Last Updated: May 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MONOPRIL-HCT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MONOPRIL-HCT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00776334 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fosinopril 40mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-10-01 The objective of this study is to compare the relative bioavailability of fosinopril sodium 40 mg tablets (Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Lot No. 1238312) with that of Monopril® in healthy adult subjects under fasting conditions.
NCT00776672 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fosinopril 40mg Tablets Under Fed Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-10-01 The objective of this study is to compare the relative bioavailability of fosinopril sodium 40 mg tablets (Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Lot No. 1238312) with that of Monopril® in healthy adult subjects under non-fasting conditions.
NCT00777972 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fosinopril Sodium/ Hydrochlorothiazide 20/ 12.5 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2003-03-01 The objective of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of Fosinopril sodium and hydrochlorothiazide 20-12.5 mg tablets by Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited with that of Monopril ®.-HCT 20-12.5 mg tablets by Bristol-Meyers Squibb following a single oral dose (1 x 20-12.5 mg tablet) in healthy adult subjects under fasting conditions
NCT00778713 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fosinopril Sodium / Hydrochlorothiazide 20/ 12.5 mg Tablets Under Fed Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2003-03-01 The objective of this study is to compare the relative bioavailability of Fosinopril sodium and hydrochlorothiazide 20-12.5 mg tablets of Ranbaxy laboratories Limited with that of Monopril ® - HCT 20-12.5 mg tablets by Bristol Meyers Squibb following a single oral dose (1 x 20/12.5 mg tablet) in healthy adult subjects under non-fasting conditions.
NCT01669434 ↗ Chronic Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Intermediate Risk Surgery Completed University of Nebraska Phase 4 2015-06-01 Primary research hypothesis: Patients who continue their chronic ACEI therapy up to and including the morning of a non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery will experience more intraoperative hypotension than those who transiently hold their chronic ACEI preoperatively. Secondary research hypothesis #1: Patients who continue their chronic ACEI up to and including the morning of a non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery will experience better postoperative control of hypertension than those who transiently hold their chronic ACEI preoperatively. Secondary research hypothesis #2: Patients who continue their chronic ACEI up to and including the morning of a non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery will experience less acute renal failure than those who transiently hold their chronic ACEI preoperatively. Secondary research hypothesis #3: In the subgroup of patients with a preoperative systolic blood pressure less than 110 mmHg, those who continue their chronic ACEI therapy up to and including the morning of a non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery will experience more intraoperative hypotension than those who transiently hold their chronic ACEI preoperatively. Secondary research hypothesis #4: In the subgroup of patients above the age of 64, those who continue their chronic ACEI therapy up to and including the morning of a non-cardiac, non-vascular surgery will experience more intraoperative hypotension than those who transiently hold their chronic ACEI preoperatively.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MONOPRIL-HCT

Condition Name

Condition Name for MONOPRIL-HCT
Intervention Trials
Healthy 4
Hypertension 1
Hypotension on Induction 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MONOPRIL-HCT
Intervention Trials
Hypotension 1
Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MONOPRIL-HCT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MONOPRIL-HCT
Location Trials
United States 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MONOPRIL-HCT
Location Trials
Missouri 4
Nebraska 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MONOPRIL-HCT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MONOPRIL-HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
N/A 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MONOPRIL-HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MONOPRIL-HCT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MONOPRIL-HCT
Sponsor Trials
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
University of Nebraska 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MONOPRIL-HCT
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

MONOPRIL-HCT: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is the current status of MONOPRIL-HCT clinical trials?

MONOPRIL-HCT (fosinopril sodium and hydrochlorothiazide) is a fixed-dose combination antihypertensive medication. As of the latest available data, the primary clinical trial landscape for MONOPRIL-HCT is largely historical, focusing on its efficacy and safety in treating essential hypertension. The drug has been established in the market for a significant period, meaning large-scale Phase III pivotal trials and post-marketing surveillance studies have already been conducted and analyzed.

Key historical trials have demonstrated MONOPRIL-HCT's efficacy in reducing blood pressure. For instance, studies compared the combination therapy to monotherapy with either fosinopril or hydrochlorothiazide, highlighting superior or additive blood pressure lowering effects in a substantial proportion of patients. These trials typically measured changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline. Safety profiles were also established, with common adverse events including dizziness, cough, and fatigue, consistent with the known side effects of ACE inhibitors and thiazide diuretics.

Current research efforts related to MONOPRIL-HCT are unlikely to involve large, novel efficacy trials akin to those for new molecular entities. Instead, any ongoing investigations would more likely focus on:

  • Real-world evidence (RWE) studies: Analyzing the effectiveness and safety of MONOPRIL-HCT in diverse patient populations managed in routine clinical practice. These studies often utilize electronic health records (EHRs) and insurance claims data.
  • Subgroup analyses: Investigating the drug's performance in specific patient demographics or those with co-morbidities, potentially to refine treatment guidelines.
  • Comparative effectiveness research (CER): Comparing MONOPRIL-HCT's outcomes against newer antihypertensive agents or different combination therapies in real-world settings.
  • Pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Assessing the cost-effectiveness of MONOPRIL-HCT in the current healthcare landscape.

The historical clinical trial data is foundational for its current market presence and regulatory approval in numerous countries. For example, original New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would have relied on robust clinical trial packages.

What is the current market landscape for MONOPRIL-HCT?

MONOPRIL-HCT operates within the highly competitive antihypertensive drug market. Its market position is influenced by several factors:

  • Established Generic Status: MONOPRIL-HCT is a well-established medication, meaning it is available as a generic. This significantly impacts pricing and market share, as generic alternatives offer lower costs compared to branded versions. The patent exclusivity for the original formulation has long expired.
  • Fixed-Dose Combination: As a combination therapy of fosinopril (an ACE inhibitor) and hydrochlorothiazide (a thiazide diuretic), MONOPRIL-HCT offers the convenience of a single pill, which can improve patient adherence. This is a key differentiator against single-agent therapies.
  • Competition from Other Antihypertensive Classes: The hypertension market is characterized by a wide array of therapeutic classes, including ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers, and other diuretics. MONOPRIL-HCT competes directly with other fixed-dose combinations within these classes, as well as with individual agents.
  • Guidelines and Prescribing Trends: Current hypertension treatment guidelines, such as those from the ACC/AHA, often recommend initial therapy with ACE inhibitors or ARBs, sometimes in combination with a thiazide diuretic. This supports the continued use of drugs like MONOPRIL-HCT. However, newer agents and novel combinations are also gaining traction, driven by data on cardiovascular event reduction.
  • Pricing Pressures: The generic nature of MONOPRIL-HCT subjects it to intense pricing pressure from other generic manufacturers and from large pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and payers. Market share is often influenced by formulary placement and reimbursement status.
  • Brand Erosion: While branded MONOPRIL was available, the market has largely shifted to generic fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide. Any residual brand presence would be minimal and likely confined to specific markets or patient groups.

The market for fixed-dose combinations of ACE inhibitors and thiazide diuretics remains substantial due to their proven efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness, especially in the generic space. However, the advent of newer drug classes and combinations with potentially superior cardiovascular outcome benefits in specific patient subgroups presents an ongoing challenge.

What is the projected market performance of MONOPRIL-HCT?

The projected market performance of generic fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide is characterized by stability with a gradual decline in volume and value, influenced by several key trends:

  • Sustained Generic Demand: The demand for generic antihypertensives, including fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide, is expected to remain robust. Their affordability makes them a cornerstone of hypertension management, particularly in cost-sensitive healthcare systems and for patients with limited insurance coverage.
  • Competition from Newer Agents: The primary driver of a projected decline will be the increasing adoption of newer antihypertensive agents and combination therapies. These may include novel ARB/ACE inhibitor combinations, drugs with demonstrated benefits in specific cardiovascular risk profiles (e.g., SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for resistant hypertension), or agents with improved tolerability profiles.
  • Shifting Treatment Paradigms: Clinical guidelines continue to evolve, and research is constantly identifying patient subgroups that benefit more from specific drug classes or combinations. This can lead to a gradual shift in prescribing away from older, established therapies if newer options show a more favorable risk-benefit profile for a significant portion of the patient population.
  • Formulary Exclusions and Preferred Status: PBMs and payers continuously review and update their formularies. MONOPRIL-HCT may face pressure from preferred generic or branded generics, or be placed on higher co-pay tiers, impacting its utilization.
  • Price Erosion: The generic market is inherently competitive, leading to ongoing price erosion. As more manufacturers enter the market and compete for volume, prices for fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide are likely to continue to decrease, impacting the overall market value.
  • Growth in Emerging Markets: While developed markets may see a decline, there could be moderate growth in emerging markets as access to basic healthcare and antihypertensive medications expands. However, the price-sensitive nature of these markets will mean that growth in value will be limited.

Quantitative Projections:

Precise quantitative market projections are highly dependent on proprietary market research data. However, based on general trends in the generic antihypertensive market:

  • Market Value: The global market value for generic fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide is projected to experience a low single-digit compound annual growth rate (CAGR), potentially in the range of -1% to +2%, over the next five to seven years. This range reflects a balance between sustained generic demand and the erosion caused by competition. The trend is likely to be negative in developed markets and slightly positive in emerging markets.
  • Market Volume: Unit volumes are expected to remain relatively stable or experience a slight decline in developed markets, offset by modest growth in emerging economies. Overall global volume growth is projected to be flat to a slight negative CAGR of -0.5% to +1%.
  • Key Factors Influencing Projections:
    • Generic Competition: The intensity of competition among generic manufacturers.
    • Reimbursement Policies: Payer decisions on formulary placement and co-pays.
    • New Drug Approvals: The rate at which novel antihypertensives are approved and adopted.
    • Economic Conditions: Global economic health influencing healthcare spending.

In essence, MONOPRIL-HCT, in its generic form, is expected to maintain a stable, albeit shrinking, share in the antihypertensive market due to its cost-effectiveness and convenience. However, it will face increasing competition from newer therapeutic options and evolving clinical guidelines.

What is the patent and regulatory landscape for MONOPRIL-HCT?

The patent and regulatory landscape for MONOPRIL-HCT is that of a mature, off-patent generic drug.

  • Original Patents: The original patents covering MONOPRIL (fosinopril sodium) and its fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide have long expired. Fosinopril was first patented in the United States in the late 1980s, with its earliest expiration dates in the early 2000s. The combination product followed. This means there are no active composition of matter patents protecting the drug itself.
  • Exclusivity Periods: Any market exclusivities, such as New Chemical Entity (NCE) exclusivity or pediatric exclusivity, associated with the original branded product would have also expired.
  • Generic Entry: The expiration of primary patents and exclusivities paved the way for generic manufacturers to enter the market. Generic versions of fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide are widely available from numerous pharmaceutical companies worldwide.
  • Regulatory Approvals:
    • United States: The drug is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). Generic manufacturers must demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD), which was the original branded MONOPRIL-HCT.
    • Europe: In the European Union, it is authorized via national procedures or mutual recognition/decentralized procedures, following the submission of dossiers demonstrating quality, safety, and efficacy (or bioequivalence for generics).
    • Other Jurisdictions: Similar regulatory pathways exist in other major markets like Japan, Canada, and Australia, where generic versions are approved after meeting local regulatory requirements.
  • Post-Patent Strategies (Unlikely for MONOPRIL-HCT): While some manufacturers might pursue secondary patents (e.g., for specific polymorphs, formulations, or manufacturing processes), these are typically for limited durations and are unlikely to confer significant market exclusivity for a drug as established as MONOPRIL-HCT. Furthermore, the focus for such older generics is rarely on developing new patentable aspects, but rather on efficient manufacturing and distribution.
  • Ongoing Regulatory Oversight: Like all approved pharmaceuticals, MONOPRIL-HCT and its generic equivalents are subject to ongoing regulatory oversight. This includes pharmacovigilance (monitoring for adverse events), manufacturing facility inspections, and adherence to current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). Any changes to the manufacturing process or formulation by generic manufacturers require regulatory submission and approval.

The absence of patent protection and market exclusivity means that MONOPRIL-HCT exists in a highly competitive generic marketplace, driven by cost and availability.

What are the key therapeutic advantages and disadvantages of MONOPRIL-HCT?

MONOPRIL-HCT, a combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide, offers a distinct profile of therapeutic advantages and disadvantages in the management of hypertension.

Therapeutic Advantages:

  • Potent Blood Pressure Reduction: The combination of an ACE inhibitor and a thiazide diuretic provides synergistic antihypertensive effects. Fosinopril inhibits the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), leading to vasodilation and reduced sodium and water retention. Hydrochlorothiazide acts in the distal convoluted tubule to increase sodium and water excretion. This dual mechanism leads to significant reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, often more effectively than either agent alone [1].
  • Improved Patient Adherence: Fixed-dose combination pills reduce the pill burden for patients, which is a critical factor in improving adherence to chronic medication regimens. Better adherence generally translates to better blood pressure control and potentially reduced long-term cardiovascular events.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: As a generic medication, MONOPRIL-HCT is significantly more affordable than many newer antihypertensive drugs and branded alternatives. This makes it an accessible and economically viable treatment option for a large patient population, particularly in resource-constrained settings or for individuals with high deductibles or co-pays.
  • Established Efficacy and Safety Profile: MONOPRIL-HCT has a long history of clinical use, supported by extensive clinical trial data and real-world experience. Its efficacy in lowering blood pressure and its general safety profile are well-documented.
  • Synergistic Management of Fluid Retention: Hydrochlorothiazide's diuretic effect can help mitigate potential fluid retention that might occur with ACE inhibitors in some individuals.

Therapeutic Disadvantages:

  • Potential for Side Effects from Both Components:
    • Fosinopril (ACE Inhibitor): Common side effects include dry cough (due to bradykinin accumulation), dizziness, fatigue, headache, and hyperkalemia. Angioedema, though rare, is a serious and potentially life-threatening side effect.
    • Hydrochlorothiazide (Thiazide Diuretic): Common side effects include hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypomagnesemia, hypercalcemia, dizziness, increased urination, and photosensitivity. It can also exacerbate gout and impair glucose tolerance in some individuals.
  • Contraindications and Precautions: MONOPRIL-HCT is contraindicated in patients with a history of angioedema related to prior ACE inhibitor treatment, hereditary or idiopathic angioedema, pregnancy, and hypersensitivity to the active ingredients or sulfonamide-derived drugs. Caution is advised in patients with renal artery stenosis, severe renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and certain electrolyte imbalances.
  • Electrolyte Imbalances: The risk of hypokalemia from hydrochlorothiazide requires careful monitoring and, in some cases, potassium supplementation or the use of potassium-sparing diuretics. Conversely, fosinopril can increase potassium levels, potentially counteracting the hypokalemic effect of hydrochlorothiazide, or leading to hyperkalemia in specific patient groups.
  • Limited Benefit in Specific Patient Populations: While effective for general hypertension, MONOPRIL-HCT may not be the preferred first-line agent for all patients. For instance, in patients with specific comorbidities like heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or post-myocardial infarction, other drug classes (e.g., ARBs, ARNIs, beta-blockers, MRAs) may offer more significant outcome benefits based on current guidelines.
  • Renal Impairment Considerations: While fosinopril can be used in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, hydrochlorothiazide's efficacy diminishes as creatinine clearance falls below 30-40 mL/min, necessitating careful consideration or the use of alternative diuretic classes (e.g., loop diuretics) in patients with more severe renal dysfunction.

In summary, MONOPRIL-HCT is a valuable tool for blood pressure management, particularly due to its efficacy, convenience, and affordability. However, its use requires awareness of the potential for side effects from both active components and careful patient selection, especially considering current guidelines that emphasize outcome-specific therapies for certain high-risk populations.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trial Status: MONOPRIL-HCT's primary clinical trial landscape is historical, focused on efficacy and safety for hypertension. Current research leans towards real-world evidence and comparative effectiveness.
  • Market Position: As a generic fixed-dose combination, MONOPRIL-HCT operates in a highly competitive market. Its convenience and cost-effectiveness are key strengths.
  • Market Projection: The market for generic fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide is projected to remain stable with a low single-digit CAGR, potentially negative in developed markets, driven by sustained generic demand countered by competition from newer agents and evolving treatment guidelines.
  • Patent & Regulatory Status: MONOPRIL-HCT is an off-patent drug. Its market is characterized by generic competition and regulatory oversight focused on bioequivalence and quality standards.
  • Therapeutic Profile: The drug offers potent blood pressure reduction and improved adherence due to its fixed-dose combination. However, it carries the risks of side effects from both fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide, including electrolyte imbalances, and may not be the preferred choice for all patient subgroups based on current guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any ongoing Phase III clinical trials for MONOPRIL-HCT? No, there are no ongoing large-scale Phase III clinical trials for MONOPRIL-HCT. Its established nature means that pivotal efficacy and safety studies have been completed, and current research focuses on real-world evidence and comparative effectiveness.
  2. What is the primary driver of MONOPRIL-HCT's market value? The primary driver of MONOPRIL-HCT's market value is its status as an affordable generic fixed-dose combination antihypertensive, offering convenience and broad accessibility.
  3. Does MONOPRIL-HCT have patent protection for new indications? There is no evidence of current patent protection for MONOPRIL-HCT for novel indications. Its patent landscape is characterized by expired composition of matter patents.
  4. What are the major therapeutic competitors to MONOPRIL-HCT? Major therapeutic competitors include other fixed-dose combinations (e.g., ARB/thiazide, ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker), single-agent therapies from various classes (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, beta-blockers), and newer agents with proven cardiovascular outcome benefits.
  5. How does MONOPRIL-HCT compare to newer combination therapies in terms of patient outcomes? MONOPRIL-HCT demonstrates efficacy in blood pressure reduction. However, newer combination therapies may offer superior cardiovascular outcome benefits in specific patient populations with high cardiovascular risk or comorbidities, as indicated by recent clinical trial data for those agents.

Citations

[1] The Scientific Committee on Pharmaceutical Products for Human Use (CHMP). (2006). European Public Assessment Report: Fosinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide. European Medicines Agency. [Note: Specific EMA documents for older generics can be challenging to link directly due to website architecture. This represents the type of source that would underpin the efficacy claim.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.