Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOTRIMIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LOTRIMIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00835510 ↗ Clinical Equivalence of Two Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis Completed Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Phase 1 2008-06-01 To demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc. butenafine hydrochloride cream 1% (test product) and Lotrimin Ultra® cream (reference listed drug) in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, and to show the superiority of the active treatments over that of the placebo (vehicle).
NCT01119742 ↗ Clinical Equivalence of Two Generic Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams as Compared to Lotrimin Ultra Cream in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis Terminated Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Phase 1 2010-07-01 To demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Taro Pharmaceuticals, Inc butenafine hydrochloride cream 1% test product and Lotrimin Ultra cream (reference listed drug) in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, and to show the superiority of the active treatments over that of the placebo (vehicle).
NCT01580878 ↗ Evaluate the Safety & Bioequivalence of a Generic Butenafine Cream & Lotrimin Ultra® & Compare Both to a Vehicle Control in Treatment of Interdigital Tinea Pedis Completed Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Phase 1 2012-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to determine the comparability of the safety and efficacy of a generic Butenafine Hydrochloride Cream, 1% (test product) and Lotrimin Ultra® (the reference listed drug) in subjects with interdigital tinea pedis. It will also be determined whether the efficacy of each of the two active treatments is superior to that of the vehicle cream (placebo).
NCT04532164 ↗ Study to Find Out if Cream V61-044 Used to Treat Fungal Infections Causes an Allergic Skin Reaction to Sunlight in Healthy Participants Completed Bayer Phase 3 2013-06-10 Allergic skin reaction can be produced by the combination of a chemical product applied to the skin and ultraviolet (UV) radiation (a type of invisible light that comes from the sun and other light sources and can hurt your skin and eyes) received by the person. The researchers in this study wanted to find out if cream V61-044 might cause an allergic skin reaction to sunlight when applied to the skin in healthy participants. Cream V61-044 (brand name: LOTRIMIN ULTRA) is an approved drug used to treat infections caused by fungi (small growing organisms such as mold, mildew, yeast or mushrooms). Participants joining this study underwent two study phases: in Induction phase, participants received the test cream and UV radiation twice a week for 3 weeks; after 10 days of rest, in Challenge phase participants received the test cream and UV radiation once again. In both phases, the test cream was applied to two test areas on the upper back of the participants and to one of the test area UV radiation was applied. Evaluation on the skin rash was conducted two days after each UV radiation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LOTRIMIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for LOTRIMIN
Intervention Trials
Tinea Pedis 2
Dermatitis, Photoallergic 1
Interdigital Tinea Pedis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LOTRIMIN
Intervention Trials
Tinea Pedis 3
Tinea 3
Dermatitis 1
Dermatitis, Photoallergic 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LOTRIMIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LOTRIMIN
Location Trials
United States 10
Belize 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LOTRIMIN
Location Trials
New Jersey 1
Texas 1
Tennessee 1
South Carolina 1
Ohio 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LOTRIMIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LOTRIMIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LOTRIMIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LOTRIMIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LOTRIMIN
Sponsor Trials
Taro Pharmaceuticals USA 3
Bayer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LOTRIMIN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 10, 2026

LOTRIMIN (clotrimazole): Clinical-Development Status, Market Snapshot, and Forward Projection

Summary: LOTRIMIN is a long-established, off-patent antifungal brand built on clotrimazole. There are no material ongoing or recently completed registrational clinical trials that would change competitive standing for the brand in the near term; the market is instead shaped by OTC/private-label penetration, household-brand pharmacy mix, and generic erosion. Near-term growth is modest and primarily driven by volume durability rather than new clinical proof.


What clinical development is happening for LOTRIMIN (clotrimazole)?

Clinical trial activity (registrational and label-expansion)

LOTRIMIN is a historical brand product line containing clotrimazole used for topical antifungal indications (commonly skin fungal infections and related conditions depending on country and formulation). The commercially relevant reality is that clotrimazole products are mature and largely generic, so brand-level lifecycle is dominated by formulation, packaging, and channel rather than new mechanism-of-action development.

High-signal expectation for investors and R&D planners:

  • There is no active, brand-shaping late-stage program visible as a clear label-expansion catalyst.
  • Competitive changes are expected to be incremental: OTC switch dynamics, retailer-private-label competition, and small formulation updates rather than new efficacy claims.

What does the lack of late-stage activity imply for near-term clinical positioning?

For an established topical antifungal franchise, the “clinical update” that matters is not new Phase 3 data but:

  • continued alignment with current standard-of-care and guideline usage patterns,
  • sustained product access and reimbursement/availability rules (mostly OTC), and
  • post-marketing surveillance rather than new registrational studies.

What is the current market structure for topical clotrimazole (LOTRIMIN)?

Competitive landscape

LOTRIMIN competes in the broad topical antifungal category where clotrimazole is frequently compared against:

  • other imidazoles and azoles (varies by formulation availability),
  • allylamines (where relevant by actives),
  • and multi-active or branded OTC antifungal combinations.

In practice, generic clotrimazole and private label exert persistent downward pressure on realized price.

Key determinants of market outcomes

For clotrimazole topical products, market performance generally tracks:

  • OTC pharmacy throughput and shelf space,
  • winter and summer seasonality (tinea and related prevalence shifts),
  • competitor pricing cadence (generic and private label),
  • and patient purchasing behavior (repeat buyers, household stock).

Channel reality

LOTRIMIN’s brand value is most visible in:

  • mass retail and pharmacy shelf availability,
  • patient familiarity,
  • and clinician/pharmacist recommendation patterns.

Brand differentiation is typically limited to:

  • product packaging,
  • ease-of-use presentation (cream vs solution vs other forms),
  • and size/format for consumer purchase.

How should LOTRIMIN be projected over the next 3 to 5 years?

Baseline projection framework

Given clotrimazole’s mature status and lack of brand-shifting clinical programs, projections should be built on category mechanics:

Drivers that support stability

  • Persistent incidence of common fungal skin issues.
  • OTC accessibility and entrenched patient behavior.
  • Retail shelf endurance of long-running brands.

Constraints that cap growth

  • Ongoing generic and private-label substitution.
  • Price compression in OTC topical antifungals.
  • Margin pressure from pharmacy and retailer contracting.

Forward view (directional, business-usable)

Projection expectation:

  • Volume: likely stable to low-growth, supported by category demand.
  • Value and margin: likely flattish to declining due to generic erosion.
  • Share: brand share depends on retailer mix and promotional intensity rather than clinical advancement.

Time window logic

  • 0-12 months: sales track seasonality and retailer promotions; no new evidence-based demand catalyst expected.
  • 12-36 months: incremental share movements within OTC antifungals driven by pricing and format.
  • 36-60 months: the category matures further; private label pressure typically persists.

Commercial scenario model for LOTRIMIN (clotrimazole)

Because a precise numeric forecast requires market sizing datasets by geography, format, and channel that are not provided here, the projection is structured as an operating scenario for planning.

Scenario assumptions that map to real pricing behavior

Scenario What changes Expected effect on LOTRIMIN
Base case OTC competitive pressure continues; no major label expansion Flat-to-low volume growth; value growth limited or negative
Upside Brand retains shelf and pharmacy recommendation; retailer promotions support throughput Modest share gains; value stabilizes
Downside Private label accelerates; pricing cadence intensifies Volume decline or share loss; value and margin fall faster

What to monitor (leading indicators)

  • OTC antifungal category sell-through by format (cream vs solution).
  • Pharmacy planogram changes and retailer private-label promos.
  • Pricing index moves for generic clotrimazole equivalents.

What would change the outlook materially?

For an established clotrimazole brand, “material” changes would come from one of these channels:

  • a new clinically differentiated formulation or dosing presentation that drives payer/pharmacy behavior,
  • new regulatory label expansions in key markets,
  • or a sustained shift in OTC competition (e.g., competitor withdrawal or major reformulation).

Absent those, the forecast remains dominated by market structure and substitution pressure.


Key Takeaways

  • LOTRIMIN is an established topical antifungal franchise based on clotrimazole, and it is off the core innovation cycle where new late-stage trials would reshape the brand.
  • The clinical update is largely post-marketing and standard-of-care alignment, not new Phase 3 label catalysts.
  • Near-term growth is expected to be volume-stable and value-limited, with generic and private-label erosion capping upside.
  • The 3 to 5 year outlook is best treated as an OTC category share and pricing exercise rather than a pipeline-driven forecast.

FAQs

1) Is LOTRIMIN tied to new clinical trial results?

No. LOTRIMIN’s market position is primarily sustained by OTC availability and established clinical use of clotrimazole rather than new label-expanding trial programs.

2) What is the main competitive pressure on LOTRIMIN?

Generic clotrimazole and private-label topical antifungals, which typically compress price and margins.

3) What drives LOTRIMIN sales most reliably?

Seasonality in fungal skin conditions, pharmacy and retail shelf presence, and promotional throughput.

4) Can format changes (cream vs solution) drive growth?

Yes, to the extent that they improve consumer preference and retailer space allocation, but they do not typically reset value trajectories against generics.

5) What would be the most credible catalyst for a stronger projection?

A true regulatory label expansion or a clinically differentiated formulation that changes clinician or patient recommendation patterns in a measurable way.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Trials Snapshots. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/drug-trials-snapshots
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. clotrimazole. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] National Library of Medicine (NLM). MedlinePlus. Clotrimazole topical. https://medlineplus.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.