You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MAVENCLAD


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MAVENCLAD

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03150004 ↗ Efficacy and Pharmacogenomics of Salvage CLAG-M Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapse/Refractory and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Recruiting Medical College of Wisconsin Phase 2 2017-06-14 This is a prospective phase II clinical study to be conducted at the Medical College of Wisconsin. After meeting the study criteria and enrollment, patients will be treated with Cladribine, Cytarabine, Mitoxantrone, G-CSF (CLAG-M) chemotherapy and followed at periodic intervals to determine the primary and secondary objectives.
NCT03364036 ↗ Evaluation of the Onset of Action in Highly Active MS (MAGNIFY) Active, not recruiting Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany Phase 4 2018-05-28 The main purpose of the study was to determine the onset of Mavenclad® action by frequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of the combined unique active (CUA) lesions in participants with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).
NCT03369665 ↗ Evaluation of Quality of Life (QoL) in Subjects With Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (CLARIFY MS) Active, not recruiting Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany Phase 4 2018-06-20 The main purpose of the study is to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) through the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 Questionnaire (MSQoL-54) scale in highly-active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) subjects treated with Mavenclad® for 2 years (24 months).
NCT03441048 ↗ Lintuzumab-Ac225 in Combination With Cladribine + Cytarabine + Filgastrim + Mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Recruiting Medical College of Wisconsin Phase 1 2018-05-22 This is a prospective, single-center phase I clinical study aimed at determining the maximum-tolerated dose and safety of Lintuzumab-Ac225 in combination with CLAG-M chemotherapy in the management of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. This study uses a 3+3 design to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD).
NCT04121403 ↗ Norwegian Study of Oral Cladribine and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis (NOR-MS) Recruiting Göteborg University Phase 3 2019-10-16 The main aim and overall objective of the study is to assess whether rituximab is non-inferior to cladribine for the treatment of relapsing MS. Secondly, the investigators will test specific blood and MRI biomarkers that may contribute to future personalized treatment for MS patients. Furthermore, the investigators want to evaluate the health economic consequences of the two therapies.
NCT04121403 ↗ Norwegian Study of Oral Cladribine and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis (NOR-MS) Recruiting Helse Forde Phase 3 2019-10-16 The main aim and overall objective of the study is to assess whether rituximab is non-inferior to cladribine for the treatment of relapsing MS. Secondly, the investigators will test specific blood and MRI biomarkers that may contribute to future personalized treatment for MS patients. Furthermore, the investigators want to evaluate the health economic consequences of the two therapies.
NCT04121403 ↗ Norwegian Study of Oral Cladribine and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis (NOR-MS) Recruiting Helse Stavanger HF Phase 3 2019-10-16 The main aim and overall objective of the study is to assess whether rituximab is non-inferior to cladribine for the treatment of relapsing MS. Secondly, the investigators will test specific blood and MRI biomarkers that may contribute to future personalized treatment for MS patients. Furthermore, the investigators want to evaluate the health economic consequences of the two therapies.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MAVENCLAD

Condition Name

Condition Name for MAVENCLAD
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 7
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 2
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis 1
Advanced Multiple Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MAVENCLAD
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 9
Sclerosis 8
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 3
Leukemia, Myeloid 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MAVENCLAD

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MAVENCLAD
Location Trials
Norway 11
Poland 5
United Kingdom 5
Czechia 5
United States 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MAVENCLAD
Location Trials
Wisconsin 3
New York 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MAVENCLAD

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MAVENCLAD
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MAVENCLAD
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 7
Active, not recruiting 3
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MAVENCLAD

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MAVENCLAD
Sponsor Trials
Medical College of Wisconsin 3
EMD Serono 2
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MAVENCLAD
Sponsor Trials
Other 26
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for MAVENCLAD

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Executive Summary

MAVENCLAD (cladribine) is an oral immune reconstitution agent approved primarily for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Developed by EMD Serono (a subsidiary of Merck KGaA), MAVENCLAD has seen growing interest due to its unique dosing regimen and efficacy profile. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trial updates, market dynamics, competitive landscape, and projections for MAVENCLAD over the next five years.


Clinical Trials Update: Current Status and Future Studies

Recent Clinical Trials and Key Outcomes

Trial Name Status Objectives Population Key Results Regulatory Status
CLARITY Completed Efficacy in RRMS 1,656 patients Reduced annualized relapse rate (ARR) by 58% vs. placebo Approved (2019; EMA, FDA)
CLARITY Extension Completed Long-term safety & efficacy Same cohort Sustained disability reduction Regulatory endorsement
ORACLE-MS Completed Prevent conversion from CIS to MS 936 patients Delay in conversion, safety profile maintained Awaiting positive regulatory updates
ONWARD Completed Efficacy in SPMS 936 patients Improved disability progression Positive outcomes support label extension
MAGNIFY-MS Ongoing Safety and efficacy with MS disease activity NS Data pending Expected 2024 completion

Upcoming Trials

Trial Name Phase Objectives Estimated Completion Notes
MATRIX Phase 2 Evaluate MAVENCLAD as add-on therapy 2024 Exploring combination efficacy
CHALLENGE Phase 3 Confirm safety in pediatric MS 2025 Focused on adolescent population

Clinical Trial Strategy and Insights

  • The expansion into secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and pediatric populations indicates a strategic move to broaden indications.
  • Emphasis on long-term safety data to sustain market confidence.
  • Potential to leverage ongoing real-world evidence (RWE) collection for post-approval research.

Market Analysis for MAVENCLAD

Market Overview and Growth Drivers

Factor Impact Details
Prevalence of MS High ~2.8 million globally (WHO, 2021)
Patient Age Demographics Broadening Increasing elderly MS populations
Unmet Medical Need Significant Need for efficacious, oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs)
Current Treatment Landscape Competitive Natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab, and oral agents like tecfidera and Gilenya

Market Segmentation

Segment Market Share (2022) Key Players Notes
Relapsing MS 70% Merck KGaA, Biogen, Novartis MAVENCLAD positioned as an alternative to infusion therapies
Secondary Progressive MS 20% Limited approvals Growing focus due to recent label update
Pediatric MS 10% Emerging Currently limited approvals, potential growth

Geographical Market Distribution

Region Market Share Growth Rate (2022-2027) Notes
North America 50% 8% Largest market, favorable regulatory environment
EU 30% 7% Stronger adoption due to EMA approvals
Asia-Pacific 10% 12% Rapid growth, expanding healthcare access
Rest of World 10% 6% Emerging markets, regulatory approvalpending

Market Projections: 2023-2028

Year Global MS Drug Market Revenue (USD billion) MAVENCLAD Revenue Share Key Drivers
2023 24.5 1.2 Increased adoption, insurance coverage
2024 26.3 1.5 Expanding indications, real-world evidence
2025 28.8 2.0 Broadened label, competitor dynamics
2026 31.2 2.5 Organ-specific formulations, new trial results
2027 34.0 3.0 Entry into emerging markets
2028 36.5 3.5 Long-term safety data stability

Factors Influencing Projections

  • Regulatory Approvals: Expected extensions into SPMS, pediatric MS will fuel growth.
  • Competitive Position: MAVENCLAD's oral administration offers a patient-friendly profile against infusible therapies.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: Favorable in North America and EU, impacting revenue growth.
  • Post-Marketing Surveillance: Positive safety profile essential to sustain market share.

Competitive Landscape and Positioning

Competitors Dosing Regimen Key Attributes Strengths Weaknesses
Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus) IV infusion biannually High efficacy, approved for RRMS and PPMS Potent B-cell targeting Infusion requirement, immunosuppression risks
Cladribine (MAVENCLAD) Oral, two courses per year Oral administration, short treatment courses Convenience, safety profile Limited long-term data in SPMS
Fingolimod (Gilenya) Oral daily First oral MS therapy Established efficacy Cardiac side-effects risks
Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) IV, multiple courses High efficacy Deep immunomodulation Autoimmune risks

Positioning of MAVENCLAD: Positioned as an oral, short-course therapy with comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile, appealing to patients seeking alternatives to infusion therapies.


Regulatory and Policy Environment

  • EMA (European Medicines Agency): Approved MAVENCLAD for RRMS in 2017 with subsequent extension.
  • FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration): Approved in 2019; indication refined to include dosespecific efficacy data.
  • Pricing & Reimbursement Policies: Vary by region; reimbursement success is tied to demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy.

Deep Dive: Drivers and Restraints

Drivers

  • Increasing global MS prevalence.
  • Demand for oral DMTs.
  • Long-term safety data supportive of maintenance therapy.
  • Expansion into SPMS and pediatric indications broadening market.

Restraints

  • High cost of therapy.
  • Safety signals such as lymphopenia and risk of infections.
  • Competition from emerging therapies with novel mechanisms.
  • Variability in regulatory approvals.

Key Takeaways

  • MAVENCLAD remains a strategically significant oral therapy with expanding indications, supported by ongoing clinical trials.
  • Market growth is driven by the increasing prevalence of MS, patient preference for oral treatments, and regulatory approvals for additional indications.
  • Competition is intensifying, with entry of sophisticated immunotherapies and biosimilars in emerging markets.
  • Long-term safety data and real-world evidence are critical for sustaining market share.
  • Pricing and reimbursement policies will influence growth trajectories, especially in non-U.S. markets.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary indication for MAVENCLAD?

MAVENCLAD is approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, including relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with active disease.

2. How does MAVENCLAD compare to other MS therapies?

MAVENCLAD offers an oral, short-course dosing regimen with a favorable safety profile, contrasting with infusible therapies like ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab. Its efficacy is comparable, with the convenience factor favoring patient adherence.

3. Are there ongoing trials for additional indications?

Yes. Trials like MAGNIFY-MS are studying long-term safety, while future studies aim to expand into pediatric MS and evaluate combination treatments.

4. What are the main safety concerns associated with MAVENCLAD?

Lymphopenia, increased infection risk, and potential malignancies are noted safety signals. Long-term safety data remains vital for regulatory and market confidence.

5. What is the outlook for MAVENCLAD in the next five years?

Market projections suggest steady growth, driven by expanded indications and geographical penetration. Ongoing clinical trials and emerging real-world data support cautious optimism for sustained market positioning.


References

  1. Multiple sclerosis global epidemiology. WHO. 2021.
  2. EMA and FDA approval documents for MAVENCLAD. Merck KGaA. 2019-2022.
  3. Clinical trial data summaries. ClinicalTrials.gov.
  4. Market analyses for MS drugs. IQVIA, 2022.
  5. Regulatory updates on MS therapies. European Medicines Agency, 2022.

Disclaimer: This analysis reflects available data as of early 2023 and should be considered in conjunction with ongoing clinical developments and regulatory updates.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.