Last Updated: August 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METHENAMINE HIPPURATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01958073 ↗ Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal Women Completed American Urogynecologic Society Phase 4 2013-10-01 The investigators would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. The investigators will use two forms of vaginal estrogen that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a placebo (without any active ingredient). The investigators are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women on the non-active treatment will be able to choose whether they would like to use either the estrogen ring or cream. The investigators will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the placebo. The investigators are also going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance).
NCT01958073 ↗ Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal Women Completed New York University Langone Medical Center Phase 4 2013-10-01 The investigators would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. The investigators will use two forms of vaginal estrogen that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a placebo (without any active ingredient). The investigators are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women on the non-active treatment will be able to choose whether they would like to use either the estrogen ring or cream. The investigators will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the placebo. The investigators are also going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance).
NCT01958073 ↗ Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal Women Completed NYU Langone Health Phase 4 2013-10-01 The investigators would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. The investigators will use two forms of vaginal estrogen that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a placebo (without any active ingredient). The investigators are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women on the non-active treatment will be able to choose whether they would like to use either the estrogen ring or cream. The investigators will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the placebo. The investigators are also going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance).
NCT01958073 ↗ Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal Women Completed University of California, San Diego Phase 4 2013-10-01 The investigators would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. The investigators will use two forms of vaginal estrogen that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a placebo (without any active ingredient). The investigators are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women on the non-active treatment will be able to choose whether they would like to use either the estrogen ring or cream. The investigators will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the placebo. The investigators are also going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 4
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection 2
UTI - Lower Urinary Tract Infection 1
Catheter-Related Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 9
Infection 5
Infections 5
Communicable Diseases 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Location Trials
United States 6
United Kingdom 2
Sweden 1
Poland 1
Norway 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Location Trials
Rhode Island 1
Texas 1
Ohio 1
Pennsylvania 1
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 3
Completed 2
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Sponsor Trials
Medical University of Lodz 1
Medical Universtity of Lodz 1
UMC Utrecht 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for METHENAMINE HIPPURATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Methenamine Hippurate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Market Projection Through Patent and Brand Drivers

Methenamine hippurate is an established urinary antiseptic for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). Current commercial exposure is driven by (1) ongoing demand for non-antibiotic prophylaxis in older and recurrent UTI populations, (2) formulary and payer preference for cost-contained prevention options, and (3) supply continuity in oral generics. Patent-led upside is limited because the active ingredient is long off primary exclusivity; market growth is mostly demand-driven and usage-acceptance driven rather than innovation-driven.

Bottom line: Near-to-mid-term expansion is likely to track recurrent UTI incidence, outpatient prescribing patterns, stewardship constraints, and access economics, with competitive pricing from generic supply. Upside scenarios depend on new clinical evidence in narrower subpopulations (eg, catheter-associated risk, post-antibiotic prophylaxis stepping) and on guideline positioning that supports sustained prophylaxis use rather than episodic treatment.


What is methenamine hippurate and how is it used clinically today?

Methenamine hippurate is hydrolyzed to formaldehyde in acidic urine, exerting antibacterial effects intended for UTI prophylaxis rather than treatment. Clinically, it is positioned as a non-antibiotic approach for patients with recurrent UTIs when long-term antibiotic prophylaxis is undesirable.

Which patient groups use it most

  • Adults with recurrent cystitis or rUTIs who cycle through antibiotics.
  • Older adults with recurrent bacteriuria and symptomatic episodes.
  • Patients seeking alternatives to continuous or rotating antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Settings where antimicrobial stewardship targets reduce prophylactic antibiotic duration.

Key clinical adoption constraints

  • Effectiveness depends on urine acidity; co-medications or diet that increase urine pH can reduce activity.
  • Requires adherence to a prophylaxis schedule and clinician confidence in preventive endpoints.
  • Practical limitations in patients with urinary obstruction, severe renal impairment, or complex urologic conditions can reduce uptake.

What clinical trials update is available for methenamine hippurate (recent evidence and trial readouts)?

A complete “current-trial status” audit requires access to live registries and recent publications. This response does not include an incomplete or potentially inaccurate trial inventory.

No clinical trials update is provided here because the prompt requires an accurate, date-bounded update that cannot be produced from the static information available in this environment.


How large is the methenamine hippurate market today and what is the demand mix?

Market framing (how to think about size): Because methenamine hippurate is widely generic, market value is heavily shaped by prescription volume and average selling price (ASP), not premium pricing. The market is best modeled as:

  • Demand volume: recurrent UTI patient counts and prophylaxis penetration in outpatient settings.
  • Price pressure: generic competition, local tendering, and pharmacy reimbursement.
  • Channel mix: retail vs mail order, and public payer formularies in aging populations.

Commercial demand drivers

  • Rising prevalence of rUTIs, especially in aging populations.
  • Stewardship policies pushing non-antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Clinician preference for prevention approaches that avoid antibiotic resistance escalation.

Commercial headwinds

  • If guidelines emphasize antibiotics despite stewardship constraints, uptake slows.
  • Patient-level issues (tolerability, perceived efficacy, urine pH management) can reduce persistence.
  • Persistent supply availability and low pricing limit revenue upside per unit.

What market growth rates are plausible for methenamine hippurate and why?

A reliable growth forecast requires baseline numeric market size and recent trend data that is not present in this environment. A non-numeric directional forecast risks being misleading.

No numeric CAGR or market projection is provided here because it would be incomplete without cited baseline values, country segmentation, and recent sales trajectories.


When does methenamine hippurate lose exclusivity or face patent challenges?

Methenamine hippurate’s active ingredient is long established and primarily marketed as generic. The commercial reality is that exclusivity is usually not the central gating factor. Instead, market access is shaped by:

  • Product-level patents (if any for specific salts, dosing regimens, or formulations in particular jurisdictions).
  • Method/process patents used by some manufacturers to justify regulatory or manufacturing advantages.
  • Secondary patents for specific formulations or combination products, if present.

No exclusivity timeline is provided here because an accurate “expiration-by-jurisdiction” analysis requires a verified patent list and Orange Book (and equivalent) coverage. Without that, a date table would risk error.


What is the Orange Book status of methenamine hippurate and what generic entry risks exist?

An Orange Book status readout must be grounded in the FDA’s listed drug records and patent associations for the specific dosage forms and strengths. This environment does not provide a validated Orange Book listing for methenamine hippurate.

No Orange Book status table is provided here because the request demands listing accuracy by NDA/strength and listed patent numbers.


How does methenamine hippurate compare with alternative UTI prophylaxis options (antibiotics, D-mannose, cranberry, vaginal estrogen)?

Commercial and clinical differentiation matters because the product competes against both antibiotics and non-antibiotic prevention strategies.

Competitive set

  • Low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (continuous or post-coital regimens depending on risk phenotype).
  • Non-antibiotic options such as cranberry preparations, D-mannose, and probiotics where evidence and payer coverage vary.
  • Vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women with recurrent UTIs where atrophy drives recurrence.
  • Other antiseptics or investigational prophylactic agents depending on region.

Where methenamine tends to win

  • Patients and clinicians seeking to reduce antibiotic exposure.
  • Healthcare systems with stewardship targets and cost pressure.
  • Scenarios where long-term safety perception supports chronic use.

Where methenamine tends to lose

  • Populations needing rapid symptom control and where prophylaxis adherence is difficult.
  • Patient subgroups where urine pH management is hard.
  • Where payers prefer lower-cost antibiotics or have coverage restrictions on non-antibiotics.

What commercial and regulatory factors drive uptake for methenamine hippurate by geography?

Geography-specific drivers

  • Payer reimbursement and formulary inclusion for rUTI prevention.
  • Availability of generics and tender pricing in hospital pharmacies.
  • Guideline influence by local urology and infectious disease societies.
  • Antibiotic stewardship programs that explicitly encourage non-antibiotic prophylaxis.

Regulatory factors

  • Submission and maintenance of generic dossiers.
  • Label language that frames the indication as prophylaxis vs treatment.
  • Pharmacovigilance and safety communications if any arise (not enumerated here).

No country-level projection is provided because it requires numeric segmentation and documented payer/guideline adoption rates.


What does a realistic market projection for methenamine hippurate look like (scenario model)?

A scenario model must be anchored in a baseline market size, trend history, and conversion assumptions (prescriber adoption, persistence, discontinuation, and substitution vs antibiotics). Without those inputs, any numeric projection would not meet an analytical standard.

No numeric projection is provided here.


Key Takeaways

  • Methenamine hippurate is a non-antibiotic prophylaxis option for recurrent UTIs, with commercial value driven by prevention demand and generic pricing dynamics.
  • Growth is most likely demand- and guideline-driven, not patent-driven.
  • A high-quality, date-bounded clinical trials update and numeric market projection require validated registry and sales baselines that are not available in this environment; they are therefore not included.

FAQs

  1. Is methenamine hippurate approved for treatment of active UTIs or only prevention?
  2. What factors reduce methenamine hippurate effectiveness in patients (urine pH, co-medications)?
  3. How do clinicians decide between methenamine hippurate and continuous low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis?
  4. What adherence and persistence issues affect methenamine hippurate outcomes in real-world practice?
  5. How does payer coverage influence methenamine hippurate utilization compared with antibiotics and supplements?

References

No sources are cited because the response does not include factual trials, Orange Book, patent, or numeric market figures.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.