Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MANNITOL; SORBITOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MANNITOL; SORBITOL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03636971 ↗ Gait Analysis Following Knee Viscosupplementation Completed Brigitte Jolles, MD Phase 2/Phase 3 2013-05-01 This is a pilot, double-blind, randomised trial that investigates which gait parameters are more sensitive following a single bolus injection of hyaluronic acid with mannitol, hyaluronic acid with sorbitol, or saline placebo for knee osteoarthritis. Outcome measures are gait analysis through a inertial sensors (Physilog), Knee Society Score (KSS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity-scale and EuroQol 5Dimensions. Follow-up will be of 4 weeks.
NCT03747679 ↗ Palatability (Taste) of Oral Formulations of Bosutinib Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2018-11-22 Healthy Adult Volunteer Taste Study of Oral Formulations of Bosutinib for Pediatric Use. This will be a single-blind, randomized, multiple-period (dosing over 4 days) study in healthy male and/or female participants. Approximately 8 participants will assess the sensory attributes of different powder for oral suspension (POS) formulations.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MANNITOL; SORBITOL

Condition Name

Condition Name for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Intervention Trials
CML 1
Gait 1
Injection 1
Knee Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis, Knee 1
Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MANNITOL; SORBITOL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Location Trials
Belgium 1
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MANNITOL; SORBITOL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MANNITOL; SORBITOL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Sponsor Trials
Brigitte Jolles, MD 1
Pfizer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MANNITOL; SORBITOL
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 26, 2026

Mannitol and Sorbitol Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (Global)

Mannitol and sorbitol are widely used excipients and, in certain indications, active medicines. Market value is driven by bulk pharmaceutical manufacturing, IV/diuretic-grade supply chains (mannitol), and confectionery and sweetener demand (sorbitol), with additional pull from regulated-grade excipient specifications. Public “clinical trials” for mannitol and sorbitol are mostly formulation, delivery, and supportive-care studies rather than large, late-stage new-molecule programs. Market projections should therefore be modeled as commodity-plus-grade premiums: growth tracks excipient volume expansion, regional manufacturing localization, and specialty-grade capacity constraints.


What clinical trials exist for mannitol and sorbitol in 2023–2026?

Mannitol: trial themes

Mannitol is studied primarily for:

  • Osmotic diuresis and intracranial pressure management settings (critical care, neurotrauma).
  • Alternative routes or dosing regimens for neuro-protection and fluid control.
  • Formulation stability and compatibility in parenteral systems.

Featured snippet answer: Clinical activity for mannitol is mostly supportive-care and dosing/formulation studies, not new drug registration programs with clear, late-stage exclusivity.

Sorbitol: trial themes

Sorbitol is studied primarily for:

  • Oral and enteral tolerability, osmotic laxation effects, and bowel preparation adjuncts.
  • Liquid formulation palatability and excipient functionality (viscosity, sweetness, moisture binding).
  • In some settings, osmotic effects used to influence hydration or gastrointestinal transit.

Featured snippet answer: Sorbitol trials tend to be supportive or formulation-focused, with measurable endpoints like stool frequency, GI transit time, and tolerability rather than disease-modifying outcomes.

Where do trials show up and why it matters for competition?

  • ClinicalTrials.gov and EU CTR capture regimen-level innovation that can change prescribing patterns for supportive care and bowel prep.
  • In excipients, “clinical trials” often validate use-case claims that support inclusion in label-adjacent protocols and formularies, affecting procurement even without new chemical entity approval.

How many mannitol vs sorbitol clinical trials are active or recently completed?

No complete, up-to-date trial-counting dataset is provided here. An accurate numerical count requires a current database query filtered by “Condition” and “Intervention” terms and then disambiguated from excipient-only mentions.

Actionable takeaway: Treat clinical trial volume for mannitol/sorbitol as primarily protocol-driven and procurement-relevant rather than indicating a breakthrough pipeline.


When does mannitol and sorbitol lose exclusivity?

Mannitol and sorbitol are commodity substances. They generally do not have drug-substance patent cliffs comparable to branded small molecules or biologics.

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity loss is typically tied to specific formulation patents, container-closure systems, and controlled-release or combination products rather than “mannitol” or “sorbitol” as monotherapies.

What actually creates “exclusivity”

  • Parenteral formulation patents (stability, osmolarity targets, fill-finish, compatibility with IV sets).
  • Combination products (if any) where mannitol/sorbitol function as a component.
  • Specific medical-use claims where jurisdictions allow limited exclusivity tied to method-of-use or label protection.

Practical conclusion for forecast models

Forecasts should be structured around:

  • Generic manufacturing capacity growth and price compression for grade commodities.
  • Specialty-grade premiums for pharma-grade dissolution and parenteral compatibility.
  • Regulatory and supply risk premiums in regions with constrained licensed capacity.

What patents protect mannitol and sorbitol for medical use (and why it affects market timing)?

No patent estate for “mannitol” and “sorbitol” by jurisdiction is supplied here, so exact claim coverage and expiration dates cannot be asserted.

Actionable framing: For both substances, the competitive barrier is rarely the molecule. It is the documentation, control strategy, and manufacturing compliance for the specific grade and dosage form (including packaging).

Patent estate usually clusters into

  • Manufacturing process controls and purification.
  • Medical-device or delivery system compatibility claims.
  • Formulation-specific patents for oral liquids, enteral products, and parenteral solutions.

Business impact: When patents exist, they are likely to constrain specific dosage forms or combination products, not the raw substance supply.


What is the FDA regulatory status of mannitol and sorbitol (drug vs excipient)?

Mannitol

  • Commonly used in parenteral solutions as an osmotic diuretic and for certain clinical indications.
  • Often treated as a drug component with approved formulations where the specific product is what has regulatory approval.

Sorbitol

  • Widely used as an excipient and sweetener.
  • Also used as an osmotic laxative in certain approved medicinal contexts or as part of bowel-prep-related regimens depending on product labeling.

Featured snippet answer: Regulatory status is product-specific. The molecule is widely recognized, but approval is tied to dosage form, strength, and clinical labeling.


What formulations of mannitol and sorbitol are most commercially important?

Mannitol formulations that matter

  • IV infusion solutions (isosmotic targets and parenteral compatibility).
  • High-purity pharma-grade mannitol used in tablets and powders when needed for crystallinity control or specific excipient behavior.

Sorbitol formulations that matter

  • Oral liquids (sweetness and moisture control).
  • Syrups and confectionery-grade sorbitol where excipient functionality and taste drive volume.
  • Medical-grade syrups used in GI transit or bowel prep-adjacent protocols.

Which companies supply mannitol and sorbitol globally, and how does supply structure impact price?

No current supplier list with market shares is provided here, so specific company-level rankings cannot be stated.

Actionable structure for market analysis:

  • Supply is concentrated in large chemical manufacturers capable of pharmaceutical-grade purification and documentation.
  • Price volatility is driven by feedstock costs, capacity utilization, and regulatory-grade qualification lead times.

How does mannitol compare with sorbitol as a market investment case?

Demand drivers

  • Mannitol: tied to critical care and parenteral volume, plus pharma excipient usage.
  • Sorbitol: tied to sweetener/excipient demand across food, pharma liquids, and GI-support products.

Risk profile

  • Mannitol faces episodic demand tied to hospital prescribing and procurement cycles.
  • Sorbitol faces broader consumer and industrial demand elasticity but may see regulatory and quality-driven premiums for pharma grade.

Featured snippet answer: Sorbitol generally behaves more like a broad-volume sweetener commodity with pharma-grade adjunct demand; mannitol behaves like a healthcare-linked parenteral excipient market with periodic demand pull.


How do generic entry and manufacturing/IP barriers affect mannitol and sorbitol pricing?

Generic entry

For molecule-level supply, “generic entry” is essentially new manufacturing capacity and grade qualification.

Manufacturing/IP barriers

  • High standards for impurity profiles and batch consistency.
  • Tight controls for parenteral grade sterility assurance and container-closure integrity.
  • Documentation and stability programs that can slow new plant qualification.

Actionable takeaway: Competitive pressure arrives through capacity expansion more than through legal exclusivity.


What is the market forecast for mannitol and sorbitol through 2030 (revenue and growth)?

No quantified market sizing and forecast figures are included in the prompt context. Without cited market-base data, numeric projections cannot be produced.

Actionable forecast approach used by investors and procurement teams (non-numeric):

  • Model volume growth from global excipient demand in oral liquids, tablets, and IV supportive care.
  • Apply grade-mix uplift for pharma-grade and parenteral-demand geographies.
  • Use scenario ranges for consumer sweetener demand (sorbitol) and for hospital utilization (mannitol).

Key clinical and commercial signposts to monitor in 2026

Clinical signposts

  • New dosing or regimen studies in critical care that change prescribing guidelines for osmotic diuresis.
  • Trials on bowel prep adjuncts or GI tolerability with sorbitol-containing compositions that shift formulary preferences.

Commercial signposts

  • Pharma-grade capacity expansions or plant outages in major producing regions.
  • Contract pricing shifts tied to hospital budgets and group purchasing organization cycles.
  • Quality notifications and regulatory compliance events that temporarily ration supply.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for mannitol and sorbitol are primarily supportive-care, dosing, and formulation-focused rather than late-stage pipeline breakthroughs.
  • Exclusivity is usually product- and formulation-specific, not molecule-specific, so “loss of exclusivity” is not a standard timeline event for the substances themselves.
  • Market dynamics are driven by grade qualification, supply capacity, and downstream procurement cycles (healthcare for mannitol; broader consumer and pharma liquid demand for sorbitol).
  • Forecasting should be built on volume capacity and grade-mix rather than patent cliff modeling.

FAQs

  1. Are mannitol and sorbitol treated as excipients or drugs by the FDA in US product labels?
  2. Do mannitol clinical trials focus more on critical care outcomes or formulation endpoints?
  3. What manufacturing constraints most affect pharmaceutical-grade mannitol and sorbitol availability?
  4. Which dosing forms of sorbitol have the highest likelihood of formulary preference shifts?
  5. How do quality deviations or recalls impact short-term pricing for pharma-grade excipients?

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. “Mannitol” and “Sorbitol” search results (accessed 2026-05-26).
  2. FDA. Orange Book and labeling databases (accessed 2026-05-26).
  3. EMA. EU Clinical Trials Register (accessed 2026-05-26).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.