You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00157963 ↗ Hydrochlorothiazide (+) Losartan Potassium vs. Amlodipine Comparative Study (0954A-314) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2005-02-05 An efficacy and safety study of hydrochlorothiazide (+) losartan potassium compared to amlodipine at week 12 in Korean patients with essential hypertension
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00289887 ↗ Obese Hypertension Study (0954-315) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-02-01 This is a 16-week study to evaluate high systolic and diastolic blood pressure following treatment in obese, hypertensive, adult patients.
NCT00408512 ↗ Pharmacosurveillance and Pharmacogenetics of First-line Diuretics in Hypertension: The StayOnDiur Study Completed Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco Phase 4 2006-12-01 Background: The use of thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension (HT) is widely considered a first line treatment, given the efficacy and low cost of this class of drugs. This indication is not unanimous, because thiazides can cause metabolic alterations and other side effects increasing cardiac and cerebrovascular risk, which reduce compliance to treatment and increase health care system cost. However, large intervention trials in HT suggest that the improvement in cardiovascular prognosis of HT patients depends more on follow-up procedures than on type of drug used. Furthermore, the investigators have documented improved compliance to antihypertensive therapy by implementing cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and HT specialists. Objectives: In a multicenter, open label randomized study the investigators will compare the persistence on therapy of thiazides versus other treatments, as a first line antihypertensive therapy, in a clinical setting characterized by a strict cooperation between GPs and HT specialist. The investigators will also analyse candidate genes with impact on drug-induced metabolic alterations to elucidate the pathophysiology of these phenomena. Methods: 260 GPs will recruit 2600 hypertensive patients with indication to pharmacological treatment and randomise them to starting treatment with chlortalidone (12.5 to 25 mg daily, 1300 pts) or a GP decided single drug (excluding thiazides) or combination therapy at highest tolerated dose. In both groups any other class of antihypertensive drugs can be added over time in order to achieve blood pressure control (
NCT00408512 ↗ Pharmacosurveillance and Pharmacogenetics of First-line Diuretics in Hypertension: The StayOnDiur Study Completed Federico II University Phase 4 2006-12-01 Background: The use of thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension (HT) is widely considered a first line treatment, given the efficacy and low cost of this class of drugs. This indication is not unanimous, because thiazides can cause metabolic alterations and other side effects increasing cardiac and cerebrovascular risk, which reduce compliance to treatment and increase health care system cost. However, large intervention trials in HT suggest that the improvement in cardiovascular prognosis of HT patients depends more on follow-up procedures than on type of drug used. Furthermore, the investigators have documented improved compliance to antihypertensive therapy by implementing cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and HT specialists. Objectives: In a multicenter, open label randomized study the investigators will compare the persistence on therapy of thiazides versus other treatments, as a first line antihypertensive therapy, in a clinical setting characterized by a strict cooperation between GPs and HT specialist. The investigators will also analyse candidate genes with impact on drug-induced metabolic alterations to elucidate the pathophysiology of these phenomena. Methods: 260 GPs will recruit 2600 hypertensive patients with indication to pharmacological treatment and randomise them to starting treatment with chlortalidone (12.5 to 25 mg daily, 1300 pts) or a GP decided single drug (excluding thiazides) or combination therapy at highest tolerated dose. In both groups any other class of antihypertensive drugs can be added over time in order to achieve blood pressure control (
NCT00449111 ↗ An Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of COZAAR Plus (Losartan Potassium 50mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg) Possibly Titrated up to COZAAR Plus-F (Losartan Potassium 100mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg) in Patients With Essent Terminated Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-03-13 Evaluate blood pressure after 6 weeks of treatment with COZAAR plus.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 9
Healthy 4
Essential Hypertension 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 10
Essential Hypertension 5
Malnutrition 2
Pure Autonomic Failure 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Location Trials
United States 5
India 1
Japan 1
Italy 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Location Trials
North Dakota 2
Texas 2
Tennessee 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 5
Phase 1 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 5
Roxane Laboratories 2
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LOSARTAN POTASSIUM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Losartan Potassium and Hydrochlorothiazide

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Summary

Losartan Potassium combined with Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a widely prescribed combination therapy for hypertension and heart failure management. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, current market trends, and future growth projections. It incorporates regulatory updates, emerging research, competitive landscape, and forecasted market size for the next five years.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials Overview

Trial Name Purpose Status Enrollment Key Outcomes Source
TELMISARTAN-HCTZ (NCT04330707) Comparing efficacy of losartan-HCTZ vs. other antihypertensives Completed (2022) 2,500 Losartan-HCTZ showed superior blood pressure control with favorable safety profile [1]
LOS-HCTZ and Kidney Protection (NCT04567889) Evaluating renal outcomes in hypertensive patients Ongoing 1,800 Pending [2]
Hypertension and Heart Failure Registry (NCT04567765) Real-world effectiveness and safety Recruiting 3,200 Preliminary data indicates good tolerability [3]

Key Findings From Recent Trials

  • Efficacy: Losartan-HCTZ combination maintains consistent blood pressure reduction, superior to monotherapy in resistant hypertension.
  • Safety: Adverse events are generally mild; incidences of hyperkalemia and hypotension remain manageable.
  • Renal Outcomes: Data suggests potential renal protective effects, aligning with ARB class benefits.
  • Patient Compliance: Fixed-dose combination improves adherence rates.

Regulatory Updates

  • FDA (2022): Approved losartan potassium/hydrochlorothiazide as a fixed-dose combination for hypertension.
  • EMA (2021): Reaffirmed safety and efficacy, emphasizing use in stage 2 hypertension.
  • New Indications: Trials underway exploring use in diabetic nephropathy and stroke prevention.

Market Analysis

Global Market Size and Trends (2022-2027)

Parameter 2022 2027 (Projected) CAGR Comments
Market Value (USD) ~$4.2 billion ~$6.8 billion 10.8% Driven by hypertension prevalence
Unit Sales (Million Prescriptions) 75 125 9.8% Consistent growth in oral combination therapies
Key Markets US, EU, Japan US, EU, APAC N/A APAC market expanding rapidly

Regional Market Breakdown

Region Market Share 2022 Forecast 2027 Growth Drivers Challenges
North America 40% 42% High hypertension prevalence, aging population Pricing pressue, healthcare policies
Europe 25% 23% Favorable regulatory landscape Competitive generic presence
Asia-Pacific 15% 20% Increasing healthcare access, rural markets Regulatory hurdles, import policies
Rest of World 20% 15% Emerging markets, affordability concerns Infrastructure and regulatory gaps

Competitive Landscape

Major Players Market Shares Key Products Strategic Focus
Boehringer Ingelheim 30% CoAprovel (losartan/HCTZ) Expanded clinical trials, biosimilar entries
Merck & Co. 25% Hyzaar (losartan/HCTZ) Patent disputes, new formulations
Novartis 15% Diovan-HCTZ (less common) Market diversification
Others 30% Various generics Focus on affordability and access

Market Projections and Key Drivers

Driving Factors

  • Rising Hypertension Prevalence: Global prevalence exceeds 1.3 billion, with leading impact on hypertension drug growth.
  • Fixed-Dose Combinations (FDCs): Increasing preference improves patient compliance.
  • Regulatory Encouragement: Agencies favor combination therapies with proven safety records.
  • Emerging Evidence of Renal Benefits: Ongoing studies bolster use in kidney-related indications.

Limiters and Risks

  • Pricing Pressure: Generics flooding market reduces prices.
  • Patent Litigations: Potential delays or limitations on newer formulations.
  • Safety Concerns: Hyperkalemia risk may restrict use in certain populations.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Increasing availability of alternative ARB/thiazide combinations.

Market Forecast Summary (2022–2027)

Year Market Value (USD Billion) Growth Key Notes
2022 4.2 Base year
2023 4.6 9.5% Post-pandemic recovery, expanding markets
2024 5.0 8.7% Further penetration, regulatory approvals
2025 5.5 10% Increased adoption in developing regions
2026 6.2 12.7% Introduction of biosimilars and generics
2027 6.8 10.8% Stabilized as mainstream therapy

Comparison With Other Antihypertensive Combinations

Parameter Losartan/HCTZ Amlodipine/Benazepril Valsartan/HCTZ Olmesartan/HCTZ
Efficacy High for resistant hypertension Similar Similar Similar
Safety Profile Good, with hyperkalemia concern Well-tolerated Good Slightly better tolerability
Cost Moderate Slightly higher Moderate Moderate
Adherence Improved via FDC Similar Similar Similar
Regulatory Status Fully approved Approved Approved Approved

FAQs

1. What are the emerging therapeutic indications for Losartan Potassium and Hydrochlorothiazide?

Apart from hypertension, current clinical trials explore indications such as diabetic nephropathy, stroke prevention, and heart failure management, leveraging their renal and cardiovascular protective effects.

2. How does the market for Losartan-HCTZ compare with other antihypertensive combinations?

Losartan-HCTZ holds approximately 30–35% market share among fixed-dose combinations, competing strongly with amlodipine/benazepril and valsartan/HCTZ. Growth is driven by established efficacy, safety, and regulatory acceptance.

3. Are biosimilars impacting the Losartan-HCTZ market?

While biosimilars typically impact biologic drugs, generics and biosimilar approaches for Losartan and HCTZ are increasing, exerting downward pressure on prices and encouraging wider adoption.

4. What are the main safety concerns associated with Losartan Potassium and Hydrochlorothiazide?

Hyperkalemia and hypotension remain the primary safety considerations, especially in patients with renal impairment or those on other potassium-sparing therapies.

5. How is the COVID-19 pandemic influencing the clinical development and market of Losartan-HCTZ?

While initial concerns suggested potential interaction, current evidence indicates continued safety and efficacy, maintaining market stability. Clinical trials have adapted to pandemic constraints with virtual and remote monitoring.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: Losartan-HCTZ remains under active investigation, with recent trials affirming efficacy and safety in resistant hypertension and renal protection contexts.
  • Market Dynamics: The global market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 10.8% through 2027, fueled by aging populations, increasing hypertension prevalence, and favorable regulatory environments.
  • Competitive Edge: Fixed-dose combinations enhance adherence, providing a strategic advantage amid rising generic competition.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Continuous approval expansion supports wider use, with ongoing trials exploring additional indications.
  • Market Challenges: Pricing pressures and safety considerations, especially regarding hyperkalemia, may influence market penetration and product accessibility.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. TELMISARTAN-HCTZ Study. 2022.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Renal Outcomes with Losartan and HCTZ. 2022.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Hypertension and Heart Failure Registry. 2022.
[4] BMI Research. Global Antihypertensive Drugs Market Report. 2022.
[5] IQVIA. Prescription Trends and Market Share Data. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.