Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MEPRO-ASPIRIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00011063 ↗ Effect of Ginkgo Biloba on Phenytoin Elimination Completed National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) Phase 1 2001-02-01 This study will examine how the herbal remedy ginkgo biloba may affect the body's elimination of other medicines. Many people take ginkgo biloba to improve memory, mental alertness and overall feeling of well being. Since this product is considered a food supplement and not a drug, it is not subject to the rigorous pre-market testing required for prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. As a result, information has not been collected on possible interactions between ginkgo biloba and other medications. This study will look at how ginkgo biloba affects the elimination of phenytoin-a medication used to treat patients with seizures. Normal healthy volunteers 21 years of age or older may be eligible for this 40-day study. Candidates will provide a medical history and undergo a physical examination and routine blood tests. Women of childbearing age must use a reliable form of birth control other than oral contraceptives ("the pill"). For at least 2 weeks before the study and throughout its duration, study participants may not have any of the following: 1) medications that can affect platelet function (e.g., aspirin, Motrin, Advil, Nuprin, ibuprofen, etc.); 2) alcoholic beverages; 3) grapefruit and grapefruit juice; and 4) all medications except those given by study personnel. On day 1 of the study, subjects take one 500-mg dose of phenytoin at 8:00 A.M.. On an empty stomach. (Subjects fast the night before taking the phenytoin and are allowed to eat breakfast 2 hours after the dose). Blood samples are drawn just before dosing and again at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 32, 48, 72 and 96 hours after the dose. Blood drawn on this first study day is collected through a catheter (small plastic tube) placed in a vein to avoid multiple needlesticks. After the 12-hour sample is collected, the subject goes home and then returns to the clinic for the remaining blood draws, which are taken by direct needlestick. When the blood sampling is completed, subjects begin ginkgo therapy. The NIH Clinical Center provides participants a supply of 60-mg capsules of ginkgo to take twice a day (at 8 A.M. and 8 P.M..) for 4 weeks. At the end of the 4 weeks, subjects are given a second dose of phenytoin as described above and repeat the blood sampling procedure. Subjects continue taking ginkgo during this second phenytoin study.
OTC NCT00267293 ↗ Ibuprofen Alone and in Combination With Acetaminophen for Treatment of Fever Completed Children Youth and Family Consortium Phase 4 2006-01-01 Currently, when a child has fever either ibuprofen (e.g. Motrin, Advil) or acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol) is given. Both Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen are approved for over the counter use for treatment of fever by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study hopes to determine whether giving both medications together is better than giving one medication alone for the treatment of fever.
OTC NCT00267293 ↗ Ibuprofen Alone and in Combination With Acetaminophen for Treatment of Fever Completed Penn State University Phase 4 2006-01-01 Currently, when a child has fever either ibuprofen (e.g. Motrin, Advil) or acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol) is given. Both Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen are approved for over the counter use for treatment of fever by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study hopes to determine whether giving both medications together is better than giving one medication alone for the treatment of fever.
OTC NCT01669824 ↗ Pharmacy Based Pharmacoepidemiological Observational Study With Aspirin Protect 100 mg Completed Bayer 2007-08-01 In this non-interventional one year study, data about overall and particularly gastrointestinal tolerability, indications, cardiovascular risk factors and compliance are collected by basic questionnaires, which are handed out by pharmacists to patients who acquire (in Germany no prescription is needed) Rx (Prescription) or OTC (Over-The-counter) Aspirin protect (enteric coated aspirin) 100 mg and are willing to participate in the study. After 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up questionnaires are sent out. Aim of the study is to get information about safety, usage and compliance under everyday's conditions, because in Germany low-dose aspirin is an OTC product with Rx indication.
OTC NCT02966002 ↗ Aspirin as a Novel Anti-Inflammatory Modality in the Fontan Patients Terminated University of Michigan Phase 4 2016-04-01 Patients who have undergone the Fontan procedure (a congenital heart surgery) may develop complications many years after their operation. Studies have shown that some of these patients develop an ongoing inflammatory state, which may be the cause of these late complications. Aspirin is a common over the counter anti-inflammatory medication used for many other chronic diseases. This study may help determine if aspirin therapy can limit the inflammation seen in Fontan patients and prevent these late complications.
New Combination NCT03124199 ↗ Rifaximin Associated With Classic Triple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Completed Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Phase 3 2014-02-01 Background: A progressive decrease in Helicobacter pylori eradication rates has been described over the years, so new combinations of antibiotics for treatment are needed. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of rifaximin to standard triple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) for the eradication of H. pylori. Methods: Independent prospective pilot clinical trial (EUDRA CT: 2013-001080-23). Forty consecutive adult patients were included with H. pylori infection, dyspeptic symptoms and naive to eradication treatment. A full blood test was performed in the first 5 patients included to evaluate the safety of the treatment. H. pylori eradication was confirmed with urea breath test at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Treatment: Rifaximin 400 mg/8 h, clarithromycin 500 mg/12 h, amoxicillin 1 g/12 h, and omeprazole 20 mg/12 h for 10 days.
OTC NCT03152409 ↗ Salicylic Augmentation in Depression Recruiting Columbia University Phase 2 2018-11-15 The investigators are doing this research study to find out if using aspirin along with antidepressant treatment can lessen symptoms of depression. This study also aims to find out if some people improve more from taking aspirin than others. The investigators also want to see if it is possible to predict which participants will do better based on a blood test. Aspirin is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an over-the-counter pain medication. But, aspirin is not approved by the FDA to make antidepressant treatment better. This research study will compare aspirin to placebo.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000151 ↗ Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1979-12-01 To evaluate the effectiveness of both argon laser photocoagulation and aspirin therapy in delaying or preventing progression of early diabetic retinopathy to more severe stages of visual loss and blindness. To help determine the best time to initiate photocoagulation treatment in diabetic retinopathy. To monitor closely the effects of diabetes mellitus and of photocoagulation on visual function. To produce natural history data that can be used to identify risk factors and test etiologic hypotheses in diabetic retinopathy.
NCT00000152 ↗ Randomized Trial of Beta-Carotene and Macular Degeneration Unknown status National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1982-04-01 To determine whether 50 mg of beta-carotene taken every other day reduces the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) among male U.S. physicians who were aged 40 to 84 in 1982. To investigate the possible relationship of AMD with other antioxidants, including selenium and vitamins A, C, and E. To identify potential risk factors for development of AMD. Possible risk factors include height, systemic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, blood cholesterol, cigarette smoking, iris and skin color, sunlight exposure, body mass index, diabetes, and alcohol intake.
NCT00000157 ↗ Randomized Trial of Aspirin and Cataracts in U.S. Physicians Terminated National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1982-04-01 To determine whether 325 mg of aspirin taken on -alternate days reduces the risk of developing cataract among male U.S. physicians who were aged 40 to 84 in 1982. To identify potential risk factors for cataract development, such as age, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, height, diabetes, medication use, and history of previous eye trauma or surgery.
NCT00000161 ↗ Randomized Trials of Vitamin Supplements and Eye Disease Unknown status National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1993-08-01 To determine whether vitamin E supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in women. To determine whether vitamin C supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To determine whether beta-carotene supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To determine whether alternate day, low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To identify potential risk factors for cataract and AMD including cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, cardiovascular disease, height, body mass index, and diabetes.
NCT00000463 ↗ Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1987-04-01 To determine the relative effectiveness of moderate versus more aggressive lipid lowering, and of low dose anticoagulation versus placebo, in delaying saphenous vein coronary bypass graft atherosclerosis and preventing occlusion of saphenous grafts of patients with saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts placed 1 to 11 years previously.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 186
Acute Coronary Syndrome 89
Stroke 60
Myocardial Infarction 54
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 276
Myocardial Ischemia 236
Coronary Disease 217
Infarction 128
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Location Trials
China 516
Japan 332
United Kingdom 303
Canada 303
Italy 229
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Location Trials
New York 139
Texas 132
Florida 125
California 120
Pennsylvania 114
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 47
PHASE3 39
PHASE2 26
[disabled in preview] 945
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 783
Recruiting 308
Unknown status 223
[disabled in preview] 363
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MEPRO-ASPIRIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 55
Bayer 52
AstraZeneca 47
[disabled in preview] 121
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MEPRO-ASPIRIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 2511
Industry 571
NIH 167
[disabled in preview] 124
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 22, 2026

MEPRO-ASPIRIN Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity Projection

MEPRO-ASPIRIN clinical and commercial outlook cannot be produced from the information provided. A complete, accurate “clinical trials update” plus market sizing and projection requires verified identifiers for the exact product (active ingredient(s), strength, route, dosage form), development sponsor(s), and up-to-date trial and regulatory records (ClinicalTrials.gov, EU CTR, FDA approvals, and Orange Book or equivalents). Without those specifics, any stated trial status, recruitment/termination signals, endpoints, timelines, pricing, forecast shares, or exclusivity dates would be non-actionable.

What is MEPRO-ASPIRIN and what evidence links it to a specific active ingredient?

A defensible clinical and market analysis depends on the exact drug identity. “MEPRO-ASPIRIN” could refer to a proprietary product label, a program name, or a branded derivative tied to a specific formulation technology. Market projection and trial status must be anchored to:

  • API(s) and salt/ester form
  • dosage form (e.g., tablet, capsule, oral solution)
  • route of administration
  • strength and regimen
  • sponsor and legal entity marketing rights

No verified linkage is available in the prompt.

Which mechanism of action, indication, and comparator matter for market sizing?

Market modeling requires:

  • indication(s) (primary and secondary)
  • patient setting (hospital/ambulatory; acute vs chronic)
  • standard-of-care comparator set
  • line of therapy

No indication or therapeutic target is provided.

Is it single-agent aspirin or combination therapy (and with what assets)?

Therapeutic combinations change both trial endpoints and addressable market:

  • additive efficacy endpoints
  • safety/bleeding profile management
  • payer coding and reimbursement category

No combination details are provided.

What clinical trials exist for MEPRO-ASPIRIN, and what are the latest updates?

A “clinical trials update” requires verifiable trial records with:

  • ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT) or EU CTR identifiers
  • phase (1/2/3), randomization, blinding, and sample size
  • enrollment status (not yet recruiting, recruiting, active, completed)
  • last update posted date
  • primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints
  • results release dates and effect size

No trial identifiers or statuses are supplied.

Which phase 2 and phase 3 programs define the exclusivity and launch timing?

Without trial phase mapping, exclusivity projections and launch scenarios are not computable.

Do any trials show safety signals that change development risk?

Safety outcomes drive regulatory strategy and commercial uptake (especially for aspirin-related bleeding risk), but no adverse event profile is provided.

When does MEPRO-ASPIRIN lose exclusivity: patent expiration, data exclusivity, and regulatory exclusivity?

Exclusivity forecasting needs:

  • patent family members (WO/EP/US filings, granted status, expiration, PTA where applicable)
  • FDA exclusivity type (if NDA/BLA): NCE, 5-year, 3-year, 7-year, or orphan; and pediatric extensions
  • regulatory exclusivity for particular dosage forms or supplemental approvals
  • Orange Book listings, if applicable

No patent, Orange Book, or FDA regulatory dossier information is provided.

What is the Orange Book status of MEPRO-ASPIRIN?

Orange Book status is required to calculate exclusivity windows and generic entry risk. No Orange Book listing data is provided.

When do any Paragraph IV challenges occur (or are expected) for MEPRO-ASPIRIN?

Paragraph IV timing depends on first commercial marketing date and listed patents. No listed patents, launch date, or challenge history is provided.

What formulations are protected for MEPRO-ASPIRIN: composition, polymorph, and method-of-use patents?

Formulation and method-of-use coverage changes both litigation exposure and generic feasibility:

  • composition of matter (API or derivative)
  • formulation patents (coatings, controlled release, gastro-protection)
  • process/method-of-manufacture patents
  • method-of-use patents tied to dosing regimens or patient subsets

No patent estate information is provided.

Which companies control the manufacturing and process IP for MEPRO-ASPIRIN?

Corporate control affects licensing leverage and risk allocation. No assignee/manufacturer mapping is provided.

How many patents cover MEPRO-ASPIRIN and what is the strength of the patent estate?

A quantified patent estate review requires a dataset of:

  • patent count by family and jurisdiction
  • claims scope (device/formulation/use)
  • claim status (granted, expired, reexam)
  • enforcement status (injunctions, settlements)
  • litigation outcomes and standard validity indicators

No patent dataset is provided.

What patent litigation affects MEPRO-ASPIRIN and what settlements define entry barriers?

Litigation status is essential for realistic generic/biosimilar entry timing:

  • case captions, courts, and docket dates
  • asserted patents and dismissal/claim-construction outcomes
  • settlement terms (effective date, carve-outs, allowed launch design)

No litigation records are provided.

What is the competitive landscape for MEPRO-ASPIRIN: branded, generic, and therapeutic alternatives?

Market projection requires:

  • competitive set by indication and mechanism class
  • competitor pricing/reimbursement and volume assumptions
  • switching dynamics (tolerability, efficacy, dosing convenience)
  • channel strategy (hospital formularies vs retail)

No indication or competitive set is provided.

How does MEPRO-ASPIRIN compare with aspirin standards of care and competitors?

Comparative differentiation influences adoption and forecast share. No comparative evidence or claims are provided.

What market size and forecast projection can be made for MEPRO-ASPIRIN by geography and indication?

A credible forecast requires:

  • target patient population size (incidence/prevalence)
  • eligible segment share
  • expected uptake curves by year
  • pricing assumptions and reimbursement constraints
  • switch rate from existing therapies
  • channel utilization and tender dynamics

No indication, geography, or pricing/regimen assumptions are provided.

Revenue projection inputs: price, volume, and penetration scenarios

Without trial efficacy data, safety/tolerability positioning, and regulatory milestones, scenario modeling cannot be computed.

What regulatory pathway will MEPRO-ASPIRIN use and what FDA milestones matter for launch?

Regulatory timing depends on pathway:

  • NDA vs ANDA landscape (if already marketed vs new formulation)
  • FDA review timelines, PDUFA dates, and label negotiations
  • CMC package readiness for formulation differentiation

No regulatory dossier status is provided.

Has MEPRO-ASPIRIN received any FDA approvals or designations?

No FDA approval date, Breakthrough/Fast Track, or orphan designation information is provided.

What generic entry risks exist for MEPRO-ASPIRIN and when could generics launch?

Generic entry risk depends on:

  • whether listed patents are still enforceable
  • whether the product qualifies for reference-based exclusivity or has its own exclusivity
  • whether Paragraph IV is likely based on Orange Book structure
  • formulation/process complexity that blocks generic bioequivalence

No exclusivity/patent listing or launch status is provided.

Key Takeaways

  • No verifiable identity, regulatory status, patent estate, or trial record is provided for “MEPRO-ASPIRIN,” so clinical update, exclusivity timelines, and market forecasts cannot be produced accurately.
  • A defensible analysis requires confirmed drug identity (API, dosage form, route), program sponsor(s), and current trial/regulatory/patent records.

FAQs

  1. What is the most reliable source to confirm MEPRO-ASPIRIN trial status and endpoints?
  2. How do formulation-specific patents affect generic approval for aspirin-based products?
  3. What determines whether an aspirin derivative gets data exclusivity in the US?
  4. How do settlement agreements typically shift generic launch dates in Paragraph IV cases?
  5. What market drivers most change adoption for differentiated aspirin formulations (bleeding risk, dosing, gastroprotection)?

References

No sources were cited because no drug-identity, trial, regulatory, patent, or market data was provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.