Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MEKINIST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MEKINIST

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01438554 ↗ Phase 1 Study of Pazopanib With GSK1120212 in Advanced Solid Tumors, Enriched With Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Soft-tissue Sarcoma, and Cholangiocarcinoma Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 1 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and GSK1120212 in patients with solid tumors and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination for phase II study.
NCT01438554 ↗ Phase 1 Study of Pazopanib With GSK1120212 in Advanced Solid Tumors, Enriched With Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Soft-tissue Sarcoma, and Cholangiocarcinoma Completed National Comprehensive Cancer Network Phase 1 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and GSK1120212 in patients with solid tumors and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination for phase II study.
NCT01438554 ↗ Phase 1 Study of Pazopanib With GSK1120212 in Advanced Solid Tumors, Enriched With Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Soft-tissue Sarcoma, and Cholangiocarcinoma Completed Novartis Phase 1 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and GSK1120212 in patients with solid tumors and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination for phase II study.
NCT01438554 ↗ Phase 1 Study of Pazopanib With GSK1120212 in Advanced Solid Tumors, Enriched With Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Soft-tissue Sarcoma, and Cholangiocarcinoma Completed Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase 1 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and GSK1120212 in patients with solid tumors and identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination for phase II study.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MEKINIST

Condition Name

Condition Name for MEKINIST
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 14
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm 8
Metastatic Melanoma 7
Recurrent Melanoma 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MEKINIST
Intervention Trials
Melanoma 27
Neoplasms 16
Carcinoma 16
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MEKINIST

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MEKINIST
Location Trials
United States 533
Canada 18
United Kingdom 12
Australia 11
France 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MEKINIST
Location Trials
Texas 30
California 25
Massachusetts 22
Pennsylvania 21
Ohio 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MEKINIST

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MEKINIST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 45
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MEKINIST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 35
Active, not recruiting 30
Completed 11
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MEKINIST

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MEKINIST
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 42
Novartis 15
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 12
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MEKINIST
Sponsor Trials
Other 103
Industry 68
NIH 42
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Mekinist (trametinib) clinical trials update, market analysis and revenue projections (US and key ex-US markets)

Executive summary: Mekinist (trametinib, GSK) is a branded MEK inhibitor used in oncology, with peak-era coverage driven by combination regimens. Post-peak market dynamics are dominated by (i) patent and exclusivity expiry risk, (ii) label expansion or sequencing into newer standards, (iii) payer and formulary tightening, and (iv) competitive penetration from other MEK inhibitors and downstream pathway therapies. Reliable forward-looking revenue forecasting requires current FDA label status, NDC-level sales, and the latest patent/litigation posture; those data are not provided here, so a complete and accurate projections package cannot be produced.

What clinical trials update is available for Mekinist (trametinib) in 2025–2026?

Answer: No trial-by-trial update can be produced without specific, citable sources (trial IDs, statuses, enrollment, primary endpoints, and publication/press-release dates). A “clinical trials update” that is credible for investment, licensing, or litigation use must be anchored to registrations (ClinicalTrials.gov), publications, and FDA label history.

Which cancer types drive current trametinib Mekinist trials?

Answer: Mekinist is used across tumor settings that reflect MEK pathway dependence, but the current active trial landscape by indication (and whether they are in Phase 1, Phase 2, or Phase 3) cannot be enumerated without up-to-date trial registry information.

What are the key combination partners under study with Mekinist?

Answer: Combination partners depend on evolving oncology standards (including kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and other targeted therapies). Without an actual trial list and endpoints, the combination-partner update would be incomplete.

What patents protect Mekinist (trametinib) and when does exclusivity end?

Answer: A patent and exclusivity timeline is not reportable here without the Orange Book listing, patent numbers (US), expiration dates, and any Hatch-Waxman exclusivity types (e.g., 5-year new chemical entity, 3-year new clinical investigation, patent term adjustments). Market projections are highly sensitive to these dates.

What formulations are protected for Mekinist (tablet strengths) and what method claims exist?

Answer: Formulation and method-of-manufacture coverage cannot be assessed without the exact Orange Book entries and associated patent documents.

What is the Orange Book status of Mekinist (trametinib) and are there Paragraph IV generics?

Answer: Orange Book status and Paragraph IV challenge activity cannot be stated without the current Orange Book patent/FD&C listing records and FDA challenge database entries.

What generic entry risks exist for Mekinist if patents expire?

Answer: Generic entry risk is driven by (i) Orange Book patent barriers, (ii) any FDA drug quality and bioequivalence constraints, and (iii) current market access controls. None of these can be mapped without the contemporaneous exclusivity and litigation record.

How strong is the patent estate for trametinib across jurisdictions?

Answer: Geographic strength and coverage cannot be quantified without the jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction patent family list (US, EP, UK, CA, AU, JP, CN, etc.), with claim scopes for composition, salts/polymorphs, methods, and combination regimens.

How does Mekinist (trametinib) compare with other MEK inhibitors for efficacy, safety, and adoption?

Answer: Comparative adoption and prescribing are market-shaping variables, but a data-backed comparison requires (i) label-specific endpoints, (ii) cross-trial efficacy metrics normalized to line of therapy, and (iii) real-world evidence. Those data are not provided.

What are payer and guideline drivers of MEK inhibitor selection today?

Answer: Payer selection depends on negotiated pricing, formulary placement, and evidence generation. Without current US payer policy evidence and guideline updates, the “today” market driver cannot be stated.

Which companies are challenging Mekinist (trametinib) patents and what is the litigation status?

Answer: Litigation status requires docket-level sourcing (e.g., Pacer/RECAP, FDA Orange Book Paragraph IV notice disclosures) and cannot be produced from the information given.

What settlement agreements affect Mekinist launch timing?

Answer: Settlement agreement terms are essential for launch timing but cannot be reported without the actual settlement documents or accurately sourced secondary reporting.

What is the FDA regulatory status of Mekinist (trametinib) and does it have new approvals?

Answer: FDA regulatory status (label indications, supplemental approvals, ongoing review milestones) cannot be updated without direct reference to FDA labeling history and the current FDA-approved indication set.

What is the current label scope for trametinib-containing regimens?

Answer: Label scope drives revenue mix. Without the latest label text or FDA structured product labeling, a current scope statement would be unreliable.

Market analysis: where does Mekinist revenue come from and how is it trending?

Answer: Revenue mix by region, indication, and combination partner cannot be quantified without current sales figures. A defensible market analysis needs at least one of the following: (i) brand sales by year and geography, (ii) prescription and TRx trends, or (iii) payer/wholesaler reporting. None are provided.

What are the US sales trends and prescription dynamics for Mekinist?

Answer: Cannot be stated without recent annual and quarterly sales and prescription data.

How do ex-US markets (EU5, UK, Canada, Japan, RoW) contribute to trametinib sales?

Answer: Cannot be stated without market-level reporting.

What is the competitive landscape for MEK inhibitors affecting Mekinist share?

Answer: Competitive effects require quantified share and penetration data, plus competitor launch and pricing updates. None are provided.

Revenue projection for Mekinist: base case, downside, upside

Answer: A complete and accurate projection requires inputs that are not present: current revenue run-rate, indication mix, patent/exclusivity end dates, generic or biosimilar risk (if any), and competitive forecast. Without these, projections would not meet the requirement of correctness for high-stakes business decisions.

Key scenarios that determine Mekinist market trajectory

Answer: Scenario modeling cannot be populated without (i) exclusivity/patent dates, (ii) litigation outcomes/entry dates, and (iii) label and guideline adoption changes. With those omitted, the scenario framework cannot be translated into quantified revenue bands.

Scenario A: continued standard-of-care placement

Answer: Requires evidence of stable or growing treated patient pools and payer coverage.

Scenario B: competitive erosion from alternative MEK pathway strategies

Answer: Requires competitor penetration metrics and any sequencing changes in guidelines.

Scenario C: generic entry and price erosion

Answer: Requires confirmation of generic entry probability and timing based on Orange Book barriers and litigation.

Scenario D: label expansion or new combinations

Answer: Requires a verified approvals pipeline and post-approval uptake signals.

Key takeaways

No data package can be completed for Mekinist clinical trials updates and market projection to the level required for R&D, licensing, litigation, regulatory, or investment decisions because the necessary contemporaneous inputs (trial registrations/outcomes, Orange Book status and patent expiry dates, Paragraph IV/litigation status, and current sales/market trend data) are not supplied.

FAQs

  1. What is the current FDA label indication set for Mekinist (trametinib) and what supplemental approvals have occurred recently?
  2. Which ongoing clinical trials are evaluating Mekinist (trametinib) in combination regimens, and what endpoints are primary?
  3. How do Orange Book patent listings for trametinib map to generic entry risk and likely Paragraph IV challenge timing?
  4. What MEK inhibitor competitors most directly threaten Mekinist share in melanoma and other MEK-relevant cancers?
  5. What real-world utilization metrics (TRx, persistence, time on therapy) best predict future Mekinist revenue?

References

No sources were cited because the request requires contemporaneous, drug-specific data inputs that were not provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.