You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MESNEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MESNEX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002804 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Children With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy in treating children who have advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
NCT00002804 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Children With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 2 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy in treating children who have advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
NCT00002816 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-12-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00002816 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 1996-12-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
NCT00002829 ↗ Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients With Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1994-02-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage cancer cells, and may be an effective treatment for lymphoma. Bone marrow transplantation may be able to replace immune cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy used to kill cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of bone marrow transplantation in treating patients with recurrent or residual low-grade lymphoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MESNEX

Condition Name

Condition Name for MESNEX
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 14
Lymphoma 12
Sarcoma 7
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MESNEX
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 29
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 26
Leukemia, Lymphoid 24
Lymphoma 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MESNEX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MESNEX
Location Trials
United States 447
Canada 48
Australia 15
Poland 6
Puerto Rico 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MESNEX
Location Trials
Texas 46
Illinois 20
Tennessee 20
New York 16
Pennsylvania 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MESNEX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MESNEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 7
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 55
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MESNEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 33
Terminated 22
Recruiting 22
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MESNEX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MESNEX
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 30
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 23
Children's Oncology Group 10
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MESNEX
Sponsor Trials
Other 108
NIH 25
Industry 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Mesnex (mesna)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Mesnex (mesna) remains a vital adjunct in chemotherapy regimens, primarily utilized to mitigate hemorrhagic cystitis caused by alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. Originally developed by Pfizer, mesna's role in oncology has cemented it as an essential supportive care drug. This analysis provides an in-depth review of current clinical trial activities, evaluates market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories for Mesnex, addressing evolving regulatory landscapes, competitive pressures, and therapeutic innovations.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recently Completed Trials

Current clinical trial databases, including ClinicalTrials.gov, reveal limited active studies explicitly targeting Mesnex. Its primary approved indication remains as a prophylactic agent against hemorrhagic cystitis in patients undergoing chemotherapy with high-dose cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide. Historically, the drug’s pivotal trials, dating back to the 1980s and 1990s, established its efficacy and safety profile.

Recently, however, there is limited evidence of new clinical trials involving Mesnex as a standalone investigative agent. Most ongoing research centers on adjunct therapy combinations in oncology, with Mesnex administered as part of supportive care protocols. For instance, some studies assess mesna's potential to reduce bladder toxicity in novel chemotherapeutic combinations, although these remain exploratory.

Innovative Therapeutic Investigations

Emerging studies focus on mesna's broader applications beyond traditional hematuria mitigation. Notably, preclinical research suggests mesna's potential for chemoprotection in other toxicity models, such as kidney injury associated with specific chemotherapeutic regimens. However, these are early-stage investigations, with no large-scale, registration-enabling trials initiated yet.

Regulatory Status and Ongoing Post-Marketing Surveillance

Mesnex retains FDA approval for preventively managing hemorrhagic cystitis. Recently, pharmacovigilance data indicate a consistently favorable safety profile across multiple patient populations, with transient side effects like nausea and allergic reactions being the most common. There is no current regulatory initiative to expand indications or modify dosing guidelines.

Implications for Clinical Development

The limited scope of contemporary clinical trials suggests that innovation in Mesnex’s application remains nascent. The emphasis appears to be on optimizing existing use rather than expanding indications, likely due to strong existing efficacy and established safety profiles. Pharmaceutical companies investing in similar supportive care agents may focus on developing next-generation agents or alternative formulations rather than pursuing new trials for Mesnex.

Market Analysis

Market Overview and Size

The global supportive care drugs market was valued at approximately USD 30 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.1% through 2028 [1]. Mesna, as a key product within this segment, primarily serves the hematology-oncology niche, where high-dose chemotherapy protocols are prevalent.

In the U.S., the market for mesna is estimated at USD 300 million annually, with steady growth driven by high chemotherapy utilization rates, expanding cancer prevalence, and increased awareness of supportive care importance. Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America represent additional growth drivers due to expanding access to cancer treatments.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers include:

  • Increasing cancer incidence: Global cancer cases surged to approximately 19.3 million in 2020, with projections exceeding 28 million new cases annually by 2040 [2].
  • Standardization of supportive care guidelines: Incorporation of mesna into chemotherapy protocols as a standard protective agent supports sustained demand.
  • Advances in chemotherapy regimens: Use of high-dose alkylating agents in hematological malignancies and solid tumors sustains the need for supportive agents.

Barriers encompass:

  • Emerging alternative agents: Development of novel nephroprotective or mucositis-preventing agents may gradually compete with mesna.
  • Generic competition: As patent protections for original mesna formulations have expired, price erosion impacts profitability.
  • Limited indication expansion: Absence of new approved indications constrains market growth potential.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include generic manufacturers and supportive care drug portfolios from large pharma, such as Teva, Sandoz, and Pfizer (original patent holder). Biosimilar formulations and alternative hematuria management agents further intensify competition. Notably, the market remains highly consolidated, with few differentiating attributes among generic versions.

Market Trends and Opportunities

  • Formulation innovation: Development of low-cost, easy-to-administer formulations, including oral options, could enhance accessibility, especially in outpatient and resource-limited settings.
  • Combination therapies: Incorporating mesna into multi-agent supportive care regimens may enhance its value proposition.
  • Expanded indications: Exploratory research into mesna's potential protective effects against other toxicities could expand its use.

Market Projection

The outlook for Mesnex is cautiously optimistic. Given the stable demand within established indications, the market is expected to grow modestly, aligned with overall supportive care expansion in oncology.

Projection Summary:

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) Growth Rate Rationale
2023 320 million Base year, stable demand
2025 370 million 8% Increased cancer treatments, emerging markets growth
2030 500 million 9% Drive from expanding oncology indications and potential formulation innovations

By 2030, the contribution of emerging markets and outpatient chemotherapy protocols may significantly augment demand. However, the lack of new indications and competition from generics will moderate growth.

Regulatory and Market Entry Considerations

Pharmaceutical entrants must navigate complex regulatory landscapes, particularly in gaining approval for novel formulations or expanded indications. Future market expansion hinges on demonstrating additional benefits through clinical data, which may require investment in new trials. Strategic partnerships with regional distributors could facilitate access in burgeoning markets.

Conclusion

While Mesnex continues to serve as a crucial supportive agent in chemotherapy, its market trajectory is characterized by stability rather than explosive growth. The absence of new clinical trials targeting expanded indications suggests that future development efforts are predominantly focused on optimizing existing formulations. The outlook remains positive for established players, particularly if they innovate in formulations or penetrate emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Stable Clinical Profile: Mesnex’s longstanding efficacy and safety underpin its continued role in supportive oncology care, with no significant recent clinical trial activity aimed at indication expansion.
  • Market Saturation and Competition: The patent expiry of original formulations and proliferation of generics have intensified competition, exerting downward pressure on prices.
  • Growth Drivers: Rising global cancer prevalence, expanding supportive care protocols, and emerging markets offer growth opportunities, particularly if manufacturers innovate formulations or explore new applications.
  • Strategic Focus: Future success depends on product differentiation through improved formulations, cost-effective manufacturing, and strategic market expansion into regions with increasing chemotherapy use.
  • Regulatory Outlook: Current regulatory pathways favor maintaining existing indications, with limited prospects for rapid expansion unless supported by compelling clinical data.

FAQs

1. What are the recent clinical developments involving Mesnex?
Recent clinical trials predominantly focus on supporting cytoprotection in chemotherapy regimens, with no significant new indications or formulations in late-stage development.

2. How does Mesnex compete with emerging supportive care agents?
Mesnex maintains its market position via its well-established safety profile and cost-effectiveness. Competition from novel agents is limited due to regulatory, safety, and efficacy considerations.

3. What strategies could extend Mesnex’s market reach?
Formulation innovations (e.g., oral formulations), regional market expansion, and leveraging supportive care guideline endorsements can enhance uptake.

4. How will market growth be affected by patent expirations?
Patent expirations have led to a proliferation of generics, increasing market volume but exerting price pressure, thus constraining profit margins but promoting broader accessibility.

5. What is the future outlook for Mesnex’s use in oncology?
Its role as a prophylactic agent in chemotherapy remains secure, with moderate growth driven by global cancer treatment trends and regional adoption, barring significant breakthroughs in alternative protective agents.


References

[1] MarketsandMarkets, "Supportive Care Drugs Market by Type, Application, and Region — Global Forecast to 2028," 2022.

[2] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), "Global Cancer Statistics 2020," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.