Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MANNITOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MANNITOL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003062 ↗ Temozolomide in Patients With Progressive or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 2 1997-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effect of temozolomide in patients with progressive or recurrent stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, with or without brain metastases, who have not been treated for metastatic disease with chemotherapy.
NCT00004767 ↗ Phase II Study of Sodium Phenylbutyrate, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Phenylacetate, and Dietary Intervention for Urea Cycle Disorders Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 2 1985-01-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of sodium phenylbutyrate, sodium benzoate, sodium phenylacetate, and dietary intervention in patients with urea cycle disorders.
NCT00004767 ↗ Phase II Study of Sodium Phenylbutyrate, Sodium Benzoate, Sodium Phenylacetate, and Dietary Intervention for Urea Cycle Disorders Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1985-01-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the safety and efficacy of sodium phenylbutyrate, sodium benzoate, sodium phenylacetate, and dietary intervention in patients with urea cycle disorders.
NCT00111956 ↗ Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Alpha Antagonism in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 2/Phase 3 2004-04-01 Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased inflammatory cytokines and reduced adiponectin, that may be mediated in part by TNF production from abdominal fat. We reasoned that an anti-TNF agent would reduce C-reactive protein (CRP) and increase adiponectin, improving the inflammatory milieu associated with metabolic syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MANNITOL

Condition Name

Condition Name for MANNITOL
Intervention Trials
Asthma 20
Cystic Fibrosis 10
Healthy 7
Traumatic Brain Injury 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MANNITOL
Intervention Trials
Asthma 23
Intracranial Hypertension 12
Brain Injuries 10
Fibrosis 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MANNITOL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MANNITOL
Location Trials
United States 137
Canada 39
United Kingdom 35
Australia 34
Italy 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MANNITOL
Location Trials
New York 19
Massachusetts 12
Minnesota 9
Oregon 8
Ohio 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MANNITOL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MANNITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 5
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 7
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MANNITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 137
Unknown status 27
Recruiting 23
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MANNITOL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MANNITOL
Sponsor Trials
Pharmaxis 19
Northwell Health 7
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute 6
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MANNITOL
Sponsor Trials
Other 387
Industry 64
NIH 17
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

MANNITOL Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 30, 2026

What is the current clinical and commercial status of mannitol, and how does the market look ahead?

What is the drug and how is it used clinically?

Mannitol is a sugar alcohol used across multiple indications, primarily as:

  • Osmotic agent in acute neurologic emergencies (classically for elevated intracranial pressure in the setting of brain injury).
  • Osmotic diuretic in acute renal physiology (used to promote urine flow and support certain settings of acute kidney management).
  • Adjunct in procedural and perioperative settings (e.g., where an osmotic agent is needed to support physiology, depending on protocol).

Mannitol is marketed as an established, off-patent active ingredient in many jurisdictions. Clinical development activity is therefore concentrated in:

  • Formulation updates (e.g., improved stability, packaging, routes)
  • Indication-specific modern trials in academic or sponsor-led settings
  • Evidence generation vs. new comparators rather than novel mechanism breakthroughs

What clinical trial activity is visible for mannitol?

A full, up-to-date sponsor-level clinical trial register scan is not available in the current context, so only high-confidence, structure-level observations can be stated without risking inaccurate listings.

Mannitol’s trial landscape typically looks like this for an established active:

  • Smaller, indication-specific randomized studies and observational evidence syntheses (especially in neurocritical care and renal support contexts).
  • Comparative studies of osmotherapy regimens where dosing, timing, and route are studied against alternatives used in intensive care.

Key point for market planning: clinical uncertainty usually does not come from whether mannitol works at all, but from optimal regimen and patient-selection for specific care pathways.

What is the competitive landscape for mannitol?

Competition is driven mainly by:

  • Availability and supply reliability of active ingredient and injection-grade product
  • Formulation and presentation (concentration, container type, packaging, stability)
  • Distribution reach and price
  • Regulatory and quality compliance rather than next-generation innovation

Because mannitol is an established, generic active ingredient in many regions, the market is shaped by industrial scale producers and regional generics.

What is the market size, segment structure, and value drivers?

A complete numeric market model requires access to current proprietary market datasets. In the absence of that, the market structure can still be mapped credibly based on product usage categories:

Market segments by use setting

  • Hospital inpatient use
    Mannitol is most frequently utilized in acute-care hospitals due to ICU/ER needs, dosing protocols, and IV administration infrastructure.
  • Critical care and neurocritical care pathways
    Demand correlates with incidence of brain injury and utilization of osmotherapy protocols.
  • Renal support pathways
    Demand correlates with acute care practices and ICU nephrology approaches.

Value drivers

  • WAC and procurement behavior in hospitals (tenders, formularies, volume-based contracts)
  • Product availability and batch quality (especially for sterile injectables)
  • Guideline adherence and local formulary inclusion
  • Payer and hospital contracting

How does pricing behave for an off-patent active like mannitol?

For mature generic injectables:

  • Pricing is usually tender-driven
  • Variation is driven by container format, supply chain capacity, and regulatory compliance costs
  • Upside is typically less about premiumization and more about cost position and supply reliability

What are the practical regulatory and evidence expectations?

For an established active ingredient, incremental clinical activity is usually aimed at:

  • Updating labeling language through local data or bridging work
  • Supporting new concentrations, container formats, or routes
  • Refining positioning in care pathways (dose timing, patient selection, monitoring requirements)

Commercial planning typically assumes:

  • Broad baseline adoption
  • Limited payer willingness to pay a premium vs. generics
  • Competitive differentiation at the procurement and formulation layer

What is the most relevant demand outlook basis (top-down)?

A practical projection framework for mannitol demand relies on:

  • Hospitalization and ICU utilization trends
  • Incidence of neurologic emergencies (trauma, hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke burden, perioperative risk)
  • Renal critical care case volume
  • Procurement replacement cycles and tender schedules

Given these dynamics, mannitol’s market outlook typically tracks:

  • Moderate unit growth driven by acute care volume
  • Flat to modest value growth driven by generics price pressure
  • Volatility only when supply constraints or quality issues affect availability

Market projection (directional)

Without access to a live market dataset, the projection must be stated directionally, not with unsupported unit or dollar figures.

Base case (most likely)

  • Units: slight-to-moderate growth aligned with hospital/ICU throughput
  • Value: restrained growth due to generic competition and tender pricing
  • Share shift: supplier wins are likely driven by procurement contracts rather than clinical superiority

Upside case

  • Better evidence adoption in guidelines for specific protocols or expanded labeling
  • Short-term supply shortages among key suppliers create temporary pricing/availability advantages

Downside case

  • Continued procurement pressure and increased generic entrants in certain markets
  • Any safety signal perceptions (even if not label-wide changes) can reduce formulary use in certain regions

Clinical evidence and market positioning: what should be modeled for R&D or investment?

If the business question is “where can mannitol create value,” the answer for an off-patent active is usually not new mechanism discovery. It is:

  • Formulation differentiation (stability, container compatibility, ease of dosing)
  • Route-specific or workflow-specific positioning
  • Evidence aligned to current guideline language and ICU pathways
  • Supply-chain and quality positioning (sterile injectable reliability)

What data points matter for a go-to-market decision?

For mannitol, decisions typically hinge on:

  • Hospital formulary inclusion in target specialties (neurocritical care, ICU medicine, perioperative care)
  • Tender economics (price per unit by concentration, container format)
  • Therapeutic protocol alignment (dose timing, monitoring standards)
  • Regulatory readiness for label language and manufacturing compliance

What does competitive differentiation look like in practice?

Differentiation is usually seen in:

  • Concentration and container format
  • Shelf life and shipping stability
  • Manufacturing footprint and batch release reliability
  • Contracting strength (national supply agreements)

Key Takeaways

  • Mannitol is a mature, multi-indication osmotic agent used primarily in acute hospital and critical care settings.
  • Clinical trial activity for mannitol is typically focused on regimen optimization and formulation or labeling updates, not novel mechanism breakthroughs.
  • Commercial performance is shaped mainly by procurement behavior, supply reliability, tender pricing, and hospital formulary positioning.
  • Market outlook is directionally positive for units with restrained value growth due to generic competition; meaningful upside requires either evidence-driven expanded protocol adoption or temporary supply/contract advantages.

FAQs

1) Is mannitol still being developed for new indications?

Evidence generation continues, but for an established active ingredient, development is generally concentrated in regimen optimization, protocol fit, and labeling/formulation updates rather than new mechanism discovery.

2) What drives mannitol demand most strongly?

Demand tracks acute care volume, particularly ICU use for neurologic emergencies and renal support pathways, plus procurement tender schedules.

3) How competitive is the mannitol market?

High. Competition is dominated by generic suppliers and distribution strength, with differentiation driven more by supply and product format than by clinical novelty.

4) Where can a new entrant realistically win?

By securing favorable tenders through cost position, supply reliability, and product format compatibility, or by supporting localized label/protocol differentiation.

5) Does clinical evidence translate directly into market share for mannitol?

It can influence formulary behavior, but in an off-patent generic market, procurement economics and supply reliability usually determine share more than incremental trial outcomes.


References (APA)

[1] FDA. (n.d.). Drug approvals and labeling resources for mannitol products (access through FDA Drugs@FDA). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Human medicines: search results for mannitol (access via EMA product database). European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Mannitol trials (search query results). U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.