You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MONOFERRIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MONOFERRIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02940860 ↗ Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2016-11-29 Evaluation of safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose compared with iron sucrose, in subjects with both non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA).
NCT02940886 ↗ Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2016-11-08 Evaluate safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) compared with iron sucrose (Venofer®), in subjects diagnosed with IDA.
NCT02962648 ↗ An Extension Trial to Assess the Safety of Re-dosing of Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2017-01-09 Evaluate safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose re-dosing, in subjects who were previously treated with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose.
NCT04945707 ↗ Impact of Intravenous Iron Repletion On Mechanisms of Exercise InTolerance in HFpEF (IRONMET-HFpEF) Not yet recruiting National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 4 2021-10-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine if the correction of functional iron deficiency by administering a single dose of intravenous iron (ferric derimaltose or Monoferric®) in participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will improve exercise capacity as measured by the change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) from baseline to 12 weeks.
NCT04945707 ↗ Impact of Intravenous Iron Repletion On Mechanisms of Exercise InTolerance in HFpEF (IRONMET-HFpEF) Not yet recruiting National Institutes of Health (NIH) Phase 4 2021-10-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine if the correction of functional iron deficiency by administering a single dose of intravenous iron (ferric derimaltose or Monoferric®) in participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will improve exercise capacity as measured by the change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) from baseline to 12 weeks.
NCT04945707 ↗ Impact of Intravenous Iron Repletion On Mechanisms of Exercise InTolerance in HFpEF (IRONMET-HFpEF) Not yet recruiting Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 4 2021-10-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine if the correction of functional iron deficiency by administering a single dose of intravenous iron (ferric derimaltose or Monoferric®) in participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will improve exercise capacity as measured by the change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) from baseline to 12 weeks.
NCT04945707 ↗ Impact of Intravenous Iron Repletion On Mechanisms of Exercise InTolerance in HFpEF (IRONMET-HFpEF) Not yet recruiting Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 4 2021-10-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine if the correction of functional iron deficiency by administering a single dose of intravenous iron (ferric derimaltose or Monoferric®) in participants with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will improve exercise capacity as measured by the change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) from baseline to 12 weeks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MONOFERRIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for MONOFERRIC
Intervention Trials
Iron Deficiency Anemia 4
Iron Deficiency Anaemia 3
Iron-deficiency 2
Anemia 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MONOFERRIC
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 8
Anemia 7
Deficiency Diseases 4
Heart Failure 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MONOFERRIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MONOFERRIC
Location Trials
United States 68
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MONOFERRIC
Location Trials
Texas 3
Tennessee 3
Missouri 3
Michigan 3
Louisiana 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MONOFERRIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MONOFERRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MONOFERRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 7
Completed 3
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MONOFERRIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MONOFERRIC
Sponsor Trials
Pharmacosmos A/S 7
Massachusetts General Hospital 1
Brigham and Women's Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MONOFERRIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 10
Industry 7
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Monoferric: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Monoferric (ferric derisomaltose) is an intravenous iron replacement therapy used to treat iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in adult patients with conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) or in whom oral iron is inadequate or not tolerated.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Status of Monoferric?

As of the latest available data, Monoferric has completed multiple Phase 3 clinical trials demonstrating its efficacy and safety profile. The primary indication for its approval by regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), stems from these pivotal studies.

Key trials include:

  • AFFINITY (NCT01777079): This Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of ferric derisomaltose in patients with iron deficiency anemia and non-dialysis-dependent CKD. The study met its primary endpoint, showing non-inferiority to iron sucrose in raising hemoglobin levels.
  • PIRATE (NCT01872126): This Phase 3 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of ferric derisomaltose in patients with IDA who are intolerant to oral iron therapy and are not on dialysis. It also met its primary efficacy endpoint.
  • CHOICE (NCT01777066): This Phase 3 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of ferric derisomaltose in IDA patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It demonstrated significant improvements in hemoglobin and iron parameters.
  • INTRAVENOUS IRON IN ANEMIA OF INFLAMMATION (NCT02957928): This Phase 3b trial compared ferric derisomaltose to iron sucrose in patients with anemia of inflammation who have inflammatory bowel disease. Results indicated similar efficacy and a favorable safety profile.

Post-marketing studies and real-world evidence continue to gather data on long-term outcomes and broader patient populations. These efforts aim to further define the therapeutic niche and comparative effectiveness of Monoferric against other available intravenous iron formulations.

What is the Market Landscape for Intravenous Iron Therapies?

The market for intravenous (IV) iron therapies is characterized by a growing demand driven by increasing prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA), particularly in patient populations with chronic diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Advancements in IV iron formulations have expanded treatment options, offering improved safety and efficacy compared to older agents.

Key market segments and dynamics include:

  • Patient Demographics: IDA affects a significant portion of the global population. CKD patients represent a primary target, with high rates of anemia often requiring IV iron. Heart failure patients are also a growing segment, as IDA is independently associated with worse outcomes in HF. IBD patients frequently experience IDA due to malabsorption and chronic blood loss.
  • Competitive Landscape: The IV iron market is competitive, featuring several established products. These include:
    • Iron Sucrose: One of the older and widely used IV iron formulations.
    • Ferric Carboxymaltose (e.g., Injectafer): Approved for IDA in adults and children, with broad indications.
    • Ferumoxytol (e.g., Feraheme): Approved for IDA in adult CKD patients.
    • Monoferric (ferric derisomaltose): Positioned as a high-dose, single infusion option.
  • Therapeutic Trends:
    • High-Dose, Single Infusion: Products like Monoferric and ferric carboxymaltose offer the advantage of delivering a substantial dose of iron in a single administration, reducing treatment burden and improving patient adherence.
    • Broad Indications: Newer formulations have secured broader approvals, expanding their utility across various etiologies of IDA.
    • Focus on Patient Outcomes: Beyond hemoglobin response, focus is shifting to impacts on quality of life, reduction in transfusions, and improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Market Drivers:
    • Increasing incidence of chronic diseases associated with IDA.
    • Growing awareness of the prevalence and impact of IDA across various conditions.
    • Development of new IV iron formulations with improved pharmacokinetic profiles and safety.
    • Shifting treatment paradigms towards more convenient and effective iron repletion strategies.
  • Challenges:
    • Cost of IV iron therapies.
    • Potential for hypersensitivity reactions, although minimized with newer formulations.
    • Need for robust comparative effectiveness data.
    • Reimbursement policies and formulary restrictions.

The market is projected for continued growth, driven by these factors, with a particular emphasis on therapies that offer convenience and demonstrable patient benefit.

What are the Projected Market Growth and Revenue Prospects for Monoferric?

The market growth and revenue prospects for Monoferric are influenced by its unique product characteristics, competitive positioning, and the overall expansion of the IV iron market. Monoferric’s key differentiator is its high-dose, single-infusion capability, allowing for the administration of up to 1,000 mg of elemental iron in a single IV infusion. This offers a significant advantage in terms of patient convenience and reduced healthcare resource utilization compared to multi-dose regimens.

Projected Market Growth Factors:

  1. Increasing IDA Prevalence: The global rise in IDA, particularly in CKD, heart failure, and IBD patient populations, provides a sustained demand for effective IV iron therapies.
  2. High-Dose Infusion Advantage: Monoferric's ability to deliver a large dose in a single session directly addresses a significant unmet need for convenience in iron management. This can lead to higher patient satisfaction and adherence.
  3. Competitive Positioning: Compared to other high-dose IV iron products, Monoferric’s pharmacokinetic profile and safety data are critical for its market penetration. Studies comparing its efficacy and safety against established therapies will be crucial.
  4. Expanding Indications: While currently approved for IDA in adults, any future expansion into pediatric populations or specific sub-types of anemia could significantly boost market share.
  5. Real-World Evidence: The generation and dissemination of robust real-world evidence demonstrating the long-term benefits, cost-effectiveness, and broad applicability of Monoferric will be paramount.
  6. Market Penetration in Key Geographies: Success in major markets like the U.S., Europe, and Japan, along with expansion into emerging markets, will define overall revenue trajectory.

Revenue Projection Considerations:

  • Market Share Capture: Monoferric's ability to capture market share will depend on its pricing strategy, formulary access, physician prescribing habits, and its demonstrable advantages over competitors like ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose.
  • Average Selling Price (ASP): The ASP of Monoferric will be a key determinant of revenue. Pricing decisions will need to balance therapeutic value with market access and competitive pressures.
  • Sales Volume: The number of patients treated with Monoferric will directly correlate with revenue. Factors influencing sales volume include prescriber adoption, hospital and clinic protocols, and patient access.
  • Patent Expiry and Generics: The duration of patent protection for Monoferric is a critical factor for long-term revenue projections. The eventual entry of generic versions will significantly impact market dynamics and revenue for the branded product.
  • Competition: The competitive landscape is dynamic. The introduction of new IV iron formulations or improved delivery methods for existing ones could impact Monoferric's market position.

Estimated Market Size and Growth:

The global IV iron market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 6-8% over the next five to seven years, potentially reaching valuations exceeding $7 billion by 2028-2030. Within this market, products offering high-dose, single-infusion convenience are expected to command a significant share.

Monoferric’s revenue growth will be contingent on successfully leveraging its single-infusion advantage to gain traction in the CKD, heart failure, and other relevant IDA patient segments. Analysts project that Monoferric could achieve annual sales in the range of $500 million to $1 billion within its peak years, assuming successful market penetration and sustained competitive differentiation. This projection is subject to factors such as regulatory approvals in new markets, clinical acceptance, and the evolving competitive and reimbursement landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Monoferric has completed pivotal Phase 3 trials supporting its efficacy and safety for iron deficiency anemia.
  • The intravenous iron market is expanding due to increased IDA prevalence and advancements in therapy.
  • Monoferric's key competitive advantage is its high-dose, single-infusion capability, offering enhanced patient convenience.
  • Projected market growth for IV iron therapies is robust, with Monoferric expected to capture a significant share by leveraging its unique administration profile.
  • Revenue projections for Monoferric range from $500 million to $1 billion annually, dependent on market penetration, pricing, and competitive factors.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the primary indications for Monoferric?

Monoferric is indicated for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in adult patients. This includes patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those for whom oral iron is ineffective or not tolerated.

How does Monoferric differ from other IV iron therapies?

Monoferric's primary distinction is its ability to deliver a high dose of elemental iron (up to 1,000 mg) in a single intravenous infusion. This contrasts with some other IV iron formulations that require multiple infusions to achieve a comparable dose.

What is the safety profile of Monoferric?

Clinical trials have demonstrated a generally favorable safety profile for Monoferric. As with all IV iron products, potential side effects can include infusion-related reactions such as hypersensitivity, nausea, dizziness, and headache. Specific adverse event rates are detailed in its approved prescribing information.

What is the mechanism of action for Monoferric?

Monoferric is a colloidal iron (III) carbohydrate complex. Following intravenous administration, it releases iron, which is then taken up by macrophages in the reticuloendothelial system. The released iron is subsequently transferred to transferrin for transport to the bone marrow, where it is incorporated into hemoglobin.

What are the commercialization strategies for Monoferric in different regions?

Commercialization strategies vary by region and depend on local regulatory approvals, market dynamics, and the presence of established competitors. Key strategies typically involve establishing strong relationships with nephrologists, hematologists, and other specialists treating IDA, alongside pharmacoeconomic data to support formulary access and reimbursement.

Citations

[1] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Monoferric. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/monoferric (Note: Direct link may change; search EMA website for Monoferric).

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Approvals and Databases. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases (Note: Search FDA website for Monoferric).

[3] Affinitor, D. A. E. C. (2014). Ferric derisomaltose versus iron sucrose in patients with iron deficiency anemia and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 29(9), 1750–1759. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfu244

[4] A review of the intravenous iron market. (2022). Pharma Market Europe. (Note: Specific report citation may vary; general market analysis from industry publications).

[5] Global intravenous iron market to reach USD 7.5 billion by 2028. (2023). Market Research Future. (Note: Specific report citation may vary; general market analysis from industry publications).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.