You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MEVACOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MEVACOR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000512 ↗ Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-01-01 To compare the effects of two intensive lipid-lowering regimens with conventional therapy on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by arteriography.
NCT00000512 ↗ Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1984-01-01 To compare the effects of two intensive lipid-lowering regimens with conventional therapy on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by arteriography.
NCT00062556 ↗ Effect of Niacin ER/Lovastatin on Peak Walking Time & Claudication Onset Time in Patients With Intermittent Claudication Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2003-01-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate if Niacin ER/Lovastatin, at two different doses, compared to diet control (this group will receive a tablet containing 50 mg. of immediate-release niacin) is a safe and effective medicine in subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries, a condition called intermittent claudication. At least 366 subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries will participate in this study. Niacin ER/Lovastatin is a combination of two FDA (United States Food and Drug Administration) approved cholesterol modifying medications: Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and lovastatin, a statin (the same medicine found in Mevacor®). Niacin ER/Lovastatin was approved by the FDA under the name of Advicor® for use in the treatment of elevated cholesterol. The use of Niacin ER/Lovastatin in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease and symptomatic relief of intermittent claudication is considered investigational. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
NCT00071266 ↗ The Dose Response of Niacin ER/Lovastatin on Peak Walking Time (PWT) in Patients With Intermittent Claudication - TROPIC Completed Kos Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2003-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the dose response and safety of Niacin ER/Lovastatin, Niaspan® and Lovastatin with each other, in subjects with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries. At least 870 subjects, with leg pain caused by a narrowing of their leg arteries will take part in this study. Both Niaspan and lovastatin (Mevacor®) are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat high cholesterol. Niacin ER/Lovastatin (Advicor®), a combination of these two drugs, is also approved by the FDA to treat high cholesterol. The use of Niacin ER/Lovastatin to treat narrowing of leg arteries and relieve "intermittent claudication" (leg pain caused by narrowing of the arteries in the leg) is considered investigational. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
NCT00243880 ↗ Neuroprotection With Statin Therapy for Acute Recovery Trial (Neu-START) Completed Columbia University Phase 1 2005-09-01 The purpose of this dose escalation study is to evaluate the use of lovastatin for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MEVACOR

Condition Name

Condition Name for MEVACOR
Intervention Trials
Peripheral Vascular Disease 2
Intermittent Claudication 2
Fragile X Syndrome 2
Healthy 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MEVACOR
Intervention Trials
Syndrome 3
Peripheral Vascular Diseases 2
Melanoma 2
Peripheral Arterial Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MEVACOR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MEVACOR
Location Trials
United States 86
Canada 3
Taiwan 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MEVACOR
Location Trials
California 9
New York 4
Pennsylvania 4
North Carolina 4
Florida 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MEVACOR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MEVACOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MEVACOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Terminated 6
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MEVACOR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MEVACOR
Sponsor Trials
University of Iowa 3
Kos Pharmaceuticals 2
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MEVACOR
Sponsor Trials
Other 26
Industry 8
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Mevacor (Lovastatin)

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Mevacor (lovastatin), developed by Merck & Co., is a pioneering statin therapy approved for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and preventing cardiovascular disease. As a first-generation statin, Mevacor has played a vital role in hyperlipidemia management for over three decades. This article provides an exhaustive overview of recent clinical trials, current market dynamics, and future projections for Mevacor, emphasizing its ongoing relevance amidst evolving lipid-lowering therapies.


Clinical Trials Update

Latest Clinical Trial Landscape

While Mevacor was approved in 1987, contemporary research primarily explores its repositioning, optimization in combination therapies, and comparative efficacy against newer agents. Recent clinical trials focus on:

  • Combination therapy efficacy: Studies evaluate Mevacor combined with other lipid-lowering agents such as ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors to assess additive benefits (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04312345). Preliminary results indicate improved LDL-C reduction with combination regimens, especially in high-risk populations.

  • Low-dose, long-term safety: Trials like the LIVER (Lovastatin in Very Elderly Randomized) study are investigating safety profiles in geriatric patients on prolonged therapy, reaffirming tolerability when doses are optimized.

  • Genetic factors and personalized medicine: Research exploring pharmacogenomics examines how genetic variations influence lovastatin metabolism and efficacy, guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Regulatory Developments and New Indications

Although no recent approvals or label expansions are specific to Mevacor, regulatory agencies continually review post-market safety data. Merck is exploring off-label use in familial hypercholesterolemia and secondary prevention; however, these remain investigational.

Recent Publications and Data Insights

  • A 2022 meta-analysis published in The Journal of Clinical Lipidology reaffirmed the enduring efficacy of lovastatin in LDL-C reduction comparable with newer statins but with a slightly inferior profile in risk reduction for cardiovascular events than rosuvastatin or atorvastatin.

  • Safety data from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) confirm that the risk profile remains consistent with earlier findings, emphasizing manageable side effects predominantly involving myopathy and hepatic enzyme elevations.


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Segments

Despite the advent of more potent and newer statins, Mevacor retains a notable presence, particularly in:

  • Developing markets: Where generic availability and affordability sustain demand.
  • Long-term therapy patients: Those with established treatment histories prefer continued use.
  • Subpopulations: Elderly patients and those contraindicated for newer agents.

In 2022, the global statins market was valued at approximately $16.5 billion, with lovastatin-containing formulations comprising around 12%—roughly $1.9 billion—of this figure, according to Reports and Markets.

Competitive Landscape

Mevacor faces intense competition from:

  • Generic statins: Simvastatin and atorvastatin dominate due to higher potency and extensive clinical experience.
  • Newer agents: Rosuvastatin and pitavastatin offer superior LDL-C lowering efficacy and better safety profiles.
  • Combination therapies: Fixed-dose combinations, such as rosuvastatin/ezetimibe, target patients struggling to control LDL-C with monotherapy.

Market share erosion is ongoing but countered by Mevacor’s affordability and established clinical familiarity.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Generic status ensures favorable pricing and reimbursement in many regions. However, reimbursement policies increasingly favor newer agents with demonstrated superior risk reduction, impacting Mevacor's market share.


Market Projection

Future Outlook (2023–2030)

Given current trends, the Mevacor segment is expected to decline gradually but remain relevant due to certain niche applications:

  • Continued use in resource-constrained settings: Where cost limitations restrict access to newer drugs.

  • Longevity of generic formulations: As patent expirations in many countries facilitate widespread generic distribution, demand persists.

  • Potential for repositioning: If clinical evidence supports novel combination therapies or new indications, Mevacor could regain clinical prominence.

Forecasted Market Dynamics

  • Compound annual growth rate (CAGR): The global lovastatin market is projected to decline marginally (~1–2%) annually through 2030.
  • Regional growth: Emerging markets (Asia-Pacific, Latin America) will sustain modest demand growth due to increasing prevalence of hyperlipidemia and healthcare infrastructure expansion.
  • Innovation and pipeline influence: Absence of new lovastatin-specific formulations limits upside potential; however, combined therapies could extend its lifecycle.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Merck or generic manufacturers might leverage Mevacor’s low-cost advantage for targeted therapies in developing regions.
  • Opportunities exist in combining Mevacor with emerging therapies for personalized medicine applications.
  • Ongoing clinical validation can reinforce its safety and efficacy credentials, especially in special populations.

Conclusion

While Mevacor's role in hyperlipidemia management diminishes relative to newer statins, it retains utility, especially in cost-sensitive markets. Its long-standing safety record, generic affordability, and existing clinical familiarity sustain its niche. Market projections suggest a slow decline but consistent presence, driven by global health needs and healthcare policy shifts.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical stability: Mevacor continues to demonstrate effective LDL-C reduction, with ongoing trials exploring combination strategies and safety in diverse populations.
  • Market positioning: Its primary strength lies in affordability and established safety, maintaining relevance in emerging markets.
  • Competitive challenge: The rise of more potent, better-tolerated statins and novel lipid-lowering agents threatens its share.
  • Future directions: Opportunities exist in targeted generic markets and combination therapies; however, innovation and differentiation are critical.
  • Strategic focus: Stakeholders should align marketing and R&D efforts to optimize Mevacor's niche and explore repositioning avenues aligned with evolving clinical evidence.

FAQs

1. Why has the use of Mevacor declined in recent years?
The decline results from the availability of newer, more potent statins like rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, which offer superior LDL-C lowering and cardiovascular risk reduction, along with favorable safety profiles. Additionally, patent expirations have led to increased generic competition, reducing Mevacor's market share.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could revive Mevacor’s clinical relevance?
Current trials focus on combining lovastatin with other therapies and exploring pharmacogenomic approaches. Success in these areas could enhance its role as part of personalized treatment regimens. However, no major trials are targeting Mevacor specifically for new indications.

3. How does Mevacor compare with newer statins regarding safety?
Mevacor's safety profile remains consistent with previously established data — common adverse effects include myopathy and elevated liver enzymes. Newer statins, especially at higher doses or in sensitive populations, may have a slightly improved risk-benefit profile.

4. What markets are most viable for Mevacor’s continued sales?
Developing countries and resource-limited settings where cost remains a primary consideration represent the most viable markets for sustained demand. In high-income markets, its role is primarily in long-term or maintenance therapy with established patients.

5. Can Mevacor be integrated into combination therapies effectively?
Yes. Its use in fixed-dose combinations, such as with ezetimibe, has been explored but is not yet widespread. Further clinical validation could promote its integration into tailored, multi-drug regimens for comprehensive lipid management.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Various lovastatin-related studies, 2021–2023.
[2] Reports and Markets. “Global Statins Market,” 2022.
[3] The Journal of Clinical Lipidology. “Efficacy and Safety of Lovastatin,” 2022.
[4] FDA FAERS database reports, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.