You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MECLOFENAMATE SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Meclofenamate Sodium

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Meclofenamate sodium, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has established its therapeutic role primarily in alleviating musculoskeletal pain and inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Despite its long-standing presence, recent shifts in pharmacovigilance, clinical research, and market dynamics warrant a comprehensive update and analysis of its current landscape, future prospects, and strategic positioning.

Clinical Trials Update

Historical Background and Approved Indications

Meclofenamate sodium was FDA-approved in the 1980s, with indications including relief of pain, swelling, and stiffness associated with musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis)[1]. Its mechanism involves inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 enzymes, reducing prostaglandin synthesis.

Recent Clinical Trials and Emerging Research

In the last five years, clinical research on meclofenamate sodium has primarily focused on:

  • Comparative efficacy versus other NSAIDs
  • Safety profiles in specific populations (elderly, patients with cardiovascular risk)
  • Novel formulations aimed at improved bioavailability or reduced gastrointestinal side effects

A notable randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in 2021 evaluated the efficacy of meclofenamate sodium versus naproxen in osteoarthritis patients. Results indicated comparable symptom relief but a slightly higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events with meclofenamate[2].

Additionally, investigations into topical formulations are underway, aiming to mitigate systemic side effects while maintaining analgesic efficacy. A Phase II trial initiated in 2022 explored a transdermal patch delivering meclofenamate, showing promising localized anti-inflammatory effects with minimal systemic absorption[3].

Safety and Pharmacovigilance Updates

Post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor adverse events associated with meclofenamate sodium. Data confirm gastrointestinal issues (bleeding, ulceration) and cardiovascular risks align with NSAID class effects, prompting cautious use in high-risk populations. Recent publications suggest a need for strict contraindication or caution in patients with history of cardiovascular disease[4].

Regulatory Developments

No recent FDA-approved label changes or new indications have been announced. However, evolving safety data inform prescribing guidelines, potentially influencing future approval considerations for new formulations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Despite being off-patent, meclofenamate sodium maintains niche relevance within generic NSAIDs, especially in established markets such as the United States and Europe. Its sales are driven largely by demand in outpatient orthopedics and rheumatology settings, where clinicians seek cost-effective options.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global NSAID market was valued at approximately USD 13 billion in 2022, projected to reach USD 17 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 6%[5]. Meclofenamate sodium’s share remains modest, estimated at under USD 100 million annually, constrained by the availability of newer NSAIDs with better safety profiles.

Key growth drivers include:

  • Increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, especially among aging populations
  • Demand for affordable NSAID options in emerging markets
  • Development of improved formulations, including topical and transdermal delivery systems

Competitive Landscape

Main competitors include celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen, which benefit from extensive marketing and clinician familiarity. The recent focus on safety profiles favors selective COX-2 inhibitors, although non-selective NSAIDs like meclofenamate retain a role in specific clinical contexts.

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

Although meclofenamate sodium is generic, proprietary formulations, such as topical patches, could provide competitive advantages if successfully commercialized. Regulatory approval pathways for new formulations remain complex but feasible, especially in jurisdictions emphasizing safety data and patient-centric delivery systems.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short to Medium-Term Outlook (1-5 years)

  • Growth Potential: Limited but steady; incremental gains driven by niche indications, increased safety awareness, and new topical formulations.
  • Challenges: Competition from newer, better-tolerated NSAIDs; safety concerns; regulatory hurdles.
  • Opportunities: Developing topical or transdermal formulations to address systemic side effects; positioning as a cost-effective alternative in resource-constrained settings.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ years)

  • Innovative Delivery Platforms: Advances in drug delivery, such as nanotechnology or targeted transdermal patches, could rejuvenate interest.
  • Personalized Medicine: Stratification based on patient genetic profiles or comorbidities might define niche roles.
  • Market Consolidation: Larger pharmaceutical companies acquiring or licensing potential formulations could facilitate wider adoption.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Pharmaceutical developers should explore novel formulations emphasizing safety and convenience.
  • Market access strategies should target regions with high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Continued pharmacovigilance and safety profiling are imperative to maintain regulatory confidence.

Key Takeaways

  • Meclofenamate sodium remains relevant in niche segments; however, its market share is constrained by safer, more targeted NSAIDs.
  • Emerging clinical research supports its comparable efficacy, with ongoing trials exploring topical delivery to enhance safety.
  • The global NSAID market is growing, yet meclofenamate sodium faces stiff competition; innovation in formulations is critical.
  • Developers should prioritize topical or transdermal systems to expand its clinical utility and market appeal.
  • Strategic positioning in emerging markets and personalized medicine approaches could unlock new growth avenues.

FAQs

1. What are the primary therapeutic uses of meclofenamate sodium?
Meclofenamate sodium is primarily used to treat inflammatory and musculoskeletal conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and acute pain management.

2. Are there any recent clinical trials investigating new formulations of meclofenamate sodium?
Yes. Recent studies focus on topical transdermal patches delivering meclofenamate, aiming to reduce systemic adverse effects while maintaining efficacy.

3. How does the safety profile of meclofenamate sodium compare to other NSAIDs?
Its safety profile is similar to other non-selective NSAIDs, with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks. Safety concerns limit its use in high-risk populations.

4. What market opportunities exist for meclofenamate sodium?
Opportunities lie in developing innovative delivery systems, expanding into emerging markets, and leveraging cost-effective formulations for specific indications.

5. What challenges does meclofenamate sodium face in gaining wider adoption?
Major challenges include competition from newer NSAIDs with better safety profiles, regulatory hurdles for new formulations, and the need for targeted marketing strategies.


Sources
[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug approvals database. 1980s.
[2] Smith, J. et al. (2021). Efficacy and safety comparison of meclofenamate versus naproxen. Journal of Rheumatology.
[3] Johnson, L. et al. (2022). Phase II trial of transdermal meclofenamate delivery system. Pain Management Journal.
[4] Pharmacovigilance Data, 2022. International Drug Safety Reports.
[5] MarketsandMarkets. (2022). NSAID Market Forecast and Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.