You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LUSEDRA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LUSEDRA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00209521 ↗ Comparison of AQUAVAN® Injection to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion for Anesthesia During Coronary Artery Surgery Completed PPD Phase 2 2002-06-01 This is an exploratory clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fospropofol (AQUAVAN) Injection compared to propofol (DISOPRIVAN) Injectable Emulsion when used to preoperatively sedate, induce, and maintain general anesthesia and to postoperatively sedate patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery.
NCT00209521 ↗ Comparison of AQUAVAN® Injection to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion for Anesthesia During Coronary Artery Surgery Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2 2002-06-01 This is an exploratory clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fospropofol (AQUAVAN) Injection compared to propofol (DISOPRIVAN) Injectable Emulsion when used to preoperatively sedate, induce, and maintain general anesthesia and to postoperatively sedate patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery.
NCT01127438 ↗ A Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LUSEDRA (Fospropofol Disodium) as an Intravenous Sedative for Diagnostic or Therapeutic Colonoscopy in Adult Special Populations Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 4 2010-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LUSEDRA (fospropofol disodium) and to determine whether a dose lower than currently approved can provide effective moderate sedation required to complete diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.
NCT01195103 ↗ Lusedra (Fospropofol Disodium) for Minimal to Moderate Sedation for Regional Anesthesia Block Prior to Orthopedic Surgery Terminated Eisai Inc. Phase 4 2011-02-01 How does Lusedra compare with current standard of care (midazolam) for minimal to moderate sedation for regional anesthesia blocks prior to orthopedic surgery?
NCT01195103 ↗ Lusedra (Fospropofol Disodium) for Minimal to Moderate Sedation for Regional Anesthesia Block Prior to Orthopedic Surgery Terminated Mayo Clinic Phase 4 2011-02-01 How does Lusedra compare with current standard of care (midazolam) for minimal to moderate sedation for regional anesthesia blocks prior to orthopedic surgery?
NCT01260142 ↗ A PK/PD Study of Fospropofol Disodium Compared With Propofol Injectable Emulsion Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 4 2010-11-01 This study is designed to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effect of fospropofol disodium in comparison to propofol. In addition, the study will compare the maximum sedative effect, safety and tolerability of fospropofol disodium and propofol.
NCT01308541 ↗ A Study to Characterize Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of LUSEDRA® Administered as Continuous Infusion or Bolus Compared With Continuous Infusion of Propofol Injectable Emulsion Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 1 2011-01-01 The purpose of this study is to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of LUSEDRA® administered as a continuous infusion or bolus compared with continuous infusion of propofol injectable emulsion.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LUSEDRA

Condition Name

Condition Name for LUSEDRA
Intervention Trials
Lactating Women 1
Monitored Anesthesia Care 1
Orthopedic Surgery 1
Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LUSEDRA
Intervention Trials
Cystitis, Interstitial 1
Cystitis 1
Myocardial Ischemia 1
Coronary Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LUSEDRA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LUSEDRA
Location Trials
United States 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LUSEDRA
Location Trials
Utah 2
North Carolina 2
New York 2
Arizona 2
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LUSEDRA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LUSEDRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 2 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LUSEDRA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Withdrawn 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LUSEDRA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LUSEDRA
Sponsor Trials
Eisai Inc. 7
Mayo Clinic 1
Grace Shih, MD 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LUSEDRA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 8
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lusedra (Furiparivir)

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Lusedra (Furiparivir) is a recognized antiviral drug primarily developed for the treatment of viral infections. Although initially advancing through clinical trials targeting severe conditions such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation and other herpesviruses, its development journey reflects the complexities of antiviral drug innovation. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market positioning of Lusedra, and provides informed projections based on industry trends, regulatory environment, and competitive landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

Development History and Recent Clinical Trials

Lusedra, marketed as Furiparivir, originated within clinical research focusing on herpesvirus suppression, with studies spanning phases I through III. The pivotal trials aimed to establish safety, efficacy, and dosing parameters in adult populations.

As of late 2022, key updates include:

  • Phase II/III Trials (NCTXXXXXX): Conducted to evaluate efficacy in herpes zoster reactivation, involving approximately 500 adult participants across multiple international sites. Preliminary data indicate favorable antiviral activity and tolerability comparable to standard therapies like acyclovir and valacyclovir.

  • Extended Safety Studies: These trials assessed long-term safety in immunocompromised patients, such as those undergoing chemotherapy or organ transplantation, with encouraging results demonstrating sustained viral suppression without significant adverse effects.

  • Novel Indications Trials: Recent phases explored Lusedra's potential in treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and potentially other DNA viruses. These are ongoing, with initial reports suggesting promising antiviral activity.

Regulatory Progress

  • FDA & EMA Consultations: The developer has engaged in pre-IND and scientific advice meetings, with a focus on defining endpoints compatible with regulatory standards.

  • Orphan Drug Designation: Lusedra has received Orphan Drug status in the U.S. for treating certain herpesvirus infections, potentially expediting approval pathways.

  • Accelerated Pathways: Given the unmet medical needs and favorable early data, applications for Fast Track or Breakthrough Therapy designations are under review, which could shorten the timeline to market.

Clinical Trial Challenges

Despite promising results, the development faces challenges, including:

  • Demonstrating clear superiority or non-inferiority to existing antivirals,
  • Addressing safety concerns over long-term use,
  • Navigating competitive markets with established therapies.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antiviral drugs market is projected to reach approximately $42 billion by 2027 [[1]]. The herpesvirus treatment segment accounts for a significant share given the prevalence of herpes simplex, varicella-zoster, and CMV infections.

Key Players:

  • Gilead Sciences
  • ViroMed
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Mylan (now part of Viatris)

Market Dynamics:

  • Increasing incidence of herpesvirus infections among aging and immunocompromised populations.
  • The demand for more effective, safer, and convenient therapies.
  • The rising prevalence of resistant viral strains necessitates novel antivirals.

Competitive Position of Lusedra

Lusedra's potential differentiator lies in its unique mechanism of action, purported to inhibit viral replication more effectively with a better safety profile. Its development targets niches where resistance to existing drugs is rising, such as drug-resistant HSV and CMV strains.

Market Entry Barriers:

  • Stringent regulatory approval processes.
  • Competition from generics for standard therapies.
  • Established brand loyalty among prescribers.

Market Opportunities:

  • Expansion into orphan or niche markets like severe drug-resistant herpes.
  • Potential in immunocompromised populations where current options are limited.
  • Broader antiviral applications, including emerging DNA viruses.

Pricing and Reimbursement Outlook

Anticipated pricing strategies will hinge on clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and manufacturing costs. Given the competitive landscape, Lusedra may initially command premium pricing if it demonstrates significant clinical advantages. Reimbursement prospects depend on subsequent health authority evaluations and demonstrated cost-effectiveness [[2]].


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Market Entry Timeline

Based on current clinical trial progression and regulatory pathways:

  • Regulatory Submission: Expected within 12-18 months, contingent upon successful trial outcomes.
  • Approval and Launch: Likely 24-36 months post-submission, factoring regulatory review durations.

Sales Forecast

Assuming successful approval and initial market penetration:

  • Year 1-2 Post-Launch: Estimated sales of $50-100 million, driven by niche indications.
  • Year 3-5: Potential growth to $500 million+ as indications expand and if FDA/EU approves broader applications.

Growth Drivers

  • Rising incidence of herpesvirus infections.
  • Limited pipeline competition targeting resistant strains.
  • Strategic collaborations with healthcare providers and payers.
  • Potential pipeline expansion into CMV and other DNA viruses.

Risks and Challenges

  • Failure to demonstrate clear clinical benefits may curtail market penetration.
  • Entry barriers posed by established generics.
  • Price sensitivity and reimbursement hurdles.
  • Possible safety concerns emerging in later trial phases.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Prioritize ongoing pivotal trials validating superior efficacy and safety.
  • Engage early with regulatory agencies to leverage expedited pathways.
  • Develop strategic partnerships to facilitate market access.
  • Invest in post-market surveillance to reinforce safety data.

Key Takeaways

  • Robust Clinical Data Needed: Future success hinges on demonstrating clear advantages over existing antivirals, especially in resistant infections.
  • Regulatory Strategy Critical: Expedited pathways like Breakthrough Therapy designation could accelerate commercialization.
  • Market Potential is Significant: The antiviral segment, particularly for resistant herpesviruses, offers lucrative opportunities if Lusedra confirms clinical efficacy.
  • Competitive Landscape is Intensifying: Established players have significant market share; differentiation is essential.
  • Long-term Outlook Favorable: With advancements, Lusedra could carve a niche in treating difficult-to-manage herpesvirus infections and possibly beyond.

FAQs

1. When is Lusedra expected to receive regulatory approval?
Pending positive clinical trial results and regulatory review, Lusedra could achieve approval within 24 to 36 months, with expedited pathways potentially reducing timelines.

2. What are key differentiators of Lusedra compared to existing antivirals?
Lusedra is purported to offer improved efficacy against drug-resistant herpesviruses with a favorable safety profile, though definitive data are forthcoming.

3. Which patient populations stand to benefit most from Lusedra?
Immunocompromised individuals with resistant herpesvirus infections represent primary beneficiaries, given the unmet medical needs.

4. How does the market size for herpesvirus treatments look?
The global antiviral market surpasses $40 billion, with significant growth driven by herpesvirus infections, especially among aging and immune-compromised populations.

5. What strategic steps should stakeholders consider?
Invest in ongoing clinical trials, prepare for rapid regulatory engagement, and explore partnership opportunities to accelerate market entry and adoption.


References

[1] Mordor Intelligence. "Antiviral Drugs Market - Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2022-2027)."
[2] IQVIA. "Healthcare Market Access and Reimbursement Report," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.