Last Updated: June 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOVAZA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LOVAZA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00246636 ↗ Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters) as Add-on Therapy in Hypertriglyceridemic Subjects Treated With Antara (Fenofibrate) Followed by an 8-week Extension Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2005-10-01 The purpose of OM5/LOV111859 was to evaluate efficacy and safety of Omacor (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) as add-on therapy to Antara (fenofibrate) and diet for the treatment of patients with very high triglycerides. The purpose of both OM5X/LOV111860 was to assess the continued efficacy and safety of adjunctive Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) therapy in hypertriglyceridemic subjects treated with fenofibrate in lowering serum triglyceride (TG) levels.
NCT00246701 ↗ Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Combined Omacor (Omega-3-acid Ethyl Esters) and Simvastatin Therapy in Hypertriglyceridemic Subjects Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2005-11-01 The purpose of OM6 is to evaluate efficacy and safety of Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) [formerly known as Omacor] combined with simvastatin for lowering non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in subjects with persistent high triglycerides despite statin therapy. Additionally, a two-year extension trial (LOV111818/OM6X) is posted on NCT00903409.
NCT00346697 ↗ Omega-3 Fatty Acids for High Triglycerides in HIV-infected Patients Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2006-10-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omega-3-fatty acids in HIV-infected patients with hypertriglyceridemia. In addition, we, the researchers, will evaluate the effect of omega-3 fatty acid administration of markers of bone turnover and inflammation.
NCT00346697 ↗ Omega-3 Fatty Acids for High Triglycerides in HIV-infected Patients Completed National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Phase 4 2006-10-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omega-3-fatty acids in HIV-infected patients with hypertriglyceridemia. In addition, we, the researchers, will evaluate the effect of omega-3 fatty acid administration of markers of bone turnover and inflammation.
NCT00346697 ↗ Omega-3 Fatty Acids for High Triglycerides in HIV-infected Patients Completed Brown, Todd, M.D., Ph.D. Phase 4 2006-10-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omega-3-fatty acids in HIV-infected patients with hypertriglyceridemia. In addition, we, the researchers, will evaluate the effect of omega-3 fatty acid administration of markers of bone turnover and inflammation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LOVAZA

Condition Name

Condition Name for LOVAZA
Intervention Trials
Hypertriglyceridemia 18
Breast Cancer 5
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease 4
Cardiovascular Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LOVAZA
Intervention Trials
Hypertriglyceridemia 25
Liver Diseases 6
Breast Neoplasms 6
Inflammation 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LOVAZA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LOVAZA
Location Trials
United States 164
Russian Federation 2
Canada 2
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LOVAZA
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 12
Massachusetts 9
Illinois 9
California 9
Ohio 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LOVAZA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LOVAZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 20
Phase 3 10
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 26
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LOVAZA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 46
Withdrawn 11
Terminated 10
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LOVAZA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LOVAZA
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 36
ImmunityBio, Inc. 8
NantCell, Inc. 6
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LOVAZA
Sponsor Trials
Other 80
Industry 67
NIH 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection

Last updated: May 20, 2026

Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters, “OM3EE”) is an FDA-approved prescription omega-3 for severe hypertriglyceridemia. The latest definable clinical development activity in public registries is limited, with most near-term competitive dynamics driven by substitution among omega-3 products and by outcomes-focused positioning versus fibrates and statin add-ons rather than by large new phase programs. Market performance is sustained by chronic prescription use and label-aligned prescribing for high triglycerides, while growth is constrained by generic/basket substitution risk at the omega-3 class level, payer pressure, and ongoing competition from other prescription omega-3s and non-omega triglyceride therapies.

What is Lovaza’s FDA status and Orange Book listing status?

Lovaza’s US regulatory posture is centered on its prescription indication for severe hypertriglyceridemia. In typical practice, omega-3 competitors with overlapping triglyceride targets can create formulary substitution even when clinical outcomes differ across subpopulations.

What indication does Lovaza have and what label endpoints matter?

  • Indication: severe hypertriglyceridemia (used to reduce triglyceride levels).
  • Clinical positioning: triglyceride reduction is the primary measurable label-aligned effect; broader cardiovascular outcomes depend on the product-level omega-3 composition and trial design, so payers often treat Lovaza as a lipid-parameter product rather than a standalone CV-outcomes agent.

How does Lovaza’s exclusivity posture affect generic and “new label” competition?

  • Lovaza is not a single-source “data exclusivity only” story; competitive pressure in omega-3 is driven by:
    • alternative prescription omega-3 formulations (including different EPA/DHA compositions),
    • branded versus authorized generic economics,
    • and payer reimbursement policies for triglyceride reduction.
  • In the Orange Book, Lovaza’s listed patents and expiration dates determine generic entry for the specific “drug product” covered. Absent current, publicly confirmed Orange Book patent mappings for this prompt, exclusivity timelines cannot be stated to the day without risking inaccuracy.

What clinical trials have been run for Lovaza and what is the latest update?

Public clinical activity for Lovaza in major registries is not dominated by new, large late-stage trials in the way it is for highly investigational drugs. Instead, the visible “trial” footprint usually comes from:

  • post-marketing studies,
  • formulation and bioequivalence work,
  • and class-level omega-3 studies that include OM3EE or comparators.

Which trial types are most common for omega-3 ethyl ester products like Lovaza?

  • Triglyceride lowering dose-response and comparative PK/PD studies
  • Liver-fat or metabolic endpoints studies (often exploratory)
  • Comparative studies against fibrates or statin add-on strategies
  • Real-world evidence studies (less common in registry databases but common in publications)

What phase is Lovaza development in now?

  • Most activity is not in registrational Phase 3 for new indications.
  • The most actionable near-term trial relevance comes from outcomes evidence (cardiovascular, pancreatitis risk, metabolic endpoints) and from comparative effectiveness work versus other prescription omega-3s and non-omega triglyceride agents.

How strong is the patent estate for Lovaza and what patents protect the drug?

Lovaza’s competitive freedom-to-operate is determined by the overlap of:

  • drug substance and composition patents,
  • formulation or manufacturing process patents,
  • and method-of-use patents (if any) tied to the severe hypertriglyceridemia label.

Because this prompt requests a “clinical trials update, market analysis and projection,” it does not provide the jurisdictional Orange Book patent list, patent numbers, assignees, or expiration dates needed to construct a precise patent landscape. Without a verifiable, enumerated patent set, a definitive “how strong” assessment risks factual error.

When does Lovaza lose exclusivity and what are the generic entry risks?

Generic entry risk for branded pharmaceuticals depends on:

  • patent expiration and listed Orange Book exclusivities,
  • the existence of unexpired patents that can be avoided via labeling carve-outs,
  • and the likelihood of Paragraph IV challenges by ANDA filers.

For Lovaza specifically, the exact expiration calendar and the current Orange Book status of active patents are required to quantify entry risk by date. Those details are not provided in the prompt and cannot be reconstructed reliably to an accurate schedule here.

What is the current market size and how big is Lovaza’s revenue exposure?

Lovaza’s revenue exposure is tied to:

  • prescriptions for severe hypertriglyceridemia,
  • payer coverage and step edits,
  • and the channel mix between retail and specialty managed care.

In the omega-3 prescription segment, category dynamics matter:

  • branded versus generic pricing,
  • conversion to alternatives on formulary,
  • and consolidation of formularies around a smaller number of preferred triglyceride-lowering agents.

Without the drug-level revenue number and segment reporting source in the prompt (for example, company annual report figures, paid claims, or IQVIA prescription dashboards), a quantified revenue projection cannot be produced without inserting unsourced numbers.

How does Lovaza compare with competing omega-3s and triglyceride therapies?

High-intent competitive comparison in omega-3 hinges on three axes:

  1. Molecule and composition
  • Prescription omega-3 products differ in EPA/DHA content and ethyl ester formulation, which can change triglyceride magnitude and tolerability perceptions.
  1. Label overlap
  • Some products have broader or different label scopes, shifting payer choice for “one product fits most.”
  1. Outcomes evidence
  • Even when triglyceride-lowering is similar, payers may prefer products with stronger outcomes data, or they may position products differently by guideline alignment.

Which comparators most often substitute for Lovaza in practice?

  • Other prescription omega-3 ethyl ester products and omega-3 concentrate options with overlapping triglyceride reduction roles.
  • Fibrates (and guideline-driven statin intensification strategies).
  • Emerging triglyceride therapies in severe hypertriglyceridemia algorithms can divert incremental demand depending on payer willingness and patient phenotype.

What market drivers support demand for Lovaza through 2030?

Key demand drivers in prescription triglyceride management include:

  • Persistent prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia and metabolic syndrome.
  • Ongoing guideline emphasis on reducing very high triglyceride levels to reduce pancreatitis risk (where omega-3s are used as one tool).
  • Stable prescribing patterns in patient subgroups where omega-3 ethyl esters are tolerated and reimbursed.

What could suppress Lovaza growth?

  • Formulary substitution to lower-cost omega-3 options.
  • Payer prior authorization and step therapy.
  • Switching by prescriber preference toward alternatives with more favorable outcomes positioning or simpler dosing.
  • Price compression across the class.

What is the clinical and commercial projection for Lovaza?

A defensible projection requires at least one of:

  • baseline sales/revenue, or
  • paid prescription counts and growth rates, or
  • payer coverage trend data, or
  • explicit guidance from the marketer.

None is included in the prompt. Without baseline numbers, any numeric forecast would be fabricated. Below is a qualitative projection framework that can guide decisioning without inventing sales figures.

Base-case commercial trajectory (qualitative)

  • Demand remains steady-to-slightly declining under competitive substitution pressure.
  • Price/mix headwinds persist as payers prefer preferred agents.
  • New growth is limited unless:
    • label expansion occurs,
    • or outcomes data materially changes reimbursement.

Downside scenario (qualitative)

  • Faster formulary migration to alternative omega-3s and non-omega triglyceride agents.
  • Greater channel inventory rationalization and stronger contracting pressure.

Upside scenario (qualitative)

  • Improved payer alignment for severe hypertriglyceridemia algorithms that favor OM3EE products.
  • More evidence-supported positioning that increases adherence and persistence.

What regulatory updates could affect Lovaza?

For an approved prescription lipid therapy, regulatory-impacting events typically come from:

  • labeling revisions tied to safety, dosing, or warnings,
  • REMS (rare for omega-3),
  • and post-marketing commitments related to manufacturing quality or stability.

No prompt-provided regulatory event list is included, so no specific “latest update” dates can be stated without risking inaccuracies.

What clinical safety signals matter for Lovaza in the current setting?

In clinical practice, omega-3 products are evaluated for:

  • bleeding risk considerations (especially in patients on anticoagulants or with surgical needs),
  • GI tolerability (burping, dyspepsia),
  • and potential interactions depending on comedications.

Any claim about “current safety updates” must be tied to specific label changes, pharmacovigilance advisories, or publications, none of which is provided here.

Key takeaways

  • Lovaza’s near-term competitive dynamics are primarily substitution-driven in the omega-3 prescription triglyceride segment, not dominated by new large registrational clinical programs.
  • Clinical development visibility for Lovaza itself is limited; most relevant activity is comparative and class-level rather than Phase 3 for new indications.
  • Market growth is constrained by payer contracting, generic/authorized generic pressures within the broader omega-3 class, and alternative triglyceride therapies.
  • A numeric market projection and revenue forecast cannot be produced from the information provided; the only defensible forecast posture is qualitative: steady-to-moderate erosion with substitution unless new evidence materially shifts reimbursement.

FAQs

  1. How do payers typically decide between prescription omega-3 products like Lovaza for severe hypertriglyceridemia?
  2. What triglyceride reduction magnitude is clinically meaningful for severe hypertriglyceridemia prescriptions?
  3. Do omega-3 ethyl ester products face different bleeding risk considerations than other triglyceride therapies?
  4. How does formulary placement affect Lovaza persistence and refill rates compared with alternative prescription omega-3s?
  5. What evidence standards do insurers use when omega-3 products are positioned for pancreatitis-risk mitigation versus cardiovascular risk reduction?

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration. Approved Drug Products: Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters). FDA label resources.
  2. US Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: Lovaza.
  3. DailyMed. Lovaza (omega-3-acid ethyl esters) prescribing information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.