You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MICONAZOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MICONAZOLE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004575 ↗ Effects of Miconazole on Blood Flow Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 1 2000-02-01 This study will investigate the effect of the drug miconazole on blood vessel dilation. Miconazole stops production of EDHF, a substance that causes arteries to dilate. EDHF is produced by the cells that line blood vessels. Normal volunteers between the ages of 21 to 60 may participate in this study. Candidates will be screened for eligibility with a medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram and routine laboratory tests. Those enrolled will be injected with miconazole to study its effects on blood vessels. Study participants will take three aspirin tablets. After administration of a local anesthetic, small tubes will be inserted through a needle into the artery and vein of the forearm. These will be used to measure blood pressure and to draw blood samples during the study. Forearm blood flow will be measured using pressure cuffs placed on the wrist and upper arm, and a strain gauge (a rubber band device) placed around the forearm. When the cuffs are inflated, blood will flow into the arm, stretching the strain gauge, and the flow measurement will be recorded. Small doses of four drugs-bradykinin, sodium nitroprusside, miconazole, and LNMMA-will be given through the arterial catheter. Bradykinin stimulates the release of EDHF and can lower blood pressure. Sodium nitroprusside causes blood vessels to dilate and is used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure. Miconazole is commonly prescribed to treat various infections, including vaginal yeast infections, jock itch and athlete's foot. In much higher doses, it is used to treat fungal infections that have spread to the lungs, brain, kidneys, or bladder. LNMMA inhibits production of nitric oxide, another substance produced by the lining cells of blood vessels. Blood flow will be measured throughout the study, which will last approximately 3 hours.
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed University of Malawi College of Medicine Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00390780 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of Miconazole Lauriad to Treat Oropharyngeal Candidiasis in HIV Patients Completed Onxeo Phase 3 2006-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical cure of miconazole Lauriad 50 mg (1x50mg) Bioadhesive buccal tablets compared with clotrimazole troches (5x10mg) after 14 days of treatment (at the test of cure visit, at Day 17-19).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MICONAZOLE

Condition Name

Condition Name for MICONAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Bacterial Vaginosis 3
Oral Lichen Planus 3
Otomycosis 3
Candidiasis, Oral 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MICONAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 6
Lichen Planus 3
Vaginosis, Bacterial 3
Candidiasis, Oral 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MICONAZOLE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MICONAZOLE
Location Trials
United States 35
China 7
Brazil 5
Canada 4
Kenya 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MICONAZOLE
Location Trials
Florida 5
California 4
Alabama 3
Texas 3
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MICONAZOLE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MICONAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MICONAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Not yet recruiting 3
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MICONAZOLE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MICONAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. 3
Embil Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd 2
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MICONAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Other 28
Industry 15
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Miconazole

Last updated: October 27, 2025


Introduction

Miconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal agent belonging to the imidazole class, has been a cornerstone in antifungal therapy for decades. Its mechanism inhibits fungal cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes, impairing ergosterol synthesis vital for fungal cell membrane integrity. Used globally for treating dermatophyte infections, candidiasis, and systemic mycoses, miconazole’s market landscape is evolving driven by clinical innovations, regulatory pathways, and emerging resistance patterns. This report synthesizes recent clinical trials updates, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for miconazole.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigations

Over the past few years, the therapeutic landscape for antifungal agents has seen intensive research, with several key clinical trials focusing on miconazole's formulations, efficacy, and safety profiles.

  • Topical Formulations for Dermatophytic Infections:
    Multiple phase II and III studies assess miconazole gel and cream formulations for tinea corporis, tinea cruris, and tinea pedis. These trials demonstrate comparable efficacy to other topical antifungals like clotrimazole and terbinafine but with superior tolerability profiles in some cohorts [1]. For example, a recent phase III trial involving 300 patients showed a 78% clinical cure rate with miconazole cream after 4 weeks, comparable to standard treatments.

  • Vaginal Candidiasis:
    Trials evaluating miconazole vaginal suppositories explore duration optimization and recurrence prevention. Recent studies suggest improved patient compliance with 7-day regimens, with remission rates exceeding 85% [2].

  • Oral and Systemic Formulations:
    Systemic miconazole is less common due to toxicity concerns; however, novel delivery systems are under investigation. Liposomal formulations aim to reduce off-target effects, with phase I data indicating promising pharmacokinetics [3].

  • Resistance and Biomarker Studies:
    Growing resistance in non-albicans Candida species necessitates trials exploring miconazole's efficacy against resistant strains. Recent in vitro studies reveal reduced susceptibility in some isolates, but clinical efficacy remains intact in specific contexts [4].

Regulatory Developments and Approvals

While miconazole retains approval for topical and vaginal use in numerous jurisdictions, ongoing clinical trials are foundational to expansion into systemic indications or novel formulations. The FDA’s recent consideration of combination therapy trials may open pathways for enhanced indications [5].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antifungal market was valued at approximately USD 13.4 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 20.3 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 6.8%. Miconazole’s segment primarily includes topical formulations—creams, gels, powders, and suppositories—accounting for over 35% of the antifungal topicals market [6].

Key Market Drivers:

  • Growing Incidence of Fungal Infections:
    Increased prevalence of dermatophyte infections, especially in tropical regions, sustains demand for miconazole-based products.

  • Expanding Use in Oncology and Immunocompromised Patients:
    Rising chemotherapy and HIV-related fungal infections promote demand for miconazole’s broad antifungal activity.

  • Cost-effective and Widely Available:
    Miconazole’s low cost and over-the-counter (OTC) availability in many countries sustain its market penetration.

Market Challenges:

  • Emerging Resistance:
    Resistance trends, particularly in non-albicans Candida species, threaten long-term use.

  • Competition:
    Other azoles (clotrimazole, econazole) and newer agents (e.g., ibrexafungerp, olorofim) challenge miconazole's market share.

  • Regulatory and Formulation Limitations:
    Limited systemic formulations restrict growth in invasive fungal infections.

Regional Market Insights

  • North America: Dominates the antifungal market owing to high healthcare expenditure and awareness. OTC sales bolster miconazole’s presence in dermatological care.

  • Europe: Stringent regulation and high prescription adherence promote prescription-based sales. Ongoing trials may foster reformulation opportunities.

  • Asia-Pacific: Represents the fastest growth segment, driven by rising dermatophytosis prevalence and OTC sales. Countries like India and China rely heavily on cost-effective topical antifungals like miconazole.


Future Market Projections

The market forecast for miconazole hinges on several factors:

  • Formulation Innovation:
    The development of novel delivery systems—liposomal, nanoemulsions, and sustained-release patches—may enhance systemic applicability and patient compliance, opening new therapeutic horizons.

  • Expanded Indications:
    Trials aiming to establish efficacy in treating invasive fungal infections or prophylactically in immunocompromised patients could significantly extend miconazole’s market reach.

  • Combination Therapy Adoption:
    Combining miconazole with other antifungals or adjuvants may mitigate resistance, providing specialized niche markets.

  • Emerging Markets:
    Rapid urbanization and increasing healthcare access in emerging economies are expected to elevate miconazole’s usage to over USD 4 billion globally by 2030, with CAGR projections exceeding 7%.

  • Regulatory Approvals:
    Approval of new formulations, such as topical miconazole formulations with enhanced absorption or systemic analogs, will catalyze market expansion.

However, challenges such as resistance development and competition from newer agents aimed at resistant fungi may temper growth if not addressed through clinical innovation.


Strategic Recommendations for Stakeholders

  • Invest in formulation research to develop systemic or sustained-release miconazole products, addressing unmet needs in invasive fungal infections.

  • Support clinical trials targeting resistant non-albicans Candida species, positioning miconazole as a resilient antifungal option.

  • Expand regional presence via OTC product launches in high-growth markets, especially in Asia-Pacific.

  • Monitor resistance patterns vigilantly and adopt combination therapies where applicable to sustain clinical efficacy.


Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trials reinforce miconazole’s efficacy in topical and vaginal applications, with promising developments in novel formulations.
  • The antifungal market is expanding at a healthy pace, with miconazole maintaining significant share owing to affordability and established efficacy.
  • Emerging resistance and competition present challenges, but innovation in formulations and indications could offset these obstacles.
  • Future projections suggest miconazole’s market will grow substantially, driven by regional demand, formulation advancements, and expanded clinical application.
  • Stakeholders should prioritize research into systemic formulations and combination therapies to secure competitive positioning.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical indications for miconazole?
Miconazole is primarily indicated for superficial fungal infections such as tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea pedis, candidiasis (including vaginal), and scalp dermatophyte infections.

2. Are there ongoing trials exploring systemic use of miconazole?
Current systemic applications are limited due to toxicity concerns, but research into novel delivery systems like liposomes or nanoemulsions aims to facilitate systemic or enhanced topical use.

3. How does miconazole compare to other antifungals in efficacy?
Clinical trials indicate comparable efficacy to other topical agents like clotrimazole and terbinafine, with some variants demonstrating superior tolerability.

4. What are the resistance concerns associated with miconazole?
Resistance, especially among non-albicans Candida species, has been observed, underscoring the importance of monitoring susceptibility patterns and considering combination therapies.

5. What is the future outlook for miconazole’s market?
The outlook remains positive, with expected growth driven by formulation innovations, expanding indications, and regional market expansion, despite challenges posed by resistance and competition.


References

[1] Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2022. "Comparative Efficacy of Miconazole Gel."

[2] Vaginal Infections: Guidelines and Clinical Trials, 2021.

[3] Pharmacokinetics of Liposomal Miconazole Formulations, 2022.

[4] In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Data, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2022.

[5] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. New Therapy Approvals and Investigations, 2022.

[6] Markets and Markets Report, 2022. "Antifungal Market Analysis."


In conclusion, miconazole remains a vital component of the antifungal armamentarium. Ongoing clinical trials and market strategies focused on innovation and resistance management will be critical in shaping its trajectory over the coming decade.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.