You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000464 ↗ Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1987-04-01 To compare the efficacy of amiodarone to conventional anti-arrhythmic therapy in individuals who had survived one episode of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
NCT00000464 ↗ Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1987-04-01 To compare the efficacy of amiodarone to conventional anti-arrhythmic therapy in individuals who had survived one episode of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
NCT00000504 ↗ Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 1982-09-01 To compare the effectiveness of various drugs and drug combinations in suppressing complex ventricular arrhythmias, and to evaluate their safety.
NCT00000526 ↗ Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1986-08-01 To determine whether drug treatment of asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in post-myocardial infarction patients reduced the incidence of sudden cardiac death and total mortality.
NCT00000556 ↗ Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1995-03-01 To compare two standard treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation: ventricular rate control and anticoagulation vs. rhythm control and anticoagulation.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Heart Diseases 4
Cardiovascular Diseases 4
Arrhythmia 3
Heart Arrest 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Heart Diseases 4
Cardiovascular Diseases 4
Myocardial Infarction 2
Infarction 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 4
Federal University of São Paulo 1
University of Washington 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MORICIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
NIH 4
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Moricizine Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

Moricizine hydrochloride, a class Ic antiarrhythmic agent, is historically used to manage ventricular arrhythmias. Although its initial application dates back several decades, recent developments in drug repurposing, sophisticated clinical trial methodologies, and an increasing global focus on arrhythmia management have rekindled interest in this compound’s potential. This comprehensive review synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, evaluates the current market landscape, and provides projections guided by emerging scientific and commercial trends.


Clinical Trials Update

Historical Context and Drug Profile

Moricizine hydrochloride gained initial FDA approval in the 1980s for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Its mechanism involves sodium channel blockade, impacting cardiac conduction pathways. However, safety concerns and the advent of newer antiarrhythmic agents led to a decline in its clinical use.

Recent Clinical Trials and Research

In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift, emphasizing drug repurposing for cardiac conditions. The U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov) lists no recent, large-scale Phase III or IV trials exclusively focusing on moricizine. Instead, several smaller studies and investigations are contributing to its evolving profile:

  • Repositioning for Arrhythmias and Potential Neuroprotective Roles:
    Recent preclinical studies suggest moricizine’s sodium-channel blocking properties could be beneficial beyond arrhythmias, including neuroprotection in ischemic stroke models. The translation into clinical trials remains in early stages, with limited human data available.

  • Combination Therapy Trials:
    Some exploratory studies assess moricizine combined with other antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone or lidocaine, aiming to optimize efficacy and reduce adverse effects. These are primarily pilot or observational in design, with small sample sizes.

  • Pharmacovigilance and Safety Monitoring:
    Given historical safety concerns, ancillary studies are underway to reevaluate safety profiles in different populations, especially in patients with comorbidities like heart failure or renal impairment.

Regulatory and Developmental Status

No recent FDA or EMA designation changes for moricizine hydrochloride have been announced. It remains an off-market, compounded drug in many regions, with some countries registering its use for specific arrhythmic conditions.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

In the past, moricizine hydrochloride’s market presence was relatively limited, overshadowed by drugs like amiodarone, lidocaine, and procainamide. The decline was driven by safety profile concerns and the advent of antiarrhythmics with better efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Current Market Dynamics

  • Pharmaceutical Industry Perspective:
    The antiarrhythmic drugs market is approximately valued at USD 4 billion globally (Market Research Future, 2021). The dominant players command patents on newer compounds like dronedarone and sotalol, leaving older agents—such as moricizine—largely non-patented, generic, or compounded.

  • Pipeline and Competitive Landscape:
    Limited direct competitors for moricizine exist. However, the broader market is significantly influenced by the rising prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias, driven by aging populations and increasing rates of ischemic heart disease.

  • Emerging Trends Favoring Old Drugs:
    Due to cost-effectiveness and familiarity, there's a growing interest in re-evaluating older drugs for new indications. Regulatory agencies are increasingly receptive to drug repurposing, especially when backed by robust clinical data and safety profiling.

Market Opportunities and Challenges

  • Opportunities:

    • Potential for repositioning moricizine as a treatment for refractory ventricular arrhythmias or in specific patient populations intolerant to newer agents.
    • Off-label expansion in regions with limited access to newer drugs.
    • Growing interest in personalized medicine and ECG-guided therapy could facilitate niche market growth.
  • Challenges:

    • Safety concerns persist, necessitating comprehensive safety data before market re-expansion.
    • Lack of recent large-scale clinical trials hampers regulatory approval pathways for new indications.
    • Market dominance by established antiarrhythmics limits commercial incentives for new development.

Market Projection

Short to Mid-term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

The immediate outlook hinges on the outcomes of ongoing or planned clinical trials. Should phase I/II studies demonstrate safety and preliminary efficacy—particularly in refractory cases—there could be a niche resurgence.

Market projections estimate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3-4% for antiarrhythmic therapy segments, primarily driven by innovations in drug delivery systems and personalized therapy rather than moricizine specifically.

Long-term Outlook (5-10 Years)

If future studies substantiate its safety and broaden its indications, moricizine hydrochloride could carve out a small but significant segment within the antiarrhythmic landscape, especially in emerging markets and in off-label contexts. The overall market for antiarrhythmics is projected to reach USD 6 billion by 2030, with older agents potentially gaining incremental usage due to cost advantages and emerging evidence.

However, widespread adoption remains unlikely without conclusive clinical benefit and regulatory endorsement. Its role may be confined to adjunctive or specialized therapies, with the market size estimated to remain modest (USD 50–100 million globally).


Conclusion and Future Directions

While moricizine hydrochloride’s clinical development has largely stagnated, recent scientific exploration hints at potential repositioning avenues. Its safety and efficacy in contemporary settings require validation through rigorous, well-designed clinical trials. Market viability will depend heavily on the demonstration of superior benefit-risk profiles compared to existing therapies.

Given current trends, we forecast a cautiously optimistic outlook for moricizine hydrochloride—favoring niche applications and off-label use rather than broad market re-entry. The drug’s future hinges on investment in targeted clinical research, regulatory engagement, and strategic positioning within personalized arrhythmia management.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research on moricizine hydrochloride remains limited; no recent large-scale trials have been reported. Early-stage preclinical studies suggest potential beyond traditional indications.
  • Market presence declined due to safety concerns and competition from newer antiarrhythmics. However, its low cost and familiarity make it a candidate for repositioning.
  • Opportunities exist in niche markets, especially through drug repurposing and personalized medicine strategies. Regulatory acceptance depends on demonstrating safety and efficacy in contemporary studies.
  • Market growth projections are modest, emphasizing specialized and regional use cases rather than broad-based adoption.
  • Further clinical validation and strategic positioning are vital for moricizine hydrochloride’s future viability.

FAQs

1. Has moricizine hydrochloride received recent regulatory approval for new indications?
No, recent approvals or expanded indications have not been granted. Its current use is primarily off-label and limited to specific regions or experimental settings.

2. Can moricizine hydrochloride be safely used as a first-line treatment?
Given historical safety concerns and limited current data, it is not recommended as a first-line therapy without further evidence and regulatory clearance.

3. What are the primary safety concerns associated with moricizine hydrochloride?
Adverse effects include proarrhythmic risks, such as QT prolongation, and potential for exacerbating arrhythmias, especially in vulnerable populations.

4. Are there ongoing efforts to repurpose moricizine for neuroprotective or other non-arrhythmic indications?
Preclinical studies suggest potential neuroprotective benefits, but clinical trials are yet to substantiate these applications.

5. How does moricizine compare economically to other antiarrhythmic drugs?
As a generic drug, moricizine is relatively low-cost, making it attractive for off-label or resource-limited settings, albeit with safety and efficacy caveats.


References

  1. Market Research Future. "Antiarrhythmic Drugs Market, 2021."
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search for moricizine-related trials.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug approval history and safety updates.
  4. Peer-reviewed journals on recent pharmacological studies involving moricizine.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.