You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MICARDIS HCT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MICARDIS HCT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed Bayer Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
NCT00034840 ↗ Telmisartan vs. Valsartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension Following a Missed Dose Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2001-10-01 The primary objectives are to demonstrate that MICARDIS® (telmisartan) is statistically superior to Diovan® (valsartan) in reducing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following a missed dose at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period as measured by the 24-hour ABPM mean and to demonstrate that MICARDIS® is statistically superior to Diovan® in reducing DBP during the last 6-hours of the 24-hour dosing interval as measured by ABPM following a dose of active study medication at the end of a 6 to 8-week treatment period.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MICARDIS HCT

Condition Name

Condition Name for MICARDIS HCT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 53
Healthy 3
Diabetic Nephropathies 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MICARDIS HCT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 50
Essential Hypertension 6
Kidney Diseases 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MICARDIS HCT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MICARDIS HCT
Location Trials
United States 271
Canada 45
Korea, Republic of 9
Australia 7
France 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MICARDIS HCT
Location Trials
California 12
Illinois 11
Texas 10
Georgia 10
Pennsylvania 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MICARDIS HCT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MICARDIS HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 18
Phase 3 12
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MICARDIS HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 61
Recruiting 7
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MICARDIS HCT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MICARDIS HCT
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 52
Bayer 3
HK inno.N Corporation 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MICARDIS HCT
Sponsor Trials
Industry 66
Other 33
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Micardis HCT

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Micardis HCT, marketed collaboratively by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly, combines telmisartan—a potent angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)—with hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic, to manage hypertension and reduce cardiovascular risk. As the competitive antihypertensive market evolves, understanding Micardis HCT’s clinical development trajectory, market positioning, and future outlook is critical for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing Clinical Investigations

While Micardis HCT’s primary patent and approval stages occurred earlier, ongoing clinical studies focus on expanded indications and real-world effectiveness. The most recent trials explore:

  • Renal Protective Effects: Recent observational studies investigated telmisartan's role in patients with diabetic nephropathy, which may influence off-label or expanded indications.
  • Cardiovascular Outcomes: Large-scale trials, such as the ONTARGET study, have established telmisartan’s efficacy in cardiovascular event reduction. However, specific trials for Micardis HCT are limited, mostly retrospective analyses utilizing existing data sets.
  • Combination Therapy Safety: Trials assess long-term safety and tolerability of Micardis HCT, especially in elderly populations and patients with comorbidities like diabetes or chronic kidney disease.

Notable Completed Trials and Data

  • ONTARGET (2008): Demonstrated telmisartan’s benefits in high-risk populations, serving as indirect evidence for Micardis HCT’s efficacy.
  • PREVAIL (2016): Focused on hypertensive patients with comorbidities, affirming the tolerability of combination therapy.
  • Real-World Evidence (2020–2022): Database analyses suggest Micardis HCT maintains consistent blood pressure control with manageable adverse events, supporting its continued clinical relevance.

Regulatory and Developmental Outlook

No recent submissions for new formulations or indications are publicly documented, indicating that current clinical research emphasizes safety and comparative effectiveness rather than breakthrough indications. Patents for Micardis HCT expire between 2024-2025, which may foster generic competition in the near-term.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The antihypertensive market is highly competitive, featuring generics, fixed-dose combinations, and novel agents. Micardis HCT, with its combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide, targets hypertensive patients requiring combination therapy, a segment projected to grow owing to increasing hypertension prevalence.

Key competitors include:

  • Losartan/HCTZ (Co-Diovan)
  • Valsartan/HCTZ (Diovan HCT)
  • Olmesartan/HCTZ (Benicar HCT)
  • Azilsartan/HCTZ (Edarbyclor)

Generic versions of Micardis HCT are already available in numerous markets, exerting downward pressure on retail prices.

Market Performance and Sales Trends

Annual sales peaked around 2018 at approximately $500 million globally but have since declined due to patent expirations and market saturation. In 2022, sales were estimated below $200 million, with the majority generated in North America and Europe. Market analysts suggest these figures will further diminish unless new indications or formulations are introduced.

Regulatory and Pricing Dynamics

Regulations favor generic substitution, reducing Micardis HCT’s market share. Price competition is fierce, especially in mature markets. Reimbursement policies are increasingly favoring cost-effective generics over branded drugs, challenging Micardis HCT’s profitability.


Future Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (Next 2-3 Years)

  • Market Decline Continues: With patent expiration and generic availability, Micardis HCT’s revenue is expected to decline further unless a new formulation, such as a once-daily extended-release version, is introduced.
  • Potential for Line Extension: Limited pipeline activity suggests minimal expectations for significant new clinical trials or indications in the near term.

Medium- to Long-term Outlook (3-10 Years)

  • Physician Preference Shift: Clinicians increasingly favor single-pill combinations with proven safety profiles, favoring newer agents like sacubitril/valsartan or SGLT2 inhibitors in hypertensive and diabetic patients.
  • Market Entrants: Biosimilar and generic versions will dominate the market, reducing Micardis HCT’s market share.
  • Emerging Technologies: Telehealth-driven adherence solutions may favor newer drugs with improved tolerability or fewer drug-drug interactions.

Opportunities and Threats

  • Opportunities: Potential for label expansion in specific populations, such as patients with resistant hypertension or diabetic nephropathy.
  • Threats: Patent expiry, aggressive generic pricing, and emerging therapies with better safety profiles threaten economic viability.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: Continued research validates Micardis HCT’s efficacy and safety for hypertension management, but no recent or upcoming pivotal trials suggest upcoming indications.
  • Market Positioning: The drug faces significant headwinds due to patent expiry, generic competition, and evolving clinician preferences.
  • Sales Outlook: Declining revenue trajectory likely unless steps are taken to leverage new clinical data or formulations.
  • Strategic Outlook: To maintain relevance, manufacturers might consider line extensions or combination innovations, though current pipeline activity appears limited.
  • Industry Dynamics: The antihypertensive category will prioritize cost-effective, innovative, and patient-friendly therapies, challenging Micardis HCT’s long-term positioning.

FAQs

Q1: When does the patent for Micardis HCT expire?
A1: The primary patent for Micardis HCT is expected to expire around 2024-2025, allowing generic versions to enter the market.

Q2: Are there any ongoing clinical trials to extend the indication for Micardis HCT?
A2: Currently, no significant or new clinical trials are announced for expanding Micardis HCT’s approved indications; most recent research supports its existing use.

Q3: How does Micardis HCT compare competitively to other ARB/HCTZ fixed-dose combinations?
A3: It offers comparable efficacy and safety profiles; however, its market share is diminishing due to patent expiration and competition from lower-cost generics and alternative therapies.

Q4: What are the prospects for Micardis HCT post-patent expiry?
A4: The entry of generics will lead to significant price reductions, decreasing revenue unless the manufacturer develops new formulations or indications.

Q5: Could Micardis HCT benefit from emerging therapies for hypertension?
A5: Potentially, if combined with innovative delivery methods or novel indications such as resistant hypertension or specific patient populations, but no such plans are publicly known.


References

  1. [1] ONTARGET trial data, 2008.
  2. [2] Peirce, M. et al. "Long-term safety of telmisartan/HCTZ in hypertension," Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 2016.
  3. [3] Market analytics reports, IQVIA (2022).
  4. [4] Patent expiration dates, USPTO records, 2024–2025.
  5. [5] Industry reports on antihypertensive drug sales, Bloomberg Intelligence, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.