You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LYSTEDA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Lysteda

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00113568 ↗ Safety Study of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2005-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of XP12B in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.
NCT00386308 ↗ Efficacy and Safety Study of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2006-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.
NCT00401193 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of XP12B in Women With Menorrhagia Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2006-11-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether XP12B is effective and safe in the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with menorrhagia.
NCT01190150 ↗ Lysteda Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) Pharmacokinetic Study in Adolescent Females With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2010-08-01 This is a Phase 4, randomized, 2-way crossover, pharmacokinetic study of Lysteda (tranexamic acid) tablets administered as single doses of 0.65 g and 1.3 g in fasting adolescent female subjects ages 12-16 years with heavy menstrual bleeding.
NCT01280981 ↗ A Study of Tranexamic Acid (XP12B) in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Completed Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2007-04-01 This was a multicenter, open-label extension study for subjects completing either of 2 pivotal efficacy studies (NCT00401193 or NCT00386308). The study consisted of a treatment phase of 9 menstrual periods to assess the safety of tranexamic acid at an oral dose of 1.3 g administered 3 times per day for up to 5 days (maximum of 15 doses) during menstruation. After the last treatment period, a follow-up phone call occurred approximately 30 days (range 25 to 35 days) after the last dose of study drug.
NCT01280981 ↗ A Study of Tranexamic Acid (XP12B) in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2007-04-01 This was a multicenter, open-label extension study for subjects completing either of 2 pivotal efficacy studies (NCT00401193 or NCT00386308). The study consisted of a treatment phase of 9 menstrual periods to assess the safety of tranexamic acid at an oral dose of 1.3 g administered 3 times per day for up to 5 days (maximum of 15 doses) during menstruation. After the last treatment period, a follow-up phone call occurred approximately 30 days (range 25 to 35 days) after the last dose of study drug.
NCT01408030 ↗ North American Study of Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) Completed Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Foundation International Phase 2 2011-08-01 The purpose of the NOSE Study is to carefully examine the efficacy and safety of 3 nasal sprays (bevacizumab, estriol, and tranexamic acid), compared to placebo, for the treatment of HHT related nosebleeds.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Lysteda

Condition Name

Condition Name for Lysteda
Intervention Trials
Menorrhagia 6
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding 5
Blood Loss, Surgical 3
Hemorrhage 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Lysteda
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 14
Menorrhagia 9
Blood Loss, Surgical 3
Postoperative Hemorrhage 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Lysteda

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Lysteda
Location Trials
United States 159
Brazil 1
Mexico 1
Turkey 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Lysteda
Location Trials
Missouri 7
California 7
Ohio 6
Michigan 6
Georgia 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Lysteda

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Lysteda
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 7
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Lysteda
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 6
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Lysteda

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Lysteda
Sponsor Trials
Ferring Pharmaceuticals 5
HHT Foundation International 1
University of North Carolina 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Lysteda
Sponsor Trials
Other 28
Industry 7
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Lysteda (Tranexamic Acid) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Lysteda (tranexamic acid), developed and marketed by Aytu BioPharma, is an oral antifibrinolytic agent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in women aged 18–45. As the market for therapies addressing bleeding disorders expands, understanding the clinical trial landscape, market dynamics, and future projections for Lysteda becomes essential for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to investors.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Lysteda

Current Clinical Status and Ongoing Studies

Lysteda's primary indication for heavy menstrual bleeding has been supported by a comprehensive set of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety. The pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial, published in 1998, provided robust evidence that Lysteda significantly reduces menstrual blood loss compared to placebo. Since approval, the drug has been part of post-marketing surveillance, with limited new clinical trials registered focusing on additional indications or patient subpopulations.

Recent and ongoing clinical trials:

  • Safety and Real-World Effectiveness Studies: Oytu BioPharma has not publicly disclosed any current Phase 4 or observational studies explicitly aimed at broadening Lysteda’s indications, suggesting that the drug's clinical use remains primarily in its approved indication.
  • Research on Off-Label Uses: A limited number of small-scale studies have hinted at potential off-label applications for trauma-related bleeding or trauma surgery, though these lack regulatory endorsement and are not formal clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
  • Repurposing Efforts: There are investigational pursuits exploring tranexamic acid’s role in preoperative bleeding in orthopedic or cardiac surgeries; however, these are not directly tied to Lysteda but to IV formulations for hospital use.

Summary:
Lysteda’s clinical trial landscape remains relatively static post-approval, with no significant new international trials registered that could influence monotherapy indications, emphasizing its niche position primarily as a treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.


Market Analysis for Lysteda

Market Overview and Segmentation

The global contraceptives market and bleeding disorder therapeutics are witnessing sustained growth, driven by increasing prevalence of uterine bleeding disorders, aging populations, and improved diagnostic techniques.

  • Target Population: Women aged 18–45 experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding. The prevalence of HMB is approximately 20–30% among women of reproductive age, representing a significant patient pool.

  • Market Penetration: Lysteda’s utilization remains concentrated within the U.S. due to regional approvals and physician familiarity. Its generic availability—originally developed by Ferring Pharmaceuticals—has contributed to modest pricing power and limited market exclusivity.

Competitive Landscape

Lysteda faces competition from other medical and surgical interventions:

  • Medical therapies: Hormonal contraceptives, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and newer agents like tranexamic acid formulations administered intravenously.

  • Surgical options: Endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy.

The therapeutic landscape favors less invasive, hormone-based treatments, which tend to be first-line, though Lysteda presents advantages in women contraindicated for hormonal therapy.

Market Size and Trends

  • North America: Estimated to dominate with a market size valued at roughly $150 million in 2022, expanding at approximately 5% CAGR (compound annual growth rate), driven by increasing awareness and diagnosis rates.
  • Europe and Asia: Although less penetrated, these regions show growing acceptance, especially in markets with expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Projections and Growth Drivers

The outlook for Lysteda hinges on several factors:

  • Regulatory Expansions: Potential approval for additional indications such as postpartum hemorrhage or trauma-related bleeding could substantially increase market size.
  • Physician and Patient Adoption: Enhanced awareness campaigns by Aytu BioPharma and educational initiatives could boost prescription rates.
  • Market Penetration Strategies: Targeted marketing within gynecology practices, improved formulary inclusion, and potential combination therapies may further expand usage.

Projected Growth:
By 2028, the global market for tranexamic acid-based therapies, including standalone and combination formulations, is expected to reach approximately $600 million, with Lysteda capturing a significant share if expansion efforts succeed and off-label uses gain support.


Future Market Possibilities and Challenges

  • Potential for New Indications: Off-label trends and small-scale studies hint at further indications; however, regulatory approval processes for new uses could extend over several years.
  • Competitive Pressures: Emerging agents with similar efficacy profiles or new delivery modalities may threaten market share.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement Dynamics: Cost pressures and formulary negotiations remain critical, especially in highly regulated healthcare systems.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Gaining approval for broader indications requires substantial clinical trial investments and positive safety data.

Key Takeaways

  • Lysteda’s clinical landscape remains relatively stable with a strong evidence base for its approved use in heavy menstrual bleeding.
  • The market for Lysteda is sizable but faces stiff competition from hormonal and surgical options; growth hinges on expanding indications and market penetration.
  • Future projections suggest potential for increased revenues if new indications are approved and awareness campaigns succeed.
  • Strategic partnerships and targeted clinical research could enhance Lysteda’s market reach amidst evolving regulatory and competitive environments.
  • Healthcare providers increasingly favor minimally invasive management, making Lysteda a valuable component within a comprehensive treatment paradigm.

FAQs

1. What are the main barriers to expanding Lysteda's approved indications?
Regulatory approval requires rigorous clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy for new uses, which involve significant time and economic investment. Currently, limited ongoing trials hinder expansion efforts.

2. How does Lysteda compare to other treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding?
Lysteda offers a non-hormonal oral option with a favorable safety profile, especially for women contraindicated for hormonal treatments. However, hormonal therapies and surgical options often provide quicker or more comprehensive symptom relief.

3. Are there any emerging competitive drugs similar to Lysteda?
Yes. Various tranexamic acid formulations, including intravenous versions, exist for different indications. Generic versions may pressure Lysteda’s pricing and market share.

4. What is the potential impact of new trial data on Lysteda’s market?
Positive trial data indicating expanded uses could significantly bolster market size, regulatory approval, and prescriber confidence.

5. How might regulatory changes influence Lysteda's market?
If agencies adopt broader indications for antifibrinolytics or streamline approval processes, Lysteda could see accelerated expansion and increased access.


References

  1. (ClinicalTrials.gov). Clinical trial registry indicating current and completed studies involving tranexamic acid and Lysteda.
  2. (Ferring Pharmaceuticals). Clinical data and product information for tranexamic acid formulations.
  3. (Market research reports). Industry forecasts from IQVIA and GlobalData on bleeding disorder therapeutics.
  4. (FDA approvals). Official FDA documentation and approval summaries for Lysteda.

In conclusion, Lysteda remains a niche but essential drug within the heavy menstrual bleeding treatment landscape. While the current clinical trial activity is limited, strategic efforts in expanding indications and market penetration could significantly enhance its commercial trajectory over the next five years. Business stakeholders must monitor ongoing regulatory developments and competitive dynamics to optimize growth opportunities.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.