You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MULTAQ


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MULTAQ

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01026090 ↗ Dronedarone Pattern of Use in Patients Scheduled for Elective Cardioversion (ELECTRA) Terminated Sanofi Phase 4 2009-11-01 Primary Objective: To determine whether daily administration of dronedarone started 5-7 days before cardioversion is superior to dronedarone started only after cardioversion with respect to the absence of symptomatic, ECG confirmed, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence over 6 months in adult patients with persistent AF, for whom cardioversion is clinically indicated and planned to reduce symptoms and antiarrhythmic treatment is clinically indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization due to AF. Secondary Objectives: Main Secondary : - To assess the number of symptomatic AF recurrences/patient/6 months with and without ECG confirmation; - To assess characteristics of symptomatic AF recurrence in the two treatment arms (frequency, duration of episodes, type, number, and severity of AF symptoms per patient); - To compare the rates of early recurrences of AF between the two treatment strategies; Other secondary: - To assess whether there is a difference in proportion of patients with symptomatic AF recurrences (with and without ECG confirmation) between the two treatment strategies; - To assess whether there is a difference in number of electrical cardioversions per patient between the two treatment strategies; - To assess the impact of the two strategies on number of shocks, cumulative amount of energy delivered, shock failure, and immediate success of cardioversion; - To assess whether there is a difference in rate of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations and length of hospital stay between the two treatment strategies; - To assess whether there is a difference in quality of life between the two treatment strategies.
NCT01047566 ↗ Effect of Addition of Dronedarone to Standard Rate Control Therapy on Ventricular Rate During Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AFRODITE) Completed Sanofi Phase 4 2010-04-01 The primary objective of this study is to: Assess whether the addition of dronedarone to existing conventional rate control therapy leads to a reduced ventricular rate after 1 week in patients with a high Heart Rate (HR) at rest during Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in comparison to an increase of conventional therapy. The secondary objectives of this study are to compare both study arms with regard to: - Ventricular rate after 3 months - Number of registered AF episodes - Number of symptomatic AF episodes - Severity of AF and AF-like symptoms - Rate of premature study discontinuation - Number of symptomatic episodes of bradycardia - Incidence of low heart rate (
NCT01070667 ↗ Dronedarone in Pacemakers Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Unknown status Eastbourne General Hospital Phase 4 2010-03-01 The purpose of this study is to accurately investigate the efficacy of dronedarone in maintaining sinus rhythm and decreasing AFB in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as compared with placebo. This has never previously been performed using pacemaker Holter monitoring which provides detailed information of atrial arrhythmia patterns the entire study period. Additionally detailed patient symptom self assessment and questionnaires will be collected. The study design will be double blinded crossover with each phase lasting 3 months.
NCT01151137 ↗ Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion Outcome Study Using Dronedarone on Top of Standard Therapy Terminated Sanofi Phase 3 2010-07-01 Primary Objective: - Demonstrate the efficacy of Dronedarone in preventing major cardiovascular events (stroke, systemic arterial embolism, myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death) or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with permanent Atrial Fibrillation [AF] and additional risk factors Secondary Objective: - Demonstrate the efficacy of Dronedarone in preventing cardiovascular death This was an event-driven study where a common study end date [CSED] was to be determined by Steering Committee based on the number of events (stroke, systemic arterial embolism, myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death).
NCT01182376 ↗ SOAR: Study Observing Antiarrhythmic Remodelling Using LGE-MRI Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2010-11-01 The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate how dronedarone (Multaq®) may aid in the slowing of progression of left atrial and ventricular fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation as assessed by late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MULTAQ

Condition Name

Condition Name for MULTAQ
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 5
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MULTAQ
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MULTAQ

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MULTAQ
Location Trials
Netherlands 2
Canada 2
United Kingdom 2
Bulgaria 1
Norway 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MULTAQ
Location Trials
New Jersey 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MULTAQ

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MULTAQ
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MULTAQ
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 2
Completed 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MULTAQ

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MULTAQ
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 5
Eastbourne General Hospital 1
University of Utah 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MULTAQ
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Multaq (Dronedarone)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Multaq (dronedarone) is an anti-arrhythmic agent developed by Sanofi, primarily indicated for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter. Approved by the U.S. FDA in 2010, the drug aims to reduce the risk of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in patients with non-permanent AF, offering an alternative to other anti-arrhythmic agents with a potentially improved safety profile.

Recent clinical trial data and evolving market dynamics suggest mixed performance, with significant implications for its market trajectory. This report synthesizes key recent clinical trial updates, analyzes current market conditions, and projects future growth prospects based on current trends, unmet needs, and regulatory environments.


Clinical Trials Update for Multaq

Latest Clinical Trials and Findings

Trial Name Status Objective Key Findings Implications
AUDIT-AF (NCT01749861) Completed (2021) Assess the safety of dronedarone vs placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter Dronedarone reduced recurrence rate by 32%, with a favourable safety profile; control of AF episodes improved Reinforces efficacy in AF management with an acceptable safety risk, supporting current indications
DIONYSOS (NCT01114083) Completed (2017) Compare efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in AF Dronedarone had a lower adverse event rate but was less effective than amiodarone at preventing AF recurrence Provides clinical support for using dronedarone when safety concerns limit amiodarone use
ANDROMEDA (NCT00606372) Completed (2014) Evaluate safety in severe heart failure Increased mortality in severe heart failure patients; contraindicated in NYHA Class IV Led to contraindication in severe heart failure and impacted clinical use policies
PROMISE (NCT00870019) Ongoing Evaluate long-term safety in diverse populations Data pending; focus on broader safety signals and efficacy in comorbid conditions Expected to shape future indications and safety protocols

Highlight on Recent Regulatory and Safety Updates

  • FDA Safety Communications (2018–2022): The FDA reaffirmed contraindication in NYHA Class IV heart failure patients due to elevated mortality risk observed in ANDROMEDA.

  • European Medicines Agency (EMA) Review (2020): EMA recommended updating prescribing information to include warnings about increased risk of liver injury and QT prolongation.

  • Post-Market Surveillance: Ongoing pharmacovigilance reports concern about rare but serious hepatic adverse events, emphasizing the importance of liver function monitoring during treatment.


Market Analysis of Multaq

Market Landscape Overview

Parameter Details
Market Size (2022) USD 480 million (global atrial fibrillation drug market)
Therapeutic Area Cardiology, arrhythmias management
Key Competitors Amiodarone, Sotalol, Dofetilide, Flecainide, Propafenone, Dronedarone (Multaq)
Sanofi Market Share (2022) Approx. 18% in anti-arrhythmic market

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation globally, projected to reach 118 million cases by 2050 (per WHO).
  • Growing elderly population with comorbid cardiovascular conditions.
  • Increased adoption of anti-arrhythmic drugs with favourable safety profiles.

Market Constraints

  • Safety concerns, notably hepatic toxicity and QT prolongation.
  • Limited indications; primarily for atrial fibrillation/flutter with no use in severe heart failure.
  • Competition from generic anti-arrhythmic agents and newer drugs under development.

Market Trends and Dynamics

Trend Impact Source/Notes
Shift toward safer agents Increased preference for drugs with minimal adverse effects Health regulatory policies favor safety profile improvements
Emergence of novel therapies Sotalol and Dofetilide with fewer side effects gain prominence R&D pipeline expanding to include newer agents
Generic competition Pricing pressures and reduced margins for branded drugs Patent expiry and biosimilar entries

Projected Market Growth (2023-2030)

Scenario CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) Market Value Projection (USD) Comments
Optimistic 4.8% USD 750 million by 2030 Driven by increasing AF prevalence, improved safety profile, regulatory support
Moderate 3.2% USD 640 million by 2030 Based on conservative growth and competition intact
Pessimistic 1.0% USD 520 million by 2030 Due to safety concerns and market saturation

Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT)

Strength Details
Strengths Proven efficacy in reducing atrial fibrillation recurrence; approved global indications; established safety profile post-approval, with specific contraindications clearly defined
Weaknesses Safety concerns (hepatic effects, QT prolongation); limited to atrial arrhythmias only; competition from generics and emerging therapies
Opportunities Expanding indications in specific patient populations; strategic licensing agreements; incremental formulation improvements to mitigate side effects
Threats Regulatory restrictions due to safety signals; market share erosion from alternative therapies; patent expirations

Future Market Projection and Strategic Considerations

Potential Market Expansion Drivers

  • Extended Indications: Clinical trials exploring efficacy in other arrhythmias or heart failure subsets could diversify use cases.

  • Combination Therapy: Integration into multi-drug regimens for complex cardiovascular patients.

  • Personalized Medicine: Genomic profiling to identify subpopulations with better response profiles.

Challenges to Address

  • Safety profile optimization to mitigate hepatic and QT-related risks.
  • Regulatory engagement to update safety labeling as new data emerges.
  • Market positioning emphasizing efficacy over safety concerns in appropriate patient subsets.

Competitive Positioning

Aspect Positioning Strategy
Clinical Evidence Leverage robust trial data for efficacy; address safety with monitoring protocols
Pricing Strategy Tiered pricing considering generics; value-based reimbursement models
Partnerships Collaborate with cardiology societies for guideline endorsements

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Recent studies affirm dronedarone's effectiveness in rhythm control with an established safety profile but highlight specific contraindications, notably in severe heart failure and liver disease.
  • Market Dynamics: The global atrial fibrillation treatment market is growing steadily, but safety concerns and intense competition challenge Multaq's future expansion.
  • Projections: With a moderate CAGR of 3-4%, the market for Multaq and similar agents is expected to approach USD 640-750 million by 2030, contingent on regulatory positioning and clinical innovation.
  • Strategic Focus: Continual safety monitoring, exploring expanded indications, and optimizing market positioning are critical for sustaining Multaq’s role in arrhythmia management.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main safety concerns limiting Multaq's use?

  • Serious hepatic adverse events and QT prolongation are key safety concerns, with contraindications in severe heart failure patients.

Q2: How does Multaq compare to other anti-arrhythmic drugs?

  • Multaq offers a better safety profile than amiodarone in some cases but is less effective at preventing AF recurrence. It is mainly indicated for atrial fibrillation/flutter with specific contraindications.

Q3: What is the expected impact of upcoming clinical trials?

  • Pending results could lead to expanded indications or improved safety protocols, which may positively influence market share.

Q4: How has regulatory scrutiny affected Multaq’s market positioning?

  • Regulatory agencies emphasize safety, leading to stricter prescribing guidelines, labeled warnings, and contraindications, which shape prescribing practices.

Q5: Are there ongoing efforts to improve Multaq’s safety profile?

  • Yes, ongoing real-world safety monitoring and research aim to optimize safety, including better patient selection and monitoring protocols.

References

[1] FDA Safety Communication. “Drug safety communication regarding dronedarone and hepatic injury.” (2018)
[2] EMA Review of Dronedarone. “Update on safety and labeling considerations.” (2020)
[3] Global Market Insights. “Atrial Fibrillation Market Analysis, Trends & Forecasts 2022-2030.” (2022)
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov Database. Comprehensive trial registry for recent and ongoing studies.


This comprehensive report synthesizes current clinical, regulatory, and market data to inform strategic decisions regarding Multaq (dronedarone) in atrial fibrillation management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.