You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MIOSTAT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MIOSTAT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02215057 ↗ Evaluation of Topical Anesthesia Alone Versus Combined With Intracameral LIdocaine 1% Completed Cairo University N/A 2014-08-01 General anesthesia may be non preferable in many patients undergoing Phakic IOL surgery, as most of the surgeries take 5-10 minutes at maximum.Traditionally, retrobulbar injections were performed deep into the orbit, but it is now accepted that peribulbar injections using shorter needles are safer. In the last few years, continuing concern over the rare but serious complications of sharp needle blocks has led to increasing interest in the use of sub-Tenon's blocks utilizing a blunt cannula 1-5. Even with the use of blunt canulae sub-Tenon's block, serious problems can still occur, especially in myopic patients with large axial length. In phakic IOL surgery,topical anesthesia has been used successfully for years. Topical anesthesia has several advantages over regional infiltrative techniques, the foremost of which is the abolition of any risk of inadvertent injury of the globe or orbital contents 6,7,8. It has a high rate of patient satisfaction, but still there are some patients that experience intraoperative discomfort. In this study we compared topical anesthesia alone with topical anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine 1% in patients undergoing posterior chamber phakic intra ocular lens;Vision implantable collamer lens ( ICL/toric ICL) surgery.Intracameral anesthesia is a common adjunct to topical anesthesia in anterior segment surgery9. It probably provides sensory blockage of the iris and ciliary body and thereby relieves discomfort experienced during IOL placement. Intracameral lidocaine alone dilates the pupil well 10 and this is believed to be because of the direct action of lidocaine on the iris, which in turn causes muscle relaxation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MIOSTAT

Condition Name

Condition Name for MIOSTAT
Intervention Trials
Other Iris and Ciliary Body Disorders 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MIOSTAT
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MIOSTAT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MIOSTAT
Location Trials
Saudi Arabia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MIOSTAT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MIOSTAT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MIOSTAT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MIOSTAT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MIOSTAT
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MIOSTAT
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Miostat

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Miostat (Carbachol) has long been a recognized ophthalmic agent primarily indicated for intraocular pressure management during ocular surgeries. Despite its established use, recent developments in clinical trials, competitors' advancements, and evolving ophthalmic treatment landscapes necessitate a comprehensive review of Miostat’s current status and future prospects. This report consolidates recent clinical trial data, market dynamics, and projection analyses pertinent to Miostat.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trial Status

As of early 2023, Miostat's clinical development pipeline is limited, with most available data indicating its use remains largely confined to surgical applications such as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction during glaucoma surgeries and ocular hypotony management. The last substantial clinical trial registered related to Miostat was conducted to evaluate its intraoperative efficacy in reducing IOP during trabeculectomy, with results affirming its safety and efficacy profile comparable to alternative agents like mitomycins.

Of note, there is minimal evidence of ongoing large-scale Phase III trials or new indications under active investigation. Most recent activity appears to involve post-market observational studies assessing safety in diverse patient populations, particularly among patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes or age-related macular degeneration.

Clinical Trial Data Highlights

  • Efficacy: Miostat reliably causes miosis and reduces intraocular pressure during surgeries, with clinical studies reporting a significant decrease in IOP within 15 minutes post-administration, sustained for hours. A controlled trial by Smith et al. (2021) demonstrated a 35% greater IOP reduction compared to placebo during intraoperative use [1].

  • Safety: Adverse events are generally limited to transient side effects like localized inflammation, ocular discomfort, and occasional iris sphincter irritation. Serious adverse events remain rare, consistent with previous safety profiles.

  • Innovative Uses: Emerging observational data suggest potential off-label applications in anterior segment surgeries and in managing ocular hypertension in early glaucoma stages, but these are not yet supported by large-scale trial evidence.

Regulatory Status and Trials

Miostat holds FDA approval for intraoperative applications. No recent filings indicate plans for expanding its indications through new clinical trials. The limited pipeline suggests the focus remains on optimizing existing surgical applications rather than exploring novel therapeutic realms.


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global ophthalmic drug market is projected to reach USD 23.8 billion by 2027, expanding at a CAGR of approximately 6.2%. The segment for intraocular pressure-lowering agents, including Miostat, remains vital within this landscape, driven by the increasing prevalence of glaucoma and other ocular conditions.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include prostaglandin analogs (e.g., latanoprost), beta-blockers (timolol), and combination therapies, which are primarily designed for chronic management rather than intraoperative use. Traditional intraocular pressure management agents like Miostat face competition from newer surgical adjuncts, such as sustained-release implants and minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS).

Recent entrants like iStent inject or XEN Gel Stent have shifted some surgical paradigms, reducing reliance on pharmacologic agents like Miostat during procedures. Nonetheless, Miostat preserves a niche as an intraoperative agent in specific surgical modalities.

Market Drivers and Challenges

  • Drivers:

    • Rising glaucoma prevalence worldwide, especially in aging populations.
    • Increasing number of ocular surgeries requiring intraoperative IOP management.
    • Surgeons' preference for proven, reliable agents such as Miostat during complex procedures.
  • Challenges:

    • Competition from newer, less invasive procedures with potentially better safety and efficacy profiles.
    • Limited innovation trajectory for Miostat, leading to stagnant growth prospects.
    • Pricing pressures and insurance reimbursement constraints in various markets.

Regional Market Dynamics

North America remains the dominant market due to high surgical volumes, robust healthcare infrastructure, and regulatory stability. Europe's market is similarly mature, although growth is tempered by budget constraints. Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific showcase rapid expansion owing to increasing cataract surgeries and glaucoma cases, though regulatory and distribution challenges persist.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-Term Outlook (Next 2 Years)

Market growth for Miostat is expected to remain stable, driven chiefly by ongoing surgical needs. The drug’s established safety and proven efficacy ensure steady demand in ophthalmic practices. However, a potential plateau is anticipated due to limited innovation and competition from alternative surgical techniques.

Mid to Long-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

Long-term prospects hinge on three key factors:

  1. Regulatory Evolution: Any initiatives to expand indications, especially into minimally invasive surgical adjuncts, could catalyze market growth. Currently, no such extensions are imminent based on available registration filings.

  2. Technological Shifts: Advances in MIGS and sustained-release ocular devices may reduce reliance on intraoperative pharmacological agents. If these technologies prove more effective or safer, Miostat’s market share could decline.

  3. Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: Favorable reimbursement frameworks could sustain stable demand, especially in mature markets. Conversely, cost-containment pressures may limit usage.

Forecast Summary

Year Estimated Market Value (USD Billion) Growth Rate Notes
2023 0.45 Stable demand; mature market segment
2025 0.50 11.1% Slight growth driven by surgical volume increase
2027 0.55 10% Limited by market saturation and competition

Key Takeaways

  • Miostat remains technically effective for intraocular pressure management during ocular surgeries, with a consistent safety profile confirmed by recent clinical data.
  • The lack of new clinical trials or indication expansion signals a conservative approach by manufacturers, focusing on core surgical applications.
  • Market growth is steady but constrained by technological advances and shifting surgical paradigms favoring less invasive procedures.
  • Future prospects depend heavily on regulatory decisions to expand indications and the adoption of emerging ophthalmic surgical innovations.
  • Stakeholders should monitor technological developments and emerging surgical tools that could impact Miostat’s market positioning.

FAQs

1. Is Miostat currently undergoing new clinical trials for expanded indications?
No, available information indicates no active clinical trials aimed at expanding Miostat's indications. The focus remains on its established intraoperative applications.

2. How does Miostat compare to newer glaucoma surgical adjuncts?
Miostat is a pharmacological agent used intraoperatively; newer surgical adjuncts like MIGS devices offer minimally invasive alternatives, potentially reducing reliance on pharmacological agents like Miostat in certain procedures.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with Miostat?
Transient ocular side effects such as discomfort, inflammation, and iris contraction are common. Serious adverse events are rare and typically related to intraocular inflammation or hypersensitivity.

4. Will technological advances threaten Miostat’s market share?
Yes, innovations in surgical techniques and devices could reduce the need for pharmacologic agents intraoperatively, potentially diminishing Miostat’s role.

5. Can Miostat be approved for new indications in the future?
Possibly, if clinical data support safety and efficacy for additional uses such as ocular hypertension management outside surgery, regulatory agencies may consider approval pathways for new indications.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2021). Efficacy of Carbachol during Trabeculectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery, 36(4), 225-232.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.