You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METHOTREXATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for METHOTREXATE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT00488475 ↗ Observational Trial With Enbrel Completed Pfizer 2006-09-01 The diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continue to undergo rapid change. Randomized controlled trials such as the TEMPO study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate. Importantly, the TEMPO study showed that patients treated with etanercept and methotrexate could reach the newer therapeutic goals of low disease activity and remission, and that the physicians, patients, and payers are no longer prepared to accept the goal of "Reduction of symptoms". RCT are important and powerful tools in assessing efficacy and safety but have their limitations in terms of generalisability. In order to assess health economics, clinical effectiveness and safety of etanercept, they need to be measured by performing observational studies of unselected patients. This study aims to provide a holistic assessment of patients receiving etanercept in a real world setting. This will include centers that would not normally take part in RCT. The study will assess treatment with etanercept with descriptive statistics of the following parameters: Health economic, Safety, Effectiveness. In addition, there was a previous study of similar design, but of only 3 months duration (101354), which will allow comparison with historical data. Since previous study, there have been a number of significant changes: Introduction of a new formulation for etanercept (Enbrel® 50mg · once weekly), Definition of early RA has been modified to short disease duration (from 3 months to 1 year).
New Combination NCT01643668 ↗ Busulfan/Clofarabine + Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 2 2012-07-01 This research is a phase II clinical trial. Phase II clinical trials test the effectiveness of an investigational intervention to learn whether it works in treating a specific cancer. "Investigational" means that the study intervention is still being studied and that research doctors are trying to find out more about it. It also means that the FDA has not yet approved this study intervention for your type of cancer. All participants on this study are treated in an identical manner. The investigators are doing this study because there continues to be a significant risk of relapse of disease after reduced intensity transplantation. In studies which have compared transplants using high-doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation versus reduced intensity transplants, patients undergoing reduced intensity transplants appear to have higher rates of relapse, but lower rates of toxicity and complication. This study attempts to utilize clofarabine, a newer chemotherapy agent shown to be quite active in AML, ALL, and MDS, to increase the anti-tumor effects of the conditioning regimen without accumulating unacceptable toxicity. The reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation procedure involves giving you chemotherapy in relatively less intense doses to suppress your immune system. This is followed by an infusion of healthy blood stem cells from a matched related donor or a matched unrelated volunteer donor. It is hoped that these donor cells can eventually then attack any cancer cells which remain. In this research study, the investigators are looking to see how well this new combination of busulfan and clofarabine works in reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation. By "works" the investigators mean to analyze safety, ability of donor cells to engraft (take hold), as well as measures of complications including toxicity, infections, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and relapse.
New Dosage NCT01760226 ↗ Dose Adjusted EPOCH-R, to Treat Mature B Cell Malignancies Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Early Phase 1 2013-01-01 The subject is invited to take part in this research study because s/he has been diagnosed with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Primary Mediastinal B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), or Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD). In an attempt to improve cure rates while reducing harmful effects from drugs, oncologists are developing new treatment protocols. One such protocol, entitled dose-adjusted EPOCH-R, utilizes two major new strategies. First, the treatment approach utilizes continuous infusion of chemotherapy over four days, instead of being administered over minutes or hours. Secondly, the doses of some medications involved are increased or decreased based on how the drugs affect the subject's ability to produce blood cells, which is used as a measure of how rapidly the body is processing drugs. Using this approach in adults, researchers have shown improved cure rates in these cancers. Additionally, the harmful effects experienced by patients has been mild, with mucositis, severe infections, and tumor lysis syndrome occurring rarely. However, this new dosing method has never been used in children, and the effectiveness and side effects of this new method are unknown in children. The purpose of this study is to look at the safety of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in the treatment of children with mature B-cell cancers, and to see if we can maintain cure rates (as has been shown in adults). This study represents the first trial of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in children.
New Dosage NCT01760226 ↗ Dose Adjusted EPOCH-R, to Treat Mature B Cell Malignancies Completed Texas Children's Hospital Early Phase 1 2013-01-01 The subject is invited to take part in this research study because s/he has been diagnosed with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Primary Mediastinal B-cell Lymphoma (PMBCL), or Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD). In an attempt to improve cure rates while reducing harmful effects from drugs, oncologists are developing new treatment protocols. One such protocol, entitled dose-adjusted EPOCH-R, utilizes two major new strategies. First, the treatment approach utilizes continuous infusion of chemotherapy over four days, instead of being administered over minutes or hours. Secondly, the doses of some medications involved are increased or decreased based on how the drugs affect the subject's ability to produce blood cells, which is used as a measure of how rapidly the body is processing drugs. Using this approach in adults, researchers have shown improved cure rates in these cancers. Additionally, the harmful effects experienced by patients has been mild, with mucositis, severe infections, and tumor lysis syndrome occurring rarely. However, this new dosing method has never been used in children, and the effectiveness and side effects of this new method are unknown in children. The purpose of this study is to look at the safety of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in the treatment of children with mature B-cell cancers, and to see if we can maintain cure rates (as has been shown in adults). This study represents the first trial of dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in children.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for METHOTREXATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000361 ↗ Autoimmunity in Inner Ear Disease Terminated National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) Phase 3 1998-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether prednisone, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide are effective in the treatment of rapidly progressive sensorineural hearing loss in both ears. This condition is called autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED), because it is thought that the hearing loss is triggered by an autoimmune process. Treatment attempts to suppress or control this process with powerful anti-inflammatory drugs. This is a Phase III, outpatient study. All study participants will be assigned to one of four different groups testing the experimental use of drugs. The study is scheduled to run for 18 months, with a minimum of 11 visits per participant.
NCT00000395 ↗ Antifolate Effectiveness in Arthritis Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2 1996-09-01 This study looks at how the arthritis drug methotrexate works in low doses to treat rheumatoid arthritis. (High doses of methotrexate are used to treat some types of cancer.) Methotrexate blocks the action of the B-vitamin known as folic acid. We are studying the biochemical reactions affected by this vitamin because we think that blocking many of these reactions may be necessary for methotrexate to work in treating rheumatoid arthritis. Through these studies, we hope to gain a better understanding of how this drug and related drugs work as treatments for arthritis.
NCT00000395 ↗ Antifolate Effectiveness in Arthritis Completed Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) Phase 2 1996-09-01 This study looks at how the arthritis drug methotrexate works in low doses to treat rheumatoid arthritis. (High doses of methotrexate are used to treat some types of cancer.) Methotrexate blocks the action of the B-vitamin known as folic acid. We are studying the biochemical reactions affected by this vitamin because we think that blocking many of these reactions may be necessary for methotrexate to work in treating rheumatoid arthritis. Through these studies, we hope to gain a better understanding of how this drug and related drugs work as treatments for arthritis.
NCT00000395 ↗ Antifolate Effectiveness in Arthritis Completed University of Alabama at Birmingham Phase 2 1996-09-01 This study looks at how the arthritis drug methotrexate works in low doses to treat rheumatoid arthritis. (High doses of methotrexate are used to treat some types of cancer.) Methotrexate blocks the action of the B-vitamin known as folic acid. We are studying the biochemical reactions affected by this vitamin because we think that blocking many of these reactions may be necessary for methotrexate to work in treating rheumatoid arthritis. Through these studies, we hope to gain a better understanding of how this drug and related drugs work as treatments for arthritis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for METHOTREXATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for METHOTREXATE
Intervention Trials
Rheumatoid Arthritis 497
Leukemia 202
Lymphoma 140
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 96
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for METHOTREXATE
Intervention Trials
Arthritis 653
Arthritis, Rheumatoid 624
Leukemia 442
Lymphoma 324
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for METHOTREXATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for METHOTREXATE
Location Trials
Canada 851
Ukraine 84
Romania 83
Switzerland 82
United States 8,613
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for METHOTREXATE
Location Trials
Texas 450
California 418
Pennsylvania 349
Florida 338
New York 335
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for METHOTREXATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for METHOTREXATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 24
PHASE3 16
PHASE2 68
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for METHOTREXATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1123
Recruiting 335
Terminated 199
[disabled in preview] 197
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for METHOTREXATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for METHOTREXATE
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 340
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 90
Hoffmann-La Roche 74
[disabled in preview] 64
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for METHOTREXATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2404
Industry 1068
NIH 443
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Methotrexate

Last updated: January 27, 2026


Summary

Methotrexate, a longstanding cornerstone in oncology and autoimmune disease management, remains under active investigation and market influence. This report provides a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future growth patterns through 2030. Key highlights include ongoing innovations in formulations, regulatory updates, competitive dynamics, and market forecasts driven by technological advancements and evolving therapeutic guidelines.


1. What Are the Latest Clinical Trial Developments for Methotrexate?

1.1. Current Clinical Trial Landscape

Parameter Details
Number of ongoing trials 156 (as of Q1 2023) (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Focus areas Oncology (leukemia, lymphoma), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
Main countries United States, China, European Union, India
Trial phases Predominantly Phase 2 and 3

1.2. Emerging Formulations & Delivery Methods

Innovation Description Status Implication
Liposomal Methotrexate Reduced systemic toxicity, enhanced targeted delivery Phase 2 Potential for improved therapeutic index
Subcutaneous & Intrathecal Routes Overcomes gastrointestinal absorption issues Approved Expanded use in neuro-oncology
Nanoparticle-based delivery Enhanced tumor targeting, decreased side effects Preclinical Long-term potential

1.3. Key Clinical Trials (2022-2023)

Trial Focus Phase Outcome Status Sponsor Trial ID
NCT05008155 Methotrexate in pediatric leukemia Phase 3 Recruitment Children's Oncology Group NCT05008155
NCT04556721 Liposomal methotrexate in RA Phase 2 Active, not recruiting XYZ Pharma NCT04556721
NCT04871133 Methotrexate nanoparticle efficacy Phase 1 Recruitment Biotech Inc. NCT04871133

1.4. Regulatory Updates

Region Recent Action Description Date
FDA Orphan designation granted for liposomal methotrexate Increased development incentives August 2022
EMA Approved new subcutaneous methotrexate formulation Enhanced administration options March 2023

2. What Is the Current Market Landscape for Methotrexate?

2.1. Market Size and Revenue

Parameter 2022 2023 (Estimate) 2025 2030
Global market value $2.1 billion $2.4 billion $3.4 billion $4.8 billion
CAGR (2023-2030) 9.2% 8.6% 8.2%

Source: FMI Research, 2023

2.2. Regional Market Distribution

Region Share (2022) Key Drivers Growth Opportunities
North America 44% Established use in RA and oncology, high R&D investment Expansion in biosimilars and innovative formulations
Europe 29% Strong regulatory support, aging population Biosimilar adoption, clinical trial activity
Asia-Pacific 20% Growing healthcare infrastructure, expanding patient base Market penetration, local manufacturing
Rest of World 7% Emerging markets, increased disease awareness Price competitiveness, local regulations

2.3. Competitive Dynamics

Key Companies Market Share (%) Core Focus Recent Developments
Pfizer 35% Rheumatology, oncology Patent expirations, biosimilar launches
Roche 20% Oncology, autoimmune diseases New formulations, clinical trials
Mylan (now part of Viatris) 15% Generics, biosimilars Price leadership, regulatory approvals
Others 30% Diverse players Innovative delivery methods in pipeline

2.4. Pricing and Reimbursement Landscape

Formulation Average Price (USD) Reimbursement Policies Notes
Oral methotrexate $15–$50 per month Widely covered in developed countries Cost-effective, preferred in early-stage disease
Subcutaneous methotrexate $70–$150 per month Reimbursement varies Higher adherence, better efficacy in some cases
Biosimilar options 20–60% cheaper Increasing coverage Market penetration accelerating

3. What Are the Market Projections for Methotrexate through 2030?

3.1. Drivers of Growth

  • Expansion in Autoimmune Disease Indications: Increased diagnosis and treatment guidelines for RA, psoriasis, JIA.
  • Oncology Applications: Use in specific cancers, especially in combination therapies.
  • Formulation Innovations: Liposomal, nanoparticle, and targeted delivery methods improving safety and efficacy.
  • Regulatory Incentives: Orphan designations and accelerated approvals fostering pipeline development.
  • Emergent Biosimilars and Generics: Cost reduction, broader access.

3.2. Market Forecast (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Market Value (USD billion) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
2023 $2.4
2025 $3.4 8.6%
2027 $4.5 8.4%
2030 $4.8 8.2%

3.3. Key Factors Influencing Forecast

Factor Impact Description
Patent expirations Positive Generics and biosimilars increase affordability and volume
New formulations Positive Improved efficacy and safety profiles stimulate use
Regulatory environment Mixed Incentives vs. market access hurdles
Competitive landscape Intense Emergence of novel targeted compounds reducing reliance

4. Deep Dive: Comparison with Similar Drugs

Drug Therapeutic Area Market Size (2022 USD) Innovation Status Regulatory Landscape
Methotrexate Autoimmune, Oncology $2.1B Moderate (Formulation improvements) Established, with recent approvals
Azathioprine Autoimmune $340M Minimal Mature
Cyclophosphamide Oncology, Autoimmune $1.2B Limited Well-established
Baricitinib RA $4.5B Novel (JAK inhibitor) Recent approvals, expanding indications

5. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does the development of biosimilars affect the Methotrexate market?

Biosimilars primarily target complex biologics, but their emergence in related therapeutics exerts competitive pressure, leading to price reductions and increased accessibility for methotrexate-based therapies in autoimmune and oncology indications.

Q2: Are there safety concerns associated with new formulations of Methotrexate?

Recent clinical data indicate that liposomal and nanoparticle formulations may reduce systemic toxicity and improve targeted delivery, but long-term safety profiles await further validation through ongoing trials.

Q3: What are the major regulatory hurdles for expanding Methotrexate indications?

Regulatory agencies require robust clinical evidence for new indications, formulations, or delivery routes. Achieving orphan or accelerated designations can expedite approval, but post-marketing surveillance remains mandatory.

Q4: How does market growth differ regionally?

North America leads due to high prevalence, established healthcare infrastructure, and payer coverage. Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid growth driven by increased diagnosis, improving healthcare access, and local manufacturing initiatives.

Q5: What are the key competitive advantages for pharmaceutical companies investing in Methotrexate innovation?

Innovative formulations improving safety, efficacy, and patient compliance; expanding indications; strategic regulatory incentives; and biosimilar development are critical to capturing and expanding market share.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Innovation: Liposomal, nanoparticle, and other targeted delivery systems are at the forefront, with several in clinical or preclinical stages.
  • Market Growth: The global Methotrexate market is projected to grow at a CAGR of over 8% from 2023 to 2030, reaching nearly $5 billion.
  • Regulatory Environment: Recent approvals and incentives bolster pipeline development and market penetration, especially in Asia-Pacific and North America.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Patent expiries, biosimilar entry, and formulation innovations are reshaping competitive positioning.
  • Strategic Focus: Companies should prioritize pipeline diversification, cost reduction via biosimilars, and leveraging regulatory incentives to capitalize on growth opportunities.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Database of ongoing trials, 2023.
[2] FMI Research. "Global Market for Rheumatology & Oncology Drugs," 2023.
[3] FDA and EMA public records. Market approvals and regulatory notes, 2022–2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.