?

For clotrimazole in VVC, clinical intent is consistent across azoles:

  • Rapid symptom relief and mycologic cure in uncomplicated VVC
  • Use in approved populations and regimens per label

Because MYCELEX is not positioned as a unique clinical advancement in the current era, performance in practice typically tracks:

  • Adherence to regimen length
  • Correct self-selection for uncomplicated candidiasis vs other causes of vaginitis symptoms
  • Time-to-treatment

Sources: FDA label and standard clinical framing of clotrimazole for VVC. [1]


What is the market projection for MYCELEX/clotrimazole through the next 5 years?

A defensible projection for a mature OTC azole brand must be grounded in category maturity and the typical adoption curve of OTC antifungals:

  • Category growth is limited because VVC prevalence is relatively stable and recurrence is patient-specific.
  • Volume growth comes mainly from population and access, plus channel distribution.
  • Value growth depends on pricing actions, SKU mix, and promotion intensity, not on mechanism innovation.

Projection framework (brand-level)

Given that:

  • clotrimazole is established and generic pressure is structural,
  • MYCELEX has no identified brand-linked late-stage pipeline driver,
  • competitive entry and substitution are expected to continue,

the most likely direction is:

  • Low-to-mid single-digit revenue growth in nominal terms driven by mix and retail pricing behavior
  • Flat-to-slight unit volume with potential share volatility tied to regimen convenience and retailer promotion

Projection ranges (directional, commercially oriented)

Because no market-share baseline figures for the MYCELEX brand are provided in the available references here, the projection is expressed as category-relative expectations rather than brand absolute numbers:

  • Base case: modest nominal growth; slight share erosion risk versus lowest-cost generics in key channels
  • Upside case: stabilization of share if short-course SKUs or convenient applicators sustain conversion in mass retail and pharmacy chains
  • Downside case: continued share loss if private label and aggressively priced generics expand distribution or promotions

Sources: Regulatory grounding for clotrimazole use; mature OTC dynamic. [1]


What are the key commercial watch-outs for MYCELEX?

1) Generic substitution and retail price elasticity

  • OTC antifungals are price-sensitive.
  • MYCELEX’s brand moat is recognition, not clinical differentiation.

2) SKU lifecycle risk

  • Pack size and regimen duration shifts can alter conversion.
  • Applicator design and user experience influence purchase repeat.

3) Indication boundary and self-diagnosis

  • OTC use requires correct patient selection for uncomplicated VVC.
  • Misuse can reduce treatment outcomes and drive returns or negative satisfaction, which hurts repeat rate.

Sources: FDA labeling controls approved use and dosing. [1]


What patent or exclusivity dynamics matter for MYCELEX?

MYCELEX is built on clotrimazole, which is an established active ingredient. In practice:

  • The core molecule is long out of primary exclusivity.
  • Any remaining brand protection is typically formulation- or packaging-related and limited in duration.
  • Competitive entry is therefore persistent.

(Brand patent analysis cannot be completed to a defensible conclusion without claim-level documents and jurisdictional filing data, which are not part of the available source set used here.)


Key Takeaways

  • MYCELEX is a mature clotrimazole OTC antifungal; clinical development is not currently defined by brand-linked registrational trials.
  • The category is structurally competitive with heavy generic substitution risk; differentiation is driven by regimen convenience, pack/SKU execution, and retail promotion.
  • Market outlook is limited by category maturity, with nominal revenue growth likely depending on pricing and mix rather than clinical innovation.
  • Near-term strategy focus is commercial execution and SKU lifecycle management rather than new clinical differentiation.

FAQs

  1. Is there ongoing Phase 3 clinical development for MYCELEX?
    No brand-specific late-stage registrational activity is identifiable in public trial reporting as “MYCELEX” at this time.

  2. What is the active ingredient in MYCELEX?
    Clotrimazole, an imidazole antifungal.

  3. What indication does MYCELEX support?
    Treatment of vulvaginal candidiasis using label-specified OTC regimens (varies by formulation/product line).

  4. What drives MYCELEX demand in the market?
    OTC consumer selection, correct uncomplicated VVC identification, adherence to regimen length, and retail channel execution.

  5. How should MYCELEX’s market projection be framed?
    As low-to-modest growth with share volatility under persistent generic price pressure, driven mainly by mix and promotion rather than pipeline-driven expansion.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Clotrimazole drug labeling and prescribing information (label content accessed via FDA label repository). FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.