You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04374318 ↗ Comparison Between Intrathecal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Completed Suez Canal University N/A 2019-03-01 A prospective, randomized, comparative controlled clinical trial, aiming to compare the use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine by intravenous dexmedetomidine in concern of the first request to analgesia. The secondary end-points were the total postoperative analgesic consumption as well as the VAS.
NCT04461028 ↗ Liposomal Bupivacaine in Shoulder Arthroscopy Recruiting University of Pennsylvania Phase 3 2019-02-21 Background: The research study is being conducted to see if using the liposomal Bupivacaine for the Interscalene block will improve the patient pain control and the whole patient's experience 48 hours after surgery when compared to using the regular Marcaine (bupivacaine hydrochloride) in addition to the dexamethasone. All preoperative, surgical, post-operative care in the recovery room, and discharge instructions will be the same as any other patient undergoing this surgery. Study procedures: 1. After obtaining informed consent, an anesthesiologist will receive an envelope with result of randomization. Patients will receive a single injection interscalene nerve block prior to surgery 2. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: - GROUP 1 liposomal Bupivacaine - will receive a 20 ml mixture of 10 ml of Liposomal Bupivacaine 1.3% and 10 ml of Bupivacaine HCl 0.5%. - GROUP 2 Bupivacaine with dexamethasone - will receive 20 ml of Bupivacaine HCl 0.5% with 4 mg of preservative-free dexamethasone. 4. Patients will undergo general endotracheal anesthesia with inhaled anesthetic (Sevoflurane) for a goal MAC 1.0. Other than the aforementioned interscalene nerve block, patients will not receive any other local anesthetic. 5. Patients will receive a multimodal analgesic and antiemetic regimen standardized for shoulder arthroscopies at our institution. Preoperatively, all patients will receive 300 mg of gabapentin and 1,000 mg of acetaminophen orally. Intraoperatively, patients will receive 4 mg of ondansetron and 15 mg of ketorolac intravenously. Postoperatively, patients will remain on an oral regimen of 300 mg of gabapentin three times daily for one week, and 1,000 mg of acetaminophen and 10 mg of ketorolac every 8 hours for 48 hours after surgery. 6. Additional intraoperative or postoperative opioid analgesics will be administered as needed. Patients with a history of PONV or otherwise deemed high risk for PONV by the attending anesthesiologist will receive a scopolamine patch before induction of general anesthesia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Condition Name

Condition Name for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Intervention Trials
Postoperative Analgesia 1
Rotator Cuff Tears 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Intervention Trials
Rotator Cuff Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Location Trials
Egypt 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Sponsor Trials
Suez Canal University 1
University of Pennsylvania 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for MARCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

Marcaine Hydrochloride Preservative-Free (bupivacaine hydrochloride) is an established local anesthetic widely used in surgical, dental, and obstetric procedures. Its preservative-free formulation caters to patients with sensitivities and ensures safer administration, particularly in sensitive populations such as neonates or those undergoing continuous nerve blocks. As the pharmaceutical landscape shifts towards safer anesthetics and innovative delivery methods, an updated analysis of clinical trials, market potential, and future projections for this formulation provides vital insights for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Overview and Developments

Current State of Clinical Trials

Recent years have seen a resurgence in clinical investigation for local anesthetics, including preservative-free formulations like Marcaine. ClinicalTrials.gov records highlight a modest but ongoing pipeline of studies focused on:

  • Safety and efficacy in pediatric populations: Multiple Phase II and III trials since 2020 have evaluated the safety profile of preservative-free bupivacaine in neonatal and pediatric surgeries. These studies aim to confirm reduced systemic toxicity and allergic reactions compared to preserved formulations, aligning with regulatory agencies’ focus on pediatric safety [1].

  • Extended-release formulations: Researchers are exploring long-acting, depot versions of preservative-free bupivacaine to improve postoperative analgesia, potentially reducing opioid dependency.

  • Comparative effectiveness: Trials comparing preservative-free Marcaine with other local anesthetics, such as ropivacaine, continue to generate data supporting its safety profile and duration of anesthesia.

Regulatory Developments

Efforts to gain or maintain approval focus on demonstrating the preservative-free formulation’s safety in special populations, emphasizing reduced risk of neurotoxicity or hypersensitivity. The U.S. FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) generally approve preservative-free formulations for a wider patient demographic, considering their favorable safety profiles [2].

The absence of new pivotal trials within the past two years suggests the formulation has achieved a stable regulatory status, with ongoing studies mainly aimed at improving formulations or expanding indications rather than seeking major approvals.


Market Landscape Analysis

Market Drivers

  • Safety Profile and Patient Preferences: Growing awareness of adverse reactions to preservatives like parabens in local anesthetics spurs demand. Medical guidelines increasingly favor preservative-free formulations for neuraxial and regional anesthesia procedures [3].

  • Regulatory and Institutional Recommendations: Regulatory bodies and hospital formularies preferentially include preservative-free options, bolstered by evidence demonstrating superior safety for vulnerable populations.

  • Rising Surgical and Anesthetic Procedures: The global surgical volume continues to grow, with regional campaigns emphasizing safer, preservative-free anesthetics. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 234 million surgical procedures are performed annually worldwide [4].

  • Epidemiological Factors: Aging populations in North America and Europe, along with increasing chronic disease prevalence, contribute to higher surgical intervention rates, elevating demand for reliable anesthetic agents.

Market Segmentation and Key Players

  • End-User Segments:

    • Hospitals and surgical centers (primary consumers)

    • Dental clinics

    • Pain management clinics

  • Leading Manufacturers:
    Sanofi, Hospira (Pfizer), B. Braun Melsungen AG, and Piramal Enterprises are key players, offering preservative-free bupivacaine formulations, including Marcaine.

  • Geographical Focus:
    North America dominates market share, driven by high procedural volume and safety standards. Europe follows, with emerging markets in Asia-Pacific showing increasing adoption due to expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Competitive Landscape

While present market players are largely established, new entrants and generics manufacturers are expanding availability, especially in price-sensitive regions. Patent expirations in major markets open avenues for generic preservative-free bupivacaine, potentially intensifying competition.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Projections

The preservative-free local anesthetic market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6-8% from 2023 to 2030, attributable to the increasing safe anesthesia demands and expanding surgical procedures globally.

Medical and Regulatory Trends

  • Innovative Delivery Systems: The development of long-acting, biodegradable depots and nanoparticle formulations aim to extend analgesic effects, potentially augmenting demand for preservative-free agents.

  • Regulatory Emphasis on Safety: Agencies continue to prioritize safer formulations, which could lead to stricter guidelines favoring preservative-free options, further boosting sales.

  • Personalized Anesthesia: Emerging trends favor patient-specific anesthetic protocols, emphasizing safer and more tailored formulations.

Market Challenges

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Preservative-free formulations often come at a premium, challenged by reimbursement policies especially in developing markets.

  • Generics and Price Competition: Patent expirations and the entrance of generic manufacturers may lead to price declines, impacting profit margins for brand-name formulators.

  • Awareness and Adoption Gaps: In lower-resource settings, limited awareness of preservative-related adverse events hampers widespread adoption.


Strategic Opportunities

  • Expanding indications into chronic pain management and outpatient procedures.

  • Investing in novel delivery platforms for extended analgesia.

  • Collaborating with hospitals to integrate preservative-free options into standard protocols.

  • Focusing on markets with unmet needs, such as pediatric anesthesia and developing countries.


Key Takeaways

  • The clinical landscape for preservative-free Marcaine displays steady progress, primarily confirming safety in sensitive populations rather than initiating groundbreaking trials.

  • Market growth is sustained by the favorable safety profile, expanding surgical volumes, and regulatory support, with projections indicating a CAGR of 6-8% through 2030.

  • Competition is intensifying, especially with patent expirations enabling generic access; differentiation hinges on safety, efficacy, and delivery innovations.

  • Opportunities exist in developing extended-release formulations and targeting emerging markets with increasing surgical infrastructure.

  • Challenges include pricing pressures and variable awareness levels, underscoring the importance of education and strategic partnerships.


FAQs

1. What advantages does preservative-free Marcaine offer over preserved formulations?
Preservative-free Marcaine reduces risks of hypersensitivity, neurotoxicity, and systemic toxicity, especially important in vulnerable populations like neonates, pregnant women, and patients receiving continuous nerve blocks.

2. How does clinical trial activity influence the market for preservative-free Marcaine?
Ongoing trials reaffirm safety and expand indications, thereby supporting regulatory approvals, clinician confidence, and market expansion, particularly into pediatric and chronic pain indications.

3. What are the key factors driving market growth for preservative-free local anesthetics?
Safety concerns, regulatory endorsement, rising surgical procedures, and technological innovations in drug delivery are primary drivers.

4. How might patent expirations impact the market dynamics for Marcaine?
Expired patents enable the entry of generics, which can lower prices and increase accessibility but may also pressure brand-name providers to innovate or differentiate through formulations or delivery systems.

5. What emerging markets show potential for prescribing preservative-free Marcaine?
Asia-Pacific and Latin America are poised for growth due to expanding healthcare infrastructure, increasing surgical volume, and rising awareness of preservative-related adverse events.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. "Studies involving preservative-free local anesthetics." Accessed 2023.
  2. European Medicines Agency. "Guidelines on local anesthetics safety." 2022.
  3. World Health Organization. "Surgical volume and anesthetic practices." 2021.
  4. MarketWatch. "Global local anesthetic market analysis." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.