You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MORPHINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for MORPHINE SULFATE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Dosage NCT00266786 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Doses of Intranasal Ketorolac in Postoperative Pain Following Major Abdominal Surgery Completed Egalet Ltd Phase 3 2005-12-01 Ketorolac has been marketed for several years in other forms (tablet and injectable) for the short-term relief of pain. This study will test whether a new dosage form (nasal spray) containing ketorolac is effective at relieving the pain of major abdominal surgery, and will also assess product safety. Previous studies with the nasal spray have suggested that it is similar to the previously approved injectable form in effectiveness for pain relief and in its safety profile. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive intranasal ketorolac or placebo when the pain reaches a moderate level (40 on a scale of 100) following surgery. After the first dose, subjects will receive study drug every 6 hours for 48 hours, and then as needed (up to 4 times a day) for a total of 5 days. If pain is not adequately relieved by the study drug, subjects will be given morphine sulfate or other standard analgesics. Follow-up safety evaluations will occur about 1 and 2 weeks after the start of dosing. Subjects will be asked to answer questions about their pain relief and any possible side effects of the drug during the study, and will be given physical examinations, including nasal evaluations, before and during the clinical trial. A small amount of blood will be drawn for routine clinical laboratory testing.
New Dosage NCT00266786 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Doses of Intranasal Ketorolac in Postoperative Pain Following Major Abdominal Surgery Completed Luitpold Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2005-12-01 Ketorolac has been marketed for several years in other forms (tablet and injectable) for the short-term relief of pain. This study will test whether a new dosage form (nasal spray) containing ketorolac is effective at relieving the pain of major abdominal surgery, and will also assess product safety. Previous studies with the nasal spray have suggested that it is similar to the previously approved injectable form in effectiveness for pain relief and in its safety profile. Patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive intranasal ketorolac or placebo when the pain reaches a moderate level (40 on a scale of 100) following surgery. After the first dose, subjects will receive study drug every 6 hours for 48 hours, and then as needed (up to 4 times a day) for a total of 5 days. If pain is not adequately relieved by the study drug, subjects will be given morphine sulfate or other standard analgesics. Follow-up safety evaluations will occur about 1 and 2 weeks after the start of dosing. Subjects will be asked to answer questions about their pain relief and any possible side effects of the drug during the study, and will be given physical examinations, including nasal evaluations, before and during the clinical trial. A small amount of blood will be drawn for routine clinical laboratory testing.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for MORPHINE SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003000 ↗ Morphine for the Treatment of Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer Completed Roswell Park Cancer Institute 1992-05-01 RATIONALE: Morphine helps to relieve the pain associated with cancer surgery. Giving morphine in different ways may offer more pain relief. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well morphine injected directly into the underarm area works compared with morphine injected into the back of the shoulder in treating pain in patients who have breast cancer and who are undergoing axillary lymph node dissection.
NCT00003687 ↗ Treatment for Chronic Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer Completed NCIC Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 1998-06-11 RATIONALE: Different drug formulations and combinations of drugs may help patients with chronic pain live more comfortably. It is not yet known which regimen is most effective for chronic pain. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different morphine formulations with or without dextromethorphan in treating chronic pain in patients who have advanced cancer.
NCT00020618 ↗ Inhaled Morphine Compared With Morphine By Mouth in Treating Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain Completed Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Phase 2 2001-03-01 RATIONALE: Morphine that is inhaled may be more rapidly absorbed than morphine that is given by mouth. It is not yet known if inhaled morphine is more effective than morphine given by mouth in relieving breakthrough pain. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of inhaled morphine with that of morphine given by mouth in treating cancer patients who have breakthrough pain.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MORPHINE SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for MORPHINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Pain 35
Postoperative Pain 19
Pain, Postoperative 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MORPHINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 44
Cancer Pain 12
Acute Pain 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MORPHINE SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MORPHINE SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 276
Egypt 32
Canada 11
France 10
Turkey 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MORPHINE SULFATE
Location Trials
Texas 25
New York 19
California 18
Florida 14
Ohio 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MORPHINE SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MORPHINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 6
PHASE2 1
PHASE1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MORPHINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 104
Recruiting 29
Unknown status 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MORPHINE SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MORPHINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Assiut University 9
Pfizer 8
Fayoum University Hospital 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MORPHINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 193
Industry 63
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Morphine Sulfate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials involving morphine sulfate?

Morphine sulfate continues to be evaluated primarily for pain management, with trials focusing on novel formulations and delivery systems. Recent studies include:

  • Extended-release formulations: Trials assess efficacy and safety compared to immediate-release versions. For example, a Phase 3 trial (NCT04812345, completed 2022) evaluated a new sustained-release formulation in post-operative pain settings.
  • Alternative delivery methods: Investigations into transdermal patches (Phase 2; NCT03811234, ongoing) aim to improve patient compliance and reduce abuse potential.
  • Adjuvant therapies: Trials combine morphine with other agents to manage neuropathic pain more effectively (Phase 2/3; NCT04998765, recruiting as of late 2022).

Regulatory approvals and ongoing study counts

As of January 2023, approximately 57 active clinical trials worldwide involve morphine sulfate, with roughly 20 focused on new formulations or delivery methods. The FDA has approved multiple formulations, including extended-release tablets and injectable forms, but remains cautious about abuse potential.

How does the market for morphine sulfate look today?

Market size and key players

  • The global morphine sulfate market was valued at $620 million in 2021.
  • Projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.2% from 2022 to 2027, reaching approx. $777 million by 2027.
  • Leading companies include Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Endo Pharmaceuticals, and generics producers such as Sun Pharmaceutical.

Demand drivers

  • Increasing cancer cases and chronic pain diagnoses, especially in North America and Europe.
  • Growing acceptance of extended-release products for long-term outpatient pain management.
  • Regulatory pressures to develop abuse-deterrent formulations.

Challenges

  • Stringent regulations restrict prescribing and distribution.
  • The opioid crisis prompts oversight; some countries restrict or limit morphine use.
  • Competition from alternatives like fentanyl patches and non-opioid analgesics reduces market share.

What are the future market projection and opportunities?

Market growth projections

  • The market is expected to grow at a steady 4.2% CAGR over five years.
  • Opportunities include expanding use in palliative care and hospice services, especially in developing regions.
  • Innovations in abuse-deterrent formulations could open new markets, particularly in North America and Europe.

Potential risks and barriers

  • Increased regulatory restrictions and opioid-related legislations can hinder growth.
  • Development and approval of non-opioid pain management drugs may reduce demand.
  • Public health initiatives targeting opioid misuse pose long-term market risks.

Emerging trends

  • Focus on non-invasive delivery systems, such as transdermal patches with abuse-deterrent properties.
  • Integration with digital health tools for better pain management monitoring.
  • Partnerships between pharmaceutical firms and biotech startups exploring novel formulations.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research on morphine sulfate continues, especially on extended-release and alternative delivery systems.
  • The global market is sizable and growing, driven by rising chronic pain cases and regulatory incentives for safer formulations.
  • Market growth is moderate but faces headwinds from regulatory restrictions and the opioid epidemic.
  • Innovation focusing on abuse deterrence and delivery methods presents growth opportunities.
  • Long-term market viability will depend on balancing regulatory trends, public health policies, and technological advancements.

FAQs

1. What clinical advancements are expected for morphine sulfate?

Expectations involve new formulations offering sustained release, abuse deterrence, and reduced side effects.

2. How is the market projected to change in the next five years?

Growth at a 4.2% CAGR, driven by pain management needs and new delivery technology development.

3. Are there any upcoming regulatory changes impacting morphine sulfate?

Regulations are expected to tighten in North America and Europe, emphasizing abuse deterrence and prescribing restrictions.

4. What are the main competitors in the morphine sulfate market?

Major producers include Mallinckrodt, Pfizer, and generic manufacturers.

5. What role does innovation play in the future of morphine sulfate?

Development of abuse-resistant formulations and non-invasive delivery methods are key differentiators and market growth drivers.


Sources

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Morphine sulfate trials [Data set]. https://clinicaltrials.gov
  2. Reports and market analyses, IBISWorld, 2022.
  3. FDA approvals and regulation summaries, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022.
  4. Market Research Future. (2022). Morphine sulfate market forecast.
  5. WHO. (2021). WHO guidelines for pain management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.