Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METHIMAZOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for METHIMAZOLE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001421 ↗ Methimazole to Treat Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2 1995-06-01 This study will test the safety and effectiveness of the drug methimazole in treating polymyositis and dermatomyositis-inflammatory muscle diseases causing weakness and muscle wasting. Although it is not known what causes of these diseases, abnormal immune function is thought to be involved. Recent studies indicate that methimazole, which has been used for many years to treat thyroid disease, may alter immune activity by affecting the interaction between white blood cells called lymphocytes and certain molecules on cell surfaces. This study will examine the effects of methimazole on immune activity and muscle strength in patients with inflammatory muscle diseases and evaluate the drug side effects. Patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis who have normal thyroid function may be eligible for this study [age requirement?]. Candidates will undergo a history and physical examination; blood and urine tests; chest X-ray; muscle strength testing, daily living skills questionnaire, and speech and swallowing evaluation; magnetic resonance imaging of muscles; and muscle biopsy (removal of a small piece of muscle tissue under local anesthetic). When indicated, some candidates may also have cancer screening tests (for example, mammogram, Pap smear), a lung function test to measure breathing capacity, or an electromyogram, in which small needles are inserted into a muscle to measure the electrical activity . Participants will take 30 mg of methimazole by mouth twice a day for 6 months. They will have blood tests weekly for the first 2 weeks and then every other week for the rest of the study to measure blood counts and liver and thyroid function. Blood will also be drawn for white blood cell studies during the screening evaluation, at the beginning of therapy, 6 to 12 weeks after therapy starts, at the end of the 6-month treatment period, and 1 and 3 months after therapy ends. Muscle enzyme and urine tests will be done once a month.. During drug treatment, patients will have periodic physical examinations and blood and muscle function tests to evaluate the response to therapy.
NCT00150111 ↗ Rituximab in the Treatment of Graves' Disease Completed Odense University Hospital Phase 1/Phase 2 2003-06-01 Aim: In a phase II pilot study encompassing 20 patients with Graves' disease to evaluate the effect of rituximab: 1. Biochemically as assessed by markers of disease activity ( free T4, free T3, TSH, TSH-receptor antibodies, anti-TPO)
NCT00150124 ↗ Block-replacement Therapy During Radioiodine Therapy Completed Steen Bonnema Phase 4 2003-01-01 Background: The use of radioactive iodine (131I) therapy as the definite cure of hyperthyroidism is widespread. According to a survey on the management of Graves' disease, thirty per cent of physicians prefer to render their patients euthyroid by antithyroid drugs (ATD) prior to 131I therapy. This strategy is presumably chosen to avoid 131I induced 'thyroid storm', which, however, is rarely encountered. Several studies have consistently shown that patients who are treated with ATD prior to 131I therapy have an increased risk of treatment failure. Mostly, patients with Graves' disease have been studied, while other studies were addressed also toxic nodular goiter. Thus, it is generally accepted that ATD have 'radioprotective' properties, although this view is almost exclusively based on retrospective data and is still under debate. Indeed, this dogma was recently challenged by two randomized trials in Graves' disease, none of which showed such an adverse effect of methimazole pretreatment. It cannot be excluded that the earlier results may have been under influence of selection bias, a source of error almost unavoidable in retrospective studies. Whether ATD is radioprotective also when used in the post 131I period has also been debated. In the early period 131I therapy following a transient rise in the thyroid hormones is seen which may give rise to discomfort in some patients. The continuous use of ATD during 131I therapy, possibly in combination with levothyroxine (BRT: block-replacement therapy), leads to more stable levels of the thyroid hormones. By resuming ATD following 131I therapy, euthyroidism can usually be maintained until the destructive effect of 131I ensues. Nevertheless, many physicians prefer not to resume ATD, probably due to reports supporting that such a strategy reduces the cure rate. Parallel to the issue of ATD pretreatment, the evidence is based on retrospective studies and the ideal set-up should be reconsidered. To underscore the importance of performing randomized trials we showed recently that resumption of methimazole seven days after 131I therapy had no influence on the final outcome. Aim:To clarify by a randomized trial whether BRT during radioiodine therapy of hyperthyroid patients influences the final outcome of this therapy, in a comparison with a regime in which methimazole as mono-therapy is discontinued 8 days before radioiodine. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients suffering from recurrent Graves' disease (n=50) or a toxic nodular goiter (n=50) are included. All patients are rendered euthyroid by methimazole (MMI) and randomized either to stop MMI eight days before 131I or to be set on BRT. This latter medication continues until three months after 131I. Calculation of the 131I activity (max. 600 MBq) includes an assessment of the 131I half-life and the thyroid volume. Patients are followed for one year with close monitoring of the thyroid function.
NCT00150137 ↗ Antithyroid Drugs During Radioiodine Therapy Completed Odense University Hospital Phase 4 2003-01-01 Background: The use of radioactive iodine (131I) therapy as the definite cure of hyperthyroidism is widespread. According to a survey on the management of Graves' disease, thirty per cent of physicians prefer to render their patients euthyroid by antithyroid drugs (ATD) prior to 131I therapy. This strategy is presumably chosen to avoid 131I induced 'thyroid storm', which, however, is rarely encountered. Several studies have consistently shown that patients who are treated with ATD prior to 131I therapy have an increased risk of treatment failure. Mostly, patients with Graves' disease have been studied, while other studies were addressed also toxic nodular goiter. Thus, it is generally accepted that ATD have 'radioprotective' properties, although this view is almost exclusively based on retrospective data and is still under debate (13). Indeed, this dogma was recently challenged by two randomized trials in Graves' disease, none of which showed such an adverse effect of methimazole pretreatment. It cannot be excluded that the earlier results may have been under influence of selection bias, a source of error almost unavoidable in retrospective studies. Whether ATD is radioprotective also when used in the post 131I period has also been debated. In the early period 131I therapy following a transient rise in the thyroid hormones is seen which may give rise to discomfort in some patients. The continuous use of ATD during 131I therapy leads to more stable levels of the thyroid hormones. By resuming ATD following 131I therapy, euthyroidism can usually be maintained until the destructive effect of 131I ensues. Nevertheless, many physicians prefer not to resume ATD, probably due to reports supporting that such a strategy reduces the cure rate. Parallel to the issue of ATD pretreatment, the evidence is based on retrospective studies and the ideal set-up should be reconsidered. To underscore the importance of performing randomized trials we showed recently that resumption of methimazole seven days after 131I therapy had no influence on the final outcome. Aim: To clarify by a randomized trial whether continuous use of methimazole during radioiodine therapy influences the final outcome of this therapy, in a comparison with a regime in which methimazole as mono-therapy is discontinued 8 days before radioiodine. Patients and Methods: 80 consecutive patients suffering from recurrent Graves' disease or a toxic nodular goiter are included. All patients are rendered euthyroid by methimazole (MMI) and randomized either to stop MMI eight days before 131I or to continue MMI until four weeks after 131I. Calculation of the 131I activity (max. 600 MBq) includes an assessment of the 131I half-life and the thyroid volume. Patients are followed for one year with close monitoring of the thyroid function.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for METHIMAZOLE

Condition Name

Condition Name for METHIMAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Graves Disease 8
Graves' Disease 4
Hyperthyroidism 2
Graves Ophthalmopathy 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for METHIMAZOLE
Intervention Trials
Graves Disease 14
Hyperthyroidism 7
Graves Ophthalmopathy 5
Eye Diseases 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for METHIMAZOLE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for METHIMAZOLE
Location Trials
United States 10
Denmark 4
China 4
Malaysia 3
Italy 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for METHIMAZOLE
Location Trials
California 2
Texas 1
Ohio 1
New Mexico 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for METHIMAZOLE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for METHIMAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for METHIMAZOLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Not yet recruiting 4
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for METHIMAZOLE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for METHIMAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Odense University Hospital 2
University of Pisa 2
Ministry of Health, Malaysia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for METHIMAZOLE
Sponsor Trials
Other 32
Industry 1
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Methimazole: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: April 24, 2026

What is the current clinical-trial landscape for methimazole?

Methimazole is an established, off-patent small-molecule antithyroid drug used for hyperthyroidism (most commonly Graves’ disease). As a result, the active interventional pipeline is limited versus newer therapeutics, and most “trial activity” in recent years centers on optimized dosing, switching strategies, formulation comparisons, safety surveillance, and use in special populations.

Clinical-trials signal:

  • Trial types commonly reported: comparative effectiveness of dosing regimens, tolerability and safety monitoring, adherence or conversion between regimens, and special-population safety studies (pregnancy-adjacent use continues to be clinically studied due to risk management requirements).
  • Evidence base: methimazole’s core efficacy and safety profile is supported by decades of clinical use; incremental trials tend to refine protocols rather than establish new indications.

Practical implication for R&D and investment:

  • The focus for near-term development is less about inventing a new active ingredient and more about product differentiation (formulation, dosing convenience, and real-world safety).

How is methimazole positioned in the treatment algorithm?

Methimazole and its related comparators (notably propylthiouracil in specific scenarios) remain standard of care for:

  • Long-term control of Graves’ hyperthyroidism in non-pregnant patients
  • Pre-operative management before thyroid surgery
  • Bridging or control while definitive therapies are decided (radioiodine or surgery)

Because methimazole is widely used, the clinical value proposition for any entrant concentrates on:

  • Reduced dosing burden or improved patient adherence
  • Improved safety management (monitoring support, patient education)
  • Reliable supply and cost competitiveness

What does the methimazole market look like today?

Methimazole has a mature, generic-dominated market structure across major geographies. Market dynamics are shaped by:

  • Patent expiry and generic availability
  • Price competition and interchangeability
  • High-volume, chronic-use prescribing in endemic and high-incidence hyperthyroidism populations
  • Ongoing demand for brand and generic supply continuity

Market structure (high level):

  • Generic manufacturers supply the majority of demand.
  • Brand share, where present, is typically small and tied to distribution networks and payer contracting.

What are the demand drivers and constraints?

Demand drivers

  • Persistent incidence of hyperthyroidism and Graves’ disease
  • Long-term pharmacologic control in many patient segments
  • Continued use in perioperative management

Constraints

  • Safety-driven monitoring requirements (notably agranulocytosis and hepatotoxicity risk)
  • Clinician preference shifts in pregnancy-adjacent risk windows toward alternative agents in some protocols
  • Competitive pricing pressure from multiple generics

What is the likely pricing and reimbursement profile?

For a mature generic drug like methimazole:

  • Pricing tends to track generic basket competition and payer formularies
  • Reimbursement is generally optimized around lowest-cost therapeutically equivalent options
  • Product differentiation is usually limited unless the entrant offers a meaningful advantage (e.g., formulation or packaging improvements tied to adherence)

What market forecast is plausible for methimazole?

A robust projection for methimazole requires country-level prescribing, incidence, and generic penetration data. The available market-level view for methimazole points to a mature, steady-demand profile with:

  • Low to mid single-digit growth driven by population trends and stable disease incidence
  • Margin pressure driven by continued generic competition
  • Growth sensitivity to payer policies and supply stability

Baseline market projection framework (directional):

  • Volume growth: primarily population and diagnosis rates, partially offset by long-term shifts toward definitive therapies in some regions
  • Value growth: likely lower than volume growth due to price competition and tender dynamics
  • Upside risks: supply disruptions that temporarily lift prices; expanded patient awareness and diagnosis rates
  • Downside risks: aggressive payer step edits, generic substitution tightening, and shifts in guideline preferences for specific populations

Where are new entrants most likely to compete?

In methimazole, competition typically clusters in:

  • Formulation and dosing convenience (tablets, dose strengths, packaging)
  • Distribution and contract performance (tender wins, hospital supply)
  • Safety and adherence support embedded in REMS-like workflows or patient labeling and education (where supported by local requirements)

For business planning, the most actionable routes are:

  • Secure reliable manufacturing capacity with consistent regulatory compliance
  • Differentiate on supply reliability and customer contracting rather than clinical novelty
  • Build pharmacovigilance and risk-communication capabilities to support market access

What should a clinical-trial watch strategy focus on?

Given the established active ingredient, the “signal” to watch is not new efficacy endpoints. It is:

  • Safety and tolerability refinements (monitoring protocols and risk mitigation)
  • Switching and dosing simplification studies that reduce clinician workflow burden
  • Special population management studies that translate into guideline updates or payer-preference policies
  • Product-quality comparisons that affect formulary decisions

Key Takeaways

  • Methimazole is an established, generic-dominated therapy with incremental clinical activity focused on protocol optimization rather than new mechanism-based innovation.
  • Market demand is steady and driven by persistent hyperthyroidism incidence and routine clinical use (chronic control and perioperative management).
  • Forecasting is best framed as mature volume growth with constrained value growth due to price competition.
  • Competitive advantage is most likely to come from formulation usability, supply reliability, and contract performance, not from breakthrough clinical claims.

FAQs

1) Is methimazole still actively researched in clinical trials?

Yes, but most activity focuses on dosing, safety monitoring practices, and special-use protocol refinements rather than establishing new therapeutic classes.

2) What drives methimazole demand most strongly?

Underlying hyperthyroidism and Graves’ disease incidence, plus routine prescribing patterns for medical management and pre-procedural control.

3) How does generic competition affect methimazole’s market outlook?

It typically compresses unit pricing and constrains value growth, even when volume remains stable or grows modestly.

4) What differentiates successful suppliers in a mature methimazole market?

Supply reliability, contract wins, consistent regulatory compliance, and patient-use convenience through product presentation.

5) What clinical safety concerns shape prescribing and monitoring?

The need for vigilant monitoring due to serious adverse event risks associated with antithyroid therapy, which affects workflows and patient management.


References

[1] National Institutes of Health (NIH). Methimazole (USAN) - Drug Information. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a682788.html
[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov: Methimazole (search results). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Safety Communications and approved labeling resources (methimazole-related information). https://www.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.