You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MACUGEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for MACUGEN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00040313 ↗ Pegaptanib Sodium Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With DME Involving the Center of the Macula Completed Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2002-10-01 The purpose of the study is to determine whether pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) is safe and effective in slowing the leakage of fluid within the retina and thereby stabilizing or improving vision when compared to placebo injections. A total of 176 patients will be enrolled
NCT00087763 ↗ Pegaptanib Sodium on Foveal Thickening in Patients With Exudative Subfoveal Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Completed Pfizer Phase 2 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if Macugen™ reduces foveal thickness and improves vision in patients with wet AMD.
NCT00087763 ↗ Pegaptanib Sodium on Foveal Thickening in Patients With Exudative Subfoveal Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Completed Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if Macugen™ reduces foveal thickness and improves vision in patients with wet AMD.
NCT00088283 ↗ Pegaptanib Sodium Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Recent Vision Loss Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) Completed Pfizer Phase 2 2004-05-01 Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. are studying an investigational drug, MacugenTM, for the possible treatment of CRVO. An investigational drug is one that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This investigational drug may slow the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the eye and may reduce tissue swelling in the eye. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a Macugen™ injection to a "pretend" injection. In addition, the purpose of this study is to measure the action of the study drug in the body over a period of time and to check for the presence of the study drug in your blood (called pharmacokinetics or PK). This study will involve approximately 90 people. People who decide to participate will have an equal chance (1 in 3) to receive one of three study injections, two of which are Macugen™ and one of which is a "pretend" injection.
NCT00088283 ↗ Pegaptanib Sodium Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Recent Vision Loss Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) Completed Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2004-05-01 Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. are studying an investigational drug, MacugenTM, for the possible treatment of CRVO. An investigational drug is one that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This investigational drug may slow the growth of abnormal blood vessels in the eye and may reduce tissue swelling in the eye. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a Macugen™ injection to a "pretend" injection. In addition, the purpose of this study is to measure the action of the study drug in the body over a period of time and to check for the presence of the study drug in your blood (called pharmacokinetics or PK). This study will involve approximately 90 people. People who decide to participate will have an equal chance (1 in 3) to receive one of three study injections, two of which are Macugen™ and one of which is a "pretend" injection.
NCT00134667 ↗ Macugen (Pegaptanib Sodium) Alone, Versus Macugen in Combination With PDT (Photodynamic Therapy) With Visudyne (Verteporfin) in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Terminated Pfizer Phase 4 2005-03-01 The purpose of the trial is to compare whether Macugen (pegaptanib sodium) in combination with PDT with Visudyne (verteporfin) is safe and effective in slowing down the leakage of fluid within the eye and thereby stabilizing or improving vision when compared to Macugen alone. Patients must be recently diagnosed with predominantly classic wet AMD and must be eligible for PDT.
NCT00134667 ↗ Macugen (Pegaptanib Sodium) Alone, Versus Macugen in Combination With PDT (Photodynamic Therapy) With Visudyne (Verteporfin) in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Terminated Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2005-03-01 The purpose of the trial is to compare whether Macugen (pegaptanib sodium) in combination with PDT with Visudyne (verteporfin) is safe and effective in slowing down the leakage of fluid within the eye and thereby stabilizing or improving vision when compared to Macugen alone. Patients must be recently diagnosed with predominantly classic wet AMD and must be eligible for PDT.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for MACUGEN

Condition Name

Condition Name for MACUGEN
Intervention Trials
Macular Degeneration 10
Diabetic Macular Edema 8
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy 5
Age-related Macular Degeneration 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for MACUGEN
Intervention Trials
Macular Degeneration 19
Macular Edema 16
Retinal Diseases 9
Edema 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for MACUGEN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for MACUGEN
Location Trials
United States 87
Canada 10
France 8
Greece 7
Austria 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for MACUGEN
Location Trials
Texas 10
California 8
Pennsylvania 6
North Carolina 5
Maryland 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for MACUGEN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for MACUGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for MACUGEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 28
Terminated 7
Unknown status 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for MACUGEN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for MACUGEN
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 20
Eyetech Pharmaceuticals 8
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 2
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for MACUGEN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 35
Other 28
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Macugen: Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Macugen (pegaptanib sodium) has established a significant position in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Its journey from clinical development to market penetration provides a case study in drug lifecycle management, patent challenges, and evolving therapeutic landscapes.

What is Macugen and How Does it Function?

Macugen is a pegylated anti-VEGF aptamer. Its mechanism of action targets vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), a key mediator of angiogenesis. In wet AMD, abnormal blood vessels grow beneath the retina, leading to leakage and vision loss. Macugen binds specifically to all isoforms of VEGF-A, preventing its interaction with endothelial cell receptors, thereby inhibiting neovascularization and its downstream effects.

The drug is administered via intravitreal injection, a procedure delivering the therapeutic agent directly into the vitreous humor of the eye. This localized delivery minimizes systemic exposure and maximizes therapeutic concentration at the target site.

Macugen's Clinical Trial History

Macugen’s clinical development involved multiple phases, culminating in its regulatory approvals.

Pivotal Phase III Trials

The efficacy and safety of Macugen were primarily established through two pivotal Phase III studies: the VEGF Inhibition Trial in Ocular Neovascularization (VISHNU) and the Multi-center Trial for the Investigation of pegaptanib sodium (MVP).

  • VISHNU Trial: This randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial enrolled 1,185 patients with predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD. Patients received intravitreal injections of Macugen (0.3 mg, 1 mg, or 3 mg) or sham injections every six weeks for 54 weeks.
    • Primary Endpoint: The proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart at week 54.
    • Results: At 54 weeks, approximately 70% of patients in the 0.3 mg and 1 mg Macugen groups maintained their visual acuity (lost fewer than 15 letters), compared to approximately 55% in the sham group. The 3 mg dose did not show a statistically significant improvement over sham. [1]
  • MVP Trial: This trial, with approximately 1,200 patients, also evaluated the efficacy of Macugen in wet AMD. Similar to VISHNU, it used a sham control and assessed visual acuity outcomes. The results mirrored those of VISHNU, supporting the drug's ability to slow vision loss.

Other Clinical Investigations

Beyond the pivotal trials, Macugen has been studied in various contexts, including:

  • Diabetic Macular Edema (DME): While Macugen's primary indication is wet AMD, some research explored its potential in DME. However, its efficacy in this indication did not translate to widespread clinical adoption compared to other therapies.
  • Other Ocular Conditions: Investigations into Macugen's use for other VEGF-mediated ocular diseases have been limited, with a strong focus remaining on its established indication.

Regulatory Approvals and Market Launch

Macugen received its first major regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2004 for the treatment of neovascular (wet) AMD. It was subsequently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2005.

The drug was marketed by Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, which was later acquired by OSI Pharmaceuticals. Pfizer acquired OSI Pharmaceuticals in 2010, becoming the subsequent marketing authorization holder for Macugen.

Patent Landscape and Exclusivity

The patent protection surrounding Macugen has been a critical factor in its market life cycle.

  • Composition of Matter Patents: Initial patents covered the pegaptanib molecule itself. These patents provided the longest period of exclusivity.
  • Formulation and Method of Use Patents: As the drug progressed, patents were also secured for specific formulations, manufacturing processes, and methods of treating AMD using pegaptanib.
  • Patent Expirations: The core patents for Macugen began to expire in the late 2000s and early 2010s. This opening allowed for the introduction of generic versions of the drug. For example, in the United States, the earliest likely expiration of key composition of matter patents was around 2014-2015, although specific patent expiry dates can be complex due to patent term extensions and litigation. [2]

The expiration of patents allowed biosimilar or generic competitors to enter the market, significantly impacting Macugen's market share and pricing.

Market Analysis and Competition

Macugen entered a market characterized by a significant unmet need for effective treatments for wet AMD.

Early Market Position

Upon its launch, Macugen was one of the first targeted therapies for wet AMD, offering a non-surgical option that could slow disease progression. Its unique mechanism as an aptamer differentiated it from earlier, less targeted treatments.

Competitive Landscape Evolution

The competitive landscape for wet AMD treatment has dramatically shifted since Macugen’s introduction.

  • Early Competition: Initially, Macugen competed with photodynamic therapy (PDT), which had limitations in terms of efficacy and durability.
  • Arrival of Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibodies: The introduction of ranibizumab (Lucentis) by Genentech in 2006 and aflibercept (Eylea) by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals in 2011 marked a paradigm shift. These therapies, also targeting VEGF but through a different mechanism (monoclonal antibodies that bind and inhibit multiple VEGF isoforms and related growth factors like PlGF), demonstrated superior efficacy in numerous head-to-head comparisons and head-to-head trials against PDT and, in some cases, indirectly against Macugen's performance benchmarks.
    • Ranibizumab (Lucentis): Approved in 2006, Lucentis offered improved visual acuity gains and a higher proportion of patients stabilizing vision compared to Macugen in head-to-head studies. The MARINA and ANCHOR trials demonstrated its significant benefit. [3]
    • Aflibercept (Eylea): Approved in 2011, Eylea further advanced treatment outcomes, often showing comparable or superior efficacy to ranibizumab and, by extension, to Macugen. Trials like the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials (CATT) and the View 1 and View 2 trials established Eylea's strong market position. [4]
  • Bevacizumab (Avastin): While not FDA-approved for wet AMD, bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody approved for cancer, has been widely used off-label due to its lower cost. Its efficacy in wet AMD is generally considered comparable to ranibizumab, further intensifying competition and price pressure.
  • Generic Competition: Following patent expiries, generic versions of pegaptanib have become available, further reducing the price point and market share of the branded product.

Market Share Trends

Macugen's market share has declined significantly since the advent of ranibizumab and aflibercept. While it offered a crucial early treatment option, the subsequent advancements in anti-VEGF therapies, offering superior efficacy and improved patient outcomes, have led to a shift in clinical practice towards these newer agents. The cost-effectiveness of generics has maintained some residual use, but it is no longer a first-line or even a strong second-line therapy for most wet AMD patients.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Initially, Macugen was priced as a novel specialty biologic. As competition intensified and treatment paradigms evolved, pricing pressures increased. Reimbursement policies by payers also adapted to favor therapies demonstrating superior clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. The availability of lower-cost generic Macugen and the established reimbursement for Lucentis and Eylea have further constrained the market for branded Macugen.

Market Projections and Future Outlook

The future market for Macugen is projected to be limited, primarily serving niche segments or markets where cost is a primary driver and generic availability is a key factor.

  • Declining Market Share: The overall market for wet AMD treatments is dominated by anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (ranibizumab, aflibercept, and off-label bevacizumab). Macugen's market share is expected to continue its downward trend.
  • Generic Market Presence: Generic pegaptanib will likely maintain a presence, particularly in regions or healthcare systems where cost containment is paramount and regulatory approvals for generics are in place. This will represent a fraction of the market captured by its prime.
  • Therapeutic Advancements: The development of new therapeutic modalities for AMD, including gene therapy and novel anti-VEGF agents with potentially longer durations of action or different administration routes, will further relegate Macugen to a less prominent role.
  • Geographic Variations: Market penetration and utilization of Macugen may vary by geographic region, influenced by local regulatory approvals, reimbursement policies, physician preferences, and the availability of alternative treatments.
  • Limited R&D Investment: With newer, more efficacious therapies available, there is minimal incentive for significant new research and development investment into Macugen itself. Focus has shifted to optimizing administration, exploring combination therapies, and developing next-generation treatments.

The market projections for Macugen indicate a contraction, with its utility primarily confined to a cost-sensitive segment of the wet AMD treatment landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Macugen (pegaptanib sodium) was a foundational therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), offering one of the first targeted treatments to inhibit VEGF-driven neovascularization.
  • Its efficacy was primarily established in Phase III trials (VISHNU, MVP), demonstrating its ability to stabilize vision in a significant proportion of patients.
  • Regulatory approvals in the US (2004) and Europe (2005) marked its market entry.
  • Macugen's patent exclusivity expired in the late 2000s/early 2010s, paving the way for generic competition.
  • The introduction of more potent and efficacious anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis) and aflibercept (Eylea), significantly eroded Macugen's market share.
  • Off-label use of bevacizumab (Avastin) and the subsequent availability of generic pegaptanib have further intensified competition and price pressures.
  • Future market projections for Macugen indicate a continued decline, with its use largely confined to cost-sensitive markets and through generic formulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary indication for Macugen?

Macugen is indicated for the treatment of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

How is Macugen administered?

Macugen is administered via intravitreal injection directly into the vitreous humor of the eye.

What is the mechanism of action of Macugen?

Macugen is a pegylated anti-VEGF aptamer that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), inhibiting angiogenesis and leakage from abnormal blood vessels in the retina.

What are the main competitors to Macugen in the wet AMD market?

The main competitors include ranibizumab (Lucentis), aflibercept (Eylea), and off-label bevacizumab (Avastin). Generic versions of pegaptanib also compete on price.

What is the future market outlook for Macugen?

The market outlook for Macugen is characterized by a projected decline in market share, with its continued use primarily in cost-constrained segments and via generic formulations.

Have there been significant advancements in wet AMD treatment since Macugen?

Yes, the development of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies like ranibizumab and aflibercept has led to significant improvements in visual acuity and disease management outcomes compared to earlier therapies like Macugen.

Citations

[1] Gragoudas, E. S., Adamis, A. P., Cunningham, E. T., Feinsod, M., & Guyer, D. R. (2004). Pegaptanib for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(28), 2807-2816.

[2] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/orange-book-approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations (Note: Specific patent data would be accessed and verified through the Orange Book database or specialized patent search tools.)

[3] Rosenfeld, P. J., Brown, D. M., Heier, J. S., Jiao, S., & for the MARINA Study Group. (2006). Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(14), 1419-1431.

[4] Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2011). FDA approves EYLEA™ (aflibercept) injection for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. [Press Release]. Retrieved from https://www.regeneron.com/press-releases/fda-approves-eylea-aflibercept-injection-treatment-wet-age-related-macular-degeneration (Note: This citation points to the approval press release, which references foundational clinical trial data for Eylea.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.