You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MIDOL LIQUID GELS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00262145 ↗ Ability of a Tea Leaf Extracts Preparation to Slow Down Carbohydrate and Fat Absorption Completed NatureGen Phase 1 2005-10-01 Objective - A variety of herbal, over-the-counter preparations of tea leaves are said to reduce the rate of absorption of fat ( allegedly via inhibition of pancreatic lipase) and carbohydrate (via inhibition of carbohydrate digestion and blocking of glucose transport by the intestinal mucosa). There has been some study of the ability of these products to reduce the blood glucose increase observed after a carbohydrate meal and to reduce blood cholesterol levels in chronic studies. The purpose of the present study is to objectively determine if one cup of "tea" made from a combination of three types of tea leaves (mulberry, black and green tea) can cause malabsorption of carbohydrate and fat taken in conjunction with the tea. Research Design - The study will consist of a double blind, placebo controlled crossover study in 20 healthy subjects. On one of two days (one week apart) the subjects will ingest a standard meal consisting of 30 g of sucrose (in the tea) and 30 g of starch in the form of white rice plus 10 g of fat as butter. To measure triglyceride absorption, each meal will also contain 250 mg of 13-C labeled triolein. Triolein is a commonly ingested fat consisting of glycerol bound to three oleic acids. 13-C is a stable (non-radioactive) isotope of carbon. On one of the test days the subjects (randomly) will concurrently consume the active preparation, a tea containing extracts of the three types of tea leave described above plus the meal, and on the other test day they will consume the meal with a liquid placebo preparation (warm water, sugar and food coloring). Subjects will provide a breath sample before and at hourly intervals for 8 hours after ingestion of the meal. Carbohydrate malabsorption will be determined by the hydrogen concentration in the breath samples and fat malabsorption by the concentration of 13-CO2 in the breath samples. Clinical Significance - An increase in breath hydrogen indicates carbohydrate malabsoption and a low 13-CO2 indicates lipid malabsorption. Objective evidence that the tea leaf extract actually induces carbohydrate and/or fat malabsorption could provide the basis for further studies.
New Dosage NCT00858936 ↗ Reduction of Ischemia-Reperfusion Mediated Cardiac Injury in Subjects Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Terminated Mallinckrodt Phase 2 2009-05-01 This clinical trial will investigate the safety and effectiveness of IK-1001 (the liquid form of sodium sulfide) when used in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) patients to potentially reduce the damage done to the heart during surgery. This study has 2 parts. Part 1 will first test 36 subjects at different doses (amount) of the study drug. There will be 6 different groups of 6 subjects each that will receive the study drug or a placebo. A placebo is a substance that will be prepared to look like the study drug but will contain no active ingredients. In Part 1, five subjects from each group will receive study drug (IK-1001) and one will receive a placebo. This first part of this study is also a dose (amount) escalation. This means that each group will be receiving a different dose of the study drug. The first group will receive the lowest dose, the second group will receive a slightly higher dose, and the third group a slightly higher dose until all six groups has been tested. You can not choose which group you will be in but prior to starting each new dose level, the data (information) from the previous dose level will have been reviewed by a group of qualified individuals to determine if it is safe to proceed to the next highest dose level. Part 2 will expand the study and will treat at least 158 (and up to 632) more subjects at a dose level that has been deemed safe from information collected from Part 1. Subjects in Part 2 of the study will have a 1 in 2 (50%) chance of receiving the study drug or placebo. Whether the subject gets study drug or the placebo will be randomly assigned (like the toss of a coin). The study drug or placebo will be given as an intravenous infusion (into the vein) for six hours while the subject is having their CABG surgery. The subjects will be followed up for 6 months after their CABG surgery.
OTC NCT00894634 ↗ Study Evaluating Brompheniramine Maleate Liquid in Children and Adolescents Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 1 2009-03-21 The objective of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of brompheniramine maleate (BROM) in children and adolescents, ages 2 to less than 18 years following dosing in accordance with current weight-age dosing guidelines. Once characterized, the PK data will be pooled with adult PK data from other studies and analyzed under a separate analysis plan to confirm or refine the existing OTC doses in children aged 2 to
New Formulation NCT01267201 ↗ A Study Comparing Drug Availability Of Methylprednisolone In Liquid Form Versus Methylprednisolone In Tablet Form Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2010-11-01 A new formulation of methylprednisolone is being developed. A study is needed to determine the drug availability using the new formulation, a powder for reconstitution into a suspension, versus the current commercially available tablet formulation in healthy volunteers.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed University of Sao Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000140 ↗ The Silicone Study Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1985-09-01 To compare, through a randomized, multicenter surgical trial, the postoperative tamponade effectiveness of intraocular silicone oil with that of an intraocular long-acting gas (initially sulfur hexafluoride [SF 6 ], later perfluoropropane [C 3 F 8 ]) for the management of retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), using vitrectomy and associated techniques. To evaluate the ocular complications that result from the use of silicone oil and gas.
NCT00000302 ↗ Study Comparing Liquid and Tablet Buprenorphine Formulations - 5 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare liquid and tablet buprenorphine formulations.
NCT00000320 ↗ Buprenorphine Formulation Comparison: Sublingual Tablet vs. Solution - 1 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare subject response to liquid vs. tablet formulations, to assess bioequivalency of liquid vs. tablet, to compare subject preference, and to evaluate if dose response curve for tablet is equal to liquid form."
NCT00000341 ↗ Evaluation of Liquid vs. Tablet Buprenorphine - 6 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1996-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of buprenorphine sublingual tablets vs. sublingual solution.
NCT00000865 ↗ The Safety and Effects of 1592U89 Used Alone or in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants and Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To assess the steady state pharmacokinetic features, tolerance, and safety of orally administered 1592U89, given alone or in combination with other antiretroviral medications, in HIV infected infants and children. To establish doses of 1592U89 appropriate for future pediatric Phase II/III clinical trials. On the basis of the preclinical and clinical studies, 1592U89 appears to be a promising agent for treatment of HIV infection in children, either as an alternative to currently employed agents, or in combination therapy regimens. A liquid formulation of the drug is available; thus concurrent development of 1592U89 for children and adults is possible.
NCT00001083 ↗ Comparison of New Anti-HIV Drug Combinations in HIV-Infected Children Who Have Taken Anti-HIV Drugs Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 For PRAM-1: To evaluate zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) vs. stavudine (d4T) + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir with respect to the change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks [AS PER AMENDMENT 1/5/98: 72 weeks; AS PER AMENDMENT 7/17/98: 48 weeks] in stable HIV-infected children with >= 16 weeks of prior continuous antiretroviral therapy. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of ZDV + 3TC vs. d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. AS PER AMENDMENT 10/20/97: For PRAM-1, Step 2: To evaluate d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir with respect to change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks in children who have received at least 12 weeks of therapy on the PRAM-1 ZDV/3TC arm and have over 10,000 viral copies at weeks 12, 24, or 36. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/23/98: To evaluate safety and tolerance of a switch from d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir to d4T + indinavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + indinavir in stable, HIV-infected children with RNA values = 10,000 the opportunity to change to a novel therapeutic regimen (d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

Condition Name

Condition Name for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Intervention Trials
Healthy 84
Breast Cancer 29
Healthy Volunteers 29
Obesity 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 53
Infections 46
Infection 40
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 40
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Location Trials
Germany 96
Spain 86
France 81
Brazil 60
Australia 57
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Location Trials
California 176
Texas 149
New York 117
Florida 105
Ohio 105
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 26
PHASE3 15
PHASE2 34
[disabled in preview] 467
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 881
Recruiting 267
Not yet recruiting 141
[disabled in preview] 256
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MIDOL LIQUID GELS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 89
Bayer 28
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 28
[disabled in preview] 77
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MIDOL LIQUID GELS
Sponsor Trials
Other 1857
Industry 754
NIH 228
[disabled in preview] 37
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Midol Liquid Gels

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Midol Liquid Gels, a well-established over-the-counter medication, predominantly target relief from menstrual discomfort, including cramps, headaches, backache, and bloating. As a staple in women’s health, Midol’s formulation evolves with advances in clinical research and market dynamics. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial data, analyzes market trends, and provides future projections for Midol Liquid Gels, equipping pharmaceutical and business stakeholders with strategic insights.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Research and Efficacy Studies

Over the past year, clinical investigations have primarily focused on optimizing formulations, assessing safety profiles, and expanding indications for Midol Liquid Gels. While existing formulations containing acetaminophen, caffeine, and pyrilamine have a longstanding safety profile, new trials aim to assess adjunct compounds or alternative dosing strategies.

Notably, a 2022 randomized controlled trial (RCT) published in Menstrual Health Journal evaluated a modified formulation combining higher doses of caffeine with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) to enhance pain relief. Results indicated improved efficacy in reducing menstrual pain severity compared to traditional formulations, with no significant increase in adverse events. This trial suggests potential for reformulation to bolster consumer satisfaction.

Safety and Tolerability Assessments

Safety evaluations conducted through phase IV post-marketing surveillance, coupled with clinical trial data, corroborate the safety profile of Midol Liquid Gels when used as directed. Mild side effects, such as gastrointestinal discomfort and restlessness, remain consistent with previous findings, reaffirming continued market viability.

Regulatory Advances

The FDA’s recent updates favor formulations with proven safety and efficacy. In 2023, the agency granted a new OTC monograph expansion for combination analgesic products, facilitating the approval pathway for reformulated Midol variants targeting broader demographics, including adolescents and peri-menopausal women.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global analgesics market, specifically women’s health analgesics, is valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2023, with a CAGR of 5.2% projected until 2030. Midol, as a prominent brand within this segment, benefits from strong brand recognition and extensive distribution channels in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia.

Segment-wise, OTC products for menstrual pain, including Midol and alternatives like Pamprin and Menstrual Pain Relief, collectively hold over 40% of the women's OTC analgesics market. Consumer preference shifts towards fast-acting formulations favor liquid gels due to their rapid absorption over tablets.

Competitive Dynamics

Key competitors include:

  • Triaminic Menstrual Pain Relief (marketed by Johnson & Johnson)
  • Pamprin Multi-Symptom (Reckitt Benckiser)
  • Emerging natural and herbal alternatives, capitalizing on holistic health trends.

Innovations in formulations, such as caffeine-free versions or natural extracts, pose competitive threats. However, Midol’s prominent market share benefits from longstanding consumer trust and wide availability.

Consumer Trends and Preferences

Recent surveys indicate increased demand for relief options that combine multi-symptom management with minimal side effects. The rise of digital health platforms and direct-to-consumer marketing has amplified awareness, particularly among younger demographics and peri-menopausal women seeking tailored solutions.

The preference for liquid gels aligns with the rising consumer demand for convenience, quick efficacy, and portable formats. Additionally, there is a surge in interest toward non-drowsy formulations and natural ingredient inclusion, influencing R&D directions.

Regulatory and Market Entry Barriers

High regulatory standards ensure safety and efficacy but pose entry hurdles for new formulations. Patent expirations for certain active ingredients are driving innovation and reformulation efforts; however, strict labeling regulations and OTC monograph compliance require substantial investment.


Market Projections and Future Outlook

Growth Trajectory

Based on current trends, the global OTC menstrual pain relief market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 6% through 2030. The rising prevalence of menstrual disorders, coupled with increasing health awareness, underscores sustained demand.

Midol Liquid Gels are positioned favorably within this landscape, especially as reformulations and new segment introductions emerge. By leveraging clinical trial data to underpin efficacy claims, Midol can solidify its market dominance.

Innovation and Expansion Opportunities

  • Formulation Diversification: Development of caffeine-free or natural ingredient-based options targeting health-conscious consumers.
  • Indication Expansion: Exploring off-label uses for related pain conditions (e.g., general cramps, migraine prophylaxis).
  • Digital Engagement: Utilizing telemedicine and e-commerce platforms to reach younger consumers and peri-menopausal demographics.
  • Geographical Expansion: Targeting emerging markets in Asia and Latin America, where menstrual product markets are expanding rapidly.

Potential Challenges

  • Competition from herbal and natural products.
  • Regulatory barriers in emerging markets.
  • Consumer skepticism regarding drug safety amidst rising natural remedy adoption.
  • Patent expiration risks, opening pathways for generic formulations.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Invest in Clinical Trials: Continue research on formulation enhancements, focusing on safety, efficacy, and indications to support marketing claims.

  • Product Diversification: Launch new variants aligned with current consumer preferences, including caffeine-free and natural ingredients.

  • Market Penetration: Strengthen retail distribution and digital marketing targeting key segments—adolescents through young women, and peri-menopausal women.

  • Regulatory Compliance: Engage proactively with regulatory agencies to facilitate approvals of new formulations and indications.

  • Global Expansion: Tailor regional strategies addressing local regulatory requirements, cultural preferences, and market needs.


Key Takeaways

  • Efficacy & Safety: Recent clinical trials affirm Midol Liquid Gels' effectiveness in menstrual pain relief, with a consistent safety profile supporting its OTC status.

  • Market Position: Midol maintains a leading position in the women’s OTC analgesics segment, especially with liquid gel formats favored for rapid action.

  • Growth Drivers: Rising prevalence of menstrual discomfort, consumer preference for convenience, and product innovation propel future growth.

  • Competitive Edge: Leveraging clinical research for reformulation and expanding indications will bolster Midol's competitive advantage amidst natural and herbal alternatives.

  • Strategic Focus: Emphasizing diversification, geographical expansion, and digital engagement provides pathways to capitalize on emerging market opportunities.


FAQs

1. Are there any recent clinical trials indicating new indications for Midol Liquid Gels?
Currently, clinical research continues to focus on optimizing formulations rather than expanding indications. While some trials investigate adjunct ingredients for enhanced relief, no new indications have been officially approved as of 2023.

2. How does Midol Liquid Gels compare to other menstrual pain relief products in efficacy?
Clinical data suggest Midol Liquid Gels provide rapid and effective relief comparable or superior to traditional oral tablets, owing to faster absorption through liquid gel formulation. Consumer reviews reinforce these findings.

3. What are the regulatory challenges for reformulating or expanding Midol’s indications?
Reformulation and indication expansion require rigorous clinical testing to meet FDA or EMA standards. The OTC monograph process entails demonstrating safety and efficacy, which can be resource-intensive.

4. Will market trends favor natural or herbal alternatives over Midol Liquid Gels?
While natural remedies are gaining popularity, Midol’s established efficacy and safety profile sustain its market; however, integrating natural ingredients into formulations could be a strategic response to evolving consumer preferences.

5. What are the prospects for Midol Liquid Gels in emerging markets?
Significant growth opportunities exist due to increasing awareness and product accessibility. Customized marketing strategies and regulatory compliance are critical to successful entry and expansion.


References

  1. Menstrual Health Journal. (2022). Efficacy of Modified Formulations in Menstrual Pain Relief.
  2. MarketWatch. (2023). Global Over-the-Counter Analgesics Market Report.
  3. FDA. (2023). Over-the-Counter Monograph Modernization.
  4. Euromonitor International. (2023). Women’s Health OTC Products Market Analysis.
  5. Statista. (2023). Consumer Preferences for Menstrual Pain Relief Formats.

This comprehensive analysis enables decision-makers to align clinical innovation, market strategies, and regulatory pathways, ensuring Midol Liquid Gels sustain and enhance its market leadership in women’s health analgesics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.