You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2024

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LORATADINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Loratadine

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT01469234 ↗ A Study of Onset of Action of Loratadine and Fexofenadine in Participants With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (P08712) Completed Bayer Phase 4 2011-10-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the onset of action of two commercially available over-the-counter antihistamines (Loratadine and Fexofenadine) in a model of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Participants undergo sensitization exposures to Mountain Cedar (juniperus ashei) pollen in a Biogenics Research Chamber; those who demonstrate an adequate allergic response determined by the Major Symptom Complex (MSC) score will then receive drug.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Loratadine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00319995 ↗ Effects of Loratadine/Montelukast vs Pseudoephedrine and Placebo in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (Study P04095) (COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-03-01 This is a Phase 3, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, double-dummy, double-blind study with a screening period. Subjects will receive one of the following three treatment groups for 15 days: loratadine 10 mg/montelukast 10 mg combination, pseudoephedrine 240 mg, or placebo. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of the combination of loratadine/montelukast, a once-daily tablet containing 10 mg loratadine and 10 mg montelukast, compared with placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in relieving the symptom of nasal congestion. The safety profile of combined loratadine/montelukast relative to placebo and pseudoephedrine will also be evaluated.
NCT00423995 ↗ Effect of Loratadine/Montelukast Combination on Congestion in SAR Patients Exposed to Pollen in an EEU (Study P04822) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-11-01 This is study of LMC, phenylephrine, and placebo in subjects with SAR. There are three visits: At Visit 1, subjects will be evaluated for participation and, if they qualify, will attend Visit 2 for priming. At Visit 2, ragweed pollen will be fed continuously and dispensed into the environmental exposure unit to induce an allergic reaction. Pollen counts will be monitored and recorded. During the priming visit(s), subjects will be evaluated to determine if they qualify. If qualified, they will return for Visit 3, where ragweed pollen will be fed continuously and dispensed into the environmental exposure unit to induce an allergic reaction. Pollen counts will be monitored and recorded as in the Priming Session. Subjects will complete symptom evaluations and if qualified, they will receive study medication and remain in the environmental exposure unit where symptoms will be evaluated for 8 hours after dosing. PNIF will be evaluated only during the treatment session. Four nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching) and three non-nasal symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watery eyes, and itching of ears/palate) will be evaluated. Adverse events will be collected throughout the study to assess safety and tolerability, and vital signs will be collected at Visit 1 and at the end of Visit 3.
NCT00481676 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Adults (18-70 Years) With Moderate to Severe Chronic Urticaria Completed Novartis Phase 2 2007-05-01 This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in adult patients with moderate to severe chronic urticaria who exhibit IgE against thyroperoxidase.
NCT00524836 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine Versus Loratadine for the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Completed UCB Pharma Phase 3 2003-09-01 Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine Versus Loratadine for the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.
NCT00525278 ↗ To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine Versus Loratadine for Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Completed UCB Pharma Phase 3 2003-08-01 To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine Versus Loratadine for Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00525382 ↗ Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Between Levocetirizine and Loratadine for Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Completed UCB Pharma Phase 3 2003-08-01 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Between Levocetirizine and Loratadine for Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Loratadine

Condition Name

Condition Name for Loratadine
Intervention Trials
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 8
Healthy 6
Rhinitis 5
Allergic Rhinitis 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Loratadine
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis, Allergic 28
Rhinitis 28
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 16
Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Loratadine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Loratadine
Location Trials
United States 81
Canada 8
Spain 3
Germany 3
China 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Loratadine
Location Trials
New Jersey 5
Maryland 4
New York 4
Ohio 4
Michigan 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Loratadine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Loratadine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 19
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Loratadine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 49
Not yet recruiting 4
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Loratadine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Loratadine
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 14
Bayer 7
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Loratadine
Sponsor Trials
Industry 46
Other 30
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.