Last Updated: August 7, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003062 ↗ Temozolomide in Patients With Progressive or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 2 1997-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effect of temozolomide in patients with progressive or recurrent stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, with or without brain metastases, who have not been treated for metastatic disease with chemotherapy.
NCT00004767 ↗ Phase II Study of Sodium Phenylbutyrate, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Phenylacetate, and Dietary Intervention for Urea Cycle Disorders Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 2 1985-01-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of sodium phenylbutyrate, sodium benzoate, sodium phenylacetate, and dietary intervention in patients with urea cycle disorders.
NCT00004767 ↗ Phase II Study of Sodium Phenylbutyrate, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Phenylacetate, and Dietary Intervention for Urea Cycle Disorders Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1985-01-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of sodium phenylbutyrate, sodium benzoate, sodium phenylacetate, and dietary intervention in patients with urea cycle disorders.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Cystic Fibrosis 10
Healthy 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Asthma 23
Intracranial Hypertension 12
Brain Neoplasms 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 137
Canada 39
United Kingdom 35
Australia 34
Italy 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
New York 19
Massachusetts 12
Minnesota 9
Oregon 8
Ohio 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 5
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 137
Unknown status 27
RECRUITING 23
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Pharmaxis 19
Northwell Health 7
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MANNITOL 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 387
Industry 64
NIH 17
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Mannitol 5% In Plastic Container Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Market Projection (2026–2036)

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Mannitol 5% in plastic containers is a legacy, off-patent isotonic osmotic agent formulation used for acute indications such as increased intracranial pressure and as an osmotic diuretic adjunct. Public patent and clinical-trial signals for this specific product format are limited because the active ingredient and core dosage form are long-established and typically excluded from active proprietary trial pipelines. As a result, market performance is driven mainly by hospital procurement, formulary inclusion, contract pricing, and supply continuity rather than by differentiated clinical development.

No complete, citable dataset was available to produce a fact-based clinical trials update, a jurisdiction-level patent/exclusivity status, and a quantitative market forecast tied to “man n itol 5% in plastic container” as a distinct FDA-listed product SKU.

Clinical trials update for Mannitol 5% in plastic container: what’s currently being studied?

No citable, product-specific ongoing trial registry set is available here for “mannitol 5% in plastic container” as a uniquely identifiable development program. Clinical evidence for mannitol is largely generic around mannitol injection and varies by indication (neurocritical care, ophthalmology, diuresis/urinary tract, and perioperative osmotic management). For this specific branded format, recent trial activity is typically not separated from the drug class in public registries.

What trial endpoints dominate mannitol research historically?

  • Osmotic efficacy endpoints tied to intracranial pressure reduction, cerebral edema management, or diuresis markers
  • Safety endpoints focused on renal function, electrolyte shifts, osmolality changes, and hemodynamic tolerance
  • Comparative endpoints versus alternative hyperosmolar therapies where trial design exists (practice-dependent)

Why product-format trials are uncommon for this SKU?

  • The active ingredient is established
  • Hospital-grade infusion products are usually supplied under GMP without separate clinical claims
  • Plastic container switching is more common as a regulatory/manufacturing change than a distinct therapeutic development program

Market analysis for Mannitol 5% in plastic container: who buys it and what drives volume?

Demand is concentrated in acute-care and neurocritical settings where mannitol is used as a hyperosmolar agent. Purchasing behavior is shaped by:

  • Hospital formulary adoption and pharmacy inventory policies
  • Group purchasing organization (GPO) contracting
  • Supply availability, container preference, and substitution rules
  • Contracted pricing and rebid cycles

End-user mix by procurement channel

  • Tertiary hospitals and neuro ICU centers (highest clinical use intensity)
  • Emergency departments and surgical services using perioperative osmotic management
  • Long-term acute care providers where off-protocol use occurs (smaller relative shares)

Pricing and supply dynamics that typically move market results

  • Acute-care tender cycles
  • Backorders and manufacturing disruptions for injectables
  • Conversion among container types (glass vs plastic) and in-house substitution rules
  • Competitive generic availability at the SKU level

Competitive landscape at the product level

For an injectable like mannitol 5% in a plastic container, competition typically comes from multiple generic manufacturers offering interchangeable presentations. Without a citable SKU-to-manufacturer mapping for the exact “plastic container” presentation in the market, a precise top-player ranking and share attribution cannot be stated.

Market projection for Mannitol 5% in plastic container (2026–2036): what growth rate is supportable from public signals?

A quantitative forward projection requires citable baseline market size, unit volumes, and a defined geography and segment definition (for example, US-only FDA-labeled units or worldwide tender volumes). No complete, citable market baseline tied specifically to “mannitol 5% in plastic container” was available here.

What can be stated with data-backed constraints is that growth for this type of product is usually moderated by:

  • Off-patent status and price compression
  • Hospital volume stability tied to clinical incidence rather than to innovation
  • Demand swings from critical care practice changes and procurement policies

In practice, projections for off-patent injectables skew toward mid-single-digit value growth with low unit growth in mature geographies, with periodic volatility driven by tender cycles and supply constraints. A numeric forecast cannot be produced here without a citable market data foundation tied to this exact product presentation.

Key differentiators: does “plastic container” change market traction or clinical risk?

Clinical risk differences are usually assessed under stability and compatibility requirements rather than by new efficacy trials. In procurement terms, plastic containers can influence adoption due to:

  • Handling and infusion compatibility workflows
  • Preference for reduced breakage risk compared with glass
  • Pharmacy operational policies

From a regulatory standpoint, container material change typically requires chemistry, manufacturing, and controls updates and labeling updates, not new clinical efficacy packages, unless a bridging study is required by the filing type.

Exclusivity and patent estate: what IP protects mannitol 5% in plastic container?

The active ingredient mannitol is not expected to have active drug-substance exclusivity in major markets. Product-level patents can exist for:

  • Specific container closure systems
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Stability and shelf-life
  • Particular method-of-use claims

However, without a citable patent and Orange Book record mapped to the exact “mannitol 5% in plastic container” presentation, this section cannot be reliably populated.

Regulatory status and substitution risk: what is the Orange Book status and what generic entry risks exist?

For off-patent injectables, competitive entry risk is mainly driven by:

  • FDA approval pathway for generics (ANDA) and required bioequivalence equivalence where applicable
  • Container and manufacturing compliance
  • Labeling differences and interchangeability determinations where relevant

A citable Orange Book status list for this exact presentation is required to quantify filing, exclusivity, and Paragraph IV litigation risk. No such citable dataset was available here.

What generic entry scenarios are most likely for this product class?

Most likely scenarios are:

  • Multiple ANDA approvals for mannitol injection at equivalent strengths and container configurations
  • Substitution at the pharmacy level where equivalent labeling supports interchangeability
  • Supply-driven market share shifts rather than efficacy-driven displacement

A scenario matrix with timelines and parties cannot be produced here without a citable filing/litigation dataset.

What manufacturing and IP barriers can delay supply for mannitol 5% injections?

Barriers typically include:

  • Sterile manufacturing capacity and aseptic process controls
  • Contamination control and batch release constraints
  • Container supply chain risks (resin, film, closure systems)
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes affecting launch schedules

No citable, event-specific supply disruption record for this exact presentation is available here.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development specific to “mannitol 5% in plastic container” is not visible as a distinct, product-grade trial pipeline in public signals; evidence is largely class-level for mannitol injection.
  • Market demand is procurement-led for hospital injectables; value movement is driven by tender pricing, contracting, and supply continuity more than by new clinical differentiation.
  • A numeric market forecast for this exact SKU cannot be produced here without citable baseline market sizing and a definition tied to the plastic-container presentation.

FAQs

  1. Is mannitol 5% injection FDA-approved for increased intracranial pressure, and how do indications vary by label?
  2. Does switching from glass to plastic containers affect stability, osmolality, or infusion compatibility for mannitol 5%?
  3. Which factors most influence hospital tender pricing for off-patent sterile injectables like mannitol?
  4. Are there ongoing clinical trials comparing mannitol versus hypertonic saline in neurocritical care that include mannitol arms?
  5. How does substitution at the pharmacy level typically work for mannitol 5% injection across different manufacturers and container configurations?

References

  1. (No citable sources were available in the provided context to support a trials update, Orange Book status, patent estate mapping, or SKU-specific market forecast for “mannitol 5% in plastic container”.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.