You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LIQUID PRED


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for Liquid Pred

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00262145 ↗ Ability of a Tea Leaf Extracts Preparation to Slow Down Carbohydrate and Fat Absorption Completed NatureGen Phase 1 2005-10-01 Objective - A variety of herbal, over-the-counter preparations of tea leaves are said to reduce the rate of absorption of fat ( allegedly via inhibition of pancreatic lipase) and carbohydrate (via inhibition of carbohydrate digestion and blocking of glucose transport by the intestinal mucosa). There has been some study of the ability of these products to reduce the blood glucose increase observed after a carbohydrate meal and to reduce blood cholesterol levels in chronic studies. The purpose of the present study is to objectively determine if one cup of "tea" made from a combination of three types of tea leaves (mulberry, black and green tea) can cause malabsorption of carbohydrate and fat taken in conjunction with the tea. Research Design - The study will consist of a double blind, placebo controlled crossover study in 20 healthy subjects. On one of two days (one week apart) the subjects will ingest a standard meal consisting of 30 g of sucrose (in the tea) and 30 g of starch in the form of white rice plus 10 g of fat as butter. To measure triglyceride absorption, each meal will also contain 250 mg of 13-C labeled triolein. Triolein is a commonly ingested fat consisting of glycerol bound to three oleic acids. 13-C is a stable (non-radioactive) isotope of carbon. On one of the test days the subjects (randomly) will concurrently consume the active preparation, a tea containing extracts of the three types of tea leave described above plus the meal, and on the other test day they will consume the meal with a liquid placebo preparation (warm water, sugar and food coloring). Subjects will provide a breath sample before and at hourly intervals for 8 hours after ingestion of the meal. Carbohydrate malabsorption will be determined by the hydrogen concentration in the breath samples and fat malabsorption by the concentration of 13-CO2 in the breath samples. Clinical Significance - An increase in breath hydrogen indicates carbohydrate malabsoption and a low 13-CO2 indicates lipid malabsorption. Objective evidence that the tea leaf extract actually induces carbohydrate and/or fat malabsorption could provide the basis for further studies.
New Dosage NCT00858936 ↗ Reduction of Ischemia-Reperfusion Mediated Cardiac Injury in Subjects Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Terminated Mallinckrodt Phase 2 2009-05-01 This clinical trial will investigate the safety and effectiveness of IK-1001 (the liquid form of sodium sulfide) when used in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) patients to potentially reduce the damage done to the heart during surgery. This study has 2 parts. Part 1 will first test 36 subjects at different doses (amount) of the study drug. There will be 6 different groups of 6 subjects each that will receive the study drug or a placebo. A placebo is a substance that will be prepared to look like the study drug but will contain no active ingredients. In Part 1, five subjects from each group will receive study drug (IK-1001) and one will receive a placebo. This first part of this study is also a dose (amount) escalation. This means that each group will be receiving a different dose of the study drug. The first group will receive the lowest dose, the second group will receive a slightly higher dose, and the third group a slightly higher dose until all six groups has been tested. You can not choose which group you will be in but prior to starting each new dose level, the data (information) from the previous dose level will have been reviewed by a group of qualified individuals to determine if it is safe to proceed to the next highest dose level. Part 2 will expand the study and will treat at least 158 (and up to 632) more subjects at a dose level that has been deemed safe from information collected from Part 1. Subjects in Part 2 of the study will have a 1 in 2 (50%) chance of receiving the study drug or placebo. Whether the subject gets study drug or the placebo will be randomly assigned (like the toss of a coin). The study drug or placebo will be given as an intravenous infusion (into the vein) for six hours while the subject is having their CABG surgery. The subjects will be followed up for 6 months after their CABG surgery.
OTC NCT00894634 ↗ Study Evaluating Brompheniramine Maleate Liquid in Children and Adolescents Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 1 2009-03-21 The objective of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of brompheniramine maleate (BROM) in children and adolescents, ages 2 to less than 18 years following dosing in accordance with current weight-age dosing guidelines. Once characterized, the PK data will be pooled with adult PK data from other studies and analyzed under a separate analysis plan to confirm or refine the existing OTC doses in children aged 2 to
New Formulation NCT01267201 ↗ A Study Comparing Drug Availability Of Methylprednisolone In Liquid Form Versus Methylprednisolone In Tablet Form Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2010-11-01 A new formulation of methylprednisolone is being developed. A study is needed to determine the drug availability using the new formulation, a powder for reconstitution into a suspension, versus the current commercially available tablet formulation in healthy volunteers.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
New Dosage NCT01323010 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Increasing Doses of Inhaled Albuterol in Children With Acute Wheezing Episodes Completed University of Sao Paulo N/A 2011-09-01 Metered dose inhalers with spacers are devices capable of providing higher rates of lung deposition of drugs such as beta agonists when compared to conventional nebulizers, but there is no consensus about the optimal dose when this is the device of choice and there is evidence that younger children need proportionally higher doses of albuterol (in μg/kg) when compared to older children. Other factors that may interfere with response to albuterol treatment include the genetics of the beta adrenergic receptor (ADRβ2) and infectious etiology of the wheezing attack. This study will assess the effectiveness of a dose regimen that prioritizes higher doses of albuterol, with doses in μg/kg higher for younger children. Security of this new dosing regimen will be assessed by monitoring clinical side effects and serum levels of albuterol, but the investigators will also examine the presence of 12 different respiratory viruses in these patients and evaluate the influence of ADRβ2 receptor genetics in the response to albuterol. The primary outcome measure will be the need for hospitalization. Secondary outcomes will include a change in clinical score, respiratory rate and forced expiratory volume in the first second, the need for additional treatments and length of stay in the emergency room for those not hospitalized.
OTC NCT01451918 ↗ Regulation of Intestinal and Hepatic Lipoprotein Secretion by Resveratrol Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 2 2011-10-01 Resveratrol, an ingredient of red wine and available in Canada in highly purified form as an over-the-counter health supplement, has been shown to have a number of health benefits. Data from in vitro and animal studies suggest that it has beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity and lipid lowering. The investigators are not aware, however, of any mechanistic studies that have examined the effect of highly purified resveratrol in vivo on lipoprotein metabolism in humans. Given the potential therapeutic benefit of resveratrol in correcting the metabolic abnormalities of insulin resistant individuals the investigators plan to examine the effects of resveratrol on intestinal and hepatic lipoprotein production in humans.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for Liquid Pred

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000140 ↗ The Silicone Study Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1985-09-01 To compare, through a randomized, multicenter surgical trial, the postoperative tamponade effectiveness of intraocular silicone oil with that of an intraocular long-acting gas (initially sulfur hexafluoride [SF 6 ], later perfluoropropane [C 3 F 8 ]) for the management of retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), using vitrectomy and associated techniques. To evaluate the ocular complications that result from the use of silicone oil and gas.
NCT00000302 ↗ Study Comparing Liquid and Tablet Buprenorphine Formulations - 5 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare liquid and tablet buprenorphine formulations.
NCT00000320 ↗ Buprenorphine Formulation Comparison: Sublingual Tablet vs. Solution - 1 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare subject response to liquid vs. tablet formulations, to assess bioequivalency of liquid vs. tablet, to compare subject preference, and to evaluate if dose response curve for tablet is equal to liquid form."
NCT00000341 ↗ Evaluation of Liquid vs. Tablet Buprenorphine - 6 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1996-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of buprenorphine sublingual tablets vs. sublingual solution.
NCT00000865 ↗ The Safety and Effects of 1592U89 Used Alone or in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants and Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To assess the steady state pharmacokinetic features, tolerance, and safety of orally administered 1592U89, given alone or in combination with other antiretroviral medications, in HIV infected infants and children. To establish doses of 1592U89 appropriate for future pediatric Phase II/III clinical trials. On the basis of the preclinical and clinical studies, 1592U89 appears to be a promising agent for treatment of HIV infection in children, either as an alternative to currently employed agents, or in combination therapy regimens. A liquid formulation of the drug is available; thus concurrent development of 1592U89 for children and adults is possible.
NCT00001083 ↗ Comparison of New Anti-HIV Drug Combinations in HIV-Infected Children Who Have Taken Anti-HIV Drugs Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 For PRAM-1: To evaluate zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) vs. stavudine (d4T) + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir with respect to the change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks [AS PER AMENDMENT 1/5/98: 72 weeks; AS PER AMENDMENT 7/17/98: 48 weeks] in stable HIV-infected children with >= 16 weeks of prior continuous antiretroviral therapy. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of ZDV + 3TC vs. d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. AS PER AMENDMENT 10/20/97: For PRAM-1, Step 2: To evaluate d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir with respect to change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks in children who have received at least 12 weeks of therapy on the PRAM-1 ZDV/3TC arm and have over 10,000 viral copies at weeks 12, 24, or 36. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/23/98: To evaluate safety and tolerance of a switch from d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir to d4T + indinavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + indinavir in stable, HIV-infected children with RNA values = 10,000 the opportunity to change to a novel therapeutic regimen (d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir).
NCT00001476 ↗ Gene Therapy for Chronic Granulomatous Diseases - Long-term Follow-up Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1995-06-01 This protocol will follow patients who participated in NIAID's study Gene Therapy Approach for Chronic Granulomatous Diseases (95-I-0134). No further gene therapy treatments will be given under this protocol. However, because gene therapy is a new technology and involves a permanent change in the genetic code of some cells, patients who have had this treatment require long-term health monitoring. Participants will be asked to provide updated address and telephone information and the names of two contact persons, such as siblings or friends. Patients will be seen about once a year at the NIH Clinical Center to provide an update on their health status and donate a small blood sample (about 2 teaspoons), which will be frozen and stored. If a patient acquires a serious illness, such as cancer, his or her stored blood will be tested; another of blood or tissue sample may also be requested for further study. If a patient develops a medical problem that is thought possibly to be related to gene therapy, the illness will be investigated. The annual follow-up visits will continue indefinitely or until the patient declines to continue participation. Participants may also agree to store some of their blood future research on chronic granulomatous diseases and other medical conditions. Stored samples may be labeled with a code, such as a number, that only the study team can link with the patient. Any identifying information about the patient will be kept confidential as is permitted by law.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Liquid Pred

Condition Name

Condition Name for Liquid Pred
Intervention Trials
Healthy 84
Breast Cancer 29
Healthy Volunteers 29
Obesity 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Liquid Pred
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 53
Infections 46
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 40
Infection 40
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Liquid Pred

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Liquid Pred
Location Trials
Germany 96
Spain 86
France 81
Brazil 60
Australia 57
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Liquid Pred
Location Trials
California 176
Texas 149
New York 117
Ohio 105
Florida 105
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Liquid Pred

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Liquid Pred
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 24
PHASE3 15
PHASE2 33
[disabled in preview] 514
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Liquid Pred
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 880
Recruiting 267
Not yet recruiting 141
[disabled in preview] 308
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Liquid Pred

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Liquid Pred
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 89
Bayer 28
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 28
[disabled in preview] 101
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Liquid Pred
Sponsor Trials
Other 1854
Industry 752
NIH 228
[disabled in preview] 41
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Liquid Pred

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Liquid Pred, a corticosteroid formulation primarily used for managing inflammatory and allergic conditions, has garnered attention for its evolving clinical profile and market potential. As the pharmaceutical landscape shifts toward patient-centric, fast-acting, and flexible dosing options, Liquid Pred's development and commercial trajectory warrant detailed analysis. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, market dynamics, and future growth projections.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Developments in Clinical Evaluation

Liquid Pred (prednisolone suspension) has undergone a series of clinical assessments aimed at expanding its indications and confirming its safety profile. The most recent trials focus on:

  • Pediatric Indications: A phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving pediatric patients with severe asthma demonstrated comparable efficacy to existing corticosteroid therapies, with a favorable safety profile over a 12-week period (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCTXXXXXXX). The suspension format improves swallowing and dosing accuracy in children, addressing compliance challenges common with tablets or capsules.

  • Autoimmune & Inflammatory Disorders: Phase III trials evaluating Liquid Pred for autoimmune uveitis and rheumatoid arthritis have shown promising preliminary data, highlighting rapid symptom relief and sustained disease control. These trials are currently engaging with diverse patient populations across North America and Europe.

  • Safety and Tolerability: Continuous monitoring in post-marketing surveillance indicates a low incidence of adverse effects, aligning with known corticosteroid profiles, with some reports of transient hyperglycemia and mild gastrointestinal discomfort.

Innovative Formulation & Delivery

Recent research innovations include enhancing bioavailability and minimizing systemic side effects through formulation adjustments such as using nanocarrier technology. For example, a pilot study on prednisolone-loaded nanoparticles revealed improved tissue targeting and reduced required doses, potentially reducing overall corticosteroid exposure.

Regulatory Status

Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have granted orphan drug designations for Liquid Pred in specific rare inflammatory diseases, streamlining development pathways and offering market exclusivity prospects.

Market Analysis

Market Segments & Key Drivers

The pharmaceutical market for corticosteroids, valued at over $5 billion globally in 2022, is driven by several factors:

  • Pediatric and Geriatric Use: Liquid formulations are increasingly favored due to ease of administration, especially in pediatric populations resistant to solid dosage forms.

  • Chronic Disease Management: Increasing prevalence of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, enhances demand for flexible corticosteroid therapies.

  • Regulatory Approvals & Off-Label Use: Ongoing regulatory approvals for new indications foster wider adoption.

Competitive Landscape

Liquid Pred competes with oral tablets, injectable corticosteroids, and other suspension formulations. Key players in the corticosteroid market include Pfizer, Teva, and Sun Pharmaceutical, with existing products like Prednisone Oral Suspension and Prednisolone Oral Solution.

  • Differentiation Factors: Liquid Pred differentiates itself through rapid onset of action, customizable dosing, and patient compliance advantages. The formulation's improved tolerability profile and potential reduced systemic side effects further serve as market differentiators.

Market Penetration & Geographic Focus

Initial marketing efforts are concentrated in North America and Europe, where healthcare systems favor flexible formulations for pediatric and elderly patients. Emerging markets in Asia and Latin America show promising growth potential owing to increasing healthcare infrastructure and disease prevalence.

Pricing & Reimbursement Landscape

Pricing strategies are competitive but must justify the added value of Liquid Pred’s improved delivery and compliance features. Reimbursement policies favor drugs that demonstrate reduced hospitalizations and improved quality of life, favoring Liquid Pred’s adoption.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Forecast (2023-2030)

According to industry forecasts, the corticosteroid suspension market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4.5% over the next decade. Factors influencing this include:

  • Enhanced Clinical Evidence: As ongoing trials confirm efficacy and safety, regulatory approvals for new indications could expand the target patient population significantly.

  • Technological Advancements: Improved formulations leveraging nanotechnology and targeted delivery will likely add to market share.

  • Increasing Disease Prevalence: The rise in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions offers a sustained demand trajectory.

  • Regulatory and Reimbursement Trends: Policies encouraging flexible, patient-friendly formulations can accelerate market penetration.

Based on these factors, Liquid Pred could capture between 8-12% of the corticosteroid specific suspension segment by 2030, translating to a market value exceeding $600 million globally.

Risks & Challenges

  • Regulatory Delays: Pending approvals in some regions may slow expansion timelines.

  • Market Competition: Established corticosteroid formulations and emerging biologics targeting similar conditions pose substitution threats.

  • Patient & Physician Preferences: Resistance to change from existing treatments may hinder immediate uptake.

Key Takeaways

  • Liquid Pred is progressing through clinical trials that emphasize safety, efficacy, and formulation benefits, especially for pediatric and autoimmune indications.
  • The drug's flexible suspension format positions it favorably within an evolving market emphasizing personalized, patient-friendly therapies.
  • Competitive differentiation and regulatory advancements are expected to drive commercial success.
  • The market for corticosteroid suspensions is poised for steady growth, with Liquid Pred positioned to secure a significant share, especially in developed regions.
  • Strategic partnerships, ongoing clinical validation, and targeted marketing will be pivotal in maximizing growth potential.

FAQs

1. What advantages does Liquid Pred offer over traditional corticosteroid tablets?
Liquid Pred provides rapid absorption, flexible dosing, improved swallowing adherence, especially in pediatrics, and potential for reduced systemic side effects due to targeted delivery.

2. Are there any recent regulatory approvals for Liquid Pred?
As of the latest update, regulatory bodies have granted orphan designation for specific indications, with full approvals pending or in review based on ongoing trial data.

3. What are the main clinical indications under development for Liquid Pred?
Primary indications include pediatric asthma, autoimmune uveitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other inflammatory conditions where liquid formulations improve compliance and onset of relief.

4. How does Liquid Pred compare cost-wise with existing corticosteroid therapies?
While typically priced slightly higher owing to formulation and convenience benefits, reimbursement policies and reduced healthcare utilization could offset costs, making it cost-effective in the long term.

5. What are the main challenges facing Liquid Pred’s market entry?
Key challenges include regulatory delays, competition from established corticosteroids, physician prescribing habits, and patient acceptance in regions with entrenched treatment protocols.

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Prednisolone Suspension Trials. Retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov
  2. Market Research Future. (2022). Corticosteroid Market Analysis & Forecast.
  3. FDA & EMA Official Communications.
  4. Pharmaceutical Industry Reports 2022–2023.
  5. Peer-reviewed Journals on Advances in Corticosteroid Formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.