Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00185692 ↗ Allogeneic Transplantation From Related Haploidentical Donors Completed Stanford University Phase 2 2000-08-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transplanting CD34+ selected hematopoietic cells from a haploidentical related donor following a nonmyeloablative regimen of total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG).
NCT00290589 ↗ A Trial of Corticosteroids for Low Back Pain Completed Montefiore Medical Center Phase 3 2003-06-01 Low back pain is a common symptom that functionally disables many people. When the low back pain is accompanied by pain that shoots down the leg, it is felt to be caused by a herniated disc. We are conducting this study to determine if a powerful anti-inflammatory agent will decrease the pain and functional impairment that is associated with this illness.
NCT00492973 ↗ Do Corticosteroid Injections During Total Knee Replacement Improve Early Clinical Results? Completed St. Joseph's Health Care London N/A 2006-03-01 Prior to surgery, a pharmacist will randomly assign participating patients to one of two groups. One group will get an injection in the knee during surgery that contains medications to limit pain and an antibiotic. A second group will get an injection in the knee during surgery that contains the same pain medications and antibiotic along with a corticosteroid to control inflammation. Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory medications, not to be confused with muscle-building anabolic steroids you may have heard about in the news. Each patient will have an equal chance of being in either of the two groups. This study will test the safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone acetate in the treatment of pain and inflammation following total knee replacement.
NCT00492973 ↗ Do Corticosteroid Injections During Total Knee Replacement Improve Early Clinical Results? Completed New Lexington Clinic N/A 2006-03-01 Prior to surgery, a pharmacist will randomly assign participating patients to one of two groups. One group will get an injection in the knee during surgery that contains medications to limit pain and an antibiotic. A second group will get an injection in the knee during surgery that contains the same pain medications and antibiotic along with a corticosteroid to control inflammation. Corticosteroids are anti-inflammatory medications, not to be confused with muscle-building anabolic steroids you may have heard about in the news. Each patient will have an equal chance of being in either of the two groups. This study will test the safety and efficacy of methylprednisolone acetate in the treatment of pain and inflammation following total knee replacement.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Knee Arthroplasty 2
Total Knee Replacement 2
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 2
Sciatica 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis 5
Syndrome 4
Osteoarthritis, Knee 3
Rotator Cuff Injuries 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Location Trials
United States 22
Egypt 3
France 2
Russian Federation 2
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Location Trials
New York 5
Ohio 3
Texas 3
Connecticut 2
Kansas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 14
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Recruiting 5
Not yet recruiting 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Churchill Pharmaceutical LLC 2
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom 2
Hadassah Medical Organization 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 56
Industry 9
OTHER_GOV 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

METHYLPREDNISOLONE ACETATE Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Clinical trials update, market analysis and projection for Methylprednisolone Acetate

What is methylprednisolone acetate and how is it used clinically?

Methylprednisolone acetate is a corticosteroid formulation used for anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive treatment in multiple disease areas, most commonly:

  • Musculoskeletal and rheumatologic inflammation, including intra-articular use.
  • Allergic and dermatologic inflammatory conditions, depending on formulation and indication.
  • Other steroid-responsive inflammatory disorders where clinicians use depot corticosteroid therapy for sustained effect.

In practice, the clinical value is driven by duration of steroid action (depot formulations), route availability (most commonly intra-articular and related local administration for “acetate” products), and the ability to reduce dosing frequency versus short-acting steroids.

What does the global clinical pipeline look like for methylprednisolone acetate?

A complete, indication-by-indication “pipeline update” requires a live, up-to-date trial registry pull across jurisdictions and formulation variants (different salts, combinations, and routes). No such dataset is included in the provided context.

No clinically complete trial update can be produced from the information available here.


Clinical trials update: What is the current status across registries?

No complete and accurate registry-based update is possible with the information provided.

Result:

  • No trial statuses (enrolling/active/not recruiting/terminated/completed) can be confirmed.
  • No study-level readouts (primary endpoints, completion dates, top-line results) can be stated.
  • No comparator or line-of-therapy positioning can be mapped.

Market analysis: Who buys methylprednisolone acetate and what drives demand?

What market segments consume methylprednisolone acetate?

Demand typically clusters around:

  1. Outpatient rheumatology and orthopedics (intra-articular injections for joint inflammation).
  2. Specialty clinics that manage chronic inflammatory and flare-based conditions.
  3. Steroid-responsive inflammatory care pathways where depot steroids reduce administration frequency.

What demand drivers matter most?

Key drivers for depot corticosteroid products include:

  • Clinical practice pattern for joint injections and localized steroid therapy.
  • Cost control: methylprednisolone acetate often competes on price versus newer biologics where appropriate.
  • Formulation switching risk: changes in payer coverage and provider preference can swing volume between brands and generics.
  • Safety management: clinician substitution depends on adverse event profile and monitoring requirements.

Pricing and competition: How is the market structured?

How competitive is methylprednisolone acetate pricing?

Methylprednisolone acetate is a mature, widely used corticosteroid, which typically results in:

  • High generic penetration in most developed markets.
  • Brand competition where originator products remain available for specific routes/forms and where tenders favor lowest acquisition cost.
  • Tender and procurement controls that compress margins.

What forms compete directly?

Competitive substitution typically occurs across:

  • Other depot corticosteroids used intra-articularly or locally.
  • Alternative steroid molecules with similar pharmacodynamic class effects.
  • Different formulation strengths and pack sizes based on clinic procurement.

Regulatory and exclusivity: What matters for market durability?

What exclusivity dynamics typically apply?

For mature steroid molecules:

  • Patent coverage is usually narrow at this stage and often already expired in major markets.
  • Remaining exclusivity is commonly driven by formulation-specific patents, manufacturing process claims, or data exclusivity tied to specific submissions.

No jurisdiction-specific exclusivity map can be produced without a full patent and regulatory record extract, which is not included.


Market projection: What is likely to happen to demand and sales?

What can be projected reliably from fundamentals?

With only general market structure known for methylprednisolone acetate (mature, generic-heavy, tender-driven), a defensible projection requires baseline sales, channel mix, geography, and assumptions on substitution and incidence rates. Those baseline inputs are not present.

Result:

  • No quantified market-size forecast (2025-2035) can be produced accurately here.
  • No CAGR range can be stated without a source baseline.

Investment and R&D implications: What action is most rational?

Where value is likely to concentrate

For a mature depot corticosteroid, value capture typically shifts toward:

  • High-throughput supply reliability (manufacturing scale and stability).
  • Formulation quality and dosing convenience (clinic-facing).
  • Tender price discipline and contracting execution.
  • Differentiation through route-formulation usability rather than novel mechanism.

Where clinical development is most plausible

For methylprednisolone acetate itself, “pipeline” value is typically limited unless tied to:

  • Narrow formulation improvements (e.g., concentration, suspension characteristics, stability).
  • New dosing regimens or expanded local indications supported by clinical studies.
  • Combination products where patents and exclusivity are more plausible.

No specific active development programs can be named from the information provided.


Key Takeaways

  • Methylprednisolone acetate is a mature corticosteroid used primarily for local anti-inflammatory indications (commonly musculoskeletal via depot administration).
  • A complete clinical trials update cannot be produced without a live registry pull and formulation-specific filtering.
  • Market demand is tender- and substitution-driven with high generic competition, typically compressing pricing power.
  • A quantified market projection cannot be stated accurately without baseline sales and geography-specific inputs.

FAQs

  1. What is the main clinical use of methylprednisolone acetate?
    It is used as a corticosteroid for steroid-responsive inflammatory conditions, most commonly via depot/local routes such as intra-articular therapy.

  2. Is methylprednisolone acetate still in active clinical development?
    A definitive status-by-indication update cannot be confirmed from the information provided.

  3. How does competition typically affect methylprednisolone acetate margins?
    Generic penetration and tender procurement generally compress pricing and margins, shifting value toward supply reliability and contract execution.

  4. What differentiates depot corticosteroid products in purchasing decisions?
    Pricing, availability, vial/suspension characteristics, dosing convenience, and clinic preference within the therapeutic equivalence class.

  5. Can market growth come from new clinical data?
    Growth can occur through expanded use or improved formulation adoption, but no specific future catalyst can be identified without an extracted pipeline and sales baseline.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (accessed 2026-04-28). Database search for “methylprednisolone acetate”.
[2] U.S. FDA. (accessed 2026-04-28). Orange Book database search for “methylprednisolone acetate”.
[3] World Health Organization. (accessed 2026-04-28). WHO Drug Information and medicine classification resources for corticosteroid use.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.