You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00196625 ↗ Salvage Therapy With Amprenavir, Lopinavir and Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Patients in Virological Failure. Completed French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis Phase 2 2000-11-01 HIV infected patients are treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Side effects and the great number of pills reduces adherence to the treatment, and induces therapeutic failure. In order to maintain efficacy of HAART, new combination is evaluated. The aim of the study is to compare the antiviral efficacy of this salvage therapy combining lopinavir and amprenavir with 200 mg/d or 400 mg/d ritonavir, together with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, over a 26-week period in HIV-infected patients in whom multiple antiretroviral regimens had failed.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004578 ↗ ABT-378/Ritonavir in Combination With Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral Naïve HIV-Infected Subjects Completed Abbott Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-11-01 To assess the safety, tolerability and antiviral activity of lopinavir/ritonavir when administered orally in antiretroviral-HIV-1 infected subjects.
NCT00006144 ↗ A Study of HIV-Disease Development in Aging Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 2000-10-01 The purpose of this study is to better understand the relationship between age and HIV disease progression. This study will explore the possible relationship between age and HIV disease progression. Older age is an important risk factor for faster disease development, but older people may respond better to combination drug therapy. This relationship needs to be understood better.
NCT00014937 ↗ Simplified Drug Regimens for HIV Patients in ACTG 388 or Patients Who Responded to A First Potent Combination Regimen Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 ACTG 388 was a clinical trial that compared three- and four-drug anti-HIV drug regimens and demonstrated the effectiveness of a three-drug regimen. This study will compare the ability of two different three-drug anti-HIV drug regimens to reduce levels of HIV in the blood. The study will also evaluate whether patients discontinue the regimens because of drug side effects.
NCT00017992 ↗ Emtricitabine Given Once A Day With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in Children With HIV Unknown status Triangle Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to see if emtricitabine is safe in children infected with HIV and to determine the best dose.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Condition Name

Condition Name for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 139
COVID-19 36
HIV 35
HIV Infection 32
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 195
COVID-19 69
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 44
Infections 37
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Location Trials
United States 770
Spain 88
Thailand 66
Canada 56
South Africa 54
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Location Trials
California 62
New York 56
Florida 43
Texas 41
Illinois 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 90
Phase 3 76
[disabled in preview] 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 219
RECRUITING 31
Terminated 30
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 55
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 52
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 20
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LOPINAVIR AND RITONAVIR
Sponsor Trials
Other 504
Industry 149
NIH 87
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lopinavir and Ritonavir

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Lopinavir combined with Ritonavir is a well-established protease inhibitor regimen primarily used in HIV therapy. With its well-documented efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety profile, it has maintained a central position in antiretroviral treatment. Recent developments, however, have expanded its scope, notably in trials investigating repurposing for COVID-19 management. This article provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections, equipping industry stakeholders with strategic insights.

Clinical Trials Update for Lopinavir and Ritonavir

HIV Treatment Efficacy and Approvals

Lopinavir/Ritonavir (marketed as Kaletra by AbbVie) remains a cornerstone in HIV combination therapy, with multiple Phase IV post-marketing studies affirming its safety and efficacy across diverse populations. Regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, maintain its approval solely for HIV treatment, emphasizing its established therapeutic profile. Data accrued over the past few years showcase sustained adherence and tolerability, especially among resistant HIV strains, cementing its role in initial and salvage therapy regimens.

Investigations into COVID-19 Applications

The COVID-19 pandemic spurred urgent repurposing trials for existing antivirals, including Lopinavir/Ritonavir. Early in the pandemic, observational studies suggested potential benefits, leading to a surge in clinical trials:

  • The SOLIDARITY Trial: Conducted by WHO, involving over 1,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Results published in 2021 demonstrated that Lopinavir/Ritonavir did not significantly reduce mortality, initiation of ventilation, or hospitalization duration compared to standard care[1].

  • LOTUS Trial: A randomized, double-blind study evaluating Lopinavir/Ritonavir’s efficacy in COVID-19, published in The Lancet, concluded that it provided no significant clinical benefit over standard care[2].

  • Ongoing Trials: Despite mixed outcomes, several phase II/III trials continue exploring higher doses, combination therapies, or new delivery mechanisms. Notably, the TOGETHER trial and other regional studies are analyzing adjunctive use with immunomodulators, aiming to clarify any potential therapeutic utility[3].

Emerging Data and Future Directions

Emerging meta-analyses suggest limited, inconsistent benefits of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in COVID-19 management. Conversely, research continues into optimizing dosing strategies, understanding pharmacokinetic interactions, and assessing combination therapies. Importantly, no new approvals or substantial modifications have been made for COVID-19 indications since 2021.

Safety and Pharmacovigilance

Post-market surveillance highlights gastrointestinal disturbances, hepatotoxicity, and potential drug-drug interactions, particularly with other protease inhibitors and medications metabolized by CYP3A4. This ongoing safety monitoring influences prescribing behaviors and encourages cautious use outside HIV indications.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antiviral market, including HIV therapies, was valued at approximately $28 billion in 2022, with protease inhibitors like Lopinavir/Ritonavir accounting for a significant share. Key players include AbbVie (Kaletra), Mylan, and several generic manufacturers.

In HIV treatment, Lopinavir/Ritonavir retains considerable market presence, especially in regions with high HIV prevalence such as Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. However, newer integrase inhibitors (e.g., Dolutegravir) have gained favor due to better tolerability and dosing convenience, exerting pressure on Lopinavir-based therapies.

COVID-19 Market Dynamics

Although initial global demand surged in early 2020, the decline in clinical trial success and the emergence of more effective or less toxic antivirals (e.g., Remdesivir, Paxlovid) have diminished its role in COVID-19. Market projections for Lopinavir/Ritonavir as an antiviral in this context are pessimistic, with limited commercial interest noted.

Competitive Landscape and Patent Status

AbbVie's patent on Kaletra expired in various jurisdictions, facilitating generics. This patent expiration accelerates price erosion and expands access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), reinforcing its role as an affordable HIV treatment.

Developing biosimilars and generics introduces price competition, further challenging branded formulations' market share.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Health authorities prioritize effective, safe, and affordable HIV therapies, often favoring generics. Reimbursement policies in LMICs favor cost-effective drugs, supporting broader access but constraining premium pricing for newer formulations.

In the COVID-19 realm, regulatory agencies have generally withdrawn Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) due to lack of efficacy evidence, leading to diminished market potential in acute settings.

Market Projection and Strategic Outlook

HIV Market

  • Forecasted Growth: The efficiency of existing antiretrovirals, including Lopinavir/Ritonavir, coupled with expanding HIV incidence in LMICs, sustains steady demand over the next five years.
  • Market Share Stability: Despite competition from integrase inhibitors, Lopinavir/Ritonavir remains relevant, especially where cost and accessibility are prioritized.
  • Innovation Trajectory: Limited pipeline development for Lopinavir/Ritonavir suggests minimal innovation investments. Focus areas include generic manufacturing and improved delivery formulations.

COVID-19 and Antiviral Applications

  • Diminished Market: Clinical trial failures and evolving treatment standards have relegated Lopinavir/Ritonavir to a marginal role in COVID-19 management.
  • Potential Re-emergence: Unlikely, barring significant new evidence or combination strategies demonstrating efficacy.

Emerging Trends and Opportunities

  1. Combination Regimens: Studies evaluating Lopinavir/Ritonavir alongside novel agents could generate niche opportunities, particularly for resistant HIV strains.

  2. Fixed-Dose Formulations: Developing simplified dosing regimens and formulations could enhance adherence and market share.

  3. Global Access: Expanding manufacturing of generics and biosimilars fortifies its relevance in LMICs, aligning with global health initiatives.

Key Takeaways

  • Established HIV Role: Lopinavir/Ritonavir remains a foundational antiretroviral, especially in resource-limited settings, due to its proven efficacy, safety, and affordability.
  • Limited COVID-19 Utility: Clinical trial data have largely negated its role in COVID-19 therapy; future prospects in this area are minimal.
  • Patent and Generics Drive Market Dynamics: Expiration of key patents is catalyzing price competition, expanding access, and maintaining steady demand.
  • Innovation and Formulation Development: Opportunities are primarily centered on optimizing delivery and enhancing adherence rather than novel chemical entities.
  • Competitive Landscape: The rising dominance of newer antiretrovirals underscores the need for strategic positioning, especially in emerging markets.

FAQs

1. Will Lopinavir/Ritonavir regain prominence in COVID-19 treatment?
Current evidence indicates limited efficacy, and regulatory agencies have withdrawn EUAs. Its role in COVID-19 treatments is unlikely to re-emerge unless new, compelling clinical data surface.

2. How significant is the market for Lopinavir/Ritonavir in low-income countries?
Very significant. Cost-effective generics enable widespread access, sustaining demand despite competition from newer HIV drugs.

3. Are there ongoing clinical trials exploring new formulations of Lopinavir/Ritonavir?
Yes, some trials focus on fixed-dose combinations, better bioavailability, and minimized side effects to bolster adherence and therapeutic outcomes.

4. How does patent expiry affect the future of Lopinavir/Ritonavir?
Patent expiries facilitate generic manufacturing, lowering prices, expanding access, and pressuring branded formulations to innovate or diversify portfolios.

5. What is the outlook for the pipeline of protease inhibitors like Lopinavir/Ritonavir?
Limited. The focus is shifting toward integrase inhibitors and novel modalities with superior tolerability and efficacy profiles.

Sources

[1] WHO Solidarity Trial Interim Results, 2021.
[2] Lancet Study on Lopinavir/Ritonavir, 2020.
[3] Ongoing COVID-19 Trials involving Protease Inhibitors, ClinicalTrials.gov.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.