You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 11, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOVENOX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Lovenox

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00289042 ↗ Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography II (ACUTE II) Completed Sanofi Phase 4 1999-12-01 SPECIFIC AIM: To test the safety and feasibility of using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin sodium; Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) in lieu of unfractionated heparin (UFH) as antithrombotic therapy for patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided chemical or electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. HYPOTHESIS: Early cardioversion from atrial fibrillation can be safely performed using a short-term anticoagulation strategy of low molecular weight heparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) compared to unfractionated heparin, accompanied by a TEE examination prior to cardioversion. The use of LMWH with TEE will result in a safe, cost-effective, and possible efficacious approach to cardioversion of atrial fibrillation compared to UFH with TEE.
NCT00289042 ↗ Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography II (ACUTE II) Completed The Cleveland Clinic Phase 4 1999-12-01 SPECIFIC AIM: To test the safety and feasibility of using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, enoxaparin sodium; Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) in lieu of unfractionated heparin (UFH) as antithrombotic therapy for patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided chemical or electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. HYPOTHESIS: Early cardioversion from atrial fibrillation can be safely performed using a short-term anticoagulation strategy of low molecular weight heparin (Lovenox, Sanofi-Aventis) compared to unfractionated heparin, accompanied by a TEE examination prior to cardioversion. The use of LMWH with TEE will result in a safe, cost-effective, and possible efficacious approach to cardioversion of atrial fibrillation compared to UFH with TEE.
NCT00358735 ↗ Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Prevention in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Continuous Enhanced Circulation Therapy (CECT) Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) Completed Medical Compression Systems N/A 2006-06-01 Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of ActiveCare+ CECT device +/- baby dose aspirin (81 mg QD) for lowering the potential risk for bleeding and of DVT during and after THA surgery in comparison with LMWH.
NCT00371683 ↗ Study of Apixaban for the Prevention of Thrombosis-related Events Following Knee Replacement Surgery Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2006-11-01 The purpose of this study is to learn if apixaban can prevent blood clots in the leg (deep vein Thrombosis [DVT]) and lung (pulmonary embolism [PE]) that sometimes occur after knee replacement surgery and to learn how apixaban compares to enoxaparin (Lovenox®) for preventing these clots. The safety of apixaban will also be studied.
NCT00375609 ↗ Factor Xa Inhibitor, PRT054021, Against Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolic Events (EXPERT) Completed Portola Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2006-05-01 Randomized study of PRT054021 40 mg and 15 mg bid vs. enoxaparin 30 mg q12h for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic events after unilateral knee replacement surgery.
NCT00413374 ↗ Once Daily Enoxaparin for Outpatient Treatment of Acute DVT and/or Pulmonary Embolism Completed Sanofi N/A 2006-05-01 To investigate the efficacy and safety of once daily enoxaparin as a "bridge" to warfarin for the outpatient treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Lovenox

Condition Name

Condition Name for Lovenox
Intervention Trials
Venous Thromboembolism 13
Pulmonary Embolism 10
Deep Vein Thrombosis 7
Venous Thrombosis 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Lovenox
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 24
Venous Thrombosis 23
Thromboembolism 20
Venous Thromboembolism 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Lovenox

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Lovenox
Location Trials
United States 140
Mexico 16
India 15
Canada 12
Brazil 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Lovenox
Location Trials
California 10
New York 9
Texas 8
Massachusetts 7
Pennsylvania 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Lovenox

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Lovenox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 19
Phase 3 8
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Lovenox
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 35
Terminated 12
Recruiting 9
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Lovenox

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Lovenox
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 6
Bristol-Myers Squibb 4
GlaxoSmithKline 4
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Lovenox
Sponsor Trials
Other 96
Industry 27
U.S. Fed 8
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lovenox (Enoxaparin)

Last updated: October 31, 2025

Introduction

Lovenox (enoxaparin sodium) remains a cornerstone in anticoagulation therapy since its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993. As a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), Lovenox is widely prescribed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events, such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The evolving landscape of anticoagulant therapy, innovative clinical trials, and market dynamics necessitate a comprehensive review of Lovenox’s current status and forward trajectory.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent clinical trials have focused on expanding Lovenox’s indications, optimizing dosing regimens, and comparing its efficacy against newer anticoagulants. Notably:

  • Extended DVT and PE prophylaxis: Trials such as the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies evaluated enoxaparin combined with warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Results indicated comparable efficacy but highlighted advantages in bleeding risk profiles, reinforcing Lovenox’s role in certain patient populations (1).

  • Perioperative management: Trials like PREVENT analyzed the safety of Lovenox in surgical patients to reduce postoperative thromboembolism. These studies affirm its safety in high-risk cohorts but prompt evaluation of dosing adjustments, especially in renal impairment.

  • COVID-19 therapeutic role: Several small-scale observational studies investigated enoxaparin's efficacy in preventing thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients. While promising in prophylaxis, definitive evidence from large randomized trials remains pending (2).

  • Novel formulations and administration routes: Research into extended-release formulations and subcutaneous delivery systems aims to improve patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes. These are in preliminary phases, with further clinical validation required.

Regulatory and Labeling Developments

While no major FDA label changes have occurred recently, off-label uses, particularly in cancer-associated thrombosis, continue to influence prescribing practices. The manufacturer (Sanofi) and regulatory bodies closely monitor ongoing trial data to refine safety and efficacy profiles.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global anticoagulant market, valued at approximately USD 10 billion in 2022, is projected to reach USD 16 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of around 6% (3). Lovenox commands a significant share due to its proven efficacy and broad licensing in prophylactic settings.

Key Market Segments

  • Hospital and inpatient care: Dominates Lovenox utilization, driven by perioperative prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolism.
  • Outpatient and long-term therapy: Growing use in outpatient settings for DVT management enhances market penetration, supported by clinical validation and ease of administration.
  • Special populations: Patients with cancer, renal impairment, or obesity often require tailored regimens, influencing market dynamics and product development.

Competitive Landscape

Lovenox faces competition from DOACs such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, which offer oral administration and simplified dosing. However, Lovenox retains advantages in specific uses, such as use in pregnancy and certain high-risk thrombosis cases.

Key competitors include:

  • Bayer’s Xarelto: Eases oral administration with broad indications.
  • Boehringer Ingelheim’s Pradaxa: Offers oral anticoagulation with rapid onset.
  • Generic LMWHs: Entry of generic formulations in emerging markets pressures pricing and margins.

Market Challenges

  • Cost and reimbursement: Lovenox is relatively expensive, with reimbursement policies varying regionally. Cost-effectiveness analyses favor Lovenox in specific settings, but high market prices limit use in resource-constrained regions.
  • Safety concerns: Bleeding risks and Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are safety considerations influencing prescriber preferences.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Potential

Enoxaparin’s longevity in anticoagulation therapy is supported by its established clinical profile, although its share in the rapidly expanding DOAC market is under pressure. Nonetheless, niche indications remain strong pillars for Lovenox’s market.

Projected growth is sustained by:

  • Expanding indications: Pending approvals for new uses, especially in cancer-associated thrombosis and surgical prophylaxis.
  • Emerging markets: Rapid healthcare infrastructure development and increasing thrombosis awareness are poised to boost demand in Asia-Pacific and Latin America.
  • Generic competition: Entry of cost-effective generic enoxaparin products will drive volume but compress margins.

Innovations and Pipeline

Research into biosimilars and alternative delivery methods aims to extend Lovenox’s relevance. Potential FDA approvals of biosimilar enoxaparin products, anticipated in the next 2-3 years, are expected to disrupt pricing and market share dynamics significantly.

Regulatory Trends

Agencies are emphasizing patient safety, prompting ongoing post-market surveillance and potential label adjustments, especially concerning bleeding risk management and use in special populations.

Forecast Summary

By 2030, Lovenox is projected to maintain a substantial segment within the anticoagulant market, driven by clinical inertia in certain indications and the continued need for injectable anticoagulants in complex cases. However, its growth rate may moderate relative to DOACs, which are gaining preference for convenience.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials continue to support Lovenox’s efficacy and safety, with ongoing investigations into new indications and formulations.
  • The market remains sizable, with growth fueled by aging populations, increased thrombotic disease awareness, and expanding healthcare infrastructure.
  • Competitive pressure from DOACs necessitates strategic positioning, emphasizing Lovenox’s unique benefits.
  • Biosimilar entries and innovative delivery mechanisms are poised to reshape market dynamics, potentially reducing costs and expanding access.
  • Regulatory vigilance on safety and efficacy will influence future labeling and utilization patterns.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical indications for Lovenox today?
Lovenox is primarily indicated for prophylaxis and treatment of DVT and PE, especially in hospitalized, surgical, and high-risk medical patients. It is also used in certain off-label settings like acute coronary syndromes and in cancer-associated thrombosis.

2. How does Lovenox compare to DOACs in terms of safety and efficacy?
Lovenox offers proven efficacy in various high-risk populations with a longstanding safety profile. While DOACs provide oral convenience and comparable efficacy in many cases, Lovenox remains preferred in pregnancy, cancer patients, and when rapid reversibility is required.

3. What are the key considerations regarding the safety profile of Lovenox?
Bleeding risk is the primary safety concern, particularly in patients with renal impairment or drug interactions. HIT, although less frequent than with unfractionated heparin, remains a rare but serious adverse event requiring monitoring.

4. What is the outlook for generic enoxaparin products?
The approval and market entry of biosimilar enoxaparin are expected to increase competitively, lowering costs and expanding access, particularly in emerging markets. This trend may impact the profitability of branded formulations.

5. Will upcoming clinical trials influence Lovenox’s market presence?
Yes, if ongoing trials confirm additional indications—such as in COVID-19 thromboprophylaxis or extended cancer-related thrombosis therapy—or demonstrate new formulations that improve compliance and safety, Lovenox’s market position could strengthen.


References

  1. Weitz JI, et al. (2017). “Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin in Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment.” The New England Journal of Medicine.
  2. Thachil J, et al. (2020). “Management of coagulopathy in COVID-19: emerging evidence and perspectives.” Blood Transfusion.
  3. MarketWatch. (2022). “Global Anticoagulant Market Analysis and Forecast.”

This comprehensive review informs stakeholders on Lovenox's clinical trajectory and market prospects, supporting strategic decision-making in healthcare and pharmaceutical investments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.