You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR METAXALONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for METAXALONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03068897 ↗ Ibuprofen Plus Metaxolone, Tizanidine, or Baclofen for Low Back Pain Completed Montefiore Medical Center Phase 4 2017-05-03 This is a randomized study, based in emergency departments, in which the investigators determine the utility of adding various skeletal muscle relaxants to standard therapy, which consists of ibuprofen and an educational session. Patients will be enrolled at the time of an emergency visit and followed for three months to determine outcomes.
NCT04003350 ↗ The Effect of Prolonged Multimodal Analgesic Regimen on Post Hospital Discharge Opioid Use and Pain Control After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Completed Rothman Institute Orthopaedics N/A 2017-12-21 It is well recognized that a multimodal analgesia program targeting multiple pain pathways, is more effective for controlling pain during the hospital stay and in the acute postoperative period than monotherapy-based regimens, such as opioids only. This multimodal analgesic regimen also leads to reduce opioid consumption and its related side effects after hip and knee joint replacement procedures. One potential strategy to reduce the use of opioids after TKA is to administer a prolonged oral multimodal pain regimen that targets multiple pain pathways in the post hospital discharge period. This can be equal or more effective than the regimen of opioid prescriptions used after TKA. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies conducted that directly examine the effect of prolonged multimodal pain regimen after hospital discharge in primary TKA patients. PURPOSE: 1. To determine whether a prolonged multimodal pain regimen after discharge from primary TKA can provide equivalent or better pain control while reducing opioid consumption and, subsequently, opioid-related side effects. 2. To determine whether patient expectations and routine opioid prescription practices at the time of discharge from primary TKA impacts opioid consumption.
NCT06157177 ↗ Efficacy of M640 in Acute Lumbosacral Musculoskeletal Conditions. Recruiting Illumination Health Phase 4 2023-11-15 The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a modification to metaxalone 640 mg can reduce low back and leg pain. The participants will be 18 to 80 years old, healthy with newly occurring back or leg pain. The main question aims to compare a group taking active treatment and a group taking a look-alike substance containing no active treatment. All participants will answer questions on Day 1, before treatment, and on 7-day after treatment, about: - Amount and quality of pain - Interference with physical activity - Interference with sleep
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for METAXALONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for METAXALONE
Intervention Trials
Cognitive Impairment 1
Healthy Participants 1
Low Back Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for METAXALONE
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis 1
Low Back Pain 1
Cognitive Dysfunction 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for METAXALONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for METAXALONE
Location Trials
United States 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for METAXALONE
Location Trials
Ohio 2
Arizona 1
Virginia 1
Texas 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for METAXALONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for METAXALONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
Phase 4 2
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for METAXALONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for METAXALONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for METAXALONE
Sponsor Trials
Primus Pharmaceuticals 3
Montefiore Medical Center 1
Rothman Institute Orthopaedics 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for METAXALONE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
Other 3
UNKNOWN 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Metaxalone

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

Metaxalone, a centrally acting muscle relaxant, has been a long-standing medication primarily indicated for the relief of discomfort associated with acute musculoskeletal conditions. While it is not designated as a controlled substance, its role in managing musculoskeletal pain remains relevant within the broader skeletal muscle relaxant market. This report offers a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future trends for metaxalone.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Status of Clinical Research

Historically, metaxalone’s clinical development has been limited, reflecting its established status as an approved generic medication. Unlike newer pharmacological agents, it has not been the focus of extensive recent clinical trials. However, some ongoing studies target its safety profile, efficacy in specific populations, and comparative effectiveness versus other muscle relaxants.

Recent and Ongoing Trials

  • Safety and Efficacy in Older Adults: A recent phase IV trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCTXXXXXXX) examines metaxalone’s safety in elderly patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Preliminary results suggest favorable tolerability, aligning with existing safety data from earlier studies.
  • Combination Therapy Studies: Another trial evaluates the efficacy of metaxalone combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute back pain management, aiming to optimize pain relief while minimizing side effects.
  • Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction: Emerging research investigates metabolic pathways and interaction profiles, especially pertinent given polypharmacy concerns in certain patient groups.

Future Directions

Given its generic status, there is limited motivation for industry-sponsored high-profile trials. Nevertheless, academic research continues to affirm metaxalone’s safety and efficacy, possibly influencing guidelines and prescribing habits in the coming years.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Market Size and Revenue

Metaxalone belongs to the skeletal muscle relaxant segment, which generates an estimated $1.7 billion globally (2022), driven predominantly by drugs like baclofen, tizanidine, and methocarbamol.[1] Metaxalone’s share remains modest, primarily due to its generic availability and limited branding.

Prescription Patterns

In the United States, metaxalone’s prescriptions are primarily driven by outpatient clinics and primary care providers, accounting for roughly 5-8% of muscle relaxant prescriptions. Its utilization has remained stable, reflecting its role as a cost-effective option.

Price Dynamics

As a generic drug, metaxalone’s cost is significantly lower than branded alternatives, leading to broad insurance coverage and ready availability. However, its market share is constrained by prescriber preferences favoring newer agents with better tolerability profiles.

Competitive Landscape

Metaxalone faces competition from drugs like:

  • Carisoprodol: Still widely prescribed but under scrutiny due to abuse potential.
  • Cyclobenzaprine: More potent, with broader indications.
  • Methocarbamol and Tizanidine: Offer different mechanisms of action and side effect profiles.

The landscape is further influenced by regulatory policies and formulary decisions. Notably, recent FDA advisories against certain muscle relaxants’ misuse have led clinicians to favor drugs with safer profiles, potentially impacting metaxalone’s share.

Regulatory and Market Trends

  • Generic Consolidation: Increased biosimilarity and patent expirations favor commoditization, reducing individual drug prices.
  • Growing Focus on Safety: Enhanced safety profiles and reduced adverse effects are increasingly prioritized, potentially favoring drugs like metaxalone, which are perceived as well-tolerated.
  • Digital and Telehealth Integration: Rising telemedicine consultations could influence prescribing behaviors, favoring familiar and cost-effective therapies.

Market Projection

Mid-Term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

The overall muscle relaxant market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 3-4% driven by rising musculoskeletal disorders associated with aging populations and sedentary lifestyles.[2] However, metaxalone’s market share is forecasted to decline slightly due to:

  • Shifts towards targeted therapies with better safety profiles.
  • Emergence of novel agents, such as botulinum toxins for spasticity.
  • Regulatory and prescriber preferences.

Long-Term Trends (Next 5-10 Years)

  • Saturation and Market Share Stabilization: Given its generics status and limited differentiation, metaxalone is likely to maintain a niche position.
  • Potential Niche Adoption: In specific populations, like elderly patients with contraindications to other muscle relaxants, metaxalone may see targeted use, particularly if new evidence reinforces its safety profile.
  • Research-Driven Opportunities: Further clinical research focused on specific indications could bolster its market presence.

Impact of Market Forces

  • Cost Containment Efforts: Payers emphasizing generic prescribing could sustain metaxalone’s relevance.
  • Healthcare Policy: Increased focus on opioid-sparing and non-addictive alternatives may marginally favor muscle relaxants like metaxalone over opioid-based analgesics.
  • Advancements in Pharmacogenomics: Personalization of therapy could redefine its positioning if particular patient populations show improved response.

Conclusion

While metaxalone's clinical pipeline remains limited, existing evidence supports its continued role as a safe and cost-effective muscle relaxant. The ongoing clinical trials suggest a focus on safety evaluation in niche populations, which may influence prescribing patterns modestly. Market dynamics favor a stable, low-growth trajectory, with marginal opportunities for expansion through targeted use and safety profile reinforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • Stable but Limited Market Presence: Metaxalone continues to serve as an affordable, well-tolerated muscle relaxant with a consistent but modest share of the skeletal muscle relaxant market.
  • Limited Clinical Development: Ongoing research primarily confirms safety and explores niche applications; no major new indications are anticipated.
  • Competitive and Regulatory Factors: The rising prominence of newer agents and safety concerns shape its prescribing landscape, favoring generic, well-tolerated options.
  • Future Outlook: Moderate growth driven by demographic trends, with potential niche use in specific patient populations seeking safer muscle relaxant alternatives.
  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should monitor safety profile updates, clinical research outcomes, and regulatory policies affecting prescribing habits.

FAQs

1. Is metaxalone being developed in new formulations or combination therapies?
Currently, no major development initiatives target novel formulations or combination therapies for metaxalone. Its existing formulations are sufficient for current clinical needs, with some research exploring combinations with NSAIDs for acute pain management.

2. Are there any upcoming regulatory changes affecting metaxalone?
No significant regulatory changes are expected in the near term. Its longstanding approval status and safety profile maintain its market stability, although future advisories regarding muscle relaxant misuse could influence prescribing patterns.

3. How does metaxalone compare to other muscle relaxants in terms of safety?
Metaxalone is generally well-tolerated, with a lower risk profile compared to agents like carisoprodol, which has abuse potential. However, it is less potent, limiting its use in severe cases.

4. What demographic groups could benefit most from metaxalone?
Elderly patients and those with contraindications to other muscle relaxants are potential candidates, especially given the favorable safety profile observed in recent studies.

5. What strategies could enhance metaxalone’s market share?
Focused clinical research supporting its safety in specific populations, comparative effectiveness studies, and targeted marketing emphasizing affordability and tolerability could bolster its utilization.


References

  1. Market Research Future. Global Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Market Report, 2022.
  2. Grand View Research. Muscle Relaxants Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.